AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Eze BTC]

Could anyone check these users? Some of them either recently joined or woke up and create short generic post (few of those on technical board). All of them never receive tag related to spam with AI/chatbot, so it's possible i simply being too skeptical.

Roberto888 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3706715
SanZoldyck - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1045517
Hodlpreneur - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3727957
Abelly - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3731248
devhazard - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3729723
Eze BTC - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3740293

edit: it may be related with LoyceV past finding LoyceV

I really understand your concern and I must commend your effort to fight AI spam.

Howbeit, if AI usage is detected it's best that drastic measure should be taken against anyone found guilty. Calling me out for no wrong other than being a newbie is you limiting all newbies' level of understanding and comprehension. To some, being a newbie is just a title, not definition of understanding and knowledge.

Personally, I don't support AI spam and I support every decision against it. I make input from my little knowledge in areas I have interest and knowledge in the bitcoin market. My dislike for AI spamming is a major reason why I commend your effort. My little request is that the stereotype against newbies be lowered a bit. Nobody feels happy being boxed and limited not to sound educated just because he's a newbie.

Regardless, thank you so much for helping the community fight AI spam.

[memehunter]

I have a bit of a problem with the idea of punishing members for their choice to cooperate,

I dont think we have to see it that way, there will always be a quality biased. All I was saying is post quality is not a automatic refection of 'not heavy AI abuse'. We have some parameters and we should adhere to those.  

 and it seems that abhiseshakana is mostly cooperating, even though sure, he could be lying about specifics ....  and maybe he is also overly relying on AI tools...

Real cooperation would be to immediately post the screenshots of AI chatbot prompt history but of course as a foundational principle of natural law, you can not force some one to produce evidence against himself.  

I suppose it is discretionary if some members might consider some kind of a tag (even a neutral one)

I am waiting for his response regarding my query earlier, not for the tag but for genuine brainstorming about how he (and others) are using AI assistance. AI tags should be temporary IMO, anyway.

[HustleZ]

Could anyone check these users? Some of them either recently joined or woke up and create short generic post (few of those on technical board). All of them never receive tag related to spam with AI/chatbot, so it's possible i simply being too skeptical.

1. Roberto888
Post 1:

A red 2025 candle wouldn't end the debate. It would just get folded into a new "cycle" theory with a longer or shifted timeframe. People cling to these patterns for clarity.

You're right that this cycle is structurally different due to ETFs and institutional adoption. The 4-year model was built on retail-driven, post-halving scarcity pumps. Now, we have constant institutional buying pressure.

The cycle isn't broken; it's just outdated. Price action will be more driven by traditional macro (rates, elections, regulations) and ETF flows than just the halving countdown. A red 2025 might signal that shift is complete, but the debate will continue. It's less about the calendar now and more about the new fundamentals.

GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated
Sapling Ai: 70% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident

There are other post I Checked made with Ai.
2. SanZoldyck

You can clearly see his tag and his history of engaging in Merit Selling. His posts aren't primarily Ai Generated but they are one liners and just comments which I don't see helpful at all. I think it could be Because of the Tag As his motivation to post was Ended by the Tag.
3. Hodlpreneur

I checked his posts, aren't Ai Generated. But I don't know if the information he is giving is Correct or not because Technicals isn't my cup of tea. We can't say anything or judge further as he has made not much posts.
4. Abelly
Post 1:

Investing in Bitcoin does not Mean pouring a lot of Money at once, But rather saving Bitcoin regularly and consistently from your own discretionary income is the real responsibility. Those who do not know about the DCA method of Investment are Basically those who wait for the perfect time or Big income and postpone it for Years. Bitcoin is for Everyone, not rich or poor, but for those who have patience, discipline and a long-term mindset. If you can save Bitcoin regularly in small amounts with responsibility, without thinking about taking risks. Then time will Become the greatest Teacher, The most Important thing is to start.

Sapling Ai: 73.6% Ai Generated
GpT Zero: 100% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident

Post 2

Quantum risk is created when someone Spends coins and their Public Key is published on the blockchain.In the case of unspent coins, only the Public Key Hash is visible from which it is not possible to extract the Private Key.Even with a Quantum Computer, Satoshis Coins have never been Spent.The Public Key has never been published, So there is no Opportunity for Attack. If you don't Spend,There is no Quantum risk.If you spend,quantum risk is created.satoshis risk.

Sapling Ai: ~ 70% Ai Generated
GPTzero: 100% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Ai Generated

The User Is Just Merit Farming Using Ai
5. devhazard

Post 1:

How to Set Up BTC Payments

The two primary methods are using a payment gateway or accepting payments directly to your own wallet.

