SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[Lauda]

- What do you think about all of the expert witnesses in the Wright vs Kleiman case?

What are you talking about? It's a clear appeal to authority; nobody shouldn't listen to them because of that. Ooh, wait a minute..

[TheNewAnon135246]

- What do you think about all of the expert witnesses in the Wright vs Kleiman case?

What are you talking about? It's a clear appeal to authority; nobody shouldn't listen to them because of that. Ooh, wait a minute..

Here's the thing.....Evidence......We have courts..... (except when it backfires of course).

[BitcoinFX]

hahaha ...

... funny, my post got deleted, thx it's still here.

wonder why ? did it hurt someone's private Feelings ?

No, you idiot. Its because you keep double-posting. This is the 4th time I've told you this. You must be pretty stupid to not be able to learn how the forum works. Read it in extra big font. Maybe it will sink into your dome better:

If you have already written the last post in a thread (any thread):

The next time a 1 watt lightbulb of an idea forms in that tiny cavern you call a brain, instead of writing a new post because you have to get it out of your dome and vomit it upon us innocents, add it to your last post by pressing the "edit" button.

If you can't understand this, perhaps you should try moving to Metanet. They'll take extra special care of an intellect as fragile as yours there, I'm sure. Especially if you pay them.

Some come here to sit and think,
Others come to sh*t and stink,
But I come here to scratch my balls,
And Wright BSV bullsh*t on the walls!

- A poem by BitcoinFX.

...

hv_'s Youtube Channel ...
- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzNeSHDotOrskiBhlJokSbA

 

...

THEYMOS HELP!
CLOSE THIS TROLL'S TOPIC!

F*CK these SV scammers have short memories.  

Lets see what lies were told about Theymos.  



Help Theymos ! These scammers best buddies need your help silencing free speech exposing their scam sh1tcoin  faketoshis vision the one and only true bitcoin !!!  

Gone Trollspotting ... brb ...

DEFCON 19: The Art of Trolling (w speaker)
- https://youtu.be/AHqGV5WjS4w *NSFW*

#NeverForget

...

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

What an dumbass. With each hard fork, Bitcoin is loses its originality. Soon it will be completely washed out at forks flow.

Only BSV remains true to the Original Satoshi Vision philosophy. That's why BSV - is Original Bitcoin and CSW is a author of Satoshi Vision

Others just a hyipers like a Roger Ver

...

With each hard fork, Bitcoin is loses its originality.

What do you think BSV is? It's a fork of a fork. The most unoriginal fork yet. If it had won the Hash War it would still be called "Bitcoin Cash."

Bitcoin Cash = hard fork
Bitcoin SV = hard fork of hard fork
Bitcoin = soft forks only

...

Lol - it was a different topic - so thx for getting things through, that only you like - what a Little Boy ... cmon

I'm not surprised at this, but you've missed the point entirely. The point is you're not allowed to bump your own post with your own post. If you are addressing a different topic, press "edit" and use the


feature.

Verstehst du schon, Dummkopf?

...

A major BSV shill is throwing DeSantis under the bus. Says it all really.  

Do Not Adjust Your Brain, There Is A Fault With Reality !



...

The supremacy is always remarkable ...

Shitcoins will always be Shitcoins ever and ever again..

2017: "Bitcoin is defined by the most proof of work chain"
2018: "Uh, the real Bitcoin is the one that abides by the original economic code"
2019: "SATOSHI'S VISION IS GOVERNMENT FRIENDLY AND ANARCHISTS WILL BE SUED INTO OBLIVION"

Source: [url=https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1189175280583270402]https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1189175280583270402][url=https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1189175280583270402]https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1189175280583270402]https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1189175280583270402][url]https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1189175280583270402]https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1189175280583270402]https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1189175280583270402]https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1189175280583270402][url]https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1189175280583270402[/url]

Interesting 

Interesting.

"That dog is a true hero..."



- https://twitter.com/CryptoScamHub/status/1189116877076946945

[BitcoinFX]

BSV Twitter is a sad echo chamber. Everyone repeats the same thing over and over again but nobody can answer simple questions like:

- Where did Satoshi ever mention turning a p2p cash system into a storage system for weather data?
- How do you expect new mining pools to sync a full node when using 1TB blocks?
- What do you think about all of the expert witnesses in the Wright vs Kleiman case?

