♨️🎲 WINDICE.io 🎲 Contests 🏆 TvT 🔰 Progressive Faucet💰 Jackpots 🎁❤

[panjul07]

As I see on the website, the fourth contest has ended. In this contest value of the prize and the duration were one third of past contests. So, the wagering volume should have been at least one third of the prevous contest to call it a more successful contest. But the amount winners have been wagered is very lower than one third of the previous one.
A 3-day contest seems to be a more attractive contest.

You need to see the fact that not all gamblers are wagering every single day. This affects to number of wagered amount during the contest.
Lets say they did another 3 days contest but the wagered amount is lower than the 3rd contest, it is common thing in any wagering contest where there is no guarantees that the wagered amount will always increase in every contest/round. Attractive or not is subjective, some people prefer to join one day contest and some other people prefer the 3 days contest.

[1714221424]

1714221424

[1714221424]

1714221424

[1714221424]

1714221424

[ahmadakbari]

Attractive or not is subjective, some people prefer to join one day contest and some other people prefer the 3 days contest.

This is exactly what Windice was testing. Which kind of contest (1-day or 3-day) gamblers are interested in. Now it seems that a 3-day contest can attract more gamblers.
I know that it's normal that wagering volume is always changing. But that's what statistics say.

[Betwrong]

Although the prize pool has been reduced significantly, compared to that for previous contest, I think the winners from the top 8



have profited more this time than previously. As we can see, the prizes for them were greater than 1% of the wagered amount. I know that one might lose more or even win something while wagering a certain amount(we should ask the contestants what really happened to them), but on average you should expect losing around 1% on a site with 1% house edge.

[Bitinity]

Although the prize pool has been reduced significantly, compared to that for previous contest, I think the winners from the top 8 have profited more this time than previously. As we can see, the prizes for them were greater than 1% of the wagered amount. I know that one might lose more or even win something while wagering a certain amount(we should ask the contestants what really happened to them), but on average you should expect losing around 1% on a site with 1% house edge.

Basically they did not reduce the prize pool but it is like they divided the contest. Previously there was 0.3btc for 3 days long contest, lastly it was 0.1btc for 24 hours so it will be the same if they do the 0.1btc contest daily. As a small player, I would prefer to choose the 24 hour contest than the 3 days contest because logically there are more competitors for us if the contest is running for several days.

[bitgolden]

As a small player, I would prefer to choose the 24 hour contest than the 3 days contest because logically there are more competitors for us if the contest is running for several days.

Plus, the big whales might have said it is enough and not really care. Yet we get to see yoloer win the first competition (rodolman was 20th at that point) than we got to see yoloer winning the second one with "only" 10 while rodolman moved to first spot and on third one rodolman finally took the crown and yoloer came in second, so rodolman won this one too even tho it was a short one but yoloer is nowhere to be found. He is not even in the top 10 list. Which tells me maybe it is not about the competition but about who plays and how much rivalry they have.

If yoloer had like 5 then rodolman would try for 6 and that would be enough, yet yoloer didn't enter this one so it was an easy win for rodolman. That is why I suggest a weekend long version of this, starts at Friday night (exactly midnight to Saturday) and ends at Sunday midnight, EVERY week instead of irregular periods of time.

[ahmadakbari]

If yoloer had like 5 then rodolman would try for 6 and that would be enough, yet yoloer didn't enter this one so it was an easy win for rodolman. That is why I suggest a weekend long version of this, starts at Friday night (exactly midnight to Saturday) and ends at Sunday midnight, EVERY week instead of irregular periods of time.

I think they will finally conduct the contests regularly at specific days and specific duration.
The  first contest was conducted from Monday to Thursday, the second one and third were conducted from Wednesday to Saturday. For the fourth contest, they changed the duration.
They are testing different kinds of contests.

[livingfree]

Double congratulations to the winners again of the last contest and as well as for windice for reaching another success for hitting the 200 million bets. I think that we will usually see an announcement from you guys if we hit again another +100 million bets.

