SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[cryptodevil]

CRAIG FAKETOSHI WRIGHT BARBECUED IN FLORIDA

CASE LOST AGAINST IRA KLEIMAN, OWES 50% OF IP AND COINS MINED.

NO TULIP TRUST.

For anyone wanting a bit more info on the above, check out 22nd Century Crypto and Katie Ananina for a detailed blow-by-blow breakdown of the situation as it unfolded.

[gentlemand]

OWES 50% OF IP AND COINS MINED.

50% of something that's never existed. What a strange wee diversion this entire thing has been.

No talk of civil or criminal contempt mentioned.

Quel dommage. At least Craigy said sorry, but he probably had his fingers crossed.

[Iamtutut]

OWES 50% OF IP AND COINS MINED.

50% of something that's never existed. What a strange wee diversion this entire thing has been.

No talk of civil or criminal contempt mentioned.

Quel dommage. At least Craigy said sorry, but he probably had his fingers crossed.

He's fucked to try posing as a good and law abiding guy.

[gentlemand]

Another thread here, there other is a BSV zombie - https://twitter.com/KatieAnanina/status/1166083984830410759

I guess the main takeaway is that Craigy is now a rubber stamped and fully endorsed liar. But we all knew that anyway and that never stopped him before. I wonder what his next move is. It could Dancing With The Stars.

And I don't get the IP reward. How does a court award that when there's no proof Kleiman, let alone the penis opposing, had anything to do with BTC? I could just about wrap my head around pretend coins, but not that.

[cryptodevil]

I guess the main takeaway is that Craigy is now a rubber stamped and fully endorsed liar.

Oh the BSV fanbois will be spinning this into a win by the simple fact that they'll claim it shows that CSW must be Satoshi if he has been told to give half of the Satoshi stash to the Kleimans.

Although, as per the latest Coindesk article on this outcome:

According to the source, while the judge did not find Wright to be credible, he did not make a finding on whether or not Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto, bitcoin’s creator.

[nutildah]

I guess the main takeaway is that Craigy is now a rubber stamped and fully endorsed liar.

Oh the BSV fanbois will be spinning this into a win by the simple fact that they'll claim it shows that CSW must be Satoshi if he has been told to give half of the Satoshi stash to the Kleimans.

Although, as per the latest Coindesk article on this outcome:

According to the source, while the judge did not find Wright to be credible, he did not make a finding on whether or not Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto, bitcoin’s creator.

This is certainly what I would describe as a one-two punch to the nuts. Craig's not Satoshi, but he still has to pay $5 billion. 

Peter Todd summarized the outcome best in a tweet:

The interesting part isn't the judge ruling against Craig Wright.

The interesting part will be when Craig fails to pay up because he never had any of those BTC.

[Iamtutut]

Another thread here, there other is a BSV zombie - https://twitter.com/KatieAnanina/status/1166083984830410759

I guess the main takeaway is that Craigy is now a rubber stamped and fully endorsed liar. But we all knew that anyway and that never stopped him before. I wonder what his next move is. It could Dancing With The Stars.

And I don't get the IP reward. How does a court award that when there's no proof Kleiman, let alone the penis opposing, had anything to do with BTC? I could just about wrap my head around pretend coins, but not that.

Protective measure for the winner. The Court may even give an order to seize part or all of fraudtoshi's IP (troll patents IMO) to recover the money for the winning side.

[hv_]

No judge can be always 100% w right

But CSW seems to be nearly 100% the founder of BitCoin

So btc will now pay a high price. Most for heir tax

https://modernconsensus.com/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin/exclusive-interview-with-craig-wright-just-after-ordered-to-pay-5-billion-in-bitcoin/

[Iamtutut]

No judge can be always 100% w right

But CSW seems to be nearly 100% the founder of BitCoin

So btc will now pay a high price. Most for heir tax

https://modernconsensus.com/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin/exclusive-interview-with-craig-wright-just-after-ordered-to-pay-5-billion-in-bitcoin/

You're so blinded by your cult of Craig that's it's comical.

[hv_]

No judge can be always 100% w right

But CSW seems to be nearly 100% the founder of BitCoin

So btc will now pay a high price. Most for heir tax

https://modernconsensus.com/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin/exclusive-interview-with-craig-wright-just-after-ordered-to-pay-5-billion-in-bitcoin/

You're so blinded by your cult of Craig that's it's comical.

Nope. No cult.

Just able to raise brain / block sizes . No coreans could

[HardFireMiner]

Sold the sald BTC I held.

Lets now watch the market, market makes no mistakes in the long run.

[gentlemand]

So btc will now pay a high price. Most for heir tax

Presumably you're a performance artist. Let me know when your project launches. I'll look forward to wine and nibblies.

Fun to read the BSV justifications this morning. One of the main ones is because it's now 'legal' that Craig is unquestionably Satoshi the Kleimans will get half a million coins that don't exist and destroy everything.