1. Use a Crypto Payment Gateway (Recommended)

Payment gateways act like PayPal or Stripe, but for crypto.
They handle the conversion to your local currency (fiat) immediately, so you avoid volatility risk.
Choose a Provider Popular options include BitPay, Coinbase Commerce, and Square.
Consider factors like fees, supported currencies, integration options, and customer support.
Set up an Account Register your business and go through the verification process.

Integrate with Your Business
Online Stores: Use plugins for e-commerce platforms like Shopify or WooCommerce, or integrate via API.
Brick-and-Mortar: Use a point-of-sale (POS) app on a tablet or smartphone to generate QR codes for customers to scan.
Receive Funds The gateway processes the transaction, converts the BTC to your local currency (e.g., USD, EUR, GBP), and deposits the funds into your bank account, often the next business day.

2. Accept Payments Directly to a Business Wallet

This method gives you full control but requires more technical expertise and management of volatility and accounting.
Set up a Secure Wallet Choose a secure, non-custodial digital wallet (software or hardware) to manage your assets.
Generate Payment Addresses Create a unique QR code or address for each transaction to ensure proper accounting and privacy.
Manage Volatility You will be responsible for the value fluctuation of the BTC you hold.

Legal and Tax Considerations
Legality Accepting BTC as a means of exchange is legal in most jurisdictions, provided you record and tax transactions correctly.
Taxation In many countries (like the US and UK), cryptocurrency is treated as property for tax purposes. This means:
You must record the fiat value of the transaction at the time it occurred.
If you hold the crypto and its value changes before you convert or spend it, you may incur capital gains or losses.
Compliance Consult a legal and tax professional to ensure you are following local Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know-Your-Customer (KYC) regulations and maintaining proper records.

Sapling: 100% Ai Generated
GPTzero: 100% Ai Generated
Originality: 100% Confident

The User was tagged With Asking A Loan and scamming. The user isn't Genuine and is just Used/Run by a Person who is greedy and somehow wants to earn without knowing what's right and what's Wrong. Posts are Ai Generated.
6. Eze BTC

I checked some Posts That weren't made with Ai. I think he's Clean.

[Abelly]

4. Abelly
Post 1:

Investing in Bitcoin does not Mean pouring a lot of Money at once, But rather saving Bitcoin regularly and consistently from your own discretionary income is the real responsibility. Those who do not know about the DCA method of Investment are Basically those who wait for the perfect time or Big income and postpone it for Years. Bitcoin is for Everyone, not rich or poor, but for those who have patience, discipline and a long-term mindset. If you can save Bitcoin regularly in small amounts with responsibility, without thinking about taking risks. Then time will Become the greatest Teacher, The most Important thing is to start.

Sapling Ai: 73.6% Ai Generated
GpT Zero: 100% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident

Post 2

Quantum risk is created when someone Spends coins and their Public Key is published on the blockchain.In the case of unspent coins, only the Public Key Hash is visible from which it is not possible to extract the Private Key.Even with a Quantum Computer, Satoshis Coins have never been Spent.The Public Key has never been published, So there is no Opportunity for Attack. If you don't Spend,There is no Quantum risk.If you spend,quantum risk is created.satoshis risk.

Sapling Ai: ~ 70% Ai Generated
GPTzero: 100% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Ai Generated

The User Is Just Merit Farming Using Ai

You are spreading confusion here. None of my posts are generated by AI. You have submitted a report here by mistake. I would like you to review my posts better. Because I checked my posts submitted here a while ago with the sites mentioned in the...

[LoyceV]

Found another user with Low Quality Post with AI.
pliego

Your feedback calls you a shitposter and you're reporting another shitposter for Merit?

Pliego has made 167 posts in a week. There are more spammers in the same campaign: aysha9853 made 266 posts, lornadane made 200 posts. Who's hiring those spammers? They're not in Hhampuz' spreadsheet.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Your feedback calls you a shitposter and you're reporting another shitposter for Merit?

Well, I've had a look and the feedback is from back 2018 but his recent post history is quite crappy as well. Just generic posts on Gambling Discussion or Trading Discussion where you can say pretty much nothing and as long as it has some resemblance to the title of the thread you'll get a pass.

Also, I smell an alt account here. It seems that the guy behind it stops posting when he can not monetize the account and just comes back when he sees some chance. Also, the only merits he is gotten in the past 120 days are from this thread, where you don't have to do much more than run text through the detectors and publish the result and 14 merits from the run a node challenge. I guess it's to meet the minimum merit requirement that some campaigns ask for.

[ABCbits]

--snip--

Thanks for the help.

Found another user with Low Quality Post with AI.
pliego

Your feedback calls you a shitposter and you're reporting another shitposter for Merit?