This ^

It's temporarily.

Who says? What is stopping someone from filling your blockchain with piles and piles of worthless data, all completely unrelated to financial transactions?

And your favorite Lighting Protocol is a stupidest thing i have ever seen

Nice English skills. Unfortunately, you assume that I like the Lightning Network. Instead of making assumptions, I suggest you create more argumentative statements.I have no problem with increasing the block size.

Just not now, and definitely not like what you're doing and what you are planning.

Nothing is stopping the BSV blockchain from being filled with piles and piles of worthless data, all completely unrelated to financial transactions! Not even price! It is happening right now ...

Add any file to the BSV blockchain
- smaller than 310MB
- https://add.bico.media/

Search Bitcoin SV
- https://oyo.cash/

Haichan is an imageboard that runs entirely on the BSV blockchain.
- https://relay.haich.us/about.html *NSFW* *WARNING: Potentially Illegal and Uncensored IMMUTABLE content*

...

Just fitting transactions onto any blockchain is hard enough in respect of transaction throughput.

Anyone could just upload the exact same text, videos, images, viruses, scripts, malware and/or 'illegal' content etc., into every block, if they were that way inclined! This is what Hal Finney meant about SPAM being a very big problem.

Imagine all of this junk in addition to high volume transactions. The BSV blockchain is also already slower to pull data from than most centralized servers and hardly anyone is using it, in comparison!

BSV proponents don't even understand the technological constraints, let alone the legal implications of using, running or storing this. They seem to think governments and big business are going to use BSV. What a joke. Why would they even want to store each others data, let alone a whole load of 'illegal' content and SPAM.

Bitcoin is about financial cryptography and not any of the above.

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

"WeatherSV — on-chain weather data"
- https://weathersv.app/find

It's completely pointless. Then consider compounding all of the above as well.

...

Imagine an Unlimited blocksize and not being able to catch up with downloading the entire blockchain, ever.

...

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0
"Be seeing you at The Restaurant at the End of the Universe?"

...

"Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space." - Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

...

I'm such a clown!

 

...

Bitcoin is about PoW and economics.

And its the best and working on chain system for electronic cash.

It is the only true innovation over last 20 years

Segshit is not

The above problems in BSV actually causes centralization and therefore break both PoW and the economic model.

No its the worst chain for electronic cash. See above post.

No innovation whatsoever actually.

...

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

Still waiting proofs that CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

The  #faketoshi  fraud  TIMELINE
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/mylegacykit.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/ponsdeserres.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/jimmy007forsure.html

...

Nice , fxclown will now push up / bump any new app news that will run on bsv

Thx. U could learn bit better about sales, but good start

 

Hint: always good to learn from the source

You have no clue about any of this, lets be honest.

I will never use BSV.

[xtraelv]

Source: https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1172153919314845696/photo/2





Source: https://medium.com/@samwill102244/anatomy-of-a-fraud-a-deep-dive-into-one-of-craig-wrights-plagiarized-papers-96bc8624fc12

[BitcoinFX]

Courtesy of MyLegacyKit ...

Full circle ...

"Craig Wright - The Bitcoin Alert Key Debunk

Our #Faketoshi came across alert keys recently. In 2018, one of those Satoshi alert keys was used to debunk him.

"I am not CSW. Unlike me, he can't sign with the Bitcoin alert key."

More info here: ... " YOU ARE HERE !  
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1189437099956678657

...

"Craig talked about this in August already, but here he explains his plans.

"The original concept of the alert key in the alert system allowed Bitcoin to have a freezing system. It would allow individual addresses, nodes, and much more to be stopped."

hxxps://craigwright.net/blog/law-regulation/if-gold-turned-to-lead/ "

...

