|
d34g13
|
 |
August 17, 2014, 07:47:12 PM |
|
Whales of twitter are bad mouthing this bad.. never seen so much before. The game plan was to troll you out of your coins, mission accomplished. Sure the devs didn't have a perfect launch but believe me when I tell you this hasn't even started yet. Massive pump will come I guarantee you, where we go from there is all up to the devs but for those selling now you just missed the perfect entry point with limited coin supply, bravo. The price is holding at above 600 lol where do you think it will go once the fork is fixed?
you mean when people get their deposits of SYS and consider dumping them ? (currently only a smaller share of SYS is actually accessable -> lower supply for the moment -> higher price for the moment) probably down a bit again  |
|
|
|
|
|
niothor
|
|
August 17, 2014, 07:48:56 PM |
|
Can anyone answer this - why did the devs return 234btc back to moolah? And regarding to rumors here they should be used these money for forming buy wall. Buy wall 200+btc set. But money has been already returned. Is something wrong with this?
the answer is a simple one - it was a public display that they are serious and committed to the join - it's was kid of like taking money for work that was not done right - they're fixing the wallet now beause that's their responibility. after a while you'll come across some coins where the devs take the ipo money and simply disappear - these guys are not that way... I respect them for that... and when the dust settles - please feel free to mine this coin at sys.lifeforce.info Absolutely. It was a statement of transparency. The devs are saying, "We won't get our money until you get yours." You both don't understand the question. Those btc were meant for the walls. The btc got returned. Why where the btc still in the support walls? Yeah, I guess I don't get you. Moolah had the btc; they turned it over to Syscoin devs. The Syscoin devs gave Moolah back the money for buy walls. I guess I'm not seeing the confusion. The coins where sent to the devs for the buy walls. The dev in good faith returned the coins to moolah. Moolah put up the buy walls. Why instead of this haven't they put the buy walls from the start to avoid this mess. |
|
|
|
|
adloule13
|
|
August 17, 2014, 07:49:34 PM |
|
What you think is gonna happen? And what problem the blackchain has?
lol "blackchain" he got you  |
|
|
|
|
jokumat
|
|
August 17, 2014, 07:49:49 PM |
|
I have 200₊ confirmations and still no deposit in mintpal. Address is correct. So what's the trouble? Am I on a fork or what?
|
|
|
|
|
tokyoghetto
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 17, 2014, 07:49:53 PM |
|
IPO was over-priced.
I am waiting for sub 100 sat prices, might pick up a few for a quick pump and dump.
|
|
|
|
|
|
d34g13
|
|
August 17, 2014, 07:50:45 PM |
|
I have 200₊ confirmations and still no deposit in mintpal. Address is correct. So what's the trouble? Am I on a fork or what?
deposits currently disabled on traiding platforms until a fixed wallet is available |
|
|
|
|
|
Cointang
|
|
August 17, 2014, 07:51:05 PM |
|
Whales of twitter are bad mouthing this bad.. never seen so much before. The game plan was to troll you out of your coins, mission accomplished. Sure the devs didn't have a perfect launch but believe me when I tell you this hasn't even started yet. Massive pump will come I guarantee you, where we go from there is all up to the devs but for those selling now you just missed the perfect entry point with limited coin supply, bravo. The price is holding at above 600 lol where do you think it will go once the fork is fixed?
I have a bucket full of coins that I a'm holding! No dump here, yet.I waited ready at launch.. I pre-planned to buy in case something went wrong during launch or I couldn't get them on an exchange fast enough. I was one of the lucky few that sold at above 1000 sats. I did'nt have time to screw around with keypair or inputting nodes.. |
1uSmoGi7FUh4Kb5Bf2snPKvnWdfLCt8fX
|
|
|
|
altcoinUK
|
|
August 17, 2014, 07:55:03 PM |
|
Can anyone answer this - why did the devs return 234btc back to moolah? And regarding to rumors here they should be used these money for forming buy wall. Buy wall 200+btc set. But money has been already returned. Is something wrong with this?
the answer is a simple one - it was a public display that they are serious and committed to the join - it's was kid of like taking money for work that was not done right - they're fixing the wallet now beause that's their responibility. after a while you'll come across some coins where the devs take the ipo money and simply disappear - these guys are not that way... I respect them for that... and when the dust settles - please feel free to mine this coin at sys.lifeforce.info Absolutely. It was a statement of transparency. The devs are saying, "We won't get our money until you get yours." You both don't understand the question. Those btc were meant for the walls. The btc got returned. Why where the btc still in the support walls? Yeah, I guess I don't get you. Moolah had the btc; they turned it over to Syscoin devs. The Syscoin devs gave Moolah back the money for buy walls. I guess I'm not seeing the confusion. The coins where sent to the devs for the buy walls. The dev in good faith returned the coins to moolah. Moolah put up the buy walls. Why instead of this haven't they put the buy walls from the start to avoid this mess. I doubt Moolah would put any buy walls to support a currency. Moolah is an indenpendent business, why would they support any third party coins? So if I create shitcoin No. 32468 Moolah would support it with buy walls - I don't think so. |
|
|
|
|
|
d34g13
|
|
August 17, 2014, 07:55:39 PM |
|
Can anyone answer this - why did the devs return 234btc back to moolah? And regarding to rumors here they should be used these money for forming buy wall. Buy wall 200+btc set. But money has been already returned. Is something wrong with this?