Pliego has made 167 posts in a week. There are more spammers in the same campaign: aysha9853 made 266 posts, lornadane made 200 posts. Who's hiring those spammers? They're not in Hhampuz' spreadsheet.

It seems they don't care about multiple neutral or negative feedback and continue to spam. At this point, only permanent ban/nuke can stop them.

[LoyceV]

At this point, only permanent ban/nuke can stop them.

I don't feel like going through 600 posts to report them, so I just clicked Ignore on all 3.

[ABCbits]

At this point, only permanent ban/nuke can stop them.

I don't feel like going through 600 posts to report them, so I just clicked Ignore on all 3.

I usually do that. But one of them flood board i usually visit, so i just tried to report it.



Although these days i don't expect too much.

Edit: Many of them marked as good, but i don't see the user receive permanent ban/nuke.

[AakZaki]

Your feedback calls you a shitposter and you're reporting another shitposter for Merit?

Pliego has made 167 posts in a week. There are more spammers in the same campaign: aysha9853 made 266 posts, lornadane made 200 posts. Who's hiring those spammers? They're not in Hhampuz' spreadsheet.

Two days ago I checked his account connection, until I opened this browser tab, this browser tab showed the profile link of the account he was connected to.

He's not just a spammer, he has a huge account farm, here's a proof of connected accounts based on On-Chain transactions.

Main Wallet = Binance Deposit 1 = 0x3952f2Db9Fd33107CE3eff69488Be75011D5f86D
Main Wallet = Binance Deposit 2 = 0x6eb12276c4ce556e2f383a6aad1775a28398e6d8
Main Wallet = Binance Deposit 3 = 0x86323116e4c9410de2368b6706ebc1c258f6b02b
Main Wallet = Binance Deposit 4 = 0x1eDfDDc929322Aa25D9DAaB4E59999378969Bc72

https://bscscan.com/address/0x3952f2db9fd33107ce3eff69488be75011d5f86d
https://bscscan.com/address/0x6eb12276c4ce556e2f383a6aad1775a28398e6d8
https://bscscan.com/txs?a=0x86323116e4c9410de2368b6706ebc1c258f6b02b
https://bscscan.com/address/0x1edfddc929322aa25d9daab4e59999378969bc72

Code:

aysha9853 - 0xc92eC3CcB1d0B6c3e0d0a5Bb6C4BF99fDd760A91
KenzoKen - RedTrust 0x42bf3b13486f392c24ce814c5B5b131d7247a6ec
TheSoapKing - 0x024E82777659a39fbAc1BBca96F1C256317cc30D
soetikno - 0x5E7117c82b20CfFD85E4cc29118a83102Bcc9a27
DuitMoney - RedTRust 0x9b33623c5683675E7f3f3188D881E8df77a28235
Rpg66 - RedTrust
HunterXZoldyck - 0x49D3CF04Acb74Ca9EF79BfC399c4cFB7E57b1d87
Antonigrock
Gusbaa - RedTrust 0xbBD5245f047E5E1dE23BA11E0c40666aC3C6dfcb
DuitMoney - RedTrust 0x9b33623c5683675E7f3f3188D881E8df77a28235
GarisKeras - RedTrust
KenzoKen - RedTrust
DinahDiyanah - RedTrust 0xF82ba91D43995fE4659f96B49A9bf5Ef6eD472Eb
Halbax (Banned)
Bobonmo
contole
Wekendoffender - RedTrust
iis62
Bilykerap - RedTrust 0x49B13afDf5051191D0146bbCF74f03c871829a47
Tachini - RedTrust
Farahabis - RedTrust 0xE6D8B92d352634797d1E609d9C98F0a0b8548524
pelo12 - Banned
dogemurah92
Tokyo Ghoul - 0x22Ac34EFe105C201C22Dabf975d609439F7FfA4c
affandi - Banned 0xc30E480046fB45b29036603F7F287B5b6aF13105
Roumanz - 0x95BD926D136CeE1c04727c188D91f8d4f7F7289d
Antonigrock - 0x38B476EC05E1e228611E5b76569D71A47fc7d6b7
tedotwijaya22 - 0x152A1Ba98FE767626DAAcFf00aD2A6540ea217e1
The clay - 0x8C88cb42766280454d20F90BBCaBC10E56CD397c
oleng12 - 0xaCc4Ce6e616850B474e02854eb1112353dAE2A2D
Shelacans - 0xF4F1E40CC4A7f16941c47a5DE71e53a1013c2AF0
Monkeybut - 0x09dBD32662627a0De3D56f58bfD88055A727f7DF
Chancunpay - 0x84A00BCd8E7B7427Afe6b878447b68ACE0e8d673
Injhagi - RedTrust 0x04953C32c8Df985A68C85B19E79fdD82171Ffb60
Tough fighters - RedTrust  
AlexJCasas
Holdgeng - 0xC12FD039050c44f482954978Ea6cB51841D5C3c6
GarisKeras - RedTrust 0x1BE2A7CA40dbb2dd764a2c2DB99fD6e7bAae1d5B
Miwang22 - 0x4a0B98E044fA23A737cC3e8A024094eAD06388F9
Franche - 0x966b9f14801d6724831bbe93eD132eDF074a0C2d
Nakatami - 0xCF60cc2C19eDa3f9471C21a386431b3acC2DA60d
Jascov - 0xD82354f15bC3f8F6bA0180ee57351092611E55FF
Lazolaz - 0x9d0ab2D321e5EE78CA37cFb394Cc18a1f4c7b08C

