[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency

[ontopicplease]

I wonder if we should send the BTC to dev instead of voting in cryptsy.

Well, maybe it's interesting to ask yourself the question; who was more usefull to XMR; cryptsy or the devs?

[1714036736]

1714036736

[1714036736]

1714036736

[Cryptobro]

Personally I would prefer it if we weren't listed on Cryptsy...I haven't heard anything good about them.

[RentaMouse]

Interesting point: BCX claimed that Cryptsy didnt add XMR back in July because they asked him for an expert opinion and he advised them of potential exploits that put them off. Does this recent change from Cryptsy mean that their "expert" has now told them that XMR is safe, or does it mean they no longer believe their "expert"?

[Come-In-Behind]

Interesting point: BCX claimed that Cryptsy didnt add XMR back in July because they asked him for an expert opinion and he advised them of potential exploits that put them off. Does this recent change from Cryptsy mean that their "expert" has now told them that XMR is safe, or does it mean they no longer believe their "expert"?

I believe BCX wanted some sort of "orced evolution. His motive could of been to threaten use of an exploit in order to force evolution upon XMR, and thus fixed any loopholes that he's seen.

However, I'm only guessing, as everyone is.

[iCEBREAKER]

I believe BCX wanted some sort of "orced evolution.

Zoidberg and windjc tried to force BBR into an orced evolution, with a massively unpopular name change to "Rune."

It was a huge fail, thank God.

[owlcatz]

I believe BCX wanted some sort of "orced evolution.

Zoidberg and windjc tried to force BBR into an orced evolution, with a massively unpopular name change to "Rune."

It was a huge fail, thank God.

Hahaha! Indeed, thank you fine sir, this made my night after not looking at the tail of this thread for a day or two! Bravo!!

[infofront]

Interesting point: BCX claimed that Cryptsy didnt add XMR back in July because they asked him for an expert opinion and he advised them of potential exploits that put them off. Does this recent change from Cryptsy mean that their "expert" has now told them that XMR is safe, or does it mean they no longer believe their "expert"?

I was wondering about that as well.
My gut feeling has always been that Cryptsy is really shady. Hell, they have very close ties to BCX, after all.

[NewLiberty]

I believe BCX wanted some sort of "orced evolution.

Zoidberg and windjc tried to force BBR into an orced evolution, with a massively unpopular name change to "Rune."

It was a huge fail, thank God.

Hahaha! Indeed, thank you fine sir, this made my night after not looking at the tail of this thread for a day or two! Bravo!!

Well, at least it wasn't a troll

[rpietila]

These paid votes are worse than any government tax as it serves no legitimate function, and nothing is done with that money except line the recipients pocket.  it is just a bribe.

Probably folks do paid votes as just an individual decision.  It makes sense for the exchange, to cover the setup costs.  I may also make sense to folks that like to stick with one exchange and already use it.  If their time is worth a little money and they figure that they will save some time by not switching back and forth.

Paying voters are the ones who have a massive stake in the $hitcoin. It is only fair that the exchanges try to recoup the implementation costs from the ones who actually gain from the exchange listing - the preminers and pumpers. I think this is a good symbiotic system.

[coinits]

These paid votes are worse than any government tax as it serves no legitimate function, and nothing is done with that money except line the recipients pocket.  it is just a bribe.

Probably folks do paid votes as just an individual decision.  It makes sense for the exchange, to cover the setup costs.  I may also make sense to folks that like to stick with one exchange and already use it.  If their time is worth a little money and they figure that they will save some time by not switching back and forth.

Paying voters are the ones who have a massive stake in the $hitcoin. It is only fair that the exchanges try to recoup the implementation costs from the ones who actually gain from the exchange listing - the preminers and pumpers. I think this is a good symbiotic system.

Exchanges should pay DEVS % of their commission to list the good altcoins.

[rpietila]

These paid votes are worse than any government tax as it serves no legitimate function, and nothing is done with that money except line the recipients pocket.  it is just a bribe.

Probably folks do paid votes as just an individual decision.  It makes sense for the exchange, to cover the setup costs.  I may also make sense to folks that like to stick with one exchange and already use it.  If their time is worth a little money and they figure that they will save some time by not switching back and forth.

Paying voters are the ones who have a massive stake in the $hitcoin. It is only fair that the exchanges try to recoup the implementation costs from the ones who actually gain from the exchange listing - the preminers and pumpers. I think this is a good symbiotic system.

Exchanges should pay DEVS % of their commission to list the good altcoins.

Good altcoins are already listed.

[Shrikez]

-snip-

- How to help with translation, in any language: https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/monero-client-net/

It is my understanding the above is Jojatekok's NET wallet.

I will gladly help translate his wallet as well, although you might want to point that out and later announce when the official GUI strings are out for translation.

[smoothie]

I don't understand why people support paid voting for an exchange to list a currency, especially when that currency is already listed on another fine exchange.  These paid votes are worse than any government tax as it serves no legitimate function, and nothing is done with that money except line the recipients pocket.  it is just a bribe.

I like Poloniex...I could give 2 shits if XMR gets traded on Cryptsy.

I'm with you.  (Not much caring whether its on Cryptsy or not.)  It decentralizes only a little.
Probably folks do paid votes as just an individual decision.  It makes sense for the exchange, to cover the setup costs.  I may also make sense to folks that like to stick with one exchange and already use it.  If their time is worth a little money and they figure that they will save some time by not switching back and forth.

I said this in another thread but if BTC-e picked up XMR that would be awesome.

[Pilotseye]

-snip-

- How to help with translation, in any language: https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/monero-client-net/

It is my understanding the above is Jojatekok's NET wallet.

I will gladly help translate his wallet as well, although you might want to point that out and later announce when the official GUI strings are out for translation.

thanks for the link, joined the team

[OrientA]

I said this in another thread but if BTC-e picked up XMR that would be awesome.

BTC-e is a much bigger exchange than most out there.

[Este Nuno]

I said this in another thread but if BTC-e picked up XMR that would be awesome.

BTC-e is a much bigger exchange than most out there.

BTC-e is a dinosaur with those alts, lol. I don't think they've changed since 2012. Except for maybe Primecoin?

Odd that they wouldn't add some of the more high volume alts out there now. Lots of money to be made.

[Febo]

Paying for Cryptsy votes is waste of founds. Just vote daily and eventually coin will get there. is already rank.4.  Every exchange adds a bit volume and adoption to coin, but is almost same if is added next week or in a month or two.  
BTC-e, we should just, ask them from time to time, when we will be able to buy Monero there. More people will ask more chances. But doubt they will start with XMT/EUR pairs.

[chukiduck]

Hi ppl,

As for today, Is monero 100% anonymous and untraceable?

[infofront]

Hi ppl,

As for today, Is monero 100% anonymous and untraceable?

Yes

[tacotime]

Hi ppl,

As for today, Is monero 100% anonymous and untraceable?

No. Please don't use Monero recklessly. The technology is still in its infancy and we're working hard to improve a number of deanonymizing related vulnerabilities for ring signatures. Think Tor in the very early days, there were many security issues.

That said, it's the most promising privacy tech I know of and is passive in nature, so when the bugs are worked out it I think it'll work nicely. In the meantime, it's still much more private than Bitcoin.