See: Alert system
- https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Alert_system

"The function has been retired from the client. People such as Mark Kerpeles had access to it and since the MtGox assets were in the hands of the Japan police it was decided to remove it altogether. Unlike what CSW is trying to say, it had nothing to do with coins."
- https://twitter.com/JinglesBTC/status/1189474943769051136

"Thanks for the info, Jingles. Is it even possible to use it as Craig wants to introduce on BSV? To me, it sounds like impossible as users choose their client, and court orders cannot be globally enforced either."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1189476520764563459

"No, to do what CSW describes would mean something different. This just displays a message in the client app. Giving someone a key to allow freezing of coins goes against everything that Bitcoin is about. Satoshi removed trusted 3rd parties, he didn’t given them power."
- https://twitter.com/JinglesBTC/status/1189483490854633472

...

Now wouldn't it be hilarious if CSW put the same alert key system into BSV.

Then folks could send out important notification alerts to BSV nodes!

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

Prove me wrong !

SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.0

Keep up the good work guys!

The  #faketoshi  fraud  TIMELINE
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/mylegacykit.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/ponsdeserres.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/jimmy007forsure.html

A Bitcoin (BTC) OG ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188



"... "Comprehensive information about the Bitcoin Alert System Retirement.

https://bitcoin.org/en/alert/2016-11-01-alert-retirement#updates ..."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1189556234745237504

...

"If you are without skills or the ability to create something useful, there is a growing business of trolling.

Requirements:
- Male
- Bad genetics
- Loser mentality
- Insecurity
- Low mental age
- Obsession with others

Keep swinging 😘"
- https://twitter.com/PeterMcCormack/status/1189554172305252353

It's a #WIN

Imagine getting sued for calling CSW #Fraudtoshi !

Imagine countersuing CSW because #Faketoshi !

...

"Do you know da wae?"
- https://twitter.com/PeterMcCormack/status/1189311168109842432

Da Wae ...
- https://youtu.be/nJNG7NRhwAk

...

"Trolling Twetch. 🤷‍♂️"



- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1189539562072297474

...

Which of them are sounds better:

bitcoinsvtalk.org
bsvtalk.org
originalbitcointalk.org
satoshivisiontalk.org
iamsatoshitalk.org

Please, vote

Bsvtalk.org
 is the most honest/accurate

BStalk.org

Even more honest/accurate

pumpkinmantalk .org ?

"Tomorrow...

#thepumpkinmancometh #pumpkinmancraig #halloween #BSV #BitcoinSV"



- https://twitter.com/RealCoinGeek/status/1189528006722805761

...

Not my *Meme* ...

"Make sure that you don't knock on Calvin's door for Halloween  #StaySafe"



- https://twitter.com/CryptoScamHub/status/1186130567420469248

...

Ewww ...

Bitcoin is scam created by darknet pedophiles.

BSV is created by clever man CSW

blah blah blah

taken out of context

Wait, I got confused now, I thouth CSW was the man behind the Bitcoin as he stated it many times, now it turns out that he is a clever darknet pedophile?. I thouth that only Calvin had this "problem"... better rename the coin to DPV then.

BSV parties are not creepy at all....

Here is a link to the actual tweet ...

- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1105442470396080128

...

- https://www.gamblingnews.com/news/calvin-ayre-faces-backlash-for-young-twerking-cubans/

- https://www.cubaheadlines.com/2019-03-18-p1-photos-and-video-of-young-cubans-dancing-twerking-published-by-canadian-businessman-un

Apparently one of those girls is currently in jail for attending this 'party' having been given a 2 year jail sentence for leaving / entering Havana without a valid 'permit'.

Such nice people.

Herewith, a collection of tweets from Calvin Ayre's official twitter ...

- https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1105989491062378498

- https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/973830331727056897

- https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1097262411999035392

- https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/992597659121733632

- https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1050874996938170368

- https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1068755244153270273

- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1070206998166282240

- https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1008881584114753536

- https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1052605819890671616

- https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1134270482134573057

- https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1134246061189545985

Ewww ... 

...

"Plotting the death of BTC"

Erm ... 

[xtraelv]

This is an interesting discussion (see below)  regarding whether the original whitepaper is open source or whether copyright applies.

The release of the whitepaper was by Satoshi Nakamoto on the Cypherpunks mailing list.  
The mailing list has a Cypherpunks anti-License. http://www.cypherspace.org/CPL/

How convenient for the next public display of ignorance to come so quickly. Copyright is established the instant a work is affixed in tangible form. That copyright exists fully independent if any registration thereof. Absent any explicit delegation of rights to the public at large by its creator, the Bitcoin white paper is not public domain.