[nutildah]

Real cooperation would be to immediately post the screenshots of AI chatbot prompt history but of course as a foundational principle of natural law, you can not force some one to produce evidence against himself.  

Right, therefore there's no reason to even ask for it. Let them produce it on their own accord, if its their own decision.

If you're accusing somebody of something, which you appear to be doing, its on you to produce the evidence to back the accusation. If you can't do it with what's already available then you can't do it, and you don't have a solid accusation.

Who's hiring those spammers? They're not in Hhampuz' spreadsheet.

Somebody with accounts to sacrifice for the sake of trolling Hhampuz, apparently. Lol.

[Satofan44]

Two days ago I checked his account connection, until I opened this browser tab, this browser tab showed the profile link of the account he was connected to.

Here is an updated list with all profiles clickable to make it easier to navigate for reviewers. My "bro" AakZaki got a little tired, so I am sharing some of my energy with him.   For cases like this having an ultra wide monitor is imperative, otherwise it becomes a chaos with tabs as shown in your screenshot. DuitMoney, KenzoKen, GarisKeras and Antonigrock were listed twice so I removed the duplicate entries. Low ranked members should not be allowed to participate in anything on this forum.  

1. aysha9853 - Red Trust 0xc92eC3CcB1d0B6c3e0d0a5Bb6C4BF99fDd760A91
2. KenzoKen - Red Trust 0x42bf3b13486f392c24ce814c5B5b131d7247a6ec
3. TheSoapKing - 0x024E82777659a39fbAc1BBca96F1C256317cc30D
4. soetikno - 0x5E7117c82b20CfFD85E4cc29118a83102Bcc9a27
5. DuitMoney - Red Trust 0x9b33623c5683675E7f3f3188D881E8df77a28235
6. Rpg66 - Red Trust
7. HunterXZoldyck - 0x49D3CF04Acb74Ca9EF79BfC399c4cFB7E57b1d87
8. Gusbaa - Red Trust - 0xbBD5245f047E5E1dE23BA11E0c40666aC3C6dfcb
9. DinahDiyanah - Red Trust 0xF82ba91D43995fE4659f96B49A9bf5Ef6eD472Eb
10. Halbax (Banned) - Red Trust
11. Bobonmo
12. contole
13. Wekendoffender - Red Trust
14. iis62
15. Bilykerap - Red Trust 0x49B13afDf5051191D0146bbCF74f03c871829a47
16. Tachini - Red Trust
17. Farahabis - Red Trust 0xE6D8B92d352634797d1E609d9C98F0a0b8548524
18. pelo12 (Banned) - Red Trust
19. dogemurah92
20. Tokyo Ghoul - 0x22Ac34EFe105C201C22Dabf975d609439F7FfA4c
21. affandi (Banned) - 0xc30E480046fB45b29036603F7F287B5b6aF13105
22. Roumanz - 0x95BD926D136CeE1c04727c188D91f8d4f7F7289d
23. Antonigrock - 0x38B476EC05E1e228611E5b76569D71A47fc7d6b7
24. tedotwijaya22 - 0x152A1Ba98FE767626DAAcFf00aD2A6540ea217e1
25. The clay - 0x8C88cb42766280454d20F90BBCaBC10E56CD397c
26. oleng12 - 0xaCc4Ce6e616850B474e02854eb1112353dAE2A2D
27. Shelacans - 0xF4F1E40CC4A7f16941c47a5DE71e53a1013c2AF0
28. Monkeybut - 0x09dBD32662627a0De3D56f58bfD88055A727f7DF
29. Chancunpay - 0x84A00BCd8E7B7427Afe6b878447b68ACE0e8d673
30. Injhagi - Red Trust 0x04953C32c8Df985A68C85B19E79fdD82171Ffb60
31. Tough fighters - Red Trust
32. AlexJCasas
33. Holdgeng - 0xC12FD039050c44f482954978Ea6cB51841D5C3c6
34. GarisKeras - Red Trust 0x1BE2A7CA40dbb2dd764a2c2DB99fD6e7bAae1d5B
35. Miwang22 - 0x4a0B98E044fA23A737cC3e8A024094eAD06388F9
36. Franche - 0x966b9f14801d6724831bbe93eD132eDF074a0C2d
37. Nakatami - 0xCF60cc2C19eDa3f9471C21a386431b3acC2DA60d
38. Jascov - 0xD82354f15bC3f8F6bA0180ee57351092611E55FF
39. Lazolaz - 0x9d0ab2D321e5EE78CA37cFb394Cc18a1f4c7b08C

Who's hiring those spammers? They're not in Hhampuz' spreadsheet.

