BTCN-dev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 12, 2018, 04:56:33 PM |
|
Price & Maket Cap update : July 12, 2018
Price : 0,01957370 BTC (-0,20%) Market Cap : 317 449 BTC
|
|
|
|
pönde
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 12, 2018, 07:47:18 PM |
|
That openledger seems interesting. But how can it be decentralized exchange, once I log in to a site, instead running a wallet on my own machine?
Atomic wallet is such. I just downloaded it. It does not yet support Monero, even at their main page in looks like does. What is going on? At atomic wallet the atomic swaps are now available between BTC, LTC and QTUM. Have you tried about these? How have they been dealing? Will be wonderful, once we will get rid of centralized exchanges.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 12, 2018, 09:43:16 PM |
|
That openledger seems interesting. But how can it be decentralized exchange, once I log in to a site, instead running a wallet on my own machine?
The actual exchange part is decentralized (you can make trades by interacting directly with the blockchain) but custody of assets is not.
|
|
|
|
pönde
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 12, 2018, 09:58:07 PM |
|
That openledger seems interesting. But how can it be decentralized exchange, once I log in to a site, instead running a wallet on my own machine?
The actual exchange part is decentralized (you can make trades by interacting directly with the blockchain) but custody of assets is not. Ok. Great. Does it use atomic swaps to do the trade? Are there any other applications, wallets or sites which connect to this decentralized exchange? Is there any open interface for it? More users would definitely bring more volume.
|
|
|
|
bones261
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 12, 2018, 10:02:27 PM |
|
That openledger seems interesting. But how can it be decentralized exchange, once I log in to a site, instead running a wallet on my own machine?
The actual exchange part is decentralized (you can make trades by interacting directly with the blockchain) but custody of assets is not. Ok. Great. Does it use atomic swaps to do the trade? Are there any other applications, wallets or sites which connect to this decentralized exchange? Is there any open interface for it? More users would definitely bring more volume. They convert your coin to a Bitshare's tokens. When you run their app or the web page, you are actually running a Bitshare's wallet.
|
|
|
|
legday
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2018, 12:15:02 AM |
|
Are there any plans in near future to add monero on ledger nano s? Is there any specific reason why CN based coins don't have ledger support?
|
|
|
|
theleaf
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2018, 05:44:22 AM |
|
Are there any plans in near future to add monero on ledger nano s? Is there any specific reason why CN based coins don't have ledger support?
is it because of the monero rings, privacy features that make it hard to add Monero to ledger and trezor? Will Monero be added to Trezor?
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2018, 05:54:28 AM |
|
Are there any plans in near future to add monero on ledger nano s? Is there any specific reason why CN based coins don't have ledger support?
is it because of the monero rings, privacy features that make it hard to add Monero to ledger and trezor? Will Monero be added to Trezor?
|
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2018, 10:46:39 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
irwanjabryg
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2018, 11:37:06 AM |
|
I have a theoretical question.Suppose a coin (could be Monero, or could be something else) requires 20 confirmations everywhere (exchanges, merchants, whatever). Suppose this coin also had an update that refused to accept alternate chains deeper than 19 blocks ago. That would, in theory, kill the 51% issue, right? What would the downsides be?
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Miners
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 440
Merit: 100
Roobet
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2018, 05:38:14 PM |
|
I have a theoretical question.Suppose a coin (could be Monero, or could be something else) requires 20 confirmations everywhere (exchanges, merchants, whatever). Suppose this coin also had an update that refused to accept alternate chains deeper than 19 blocks ago. That would, in theory, kill the 51% issue, right? What would the downsides be?
I would prefer to experience my transactions with longer confirmations because the transactional procedures will become more secure and can better prevent Replay Attacks, Double Spend Attacks.
Faster transaction speeds are not always means it's better and can bring more secured transactional services for users.
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 5241
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2018, 12:40:02 AM |
|
I have a theoretical question.Suppose a coin (could be Monero, or could be something else) requires 20 confirmations everywhere (exchanges, merchants, whatever). Suppose this coin also had an update that refused to accept alternate chains deeper than 19 blocks ago. That would, in theory, kill the 51% issue, right? What would the downsides be?
Which scam fork you asking this for? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) thx, any critical reason to update or is this a scheduled one?
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
nericryp
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2018, 03:54:53 AM |
|
I brought some XMR on April, which is nearly the highest price of it. Since than, the price keep drop and it ready drop like nearly 33%. Now I have been waiting for like 4 months and the surge of XMR still haven't come..... Now price of XMR now hitting near the lowest, should I buy some or just wait for the price tol drop?