The bitcoin whitepaper was first distributed by Satoshi Nakamoto on the Cypherpunks mailing list. The mailing list has a Cypherpunks anti-License. http://www.cypherspace.org/CPL/

So that is still for the jury to decide.

The intent of the Cypherpunks anti-License (CPL) is to inform users that they are free to use and redistribute the indicated work or any derived or modified work in any manner they choose. Works distributed under the CPL are in the Public Domain.

Cypherpunks of which Satoshi Nakamoto (and later CSW) were members of clearly state:

The enforcement of IP law and anonymity are in direct conflict. To fully enforce IP laws, anonymity would have to be outlawed. Cypherpunks believe this would be a bad thing, because control of information imparts power, and anonymity gives individuals control over disclosure of information about themselves and their actions.

So there are two scenarios:

CSW is not Satoshi Nakamoto in which case he is presenting fraudulent documents and attempting to commit a fraud.

CSW is Satoshi Nakamoto and breached the moral principles of the group of people that directly assisted him with the creation of bitcoin.
Used their knowledge, skills and time in the creation of something that he later would try to claim IP rights to contrary to the groups goals. Resulting in a feeling of exploitation and huge betrayal.

Your choice. Which do you pick ?

[BitcoinFX]

This is an interesting discussion (see below)  regarding whether the original whitepaper is open source or whether copyright applies.

The release of the whitepaper was by Satoshi Nakamoto on the Cypherpunks mailing list.  
The mailing list has a Cypherpunks anti-License. http://www.cypherspace.org/CPL/

How convenient for the next public display of ignorance to come so quickly. Copyright is established the instant a work is affixed in tangible form. That copyright exists fully independent if any registration thereof. Absent any explicit delegation of rights to the public at large by its creator, the Bitcoin white paper is not public domain.

The bitcoin whitepaper was first distributed by Satoshi Nakamoto on the Cypherpunks mailing list. The mailing list has a Cypherpunks anti-License. http://www.cypherspace.org/CPL/

So that is still for the jury to decide.

The intent of the Cypherpunks anti-License (CPL) is to inform users that they are free to use and redistribute the indicated work or any derived or modified work in any manner they choose. Works distributed under the CPL are in the Public Domain.

Cypherpunks of which Satoshi Nakamoto (and later CSW) were members of clearly state:

The enforcement of IP law and anonymity are in direct conflict. To fully enforce IP laws, anonymity would have to be outlawed. Cypherpunks believe this would be a bad thing, because control of information imparts power, and anonymity gives individuals control over disclosure of information about themselves and their actions.

So there are two scenarios:

CSW is not Satoshi Nakamoto in which case he is presenting fraudulent documents and attempting to commit a fraud.

CSW is Satoshi Nakamoto and breached the moral principles of the group of people that directly assisted him with the creation of bitcoin.
Used their knowledge, skills and time in the creation of something that he later would try to claim IP rights to contrary to the groups goals. Resulting in a feeling of huge betrayal.

Your choice. Which do you pick ?

The most important and relevant bit ...

... "Background

The CPL is written from a mindset which derides the very concept of Intellectual Property restrictions as being incompatible with a free society.

Cryptographically assured anonymity and anonymous use of Internet resources mean that denizens of cypherspace can ignore copyright, licenses attempting to control use and distribution of works, and patents on ideas. It is not possible to enforce IP laws by calls to government legal systems when the flaunter is strongly anonymous. " ...

- http://www.cypherspace.org/CPL/

...

- https://www.dictionary.com/browse/flaunter



...

The original Bitcoin whitepaper has no copyright or any form of licensing whatsoever.

- https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

It isn't even copyleft. It is literally copy left.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft

"@COPYLEFT ALL WRONGS RESERVED"

...

Only Signed and Verified will do i.e. Cryptographically assured (as above).



Yes Satoshi Nakamoto was a clever bast*rd indeed.

CSW's and nChain's patents are likely Prior Art i.e. worthless and unenforceable without said cryptographically assured proof.

[xtraelv]

The most important and relevant bit ...