the answer is a simple one - it was a public display that they are serious and committed to the join - it's was kid of like taking money for work that was not done right - they're fixing the wallet now beause that's their responibility. after a while you'll come across some coins where the devs take the ipo money and simply disappear - these guys are not that way... I respect them for that... and when the dust settles - please feel free to mine this coin at sys.lifeforce.info Absolutely. It was a statement of transparency. The devs are saying, "We won't get our money until you get yours." You both don't understand the question. Those btc were meant for the walls. The btc got returned. Why where the btc still in the support walls? Yeah, I guess I don't get you. Moolah had the btc; they turned it over to Syscoin devs. The Syscoin devs gave Moolah back the money for buy walls. I guess I'm not seeing the confusion. The coins where sent to the devs for the buy walls. The dev in good faith returned the coins to moolah. Moolah put up the buy walls. Why instead of this haven't they put the buy walls from the start to avoid this mess. I doubt Moolah would put any buy walls to support a currency. Moolah is an indenpendent business, why would they support any third party coins? So if I create shitcoin No. 32468 Moolah would support it with buy walls - I don't think so. he confirmed it himself - take it as a fact (read up earlier pages if you dont trust me) |
|
|
|
|
|
jokumat
|
|
August 17, 2014, 07:57:40 PM |
|
I have 200₊ confirmations and still no deposit in mintpal. Address is correct. So what's the trouble? Am I on a fork or what?
deposits currently disabled on traiding platforms until a fixed wallet is available Thnaks. I noticed this at bittrex but they say nothing about disabling deposits at MP. They let me create address, everything. Mintpal really sucks. |
|
|
|
|
|
altcoinUK
|
|
August 17, 2014, 07:58:36 PM |
|
Can anyone answer this - why did the devs return 234btc back to moolah? And regarding to rumors here they should be used these money for forming buy wall. Buy wall 200+btc set. But money has been already returned. Is something wrong with this?
the answer is a simple one - it was a public display that they are serious and committed to the join - it's was kid of like taking money for work that was not done right - they're fixing the wallet now beause that's their responibility. after a while you'll come across some coins where the devs take the ipo money and simply disappear - these guys are not that way... I respect them for that... and when the dust settles - please feel free to mine this coin at sys.lifeforce.info Absolutely. It was a statement of transparency. The devs are saying, "We won't get our money until you get yours." You both don't understand the question. Those btc were meant for the walls. The btc got returned. Why where the btc still in the support walls? Yeah, I guess I don't get you. Moolah had the btc; they turned it over to Syscoin devs. The Syscoin devs gave Moolah back the money for buy walls. I guess I'm not seeing the confusion. The coins where sent to the devs for the buy walls. The dev in good faith returned the coins to moolah. Moolah put up the buy walls. Why instead of this haven't they put the buy walls from the start to avoid this mess. I doubt Moolah would put any buy walls to support a currency. Moolah is an indenpendent business, why would they support any third party coins? So if I create shitcoin No. 32468 Moolah would support it with buy walls - I don't think so. he confirmed it himself - take it as a fact (read up earlier pages if you dont trust me) Who confirmed, Moolah? That guy wasn't the Moolah CEO, he was some random guy trolling here. It doesn't make any sense that Moolah would support any coins with a buy wall. |
|
|
|
|
|
jokumat
|
|
August 17, 2014, 07:58:43 PM |
|
So some people are getting advantage of buying walls and others are stuck in forks and broken wallets...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TiberiuC
|
|
August 17, 2014, 08:02:56 PM |
|
Can anyone answer this - why did the devs return 234btc back to moolah? And regarding to rumors here they should be used these money for forming buy wall. Buy wall 200+btc set. But money has been already returned. Is something wrong with this?