Somebody with accounts to sacrifice for the sake of trolling Hhampuz, apparently. Lol.

It gives the accounts fake credibility overall and especially when applying to another signature campaign. However, whoever is the owner of those is completely retarded. They managed to ruin the accounts without accomplishing anything at all.

[memehunter]

If you're accusing somebody of something, which you appear to be doing, its on you to produce the evidence to back the accusation. If you can't do it with what's already available then you can't do it, and you don't have a solid accusation.

What are you talking about, this is not enough proof?

1.) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66200415#msg66200415

+

I find this explanation not convincing, if he was just checking there should not be so high percentage of AI detectors. It seems he is heavily using AI chatbots in his posts. And regarding his qualifications, I also have some (most of us do, I believe) but in his case it seems like an excuse to hide the obvious. 

2.)

I use GPT Chat to:
- Look up bibliographical references/reliable references
- Look up the meaning or significance of satire that uses ironic language that I'm unfamiliar with
- Double-check the chronology of events

The reason I prefer to search for references in GPT Chat is because it's more efficient and more comprehensive than asking on Google.

[Free Market Capitalist]

However, I don't use GPT Chat to answer a topic, let alone copy and paste from GPT Chat, as that would be highly inappropriate.

I use GPT Chat to:
- Look up bibliographical references/reliable references
- Look up the meaning or significance of satire that uses ironic language that I'm unfamiliar with
- Double-check the chronology of events

The latter is fine and according to current times but regarding the first sentence how do you explain this report?

Let's see more:

Banks, the stock market, and fiat money are the trio causing global economic chaos and are also the tools used by those at the top of the pyramid to siphon wealth from the bottom. These three are more than just economic infrastructure; combined with lobbying power, exclusive access, and policies prioritizing asset stability, they function as engines of wealth accumulation.

Banks disburse credit to purchase assets (supporting stock/real estate prices), the stock market passes profits on to capital owners, while monetary policy (fiat) fuels liquidity and low interest rates, creating a positive feedback loop that boosts asset prices and wealth accumulation at the top of the pyramid, while marginalizing the bottom (workers and MSMEs).

Banks exploit wealth through their role as creators and providers of credit, as well as gatekeepers of liquidity access and risk intermediaries. Easy access to low interest rates is provided for borrowers with collateral, while micro-entrepreneurs and consumer customers are subject to high interest rates, fees, minimum balance requirements, and penalties. So, small customers provide capital to banks. This results in an increase in the portion of national income derived from asset returns, even though the real sector and productivity are neglected. This makes the economy more vulnerable to crises and increases the wealth share of the top 3%.

The capital market plays a role in diverting profit flows and increasing company value to shareholders rather than to real investments or the labor sector, through a structure that provides information and ease of execution to large players. Unequal share ownership without equitable income distribution causes asset price inflation and does not reflect broader economic health. Pursuing EPS suppresses long-term investment, which impacts productivity in the real sector. This is evident in concentrated consumption among asset owners, while the bottom of the pyramid suffers from shortages.

Fiat money, through its monetary policies (QE, open market operations, money printing), affects asset prices differently from the prices of goods/services, resulting in the majority of monetized profits flowing to asset owners. When central banks print money to buy financial assets (bonds, MBS), asset prices rise. Asset owners experience capital gains, but they are slow and do not even affect real sectors such as wages and employment. Low interest rates encourage the purchase of risky assets, and speculation generates profits for the 3% due to rising asset prices. Asset inflation is easier and faster than wage inflation. The practice of manipulating/buffering exchange rates benefits large exporters or multinational corporations.

Copyleaks: 100% AI content found
Gptzero: 100% AI generated. Possible AI paraphrasing. We are highly confident this text was originally AI, but rewritten by AI or a human
Originality: 100% Confident That's AI

Another one:

Financial issues aren't just about income, but also about how we map, allocate, and discipline that cash flow. Many people think that those with small incomes don't need financial strategies and planning; they simply need to let their money flow as it is. However, the lower the income, the more important a money management system becomes, as the margin for allocation error becomes slimmer. Savings and investments don't need to be chosen one at a time; they need to be allocated based on priorities and proportions that align with our financial situation. Even small amounts can have a significant impact if implemented over the long term. Increasing desires can indeed make life difficult, but the key solution isn't avoiding them, but rather having a proper roadmap and financial management. Consistency without a strategy only leads to hard work without progress. What's needed is consistency, goals, structure (work smart).