... "Background

The CPL is written from a mindset which derides the very concept of Intellectual Property restrictions as being incompatible with a free society.

Cryptographically assured anonymity and anonymous use of Internet resources mean that denizens of cypherspace can ignore copyright, licenses attempting to control use and distribution of works, and patents on ideas. It is not possible to enforce IP laws by calls to government legal systems when the flaunter is strongly anonymous. " ...
- http://www.cypherspace.org/CPL/

...

- https://www.dictionary.com/browse/flaunter



...

The original Bitcoin whitepaper has no copyright or any form of licensing whatsoever.
- https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

It isn't even copyleft. It is literally copy left.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft

"@COPYLEFT ALL WRONGS RESERVED"

...

Only Signed and Verified will do i.e. Cryptographically assured (as above).

Copyright is automatic. It does not have to be displayed or enforced.

However - there was a conscious choice by Satoshi Nakamoto to publish it on the cypherpunks mailing list.

This makes it subject to the CPL of the mailing list - which makes it public domain.
Satoshi received consideration in return (the ability to distribute the publication) so (in my opinion) it is a legally binding contract.

[BitcoinFX]

The most important and relevant bit ...

... "Background

The CPL is written from a mindset which derides the very concept of Intellectual Property restrictions as being incompatible with a free society.

Cryptographically assured anonymity and anonymous use of Internet resources mean that denizens of cypherspace can ignore copyright, licenses attempting to control use and distribution of works, and patents on ideas. It is not possible to enforce IP laws by calls to government legal systems when the flaunter is strongly anonymous. " ...
- http://www.cypherspace.org/CPL/

...

- https://www.dictionary.com/browse/flaunter



...

The original Bitcoin whitepaper has no copyright or any form of licensing whatsoever.
- https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

It isn't even copyleft. It is literally copy left.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft

"@COPYLEFT ALL WRONGS RESERVED"

...

Only Signed and Verified will do i.e. Cryptographically assured (as above).

Copyright is automatic. It does not have to be displayed or enforced.

However - there was a conscious choice by Satoshi Nakamoto to publish it on the cypherpunks mailing list.

This makes it subject to the CPL of the mailing list - which makes it public domain.
Satoshi received consideration in return (the ability to distribute the publication) so (in my opinion) it is a legally binding contract.

Indeed this is one for the lawyers to argue over. Are we assuming Satoshi was an American based in America here, for example ...

3 Commonly Misunderstood U.S. Copyright Concepts
- https://www.copyrightlaws.com/u-s-copyright-law-misinformation/

International copyright treaties
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_copyright_treaties

Universal Copyright Convention
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Copyright_Convention

Public domain
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain

Again, I believe that it is a valid legal argument that only the proven originator can enforce.

This also goes a long way in explaining CSW's claims and actions as a 'bad actor' and impostor here.

[mindrust]

Theymos! Please help! Close this troll's topic.

Nutildah - is scam. Bitcoin SV - is not scam. Wake up

If you think nutildah is scam, gather you evidences and create a topic about it. Otherwise shut the fuck up.

Bsv is scam and anyone who supports this shit is as guilty as the main funders/creators (csw & ayre) of this shitcoin.

Also stop asking for help from theymos you look more retarded than you already are.

[Dabs]

Is the BSV forum account showing a SegWit address on it's signature?



Maybe it's multi-sig. I didn't bother to look.

[BitcoinFX]

#HappyHalloween

Because big blocks are more profitable?

And there you have it. They don't care about cryto currency, they're only in it for profit. After having watched the video the other day of Craig, I was left with the feeling that he is exactly the same way. All he seems to care about is getting in bed with the banks, corporations and the like just so he can get rich and nothing more.

Indeed.

You BSV folks actually believe this guy is Satoshi Nakamoto ... This guy ...  

"We did warn you...HE'S HERE! 😱😧🎃

#HappyHalloween #Halloween19 #BSV #BitcoinSV #PumpkinManCraig"

- https://youtu.be/gHo79k6rv3M

- https://twitter.com/RealCoinGeek/status/1189845193933180936

That is scarily pathetic.

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

...