For which purposes need a manager? 

To answer problems and concerns here, that's what he's suggesting about a community manager. For me, you've been doing good here and no need to do that, I don't know if he's really into it and plays in windice or just want to suggest it.

[Zicadis]

If yoloer had like 5 then rodolman would try for 6 and that would be enough, yet yoloer didn't enter this one so it was an easy win for rodolman. That is why I suggest a weekend long version of this, starts at Friday night (exactly midnight to Saturday) and ends at Sunday midnight, EVERY week instead of irregular periods of time.

I think they will finally conduct the contests regularly at specific days and specific duration.
The  first contest was conducted from Monday to Thursday, the second one and third were conducted from Wednesday to Saturday. For the fourth contest, they changed the duration.
They are testing different kinds of contests.

I suppose more ordered conducts would be better received as people would get to learn the routine
Either way having contests at least once/week will bring huge traffic in comparison to having none. Good idea to test out different contests durations, strategies etc it would be a great test run, which would complement the project well.

[Lakai01]

-snip-
Plus, the big whales might have said it is enough and not really care.

You dont have to be a whale to take part in the contests and win. Its enough to have eg 0.1 BTC and autoplay 30-50 times. Chances are higher that you lose your astake, though

[virasog]

-snip-
Plus, the big whales might have said it is enough and not really care.

You dont have to be a whale to take part in the contests and win. Its enough to have eg 0.1 BTC and autoplay 30-50 times. Chances are higher that you lose your astake, though

0.1 btc is not a small amount for many people and then its always a risk in gambling to lose all of the amount. Still people risk it on this and other sites with the hope to earn big.
Not everyone wins in gambling but lucky ones do change their fortune. Worth a try this contest at windice for the riches.

[windice]

[ahmadakbari]

The next contest will surely attract many gamblers and I expect a very big wagering volume during the contest. 0.4 BTC only for 3 days is a very big amount comparing to other contests I've ever seen in other gambling websites.

[atjiat]

-snip-
Plus, the big whales might have said it is enough and not really care.

You dont have to be a whale to take part in the contests and win. Its enough to have eg 0.1 BTC and autoplay 30-50 times. Chances are higher that you lose your astake, though

0.1 btc is not a small amount for many people and then its always a risk in gambling to lose all of the amount. Still people risk it on this and other sites with the hope to earn big.
Not everyone wins in gambling but lucky ones do change their fortune. Worth a try this contest at windice for the riches.

I completely agree with you, this is really a very large amount for many users who play dice.  I try to use various resources, especially those where it is possible to use faucet, in order to try my luck and only then I can make a deposit for a certain amount, which I can risk.  But this is definitely not 1/10 Bitcoin.  If the statement that is written above is true, then for people like me, participation in the prize draw is closed?

[ahmadakbari]

-snip-
Plus, the big whales might have said it is enough and not really care.

You dont have to be a whale to take part in the contests and win. Its enough to have eg 0.1 BTC and autoplay 30-50 times. Chances are higher that you lose your astake, though

0.1 btc is not a small amount for many people and then its always a risk in gambling to lose all of the amount. Still people risk it on this and other sites with the hope to earn big.
Not everyone wins in gambling but lucky ones do change their fortune. Worth a try this contest at windice for the riches.

I completely agree with you, this is really a very large amount for many users who play dice.  I try to use various resources, especially those where it is possible to use faucet, in order to try my luck and only then I can make a deposit for a certain amount, which I can risk.  But this is definitely not 1/10 Bitcoin.  If the statement that is written above is true, then for people like me, participation in the prize draw is closed?

It is possible to win a prize with much lower balance. In the last contest, the 10th winner of the contest had wagered only 0.18 BTC. If you have more than 0.002 BTC. you can reach this wagering amount.

[Zicadis]

-snip-
Plus, the big whales might have said it is enough and not really care.