Copyleaks: 100% AI content found
Gptzero: 63% AI generated. Possible AI paraphrasing. We are highly confident this text was originally AI, but rewritten by AI or a human
Originality: 100% Confident That's AI

At this point I think we don't need him showing "proof" of anything, we can safely say he is an AI spammer.

[TokenTikas]

The latter is fine and according to current times but regarding the first sentence how do you explain this report?

And added today more AI Post....

In budgeting and investment portfolios, there's no such thing as the best asset, but rather an asset that fulfills the right function. Gold, cash, and Bitcoin aren't competing assets, let alone mutually exclusive. Therefore, I reject the notion that one asset can solve all needs and problems.

In my opinion, the primary function of fiat is peace of mind and spirit. When we see a significant balance in our account, we feel calm. Furthermore, fiat is a source of emergency fund liquidity. A common mistake made by parents in the past was hoarding fiat in savings accounts, which inevitably lose value due to inflation. Meanwhile, many younger generations make the mistake of setting aside too little fiat, disrupting cash flow.

Gold is favored across generations because it protects our assets from inflation and financial, monetary, and even geopolitical crises such as war. Although gold has always been portrayed as a symbol of prosperity, it doesn't make us instantly rich. It's not an asset that's suited to growing and multiplying wealth, but it can act as a shield for our wealth.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin, despite its current high volatility, remains the most growth-friendly asset and a hedge against debasement. Assets that will dominate in the future so it requires a long time and trust in storing them.

The allocation of cash, gold, and bitcoin within a portfolio isn't based on past, present, and future considerations, but rather on their function, risk, and liquidity. Despite its long history, gold remains relevant today. Although a futuristic asset, it's already widely used. Meanwhile, fiat, despite being constantly eroded by inflation, remains important and necessary. Without sufficient fiat, we will panic-sell our assets and Bitcoin, even before the right time. Therefore, asset purchases, especially Bitcoin, must be cash flow-focused and moderate to maintain financial security.

Copyleaks: 100%, AI Phrases Detected
Undetectable.ai: 49%
Writing type: 100%AI

I agree with this. Many people misunderstand passive income. They hear descriptions and imagine it as prosperity and quiet, with money flowing in constantly. This view leads many to overestimate their expectations and start building passive income by searching for the most profitable businesses, often ending up victims of scams with the promise of tempting profits.

However, passive income needs to be built, requires effort that takes time and isn't instant. It requires discipline and a proper financial management structure. From my personal experience, I can only focus on building passive income when the economy is stable. When my active income is sufficient to cover monthly living expenses, with clear cash flow control, a 12-month emergency fund locked in, a sinking fund filled, a secure savings account, and some remaining, I have room to explore investment options and increase assets. One mistake many people make is a lack of financial stability.

Because my active income is from export trading, and two commodities are already passive income. So, for passive income, I developed it from my main business, such as:
- Becoming an investor for several exporters with a profit-sharing system specifically for exports with LC
- Building a YouTube channel about import and export
- Becoming an online consultant and mentor for new exporters
- Offering export and import consulting and management services in several countries of origin and destination

Little by little, I also started building productive assets by purchasing a relatively affordable terraced house with high demand among small and middle-class families. Initially, I was also interested in using the services of an experienced financial planner. However, from my initial perspective, most suggested passive income through deposits, bonds, insurance, and dividend-paying stocks, while my wife and I preferred property and semi-passive businesses where we could determine the details ourselves.

From my experience, I've found that passive income isn't zero-risk. Even small amounts of risk still exist. Don't forget that passive income comes from the assets we own, so we must maintain them regularly. One mistake many people make is thinking that passive income requires a large amount of capital. For example, through social media, a single video can potentially generate lifetime passive income. Or for those who are determined and have no history of heart disease or stroke, passive income can be built through productive debt (although I strongly advise against it).

Copyleaks: 100%, AI Phrases Detected.
Undetectable.ai: 43%
Writing type: 100%AI

From what I can see here, all the posts are written using AI. It’s surprising how an account with such a good rank is posting randomly like this using AI tools. Normally, the password of this account hasn’t been changed, but the style of the posts has clearly changed.

[HustleZ]

The User Furball808 was Tagged by @ABCbits for spreading false/fake/unhelpful information and that's Obvious Because how Can A user using Ai Who is so dumb who couldn't even share his thoughts without using Ai share helpful info???