"This is tooo funny, I set this reminder a year ago when $BSV fork was happening.  CSW said on several occasions he was going to rekt all privacy coins by releasing his priv breaking info🤦‍♂️ , add this to the long list of groundbreaking tech/data "soon to be released"...  Snooze!"



- https://twitter.com/SirLamboMoon/status/1189892866153361408



...

"Craig Wright - $BTC & $LTC dead by November 15, 2019

Who remembers Craig's claim that he would reveal something something SegWit something, Bitcoin killed?

There you go. 50, 49, 48, ... 🍿🍿🍿"



- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1177727724649156608



...

"Now that I'm on it anyway: how about the November 2018 BCH hashwar dump-of-BTC-threat, combined with a Satoshi stash dump in 2019! Wow! 😂"



- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1178044481679056901

...

"Next. That same month, on November 3, 2018, Craig made the "2 years of no trade. Bitcoin will die" threat to Roger Ver.

I think he's still busy figuring out how that "no trade" actually works, because ever since, it was BSV being delisted from several major exchanges! 🤦‍♂️"



- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1178053308822544389

[BitcoinFX]

Theymos, help please, close this troll's topic.

BSV - is not scam

...

*Satire*

Please help! Satoshi! Close this troll's topic.

BSV - is scam

*More Satire*
Uganda knuckles vs Ugandan knuckles
- https://youtu.be/dep1MrobOq4

BCT mods still deleting on topic posts (if this does not help highlight exactly why BSV 'team members' are fake, I don't know what does) ...

Do not try to censor me.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Is the BSV forum account showing a SegWit address on it's signature?



Maybe it's multi-sig. I didn't bother to look.

We have more pressing issues to consider I think ! TBH I'm just quoting to keep the thread roll running ...

Look at these lies ...

That's the way it's

...

Easily debunked ...

The above info graphic presents a completely false narrative of the actual chain of events.

Below is the true chain of events.

Original Bitcoin (BTC) began with the Genesis block at block 0 in 2009. BCH and BSV did not exist at this point in time.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Bitcoin Cash (BCH): Forked (from BTC) at block (height) 478558, on 1 August 2017, for each Bitcoin (BTC), an owner got 1 Bitcoin Cash (BCH)

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_Cash

BSV did not exist at this point in time.

Bitcoin SV (BSV): Forked (from BCH) at block (height) 556766, on 15 November 2018, for each Bitcoin Cash (BCH), an owner got 1 Bitcoin SV (BSV).

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_Cash#2018_split_to_create_Bitcoin_SV

Historical transactions are the same and are present on each chain up to the point of the respective fork(s).

Each fork continues on its own chain.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bitcoin_forks

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

#CraigIsNotSatoshi

Again, BSV is a copy of a copy of original Bitcoin (BTC) which was forked at BCH block height #556767. It's in the BSV 'source code' repo. here:

- https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/blob/master/LICENSE

Perhaps someone could kindly produce a correct info graphic to easily debunk this ?

...

BSV self-moderated thread deleting posts ...

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

The lengths people on this thread to defame people in the BSV community really shows fear. Very bullish on BSV, transaction volume now exceeding BTC on a daily basis!!!!

Facts don’t lie..

Sv.coin.dance

Bsv more profitable to mine and transact. Fact.

Fear is real, activity in thread in recent time proves that.
No such thing as bad publicity.

Wrong ! No fear here whatsoever.

Simply presenting hard facts to prove that CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

This is the response we are undertaking in regards to BSV continually claiming to be original Bitcoin (BTC).

CSW has provided no proof to the community here or elsewhere, hard evidence exists to the contrary.

The  #faketoshi  fraud  TIMELINE
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/mylegacykit.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/ponsdeserres.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/jimmy007forsure.html

SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.0

This will continue until you recognize and acknowledge the above. Look at the despicable actions of the people you are supporting.

By supporting BSV you are complicit in the attempt to 'hijack' the original Bitcoin (BTC) project, are you not?

Mate you’ve wasted hours with the same character arguments against Craig that have no relevance to bitcoin Sv. Look at your posts, you’re clearly heavily invested in making sure bitcoin Sv does not succeed. You need better arguments. You are scared.

Not your mate. Try actually reading and digesting the information and answering the question ...

Why am I scared ? Are you threatening me ?

...

