Lucko
|
|
November 02, 2013, 07:43:24 PM |
|
2013-09-12: Block id's 381 and 367 in the block statistics page are no longer listed as these blocks were not actually found at all. A pool bug due to double submission of successful blocks in certain circumstances is the cause of this. I've removed the blocks so they don't get paid and will manually adjust the DGM calculation this weekend so no user is affected by it. I'm tracking down the cause of the issue.
Still not solved... I'm not sure if you can recalculate DMG at this point...
|
|
|
|
KrLos
|
|
November 02, 2013, 08:41:10 PM |
|
2013-09-12: Block id's 381 and 367 in the block statistics page are no longer listed as these blocks were not actually found at all. A pool bug due to double submission of successful blocks in certain circumstances is the cause of this. I've removed the blocks so they don't get paid and will manually adjust the DGM calculation this weekend so no user is affected by it. I'm tracking down the cause of the issue.
Still not solved... I'm not sure if you can recalculate DMG at this point...
Those are old blocks, latest block is #437, check: http://mmpool.bitparking.com/blockstats
|
|
|
|
Lucko
|
|
November 02, 2013, 09:05:28 PM |
|
Yes that is why I'm asking when recalculation will happen and if it is still possible... Since "will manually adjust the DGM calculation this weekend so no user is affected by it" was long time ago but we are still affected...
|
|
|
|
helipotte
|
|
November 03, 2013, 04:40:34 PM |
|
The strange hashrate difference is happening again. Been monitoring it for about an hour. I have low rejects and HW errors but pool is reporting hashrate to be about 15%-20% lower than actual. I first saw this happening about a week ago. Will this loss of hashrate affect round payout? Could the pool operators perhaps shine some light on this?
|
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
November 04, 2013, 07:01:12 AM |
|
Blockchain isn't always sure, it's very inaccurate
|
|
|
|
KrLos
|
|
November 04, 2013, 07:36:03 AM |
|
Blockchain isn't always sure, it's very inaccurate
Thanks... but i tought that blockchain info gets his information through the blockchain, so it's different? I'm kindda disapointed of blockchain.info
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
November 04, 2013, 07:43:21 AM |
|
No it guesses Pools don't own blocks, blockchain guesses by ip Don't be disappointed it's just a bonus metric
|
|
|
|
kjlimo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1031
|
|
November 04, 2013, 01:29:23 PM |
|
No it guesses Pools don't own blocks, blockchain guesses by ip Don't be disappointed it's just a bonus metric
Is there a way to crowd source information, so the pools could add info to the blockchain.info system? That could create more misinformation than information (especially with plenty of people trying to not own btcs), but I wasn't sure if this functionality existed.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
November 04, 2013, 01:32:32 PM |
|
You can add public permanent massages in transactions Check out the fbi silkroad seizure address
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
November 04, 2013, 01:36:18 PM |
|
Blocks are harder to correlate because they are virgin coins, no transactions Blockchain looks the relay ip which should be the pool since they stay very peered but another pool could relay it to blockchain first Ips can change Blocks are as anonymous as you can get There's no need to track them A pool tagging them like p2pool does do can get them attacked and forked
|
|
|
|
BitCrawler
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
November 04, 2013, 04:19:33 PM |
|
Are there any statistics on how profitable mining at bitparking is? How much more income does merged mining deliver? Are we talking about 0.1%, 1% or 10%?
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
November 04, 2013, 04:25:20 PM |
|
Calculate the nmc value and their ratio. The others are like 0%
|
|
|
|
kjlimo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1031
|
|
November 04, 2013, 04:31:51 PM |
|
Are there any statistics on how profitable mining at bitparking is? How much more income does merged mining deliver? Are we talking about 0.1%, 1% or 10%?
It's been less than 1% recently; however, in the past, it's been as high as 3-5%.
|
|
|
|
kjlimo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1031
|
|
November 04, 2013, 06:31:22 PM |
|
1900 pankkake> !exchange 1900 mmbot> NMC is 0.00246301 BTC per NMC at Vircurex, we earn 63.9831667836 NMC per bitcoin block = 0.15759117962 BTC or 0.63% additional BTC per block 1900 mmbot> IXC is 4.926e-05 BTC per IXC at Vircurex, we earn 231.595591697 IXC per bitcoin block = 0.011408398847 BTC or 0.05% additional BTC per block 1900 mmbot> I0C is 2.032e-05 BTC per I0C at Vircurex, we earn 358.838041402 I0C per bitcoin block = 0.0072915890013 BTC or 0.03% additional BTC per block 1900 mmbot> DVC is 2.5e-07 BTC per DVC at Vircurex, we earn 12062.2704009 DVC per bitcoin block = 0.00301556760022 BTC or 0.01% additional BTC per block 1900 mmbot> Total extra BTC per block is 0.179306735068 or 0.72% extra income
Nice summary!
|
|
|
|
KrLos
|
|
November 05, 2013, 04:31:26 AM |
|
Hash Rate (GH/s) 15640.88
|
|
|
|
kjlimo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1031
|
|
November 05, 2013, 02:36:27 PM |
|
Hash Rate (GH/s) 15640.88
Block expected time: 29.8 Hours At new difficulty: 39 hours (ouch). Variance gonna continue to grow
|
|
|
|
KrLos
|
|
November 07, 2013, 04:31:57 AM |
|
Hash Rate (GH/s) 17079.12
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
November 07, 2013, 11:01:29 AM |
|
2 today!
|
|
|
|
kjlimo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1031
|
|
November 07, 2013, 06:09:46 PM |
|
2 today!
Woohooo! It's days like to today that remind me why Ideal with the 40-70 hour blocks, haha.
|
|
|
|
|