the answer is a simple one - it was a public display that they are serious and committed to the join - it's was kid of like taking money for work that was not done right - they're fixing the wallet now beause that's their responibility. after a while you'll come across some coins where the devs take the ipo money and simply disappear - these guys are not that way... I respect them for that... and when the dust settles - please feel free to mine this coin at sys.lifeforce.info Absolutely. It was a statement of transparency. The devs are saying, "We won't get our money until you get yours." You both don't understand the question. Those btc were meant for the walls. The btc got returned. Why where the btc still in the support walls? Yeah, I guess I don't get you. Moolah had the btc; they turned it over to Syscoin devs. The Syscoin devs gave Moolah back the money for buy walls. I guess I'm not seeing the confusion. The coins where sent to the devs for the buy walls. The dev in good faith returned the coins to moolah. Moolah put up the buy walls. Why instead of this haven't they put the buy walls from the start to avoid this mess. I doubt Moolah would put any buy walls to support a currency. Moolah is an indenpendent business, why would they support any third party coins? So if I create shitcoin No. 32468 Moolah would support it with buy walls - I don't think so. he confirmed it himself - take it as a fact (read up earlier pages if you dont trust me) Who confirmed, Moolah? That guy wasn't the Moolah CEO, he was some random guy trolling here. It doesn't make any sense that Moolah would support any coins with a buy wall. It would make sense in this case, since they bought mintpal. If this turns out well it will have a positive effect on mintpals volume. |
|
|
|
|
|
altcoinUK
|
|
August 17, 2014, 08:09:03 PM |
|
It would make sense in this case, since they bought mintpal. If this turns out well it will have a positive effect on mintpals volume.
I am sure every actions could be justified, but what other coins would say if Moolah that supposed to provide a transparent, unbiased service support a particular coin that is in trouble with buy walls. Of course they could do that technically but it wouldn't be ethical. Their business is not to save coins, but provide service for coins. |
|
|
|
|
|
RJF
|
|
August 17, 2014, 08:18:16 PM |
|
I'm an investor just for gambling, but yeah really what a shit product you have produced. I'm really disappointed.
I predict you guys abandoning this coin in less than 3 weeks. You got what you wanted. Enjoy
They haven't gotten anything, not single dime, nothing. try reading the thread before you make statements without facts. |
DNotesVault“First, they ignore you. Then, they laugh at you. Then, they fight you. Then you win!” – Mahatma Gandhi Prepare for your future now, check out CRISP For Retirement and our complete family of CRISP savings plans. |
|
|
CoinHolder
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
August 17, 2014, 08:19:51 PM |
|
SysLaunchTM
|
|
|
|
|
|
ShameOnYou
|
|
August 17, 2014, 08:20:36 PM |
|
So what's the deal with this coin? I heard it was the new flavor of the month! The business + blockchain idea was very interesting to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
awais3344
|
|
August 17, 2014, 08:22:18 PM |
|
So what's the deal with this coin? I heard it was the new flavor of the month! The business + blockchain idea was very interesting to me.
it didnt workout that well. however i still believe that team is working kudos for that. i will wait a week before selling my coins |
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
NEOSCOIN +POD Developers +Active Community - V2 Coming Soon! Live In-App Trading, Live Pool Stats - IRC - Arbitrush Anonymous System soon!! NEOSCOIN
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|
|
|
|
d34g13
|
|
August 17, 2014, 08:24:13 PM |
|
Can anyone answer this - why did the devs return 234btc back to moolah? And regarding to rumors here they should be used these money for forming buy wall. Buy wall 200+btc set. But money has been already returned. Is something wrong with this?
the answer is a simple one - it was a public display that they are serious and committed to the join - it's was kid of like taking money for work that was not done right - they're fixing the wallet now beause that's their responibility. after a while you'll come across some coins where the devs take the ipo money and simply disappear - these guys are not that way... I respect them for that... and when the dust settles - please feel free to mine this coin at sys.lifeforce.info Absolutely. It was a statement of transparency. The devs are saying, "We won't get our money until you get yours." You both don't understand the question. Those btc were meant for the walls. The btc got returned. Why where the btc still in the support walls? Yeah, I guess I don't get you. Moolah had the btc; they turned it over to Syscoin devs. The Syscoin devs gave Moolah back the money for buy walls. I guess I'm not seeing the confusion. The coins where sent to the devs for the buy walls. The dev in good faith returned the coins to moolah. Moolah put up the buy walls. Why instead of this haven't they put the buy walls from the start to avoid this mess. I doubt Moolah would put any buy walls to support a currency. Moolah is an indenpendent business, why would they support any third party coins? So if I create shitcoin No. 32468 Moolah would support it with buy walls - I don't think so. he confirmed it himself - take it as a fact (read up earlier pages if you dont trust me) Who confirmed, Moolah? That guy wasn't the Moolah CEO, he was some random guy trolling here. It doesn't make any sense that Moolah would support any coins with a buy wall. im refering to moolah who is also op in the mintpal irc channel - so its clear who he is - simple |
|
|
|
|
sushipooo
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
August 17, 2014, 08:25:24 PM |
|
This image was posted on Litecoin reddit:  Does this mean syscoin is just a bad clone ? At least the dev should've searched for all word "Litecoin" on the source code. so what? I see annoying crap like that in almost all coins out there. Because 'almost all coins out there' are crap. By your argument do you mean Syscoin isn't different from 'almost all coins out there' ? I'm saying this is a FUD argument. Has no impact on anything important. |
|
|
|
|