BSV self-moderated thread deleting posts (again) ...

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

The daily digest ...

Mate you’ve wasted hours with the same character arguments against Craig that have no relevance to bitcoin Sv. Look at your posts, you’re clearly heavily invested in making sure bitcoin Sv does not succeed. You need better arguments. You are scared.

My guess is that as bitcointalk user 30. One of the first bitcoin exchange operators and someone who actually spoke to the real Satoshi Nakamoto when bitcoin was in its very early stages that BitcoinFX is in a unique position to judge someone claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

Craig has made lots of claims about BSV and about Bitcoin. His character and overall conduct is very relevant to the discussion.

It is always called FUD right up until things go wrong. Then it becomes known as "prior warnings".

Proof of what?

Bought an old account?

Did he sign?

This is high quality nonsens

But good all see it for free

 

...snip...

Yes I have signed actually and I'm the originator of my own account.

Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

ALL coins were spent long ago for anyone who is reading this
- in fact some of you may have a few of them in your wallets!

Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for forum account recovery etc.,

1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am not Satoshi Nakamoto. Are you?
42/ is the answer.
Be seeing you at The Restaurant at the End of the Universe?
0.00000000 - BitcoinFX - bitcointalk.org - July 9th, 2018
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp
HMoTNpmqieWmcIvF/aMTCZlLqAuYnrWuQJk45S0pXK4pFOAB/j2WBTkA5KEGSpJQTclPL3ehaTSdPpV9Ivq+lC0=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

https://brainwalletx.github.io/#verify?vrAddr=1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp&vrMsg=I%20am%20not%20Satoshi%20Nakamoto.%20Are%20you%3F%0A42%2F%20is%20the%20answer.%0ABe%20seeing%20you%20at%20The%20Restaurant%20at%20the%20End%20of%20the%20Universe%3F%0A0.00000000%20-%20BitcoinFX%20-%20bitcointalk.org%20-%20July%209th%2C%202018&vrSig=HMoTNpmqieWmcIvF%2FaMTCZlLqAuYnrWuQJk45S0pXK4pFOAB%2Fj2WBTkA5KEGSpJQTclPL3ehaTSdPpV9Ivq%2BlC0%3D

...snip...

Now ask yourself why can't CSW sign any old wallets or even produce any keys or valid evidence or access any original Satoshi accounts.

I'll tell you why ...

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

Try actually reading and digesting the information presented. You might actually learn something.

CSW cannot even answer basic questions about real Bitcoin history.



...

STORMZY - KNOW ME FROM
- https://youtu.be/PxbzujA69DA *NSFW*

[nutildah]

A few weeks ago I mentioned that I wondered what the outcome of the settlement being made between Wright and Kleiman would be. Whatever it was, Wright just pulled out of it, now saying its because he doesn't have the money for the settlement. (Duh).

In reliance on these efforts and what seemed to be steady progress toward global resolution, Plaintiffs stopped active litigation, focused on settlement, and joined both of Craig’s motions to extend the case deadlines by 30 days (ECF No. 284 and 287). The Court granted the first motion, but held the existing March 30, 2020 trial date; it all but denied the second motion, pushing off only the deadline for Plaintiffs to move for attorneys’ fees and Defendant to appeal this Court’s sanctions order (See ECF No. 286 and 289).

On October 30, without any advance notice, Plaintiffs were informed Craig could no longer finance the settlement and was “breaking” the non-binding settlement agreement.

To that end, Plaintiffs began shifting back into preparing for trial (with much lost time).

So now the Plaintiffs have to go back to square one (or square 2, or 3) with the case going back to trial mode. It would appear Craig's plan is to keep pulling these time-wasting maneuvers indefinitely... I'm sure the judge won't be willing to overlook his stalling tactics for too long.

The next event would have been scheduled for Nov. 8th when the CFO of one of Craig's companies said they could give a deposition. Of course the defense didn't consent to it and said they would need more time to figure out if they ever would...  

[TheNewAnon135246]

This is going to be great. I have a PACER account so I'll link all paid docs here (from now on).

[gentlemand]

Don't sweat it. He's got the Tulip Trust to look forward to in a few short weeks, right?

