dddbtc
|
|
September 19, 2013, 11:56:40 PM |
|
Is the site down?
Yeah, just went down due to a bitcoind crash. Bringing it up now. Nice support and response time
|
|
|
|
doublec (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 20, 2013, 12:01:02 AM |
|
Yeah, just went down due to a bitcoind crash. Bringing it up now.
Back up now.
|
|
|
|
Lucko
|
|
September 21, 2013, 05:47:40 PM |
|
I've removed the two erroneous blocks from the system and put a note on the front page of the pool about it. I'll adjust the DGM payment amounts this weekend and comment here when done. I've put some logging and changes in place to track down where the double submission might be occurring.
Any news on recalculation? I've not finished it yet but I will complete it soon. ETA? I have account that I'm closing(new coins) and need to take BTC off it... I'm only waiting for this now...
|
|
|
|
dddbtc
|
|
September 22, 2013, 12:37:41 AM |
|
Yeah, just went down due to a bitcoind crash. Bringing it up now.
Back up now. http://mmpool.bitparking.com/user/nookupeousI've been mining for over 24hrs since my last withdraw and none of my paid shares have counted towards my BTC balance. Is everything functioning correctly? I'd hate to think my hashrate has been (mostly) going to waste.
|
|
|
|
doublec (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 22, 2013, 12:43:18 AM |
|
I've been mining for over 24hrs since my last withdraw and none of my paid shares have counted towards my BTC balance. Is everything functioning correctly? I'd hate to think my hashrate has been (mostly) going to waste.
BTC increases when a block is found. Note the 'Round Duration' on your page. It's over 24 hours. That's why you haven't had an increase - no blocks have been found in that 24 hours.
|
|
|
|
Izumi Konata
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
September 22, 2013, 01:09:05 AM |
|
I noticed you added more coins lately. (mining dev, ix and NMC 'sides BTC atm, but noticed i0coin and groupcoin getting added) I'd hate to have to payout all mined coins to make a new user every time you add new coins to mine though.
Any plans for giving old users a (one-time once introduced?) chance to add new coins to mine to their accounts? Or will I keep having to make a new account each time you add a new coin?
|
|
|
|
kjlimo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1031
|
|
September 22, 2013, 02:27:14 AM |
|
I noticed you added more coins lately. (mining dev, ix and NMC 'sides BTC atm, but noticed i0coin and groupcoin getting added) I'd hate to have to payout all mined coins to make a new user every time you add new coins to mine though.
Any plans for giving old users a (one-time once introduced?) chance to add new coins to mine to their accounts? Or will I keep having to make a new account each time you add a new coin?
I'm on my 7th account... not too hard to create a new one. But i suppose it might be "easier" if there was an option to add new addresses for new coins.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
September 22, 2013, 05:15:19 AM |
|
Yeah, just went down due to a bitcoind crash. Bringing it up now.
Back up now. http://mmpool.bitparking.com/user/nookupeousI've been mining for over 24hrs since my last withdraw and none of my paid shares have counted towards my BTC balance. Is everything functioning correctly? I'd hate to think my hashrate has been (mostly) going to waste. Round Duration 36:22:16
|
|
|
|
kjlimo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1031
|
|
September 22, 2013, 06:00:03 AM |
|
Yeah, just went down due to a bitcoind crash. Bringing it up now.
Back up now. http://mmpool.bitparking.com/user/nookupeousI've been mining for over 24hrs since my last withdraw and none of my paid shares have counted towards my BTC balance. Is everything functioning correctly? I'd hate to think my hashrate has been (mostly) going to waste. Round Duration 36:22:16 painful, but it's aight, we'll have good luck again soon enough
|
|
|
|
SebastianJu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
|
|
September 22, 2013, 12:22:44 PM |
|
Whats the reason that every found block that only took a couple minutes to find is thrown away? Should i believe that everytime another miner was faster? I mean we found a block and always its too late? Why doesnt this happen with blocks found after a longer time? If other miners were faster to propagate then blocks that took longer should be lost too. But its only the fast blocks. I dont see the logic behind. And when this pool has a bad connection to the network, so that other miners can propagate faster... why not change this? Im not sure what to think about this.
|
Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
|
|
|
doublec (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 22, 2013, 12:47:14 PM |
|
Whats the reason that every found block that only took a couple minutes to find is thrown away? Should i believe that everytime another miner was faster? I mean we found a block and always its too late? Why doesnt this happen with blocks found after a longer time? If other miners were faster to propagate then blocks that took longer should be lost too. But its only the fast blocks. I dont see the logic behind. And when this pool has a bad connection to the network, so that other miners can propagate faster... why not change this? Im not sure what to think about this.