It seems to slip their mind he'll also get half a million non existent BSVs and since most BSVs haven't been claimed that's going to annihilate it in a non existent matter.

This reminds me of when r/btc latched on to the idea of Tether's takedown 'destroying' BTC and obsessed over it for months while stroking their genitals. They were too fucking dim or lazy to realise that just might have an effect on their Bcashes too.

[HardFireMiner]

So btc will now pay a high price. Most for heir tax

Presumably you're a performance artist. Let me know when your project launches. I'll look forward to wine and nibblies.

Fun to read the BSV justifications this morning. One of the main ones is because it's now 'legal' that Craig is unquestionably Satoshi the Kleimans will get half a million coins that don't exist and destroy everything.

It seems to slip their mind he'll also get half a million non existent BSVs and since most BSVs haven't been claimed that's going to annihilate it in a non existent matter.

This reminds me of when r/btc latched on to the idea of Tether's takedown 'destroying' BTC and obsessed over it for months while stroking their genitals. They were too fucking dim or lazy to realise that just might have an effect on their Bcashes too.

I see you weren't very cautious when reading, so I will put it for you again:

And again, shouldn’t that include the BTC, BCH, and BSV and every other fork of Bitcoin? All of those had to replicate the original blockchain starting from zero.

According to the judge it’s only from before Dave died, so only BTC. Sorry BTC.

[gentlemand]

And if you want some genuinely pitiful reading then here is a fountain of deadheaded thinking - https://old.reddit.com/r/bitcoincashSV/

I for one refuse to pollute my mind with such execrable stupidity but others might.

[HardFireMiner]

And if you want some genuinely pitiful reading then here is a fountain of deadheaded thinking - https://old.reddit.com/r/bitcoincashSV/

I for one refuse to pollute my mind with such execrable stupidity but others might.

You refuse but still make a point regarding inheritance of BCH and BSV by Ira Kleiman, implying that this will crush the market even worse. A wrong point, in contradiction with the US Federal Judge of Florida.

Execrable stupidity you say? I agree, really mate.

[nutildah]

You refuse but still make a point regarding inheritance of BCH and BSV by Ira Kleiman, implying that this will crush the market even worse. A wrong point, in contradiction with the US Federal Judge of Florida.

We still don't know if the trust ever existed to begin with, so likely Wright won't be giving Kleiman any bitcoins. What Wright will have to fork over is the expenses of Kleiman's legal fees, which could very well come from the selling of his BSV holdings.

I just noticed in a trust feedback you left for gmaxwell today you stated the following:

So now, for the first time in history we have confirmation by a US Federal Court of the fact that CSW is at least 50% of Satoshi Nakamoto.

This is wholly untrue. The judge refused to rule on whether or not Wright was Nakamoto -- 10%, 50% or 100%. The only people in the court room who said Wright was Satoshi were the attorneys.

[Iamtutut]

And if you want some genuinely pitiful reading then here is a fountain of deadheaded thinking - https://old.reddit.com/r/bitcoincashSV/

I for one refuse to pollute my mind with such execrable stupidity but others might.

You refuse but still make a point regarding inheritance of BCH and BSV by Ira Kleiman, implying that this will crush the market even worse. A wrong point, in contradiction with the US Federal Judge of Florida.

Execrable stupidity you say? I agree, really mate.

These 1M or 800K+ (depending on the day Wright lies) don't exist. There is evidence the BS Tulip Trust was purchased as an empty shell in 2014.

[actmyname]

Why would he go to such lengths of creating contrived measures in order to verify his history rather than going to the simple route? Why act in such a way that makes it seem like he's lying countless times, even going to the lengths of trying to sue others, even going to the lengths of fabricating evidence?Either he's trying to do some long-winded swindle which is lost on anyone who isn't a diehard CSW fan... or we can apply Occam's razor and pragmatically assume that he is, in fact, not satoshi.

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Why would he go to such lengths of creating contrived measures in order to verify his history rather than going to the simple route? Why act in such a way that makes it seem like he's lying countless times, even going to the lengths of trying to sue others, even going to the lengths of fabricating evidence?Either he's trying to do some long-winded swindle which is lost on anyone who isn't a diehard CSW fan... or we can apply Occam's razor and pragmatically assume that he is, in fact, not satoshi.

This: https://www.healthline.com/health/pathological-liar#what-is-it.

[nutildah]

I see you weren't very cautious when reading, so I will put it for you again:

And again, shouldn’t that include the BTC, BCH, and BSV and every other fork of Bitcoin? All of those had to replicate the original blockchain starting from zero.

According to the judge it’s only from before Dave died, so only BTC. Sorry BTC.

It would appear this assertion is incorrect:



https://edoc.pub/kleiman-lawsuit-amended-complaint-pdf-free.html