Then we're all going to be reduced to cowed silence while he personally drives from door to door and forces us to inhale his red socks.

[nutildah]

This is going to be great. I have a PACER account so I'll link all paid docs here (from now on).

Please do. I appreciate a good comedy script.

Don't sweat it. He's got the Tulip Trust to look forward to in a few short weeks, right?

If that happens I will literally eat a crow. Or, something close to it.

[Phinnaeus Gage]

This is going to be great. I have a PACER account so I'll link all paid docs here (from now on).

Please do. I appreciate a good comedy script.

Don't sweat it. He's got the Tulip Trust to look forward to in a few short weeks, right?

If that happens I will literally eat a crow. Or, something close to it.

I will eat McAfee's dick.

[BitcoinFX]

This is going to be great. I have a PACER account so I'll link all paid docs here (from now on).

Please do. I appreciate a good comedy script.

Don't sweat it. He's got the Tulip Trust to look forward to in a few short weeks, right?

If that happens I will literally eat a crow. Or, something close to it.

I will eat McAfee's dick.

*Satire*
Terminator: Genesis | Robot Chicken | Adult Swim *NSFW*
- https://youtu.be/XLewszA9ao8



...

Clearing words

https://mobile.twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1191284725920542720

Calling Craig's lawyers deceitful. Oh sure, the help is the deceitful ones!    

What a joke.

The whole thing is just a pathetic stall for an indefinite amount of more time. Scammer Tactics 101.

Priceless ...

"Pretty much everything in this article is wrong.  I will be publishing a fact based release later today Antigua time to clarify.  Very decietful of Craigs lawyers to publish such lies into court.  Craig was NOT involved in any settlement...it was only me.
- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1191284725920542720

Methinks Ira’s lawyers are going to love that one.

"So, what your telling us is you bankrolled it all ..." [citation needed] - SWIM

Keep on digging!



...

In other news ...

“Right now, 30% of Binance money funds women in prostitution; 30% of Binance and Tether funds women in slavery…” - CSW ...

Binance CEO Swats ‘Stupid’ Bitcoin SV Craig Wright’s Shocking Slavery and Prostitution Claims ...
- https://www.ccn.com/binance-ceo-bitcoin-sv-craig-wright-slavery-prostitution/

...

*More Satire* ...



- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1190217280392761345

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

...



...



- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1190379461851701250

#CraigIsNotSatoshi

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.msg52872005#msg52872005

"this is a factual explanation of what happned when I tried to buy the Kleiman estate.  What was filed in court by their side is fiction and likely purjery."
- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1191308492885372928
- https://coingeek.com/calvin-ayre-passes-on-buying-dave-kleiman-estate-because-it-holds-no-assets/

"It actually happened, happned" ... SWIM

"purjery" ... SWIM



Purrrrjery ... ?

...

"... "Craig was NOT involved in any settlement... it was only me." - Calvin Ayre

We knew that already, Calvin. Craig was bailed out in 2015 for ~$15 million, and didn't make any money on patents etc since then. Basically, he has been leeching on you, Calvin. Pull the plug soon? 🙄 ..."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1191309771175088129

"Then this. Interesting info, but for Ira & his counsel Calvin is not the party to settle with. So if Calvin doesn't buy something from Craig or otherwise sponsors the settlement, Craig remains broke when he pulls himself saying he cannot finance. 🤷‍♂️"
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1191313081906946049

"..."Dr. Wright and Dave Kleiman mined their respective portions of the Satoshi Coins separately as far as can be determined."

😂😂😂

May the discovery continue! Please! I beg you, Ira's counsel! 😂 ..."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1191314613394182144

"Calvin thinks he can redo the lawsuit all by himself lol. Or, he indirectly admits Craig has been fraudulently setting up the 2011-2013 mining/IP scheme? 🤦‍♂️

And uhm... "no actual evidence of a partnership" vs "Kleiman collaborated with Wright"?

My brain hurts..."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1191324161945325569

"Another doozy from Calvin's article.

"Ira may have destroyed the private keys by overwriting Dave's hard drives, leaving their accessibility in doubt." 🤦‍♂️

I wonder where the inspiration for that quote came from! 😂"
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1191338093158260737

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.msg52838876#msg52838876