sorryforthat
|
|
June 02, 2014, 06:24:50 AM |
|
When will a pool be ready and what is needed for it to be finalized?
|
|
|
|
Vorksholk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1713
Merit: 1029
|
|
June 02, 2014, 06:25:49 AM |
|
Is anyone currently working on a GUI of some sort?
|
|
|
|
Cohle
|
|
June 02, 2014, 07:20:21 AM |
|
Is there progress on the base GUI (as per the roadmap)?
|
|
|
|
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
|
|
June 02, 2014, 08:05:55 AM |
|
Ok its up and running... I've tested all i can without any BBR ... someone be the first! Thanks, Richie Thank you!
|
|
|
|
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
|
|
June 02, 2014, 08:18:04 AM |
|
Anyone else getting this error while trying to transfer?
Error: transaction <1edab0d63b5c19af30aa0a36b850ff3535fd883f3332b0627837c140aa44da60> was rejected by daemon with status "Failed"
I tried rebuilding and still getting the same error. This is the error message in the daemon.
2014-Jun-02 03:30:17.816807 [RPC0]Transaction verification failed: <dac3116a58bb59548bf0e155f3c174edfdd485ca584c52c7fb1b162d0be429a1> 2014-Jun-02 03:30:17.816968 [RPC0][on_send_raw_tx]: Failed to process tx 2014-Jun-02 03:31:04.975187 [RPC1]transaction is too big for current transaction flow, tx_id: <67afa7a671e0e4436fc508ebe0a29971f8b47d576341cce9602e327093458d4a>
What software version ? How much coins you have tried to send? You can PM me if you want.
|
|
|
|
sdersdf2
|
|
June 02, 2014, 11:16:52 AM |
|
Is this just a pump and dump coin, or does the dev/community have long-term plans for this coin?
|
|
|
|
|
nakaone
|
|
June 02, 2014, 11:20:31 AM |
|
this is the most funniest price I have ever seen on a project
is it THAT profitable to mine?
|
|
|
|
superresistant
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1131
|
|
June 02, 2014, 11:36:06 AM |
|
Is this just a pump and dump coin, or does the dev/community have long-term plans for this coin?
Dev/community doesn't give a shit about the price. It only matter the long term.
|
|
|
|
eddywise
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 253
Merit: 250
Let's Boolberry
|
|
June 02, 2014, 12:21:41 PM |
|
|
Boolberry : @eddywise DRK: XqTbkj1hpCWBpBSvbWtzBRu5PxzJ2KoA3F BTC: 1FZYvzY4cPLwwZmU8rGPM7xGYjfjiZUmuZ Once desperately want, now desperate to forget
|
|
|
emontmon
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
|
|
June 02, 2014, 12:45:08 PM |
|
this is the most funniest price I have ever seen on a project
is it THAT profitable to mine?
That's the funniest fud. Do you have a point in leaving the Darkcoin thread
|
|
|
|
pttx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
June 02, 2014, 01:29:15 PM |
|
Anyone else getting this error while trying to transfer?
Error: transaction <1edab0d63b5c19af30aa0a36b850ff3535fd883f3332b0627837c140aa44da60> was rejected by daemon with status "Failed"
I tried rebuilding and still getting the same error. This is the error message in the daemon.
2014-Jun-02 03:30:17.816807 [RPC0]Transaction verification failed: <dac3116a58bb59548bf0e155f3c174edfdd485ca584c52c7fb1b162d0be429a1> 2014-Jun-02 03:30:17.816968 [RPC0][on_send_raw_tx]: Failed to process tx 2014-Jun-02 03:31:04.975187 [RPC1]transaction is too big for current transaction flow, tx_id: <67afa7a671e0e4436fc508ebe0a29971f8b47d576341cce9602e327093458d4a>
What software version ? How much coins you have tried to send? You can PM me if you want. Build from latest github update on osx. Was trying to send 10k, but smaller transactions seems to work.
|
|
|
|
luckykitty
|
|
June 02, 2014, 01:39:51 PM |
|
When we can have a pool?
|
|
|
|
emontmon
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
|
|
June 02, 2014, 02:02:07 PM |
|
When we can have a pool?
if decentralization is important, why is a pool necessary?
|
|
|
|
luckykitty
|
|
June 02, 2014, 02:34:57 PM |
|
Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?
|
|
|
|
Anotheranonlol
|
|
June 02, 2014, 02:47:21 PM |
|
Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?
Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments.
|
|
|
|
luckykitty
|
|
June 02, 2014, 03:07:43 PM |
|
Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?
Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments. So the entir BBR network is working like a pool?
|
|
|
|
Anotheranonlol
|
|
June 02, 2014, 03:16:01 PM |
|
Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?
Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments. So the entir BBR network is working like a pool? No. Everyone is solo-mining. there is no pool launched yet.
|
|
|
|
emontmon
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
|
|
June 02, 2014, 03:17:01 PM |
|
Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?
Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments. i understand peoples' want for immediate gratification. but if decentralization is key and important for cryptocurrenciees, shouldn't brain function supersede emotional needs. 1. 5 days full block is better than little payments at this stage. 2. no centralization issues. one pool getting control. is not number 2 extremely important.
|
|
|
|
dga
|
|
June 02, 2014, 03:31:42 PM |
|
Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?
Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments. i understand peoples' want for immediate gratification. but if decentralization is key and important for cryptocurrenciees, shouldn't brain function supersede emotional needs. 1. 5 days full block is better than little payments at this stage. 2. no centralization issues. one pool getting control. is not number 2 extremely important. A good way to address this would be to get a standalone miner that can mine into the wallet (as works well in bitcoin), instead of just pools. That would enable people to run one wallet and have many miners, instead of running many copies of the wallet. In general, the standalone miners are easier to compile and run, and work on a wider variety of systems. (And, while it may be less of an issue for BBR, for other CN* coins, one wallet will use less network bandwidth than many).
|
|
|
|
|