Again, For the Ref

1.

How does investors think during the holidays? Don’t people start to buy gifts using bitcoin? Buy trip tickets using bitcoin? Or some may start taking profit as the end of the year approaches? But why is it that historically bitcoin has risen during this part of the year?

Extra/Bonus money may be directed towards bitcoin instead. Investors may be planning for future years and wants to start accumulating now before the new year comes.

Do you buy or sell bitcoin during the holidays?

Sapling Ai: 86.2%
Originality Ai: partially confident because the words aren't Enough...
GPTZero: 74.2%

2.

We all have different strategies while investing in bitcoin. We all invest in different times with different amounts based on what we can afford and our goals in a specific time. I saw people discussing how it feels good when bitcoin drops and it’s time for their usual DCA routine. DCA means buying when bitcoin is down and buying when bitcoin is up. It might be a little painful when one buys and the market is at the top because maybe they would want to buy more or they are fighting off the temptation of having to sell their bitcoins whe it’s doing so well. If you are doing DCA, how satisfying it is to buy bitcoin when it’s decling in price? Are you guys the success stories arter all?

Sapling Ai: 98.9%
Originality Ai: 86.2%
GPTZero: 74.2 %

3.

Gamblers can win in sports betting through meticulous analysis of a team, a player or a match from before. They can accurately predict how the game will go or how the game will end especially if they know the strategies based on other matches. However, why I say you can never win all the time with sports betting is because you are betting basically on humans. Humans are complex and sometimes difficult to make sense of. If a previous winner or champion loses today, it can be blamed to that he just had a bad day. Or he was in a bad headspace. Or maybe he’s past the prime. Maybe the competitor is just better. Whatever the reasons may be, it’s hard to predict those things because it comes and it goes.

Sapling Ai: 79.6%
Originality Ai: 73.6%
GPTZero: 78%

[JayJuanGee]

If you're accusing somebody of something, which you appear to be doing, its on you to produce the evidence to back the accusation. If you can't do it with what's already available then you can't do it, and you don't have a solid accusation.

What are you talking about, this is not enough proof?

1.) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66200415#msg66200415
+
I find this explanation not convincing, if he was just checking there should not be so high percentage of AI detectors. It seems he is heavily using AI chatbots in his posts. And regarding his qualifications, I also have some (most of us do, I believe) but in his case it seems like an excuse to hide the obvious.  
2.)

I use GPT Chat to:
- Look up bibliographical references/reliable references
- Look up the meaning or significance of satire that uses ironic language that I'm unfamiliar with
- Double-check the chronology of events
The reason I prefer to search for references in GPT Chat is because it's more efficient and more comprehensive than asking on Google.

Of course many of us, including yours truly, would prefer to not deal with the AI matter and/or review posts trying to differentiate between those merely using AI as a kind of filling in of the gaps or to help to sort out a few ideas versus those members who are posting while seeming to lift whole sections from AI without having much if any human intervention - except perhaps a few words changed here and there or maybe sentence order changes.. and of course the humanizing tools are attempting to carry out those tasks too.. so some of these guys might still not be even mentally engaging with the editing of their contents prior to hitting "post".

With your persistence, I looked at more of abhishakana's posts which brings me over to the side that more explanation from abhiseshakana is justified - even though, maybe guys do not necessarily need to explain exactly why they are tagging... especially the neutral tags are just alerting to the matter and perhaps allowing for some marking of so much work that some members might end up doing sifting through several suspect posts.

At the same time, yeah abhiseshakana gave some explanations that touches upon a few concerns, yet the overall essence seems to be leaning more towards abhiseshakana being a liar or an exaggerator.. since mere mortal humans would likely not say some of the things the way abhiseshakana says them and so there ends up being too much perfection. including that even the text is showing it to be AI and not even some traces of being humanized in the ways that abhiseshakana is describing himself to be doing... and yeah, maybe bot abhiseshakana is going to learn to make more imperfections in his posts so that he can come off as more human-like.. and yeah, maybe it remains difficult to achieve smoking gun evidence on some of these members and there are just senses that .. it all adds up to too much, even though guys are going to judge what is too much in differing ways ......

 I suppose many members who are tagging seem to have a reasonable amount of flexibility to remove their tags.. which is another dilemma.. since many times the tags are merely neutral.. so merely alerting to a potential problem or showing what might have been a pase practice of a member.. which then might lend concerns about how much time might pass before removing the "neutral" tag.. in the even that "neutral" seemed the most appropriate... .. I recognize also that guys end up spending a lot of time, merely going through their tags from time to time to figure out if some tags might be justifiably removed.. which then no longer alerts members to the sorted history of some of these low value posting habits...  

