Actually you did say a troll and I said you seem to be in love with this company now so I just implied why dont you buy $7k worht of the boards (10 now). I pick points that seem to not add up and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. How am I using any fallacy to illustrate my point? It seems you are just pulling shit out of your ass now.
You seem to have been charmed by whoever they sent that has you absolutely convinced this is not a scam.
Lie #1.
I have business experience but not a startup. You admit it requires capital and I don't know many people that would work for free or even for a portion of a business this small.
You don't know them, so they must not exist, right? You might have heard of a little company, started out of an apartment with the employees not getting paid, but getting a portion of the company. Everyone thought it would fail in the beginning except the people involved directly. The company is now known as "Facebook." Have you heard of it? Just one of hundreds of high profile examples.
People have bills to pay unless you have too much money. Does your landlord know you run a business out of your residence? If so I am sure you are violating your lease and can/will eventually be evicted. If you own thats a different story but clearly they do not. Again it seems you are speaking out your ass.
Yes, because you assume I live in an apartment or something? One more thing that has NOTHING to do with the issue, you are just throwing it out there to bolster your argument.
OK I didnt break out websters
Perhaps you should before using terms you aren't clear on.
Exponential power consumption occurs at some point when overclocking but a steepening curve still gets my point across. I have my CPU well overclocked and it uses a lot more power per watt than at stock settings. Same with my GPU. Either way the more hashing power the more the power consumption which means they have failed on their promise of 19.6W (quite the specific number too btw).
So now it's not exponential but a steepening curve? You are agreeing to that point? So what you're saying is that basically what you said before you just pulled out of your ass, right?
You seem to like using the word straw a lot.
I did use it a lot, because you used classic examples of straw men. What do you want me to call it? Do you want me to make up definitions of words like you've been doing? Your logical fallacy is called a straw man, go look that up as well. I am not making this up.
I am merely pointing out what I have observed.
And I am merely pointing out that what you have "observed" is false, irrelevant to your principal thesis (that it is a scam) or completely fabricated.
I also did some work earlier in the thread trying to track down any signs of legitimacy to this businsess in paper form and was unable to. This could have simply been disproven by them by providing a business license which would then be confirmed? Why the secrecy with the business license?
WHAT. DOES. THIS. HAVE. TO. DO. WITH. IT. BEING. A. SCAM?
You seem to be quite biased now lashing out with insults to anyone who still questions this company, hence the question by the other user if they are paying you now. Thats more than just me who thinks this.
But it's just you posting a bogus list, so take what you want from that. I am not biased nor am I lashing out, beyond calling you on your "list" of "evidence" that is anything but. YOU are being biased by providing fabricated or irrelevant evidence to support your claims. That, also, is the definition of bias, another word you should probably look up.
So how much straw are you selling Inaba? Either way im not buying. I didnt challenge your numbers at all during testing just the company itself so there is no reason for you to take offence the way you did if you were truly unbiased.
Of course you're not buying it, you're far too biased to accept the evidence that's in front of you, provided multiple times, in several forms. You want this so badly to be a scam you are unwilling to accept factual evidence that flies in the face of your "evidence." Once again, you've provided exactly NOTHING to counter even a single argument. Throw me a bone here, at least make an attempt to at a counter argument.
I just really dont know what else to add here because you seem to be lashing out at me for merely pointing out observations as an unbiased, uninvested observer. I think you should try and evaluate if you are truly objective anymore because I sure question it.
I am "lashout out" as someone speaking authoritatively on subjects when you clearly have absolutely no authority to speak with regards to them. I am "lashing out" at complete fabrications of "evidence" for supposed "crimes" that haven't even happened yet. And the only reason I have engaged thus far is because I get worn out of people who are unable to use even basic logic to pick out reality from fantasy and then try to pass off their rambling as useful discourse as opposed to the troll attempt that it is. Hell, for all I know you actually believe what you are saying constitutes evidence for a scam... if so, you really need to rexamine a few things with regards to this and examine your motives for repeatedly posting your little "list". There are reasons this could be a scam, there is evidence that mistakes could have been made, there are many things in this that are unexpected - but none of that is on your list of "evidence" that it is a scam only irrelevant fact, fabrications and misinformation.
