[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency

[JuanHungLo]

Here new monero pool: http://xmr.foreverpoo.org with solid dedicated server. Please add this pool in your monero pool list!

I hope that wasn't a Freudian slip.   

[1714217256]

1714217256

[1714217256]

1714217256

[1714217256]

1714217256

[1714217256]

1714217256

[Hueristic]

Here new monero pool: http://xmr.foreverpoo.org with solid dedicated server. Please add this pool in your monero pool list!

I hope that wasn't a Freudian slip.   

Lol better than a squirting dedicated server I guess.

Hide E Ho!

[pehoko]

Never saw such a crappy wallet as monero ... shame.

[owlcatz]

Never saw such a crappy wallet as monero ... shame.

Riiiiight.... Run along now, I think dash is calling you?

[kitsune80]

ahaha sorry i have loose my L http://xmr.foreverpool.org 

[Hueristic]

ahaha sorry i have loose my L http://xmr.foreverpool.org 

Code:

Our Pool
Hash Rate: 0.00 H/sec
Block Found: Never
Connected Miners: 0
Total Fee: 1.2 %
Block Found Every: Infinity years (est.)

There are a few things wrong here that you might want to address.

[zef316]

Well this is Moero XMR is really surprising me. I was trying to make maximum but I dont have resources so i was start mining this through minergate slowly and this is giving me some nice short payouts. I will use GPU in near future soon to increase the limit and payouts..

[GingerAle]

Well this is Moero XMR is really surprising me. I was trying to make maximum but I dont have resources so i was start mining this through minergate slowly and this is giving me some nice short payouts. I will use GPU in near future soon to increase the limit and payouts..

Please don't use minergate. Minergate is evil and will destroy monero.

[M5M400]

ahaha sorry i have loose my L http://xmr.foreverpool.org 

I'll add it to the list on moneropoo(l)s.com - where's the pool located?

[bitebits]

ahaha sorry i have loose my L http://xmr.foreverpool.org 

I'll add it to the list on moneropoo(l)s.com - where's the pool located?

UK London it seems (138.68.147.156)

[crysx]

Well this is Moero XMR is really surprising me. I was trying to make maximum but I dont have resources so i was start mining this through minergate slowly and this is giving me some nice short payouts. I will use GPU in near future soon to increase the limit and payouts..

Please don't use minergate. Minergate is evil and will destroy monero.

do you have a link to them? ...

id like to see please ...

#crysx

[BoscoMurray]

Monero mentioned in the UK financial news: http://moneyweek.com/bitcoin-has-further-to-go/

[ocminer]

I've added direct mining to Poloniex payment ids to https://xmr.suprnova.cc as well now

[phoenix rises]

Can anyone explain to me why several high fee (0.1-0.15) RingCT tx's, that did not look abnormal, sat in the mempool for over an hour unconfirmed, while lower fee (.025 ish) similar looking RingCT tx's got processed in front of them and 5 empty blocks were mined?

Unless I am missing something, this seems highly irratonal as far as miners are concerned, and suboptimal in terms of how the network is performing. It was my understanding that that there was such  thing as 'fee priority', but in this instance that does not appear to be the case / is not working as it should.

The tx's concerned were eventually mined in blocks 1226464 and 1226465, and the first 3 characters of the ones i was watching were 230, 2ac, d76 and 56c. The latter was mined in 1226465 and had a fee of 0.15 for a size of 14kb, the others in 1226464 with a fee of 0.1 and sizes of 13kb. Input/output were 2/2,9/2,3/2 and 6/2 respectively.

http://blox.supportxmr.com/block/1226464
http://blox.supportxmr.com/block/1226465

http://imgur.com/8EvtEss - mempool screenshot

Looking forward to an explanation that will deepen my understanding of how the network functions

Thanks

Edited to add more details

[M5M400]

Can anyone explain to me why several high fee (0.1-0.15) RingCT tx's, that did not look abnormal, sat in the mempool for over an hour unconfirmed, while lower fee (.025 ish) similar looking RingCT tx's got processed in front of them and 5 empty blocks were mined?

Unless I am missing something, this seems highly irratonal as far as miners are concerned, and suboptimal in terms of how the network is performing. It was my understanding that that there was such  thing as 'fee priority', but in this instance that does not appear to be the case / is not working as it should.

The tx's concerned were eventually mined in blocks 1226464 and 1226465, and the first 3 characters of the ones i was watching were 230, 2ac, d76 and 56c. The latter was mined in 1226465 and had a fee of 0.15 for a size of 14kb, the others in 1226464 with a fee of 0.1 and sizes of 13kb. Input/output were 2/2,9/2,3/2 and 6/2 respectively.

http://blox.supportxmr.com/block/1226464
http://blox.supportxmr.com/block/1226465

http://imgur.com/8EvtEss - mempool screenshot

Looking forward to an explanation that will deepen my understanding of how the network functions

Thanks

Edited to add more details

I can't answer it, but I would love to see that question posted on /r/monero

[phoenix rises]

<snip>

I can't answer it, but I would love to see that question posted on /r/monero

By all means, go ahead and cross post it - I'm not signed up over there yet

[jwinterm]

<snip>

I can't answer it, but I would love to see that question posted on /r/monero

By all means, go ahead and cross post it - I'm not signed up over there yet

Even better post on monero.stackexchange.com

[bizzyb]

Dear Monero community

We are happy to announce the launch of our first app, Forex Trading, on our crypto portal www.MUEX.io

You can deposit MONERO now and receive 100% bonus on your initial deposit to spot trade forex!

Please do check out our ANN here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1756784

Thanks & good luck

[phoenix rises]

<snip>

I can't answer it, but I would love to see that question posted on /r/monero

Even better post on monero.stackexchange.com

Done and done  

http://monero.stackexchange.com/questions/3398/how-do-fees-affect-tx-priority-and-how-did-these-specific-high-fee-txs-sit-unco

Not appearing on reddit yet but here is the link (is that normal for new accounts ??)

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/5oq3ws/how_do_fees_affect_tx_priority_and_how_did_these/

Edit: There now

[AngryDwarf]

Hi,

I'm new to cryptonote technology. I use a dual boot computer, so with some bitcoin type wallets I install the blockchain/wallet on an NTFS partition so I can share them between O/S.
With monero, this seems to cause a few issues. Firstly, the monero daemon on first start up throws up a warning which either seems windows or linux based, possibly due to the p2pstate.bin poolstate.bin files. Restarting in the same O/S and the issue disappears. Secondly, it would seem that the wallet files are incompatible, throwing up a memory allocation error while trying to open the wallet.
I've decided to use separate blockchain daemons on each O/S, but would like to find a way to share the wallet. Would it be possible to have one wallet files in windows, and set up a duplicate wallet file in linux using the following: https://getmonero.org/knowledge-base/user-guides/restore_account ?