Those short blocks aren't found. It's a bug in the pool software I'm using that occasionally reports a double finding of a block. I'm trying to track it down. If you read the thread on the HHTT pool they're having the same issue (I use the same software as them in the backend for Stratum users).
|
|
|
|
SebastianJu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
|
|
September 22, 2013, 02:51:50 PM |
|
Whats the reason that every found block that only took a couple minutes to find is thrown away? Should i believe that everytime another miner was faster? I mean we found a block and always its too late? Why doesnt this happen with blocks found after a longer time? If other miners were faster to propagate then blocks that took longer should be lost too. But its only the fast blocks. I dont see the logic behind. And when this pool has a bad connection to the network, so that other miners can propagate faster... why not change this? Im not sure what to think about this.
Those short blocks aren't found. It's a bug in the pool software I'm using that occasionally reports a double finding of a block. I'm trying to track it down. If you read the thread on the HHTT pool they're having the same issue (I use the same software as them in the backend for Stratum users). Ok. Thanks for the answer.
|
Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
|
|
|
davmow
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:26:12 AM |
|
I need help setting this up with guiminer, can anybody help?
|
|
|
|
kjlimo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1031
|
|
September 23, 2013, 04:30:17 AM |
|
I need help setting this up with guiminer, can anybody help?
sent you my e-mail via PM
|
|
|
|
Lucko
|
|
September 23, 2013, 06:19:20 PM |
|
I'm sorry for being such a pain in a backside but I would like to take BTC out of my old accaunt(new coins) but I can't do that till you make recalculations. Any ETA?
Or is there a way you would merge accounts they have same BTC address so it should not be a problem...
|
|
|
|
doublec (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 24, 2013, 01:59:50 PM |
|
I'm sorry for being such a pain in a backside but I would like to take BTC out of my old accaunt(new coins) but I can't do that till you make recalculations. Any ETA?
Sorry about the delay, I've be waiting until I've found and resolved the issue so I can do a one time correction. Unfortunately it happened again last night so now I've put in code to attempt to detect the issue when it happens and autocorrect. This means going forward the bug, while still existant, won't have an effect. Now that that's done I'll revisit the uncorrected blocks and do a fixup. What I'll probably end up doing is a btc payment to all the affected accounts based on the affect the extra blocks had.
|
|
|
|
kjlimo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1031
|
|
September 24, 2013, 02:11:02 PM |
|
I'm sorry for being such a pain in a backside but I would like to take BTC out of my old accaunt(new coins) but I can't do that till you make recalculations. Any ETA?
Sorry about the delay, I've be waiting until I've found and resolved the issue so I can do a one time correction. Unfortunately it happened again last night so now I've put in code to attempt to detect the issue when it happens and autocorrect. This means going forward the bug, while still existant, won't have an effect. Now that that's done I'll revisit the uncorrected blocks and do a fixup. What I'll probably end up doing is a btc payment to all the affected accounts based on the affect the extra blocks had. thanks for the update! Keep up the awesome!
|
|
|
|
HotSwap
|
|
September 27, 2013, 11:12:20 PM |
|
Any thoughts of user diff for 120Gh/s? I have it running at d=12 at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Krak
|
|
September 27, 2013, 11:27:38 PM |
|
Any thoughts of user diff for 120Gh/s? I have it running at d=12 at the moment.
120/1.4=~86 Round that to 64 or 128 if you prefer going by factors of 2.
|
BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
|
|
|
HotSwap
|
|
September 27, 2013, 11:31:04 PM |
|
Any thoughts of user diff for 120Gh/s? I have it running at d=12 at the moment.
120/1.4=~86 Round that to 64 or 128 if you prefer going by factors of 2. Can I ask what the 1.4 is? just trying to understand it all. Thanks for the info!
|
|
|
|
|