You dont have to be a whale to take part in the contests and win. Its enough to have eg 0.1 BTC and autoplay 30-50 times. Chances are higher that you lose your astake, though

0.1 btc is not a small amount for many people and then its always a risk in gambling to lose all of the amount. Still people risk it on this and other sites with the hope to earn big.
Not everyone wins in gambling but lucky ones do change their fortune. Worth a try this contest at windice for the riches.

I completely agree with you, this is really a very large amount for many users who play dice.  I try to use various resources, especially those where it is possible to use faucet, in order to try my luck and only then I can make a deposit for a certain amount, which I can risk.  But this is definitely not 1/10 Bitcoin.  If the statement that is written above is true, then for people like me, participation in the prize draw is closed?

It is possible to win a prize with much lower balance. In the last contest, the 10th winner of the contest had wagered only 0.18 BTC. If you have more than 0.002 BTC. you can reach this wagering amount.

Even the 0.18BTC is a staggering amount that I believe not many people are comfortable taking the leap of fate on, especially when things are about to improve. For people with low balances this is always an issue, there's always that element of putting in all you got (bad idea btw) in the hope you'd at least come on the 10th place but lets be honest these races are purely competitive and the chances are that there are other people out there that could easily out-wager you.

Thus, most of these races are pre-selective for those players affording to go in with that little bit more - it's a shame really, as the poorer players can't afford these races - so I wonder whether it may be worth thinking of two races with different wagering amounts to allow the little guys a fair chance too?

[ralle14]

-snip

Imo having two seperate wagering competitions won't be any different unless there would be rules. Other gamblers who could wager a lot could join both contests leaving no chances for those who can't wager at least 1 btc. They could always join the weekly promotion in their forum if they struggle to win something from these wagering contest. If there would be another contest just for small gamblers it needs to be something different like rankings would be based on points depending on the type of bets (betids+roll+multiplier etc).

[FanEagle]

Yeah looking at the winner for example, he spent 3.1 bitcoins which has an expected loss of 0.03 and he won 0.04, of course that doesn't mean that he lost or won money in this sense because with one bad luck you can lose more than expected or with one good luck you can win instead of lose, that is why I doubt it was exactly 0.03 loss. It is really not something we can calculate normally (specially for something as small as 3 btc, maybe would have been easier with 300 btc).

However, all in all the "possibility" of having positive house edge is a lot better than having negative one. Rodolman literally played with positive house edge which very very rare people can say when they are gambling on a casino. Dude had a expected win of 0.01 btc when gambling this contest.

[livingfree]

Another contest we've got there and the length is within approximately 4 days. 1st - 10th place sure got a nice allocation for the pool.

But aim for 1st - 7th place.

[panjul07]

Another contest we've got there and the length is within approximately 4 days. 1st - 10th place sure got a nice allocation for the pool.

But aim for 1st - 7th place.

It would be better if you do not aim for the prize of the competition. Focusing too much to compete for the prize of the competition may lead you to something bad, so you need to be realistic as well.
Just an example, lets say you are starting wagering and you win nice amount already but you are not even on the top 50 place. In this case, it will be better if you stop wagering and enjoy the winning instead of trying to wager more for your aim as you may lose what you have just won as well as you may lose all what you have.

[Bitkoyns]

Another contest we've got there and the length is within approximately 4 days. 1st - 10th place sure got a nice allocation for the pool.

But aim for 1st - 7th place.

It would be better if you do not aim for the prize of the competition. Focusing too much to compete for the prize of the competition may lead you to something bad, so you need to be realistic as well.
Just an example, lets say you are starting wagering and you win nice amount already but you are not even on the top 50 place. In this case, it will be better if you stop wagering and enjoy the winning instead of trying to wager more for your aim as you may lose what you have just won as well as you may lose all what you have.

I agree with you here, in the past I always chase the prizes and I end up busting my wallet. Sometimes you will lose more than the prize you can get when trying to reach the top prizes and sometimes you wouldn't get anything if you got busted early in the competition. Its really best to save all the money won as it is already yours unlike the prizes which is not yet sure you would get it