We're nowhere near "the lowest". Just last year, Monero was trading at $37. I know what you mean, but I don't think the Monero can go back to $37 as the bitcoin price still have $6xxx. To me, I really wish the price will go up, so I can sell my Monero and earn some money.... Patience is a virtue man, as i can see on the chart the price of monero haggles from $0.5 to $2 for over two years! maybe the same thing will happen, it will have a sideways for a year or two between $50 - $200 before breaking out again.
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2018, 08:30:31 AM |
|
I have a theoretical question.Suppose a coin (could be Monero, or could be something else) requires 20 confirmations everywhere (exchanges, merchants, whatever). Suppose this coin also had an update that refused to accept alternate chains deeper than 19 blocks ago. That would, in theory, kill the 51% issue, right? What would the downsides be?
Which scam fork you asking this for? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) thx, any critical reason to update or is this a scheduled one? I guess it would be prudent to upgrade if you're affected by the time-out issue.
|
|
|
|
Febo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2018, 01:53:54 PM |
|
I have a theoretical question.Suppose a coin (could be Monero, or could be something else) requires 20 confirmations everywhere (exchanges, merchants, whatever). Suppose this coin also had an update that refused to accept alternate chains deeper than 19 blocks ago. That would, in theory, kill the 51% issue, right? What would the downsides be?
20 confirmations is 40 minutes. That seems a lot for a payment. What is an alternative chain and what is real chain? Both are real and both are alternative. Miners will decide which is real. I see only a problems if you limit that they need to decide in less then 19 blocks. Basically you take final decision out of their hands.
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 5241
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2018, 02:45:41 PM |
|
I have a theoretical question.Suppose a coin (could be Monero, or could be something else) requires 20 confirmations everywhere (exchanges, merchants, whatever). Suppose this coin also had an update that refused to accept alternate chains deeper than 19 blocks ago. That would, in theory, kill the 51% issue, right? What would the downsides be?
Which scam fork you asking this for? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) thx, any critical reason to update or is this a scheduled one? I guess it would be prudent to upgrade if you're affected by the time-out issue. thx, I wasn't sure if it was just this. I noticed it didn't happen if I kept focus on the console itself. Just wanted to make sure there wasn't and DB breaking issues as I had a corruption issue I dealt with for awhile but didn't see a bug fix on that. Just bad timing for me on that I guess. The following critical bugs that were present in CLI v0.12.2.0 are fixed in CLI v0.12.3.0:
The time-out issue (i.e. wallet not able to connect to daemon upon creating a transaction or wallet disconnecting during wallet refresh (with either a remote node or a local node))
In addition to aforementioned salient bug fixes, there are a lot of small bug fixes and improvements. 20 confirmations is 40 minutes. That seems a lot for a payment.
What is an alternative chain and what is real chain? Both are real and both are alternative. Miners will decide which is real. I see only a problems if you limit that they need to decide in less then 19 blocks. Basically you take final decision out of their hands. Or you could fork ASICs back in because you cannot figure out your dif adjustment, theoretically. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 5241
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 14, 2018, 03:36:50 PM |
|
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 15, 2018, 07:40:29 AM |
|
I have a theoretical question.Suppose a coin (could be Monero, or could be something else) requires 20 confirmations everywhere (exchanges, merchants, whatever). Suppose this coin also had an update that refused to accept alternate chains deeper than 19 blocks ago. That would, in theory, kill the 51% issue, right? What would the downsides be?
Which scam fork you asking this for? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) thx, any critical reason to update or is this a scheduled one? I guess it would be prudent to upgrade if you're affected by the time-out issue. thx, I wasn't sure if it was just this. I noticed it didn't happen if I kept focus on the console itself. Just wanted to make sure there wasn't and DB breaking issues as I had a corruption issue I dealt with for awhile but didn't see a bug fix on that. Just bad timing for me on that I guess. The following critical bugs that were present in CLI v0.12.2.0 are fixed in CLI v0.12.3.0:
The time-out issue (i.e. wallet not able to connect to daemon upon creating a transaction or wallet disconnecting during wallet refresh (with either a remote node or a local node))
In addition to aforementioned salient bug fixes, there are a lot of small bug fixes and improvements. 20 confirmations is 40 minutes. That seems a lot for a payment.
What is an alternative chain and what is real chain? Both are real and both are alternative. Miners will decide which is real. I see only a problems if you limit that they need to decide in less then 19 blocks. Basically you take final decision out of their hands. Or you could fork ASICs back in because you cannot figure out your dif adjustment, theoretically. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) There was a bug that resulted in the daemon not syncing in "safe-mode" (which hardens against blockchain corruptions) once it was fully synced. I am not entirely sure in which v0.12 version it was fixed though.
|
|
|
|
cool4y
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 494
Merit: 12
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 15, 2018, 04:54:31 PM |
|
Monero is rolling out new updates like christmas presents, love it!
|
|
|
|
|