Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 01:54:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [9 TH] Bitparking Pool, DGM 0%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining  (Read 163657 times)
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 02, 2013, 07:43:24 PM
 #1361

2013-09-12: Block id's 381 and 367 in the block statistics page are no longer listed as these blocks were not actually found at all. A pool bug due to double submission of successful blocks in certain circumstances is the cause of this. I've removed the blocks so they don't get paid and will manually adjust the DGM calculation this weekend so no user is affected by it. I'm tracking down the cause of the issue.

Still not solved... I'm not sure if you can recalculate DMG at this point...
1714917249
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714917249

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714917249
Reply with quote  #2

1714917249
Report to moderator
1714917249
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714917249

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714917249
Reply with quote  #2

1714917249
Report to moderator
1714917249
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714917249

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714917249
Reply with quote  #2

1714917249
Report to moderator
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
KrLos
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 768
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 02, 2013, 08:41:10 PM
 #1362

2013-09-12: Block id's 381 and 367 in the block statistics page are no longer listed as these blocks were not actually found at all. A pool bug due to double submission of successful blocks in certain circumstances is the cause of this. I've removed the blocks so they don't get paid and will manually adjust the DGM calculation this weekend so no user is affected by it. I'm tracking down the cause of the issue.

Still not solved... I'm not sure if you can recalculate DMG at this point...

Those are old blocks, latest block is #437, check:

http://mmpool.bitparking.com/blockstats
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 02, 2013, 09:05:28 PM
 #1363

Yes that is why I'm asking when recalculation will happen and if it is still possible... Since "will manually adjust the DGM calculation this weekend so no user is affected by it" was long time ago but we are still affected...
helipotte
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 650
Merit: 500


Pick and place? I need more coffee.


View Profile
November 03, 2013, 04:40:34 PM
 #1364

The strange hashrate difference is happening again.  Been monitoring it for about an hour.  I have low rejects and HW errors but pool is reporting hashrate to be about 15%-20% lower than actual.  I first saw this happening about a week ago.  Will this loss of hashrate affect round payout?

Could the pool operators perhaps shine some light on this? Huh
KrLos
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 768
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 04, 2013, 04:51:32 AM
 #1365

Hello, i have a question...

Why in https://blockchain.info/es/blocks/Bitparking says that the pool have founded 3 blocks 03/11/2013

And

http://mmpool.bitparking.com/blockstats says that in the same day we just founded 1?

can someone explain it to me?.
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
November 04, 2013, 07:01:12 AM
 #1366

Blockchain isn't always sure, it's very inaccurate

KrLos
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 768
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 04, 2013, 07:36:03 AM
 #1367

Blockchain isn't always sure, it's very inaccurate

Thanks... but i tought that blockchain info gets his information through the blockchain, so it's different?

I'm kindda disapointed of blockchain.info
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
November 04, 2013, 07:43:21 AM
 #1368

No it guesses
Pools don't own blocks, blockchain guesses by ip
Don't be disappointed it's just a bonus metric

kjlimo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1031


View Profile WWW
November 04, 2013, 01:29:23 PM
 #1369

No it guesses
Pools don't own blocks, blockchain guesses by ip
Don't be disappointed it's just a bonus metric

Is there a way to crowd source information, so the pools could add info to the blockchain.info system? 

That could create more misinformation than information (especially with plenty of people trying to not own btcs), but I wasn't sure if this functionality existed.

Coinbase for selling BTCs
Fold for spending BTCs
PM me with any questions on these sites/apps!  http://www.montybitcoin.com


or Vircurex for trading alt cryptocurrencies like DOGEs
CoinNinja for exploring the blockchain.
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
November 04, 2013, 01:32:32 PM
 #1370

You can add public permanent massages in transactions
Check out the fbi silkroad seizure address

bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
November 04, 2013, 01:36:18 PM
 #1371

Blocks are harder to correlate because they are virgin coins, no transactions
Blockchain looks the relay ip which should be the pool since they stay very peered but another pool could relay it to blockchain first
Ips can change
Blocks are as anonymous as you can get
There's no need to track them
A pool tagging them like p2pool does do can get them attacked and forked

BitCrawler
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 04, 2013, 04:19:33 PM
 #1372

Are there any statistics on how profitable mining at bitparking is? How much more income does merged mining deliver? Are we talking about 0.1%, 1% or 10%?
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
November 04, 2013, 04:25:20 PM
 #1373

Calculate the nmc value and their ratio. The others are like 0%

kjlimo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1031


View Profile WWW
November 04, 2013, 04:31:51 PM
 #1374

Are there any statistics on how profitable mining at bitparking is? How much more income does merged mining deliver? Are we talking about 0.1%, 1% or 10%?

It's been less than 1% recently; however, in the past, it's been as high as 3-5%.

Coinbase for selling BTCs
Fold for spending BTCs
PM me with any questions on these sites/apps!  http://www.montybitcoin.com


or Vircurex for trading alt cryptocurrencies like DOGEs
CoinNinja for exploring the blockchain.
kjlimo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1031


View Profile WWW
November 04, 2013, 06:31:22 PM
 #1375

Code:
1900 pankkake> !exchange
1900 mmbot> NMC is 0.00246301 BTC per NMC at Vircurex, we earn 63.9831667836
            NMC per bitcoin block = 0.15759117962 BTC or 0.63% additional BTC
            per block
1900 mmbot> IXC is 4.926e-05 BTC per IXC at Vircurex, we earn 231.595591697 IXC
            per bitcoin block = 0.011408398847 BTC or 0.05% additional BTC per
            block
1900 mmbot> I0C is 2.032e-05 BTC per I0C at Vircurex, we earn 358.838041402 I0C
            per bitcoin block = 0.0072915890013 BTC or 0.03% additional BTC per
            block
1900 mmbot> DVC is 2.5e-07 BTC per DVC at Vircurex, we earn 12062.2704009 DVC
            per bitcoin block = 0.00301556760022 BTC or 0.01% additional BTC
            per block
1900 mmbot> Total extra BTC per block is 0.179306735068 or 0.72% extra income

Nice summary!

Coinbase for selling BTCs
Fold for spending BTCs
PM me with any questions on these sites/apps!  http://www.montybitcoin.com


or Vircurex for trading alt cryptocurrencies like DOGEs
CoinNinja for exploring the blockchain.
KrLos
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 768
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 04:31:26 AM
 #1376

Hash Rate (GH/s)          15640.88
kjlimo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1031


View Profile WWW
November 05, 2013, 02:36:27 PM
 #1377

Hash Rate (GH/s)          15640.88

Block expected time: 29.8 Hours

At new difficulty: 39 hours (ouch).  Variance gonna continue to grow Sad

Coinbase for selling BTCs
Fold for spending BTCs
PM me with any questions on these sites/apps!  http://www.montybitcoin.com


or Vircurex for trading alt cryptocurrencies like DOGEs
CoinNinja for exploring the blockchain.
KrLos
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 768
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 07, 2013, 04:31:57 AM
 #1378

Hash Rate (GH/s)       17079.12
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
November 07, 2013, 11:01:29 AM
 #1379

2 today!

kjlimo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1031


View Profile WWW
November 07, 2013, 06:09:46 PM
 #1380

2 today!

Woohooo!  It's days like to today that remind me why  Ideal with the 40-70 hour blocks, haha.

Coinbase for selling BTCs
Fold for spending BTCs
PM me with any questions on these sites/apps!  http://www.montybitcoin.com


or Vircurex for trading alt cryptocurrencies like DOGEs
CoinNinja for exploring the blockchain.
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!