I have been criticized for not even being against low value posts especially if it seems that the are happening through real thinking since sometimes members say and think some pretty dumb shit, and I am not even claiming to be immuned from that.

And, I know some guys who are tagging get frustrated by how much effort is spent tagging and even showing evidence of reasonable inferences, while at the same time, some of the overly AI-reliant members do not seem to be easily deterred .. since I suppose many of the AI-reliant members already have systems in place for identifying threads and/or rapidly deploying some droning-on text responses, whether they are posting 30 times a day, 75 times a day or some other quantity that does not seem very easy to accomplish for an actual human..  

I recognize the ongoing arguments coming from the overly AI-reliant members suggesting that they are providing higher value due to their use of AI as compared with "regular humans," and surely there is likely some truth that a certain amount of use of AI could actually improve contents and substance and even help to make connections - since many of us likely get frustrated when we come across some posts that make a lot of good points, but then they fail to accurately portray certain facts that would end up changing the whole outcome and/or the reasonable direction of the post's contents - so AI could sometimes help to highlight when some of those basics are missing or that there might be logical incoherence with how the facts relate to the conclusion(s).  At the same time, many of us will likely continue to argue that a certain amount of actual human input is ongoingly required to make the contents actually valuable even if some of the sophistication of the arguments and facts might be inferior in several ways rather than superficially appearing to potentially be valuable while having almost no human input beyond potentially clever use of prompts. 

[HustleZ]

~snip~

For me, The issue isn't Using Ai here and there, it's when posts are mostly made from Ai and The user doesn't share 1 bit of knowledge and just solely depends on Ai. When someone is continuously posting Using Ai And no Human effort it becomes hard to not question it and if it Becomes normal and Accepted then it Becomes unfair for the people who take time to write big paragraphs and convey their points such as yours themselves.

Moreover, in this case the explanations from abiseskhana doesn't really add up . The posts contradicts his explanation of using Ai for "just references" or a little tweaking. The posts are Highly Ai generated Which suggests he uses to Ai to generated thoughts/knowledgeful replies as he isn't that able. I believe the real owner has lost access to his account or he really has given it to someone himself.

Ps: everyone would prefer to see imperfect Human posting than flawless Ai Shit.

[Free Market Capitalist]

With your persistence, I looked at more of abhishakana's posts which brings me over to the side that more explanation from abhiseshakana is justified - even though, maybe guys do not necessarily need to explain exactly why they are tagging... especially the neutral tags are just alerting to the matter and perhaps allowing for some marking of so much work that some members might end up doing sifting through several suspect posts.

Well, I beg to differ. If we add up this report, this one and this one we get 7 AI generated posts. But those are just a sample of his entire post history. If we ran more posts through the detectors, we would find more AI-generated posts for sure. As things stand, there is plenty of evidence to say that abhiseshakana is an AI spammer, following the rules proposed by nutildah, who tends to be rather conservative so we are on the safe side here.

I suppose many members who are tagging seem to have a reasonable amount of flexibility to remove their tags.. which is another dilemma.. since many times the tags are merely neutral.. so merely alerting to a potential problem or showing what might have been a pase practice of a member..

I'm not sure why, but the community started leaving neutral tags for AI spammers, and we do the same in almost all cases. However, I could understand red-tagging an AI spammer, especially if they participate in signature campaigns because, at the end of the day, they are breaking the rules to make money. I see a certain trading risk there.

which then might lend concerns about how much time might pass before removing the "neutral" tag..

In my case, it would be months of good behavior before I would consider removing it.

 
I recognize the ongoing arguments coming from the overly AI-reliant members suggesting that they are providing higher value due to their use of AI as compared with "regular humans," and surely there is likely some truth that a certain amount of use of AI could actually improve contents and substance...

It all depends on how it is used. AI is being used more and more every day, and this trend is set to continue. Copying and pasting what AI generates to publish your posts as if they were your own thoughts is not legitimate use. We all agree on that even though we have different views on AI.

[Karl_3000]

I suppose many members who are tagging seem to have a reasonable amount of flexibility to remove their tags.. which is another dilemma.. since many times the tags are merely neutral.. so merely alerting to a potential problem or showing what might have been a pase practice of a member..

I'm not sure why, but the community started leaving neutral tags for AI spammers, and we do the same in almost all cases. However, I could understand red-tagging an AI spammer, especially if they participate in signature campaigns because, at the end of the day, they are breaking the rules to make money. I see a certain trading risk there.

But why were most of the highly ranked members that were found guilty in the past not tagged at all? Many of them were left alone while the newbies or low ranked members are the ones that were tagged?

Any user that is in a campaign supposed to be tagged red if they are in a campaign, neutral tag is too mild as the punishment of their wrongdoings.