YAdaminer
|
|
June 03, 2014, 10:26:26 AM |
|
I will always make the right decision, We all want Sync to succeed. Everyone is rushing after anonymous wallet but there's no place to spend the coins in the darknet. I am closely watching this coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630628.0 since they are launching DarknetMarket with their coin. I don't think that anon is the right way for sync although right now all coins going that way are in some kind of uptrend, we got our uptrend with 100% interest. Why we should folow when we are in the lead. On some coins announcement of anon implementation caused pump but we all know what is following after pump. Our mpool with our small volume uptrend also making a change, othervise we would be allready at 0.0001. So as I said great things happen when you least expect them. Buy SYNC the new type of miner - ROI 1 year or less - energy efficiant - reward program - ...
|
|
|
|
HunterS
|
|
June 03, 2014, 10:29:40 AM |
|
all these coin trying to be anonymise and associating themselves with tor and darknet is only going to draw unwanted attention and i think is just a bad image for crypto in general
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
June 03, 2014, 10:31:00 AM |
|
all these coin trying to be anonymise and associating themselves with tor and darknet is only going to draw unwanted attention and i think is just a bad image for crypto in general
MASSIVE MONEY LAUNDERING SCAMS. like i've said - get your profit while you can.
|
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
HunterS
|
|
June 03, 2014, 10:36:31 AM |
|
OUujeeA! I am finally STAKING! awesome bro.the new wallet running smooth as.i havent had one sycning problem since update Hats off to the dev and anyone whos been helping.cheers guys and girls
|
|
|
|
Mick2K
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2014, 10:42:28 AM |
|
I personally don't care about anonymity. I don't want to buy drugs or illegal porn shit with any coin. But if MsCollec want to implement some anon features then it's okay. It' his/her decision.
But i think a higher stake would be nice. If this coin should be an long time investment maybe it is possible to lower the interest over time. I don't know.
Do whatever you think is right. I will hold my little amount of sync and buy more if i can.
|
|
|
|
YAdaminer
|
|
June 03, 2014, 10:42:34 AM |
|
PsychoMarket : 50% per year is better It is not. If nothing else then because you dont fix what isnt broken cause you could breake it in fixing process.
|
|
|
|
srbty
|
|
June 03, 2014, 10:45:55 AM |
|
OUujeeA! I am finally STAKING! awesome bro.the new wallet running smooth as.i havent had one sycning problem since update Hats off to the dev and anyone whos been helping.cheers guys and girls What means "Generated but not accepted" ?
|
|
|
|
srbty
|
|
June 03, 2014, 10:50:57 AM |
|
okey, i found the answer.
|
|
|
|
HunterS
|
|
June 03, 2014, 10:55:21 AM |
|
okey, i found the answer. i not complete sure but i think its like and orphan block when mining
|
|
|
|
srbty
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:02:40 AM |
|
vvhen i click on transaction, pop up this explanation:
"Generated coins must mature 60 blocks before they can be spent. When you generated this block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, its state will change to "not accepted" and it won't be spendable. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a block within a few seconds of yours."
|
|
|
|
srbty
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:03:44 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Kenta
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:04:45 PM |
|
to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems. Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.
I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?
How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?
|
|
|
|
sovie
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:07:39 PM |
|
I'm of the definite opinion that for any financial instrument to survive in any kind of market if it is serious that is, it must compete with other financial instruments.
After all Sync is directly competing with $ £ E GOLD SILVER for a safe haven of value.
Economics 101
Fiat is controlled by goverment and banking cartels but they still offer anywhere from 3 - 8% interest TRADITIONALLY - the fools have fucked that up big time
Gold and Silver is heavily manipuilated by the cartels but that will end August this year
as they have been caught red handed.
Gold and silver has a potential upswing of anywhere from 100% to 10000% (i have some do you??)
Both fiat and metals can be used to directly exchange for any kind of material goods
However Crypto is in complete infancy at this stage so dark markets or reward programs
or whatever is not what is going to bring potential investors to this coin.
Crypto is being used and will continue to be used primarily by everyone as a way to store and increase
the value they hold, its a s simple as that.
Idea are always good but we must not lose sight on how and why the financial markets work the way they do
and how are we going to capitalise on that for the good of the coin. Quite frankly dreaming of markets that don't exist
and won't exist properly for many years is not what will make this coin vaulable.
But holding and maintaining VALUE is what will make this coin even more profitable than bitcoin its a s simple as that.
So to that end dropping the interest rate is the correct thing to do, but in light of the points outlined above
interst should be pegged at a competative rate to other assets to a reasonable 3 - 10% variable per anum
Variable meaning adjustable as any financial instrument is and this nonsensical approach will attract the big boys!
Don't get me wrong starting markets and implementing new technology is a must in this field but for the next year
lets face it no market or reward program will make one jot of difference to a potential investor from wanting to transfer
his bitcoins or fiat or gold and silver or shares or whatever to Sync save for the ability to safly hold and potential increase
their portfolios. SO I APPEAL TO MSCOLLEC DON'T SET THE INTEREST TO 1% AND TOO LOOK AT THE WIDER IMPLICATIONS
OF DOING THIS .Sync does still retain a modicum of potential and it will soar but
only if the next few steps are implemented properly and with serious thought on how it will impact on financial markets how it will work and exist
in relation to and challenge as a store of VALUE to the other financial class instruments currently available.
My vote goes 3% to 8% per anum variable
|
|
|
|
Mick2K
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:08:34 PM |
|
to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems. Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.
I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?
How about you guys, do you have any problems today or is it only me?
No problems for me after the fork but i have not had any problems before the fork. I never understood the problems that many had.
|
|
|
|
powersup
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:10:41 PM |
|
to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems. Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.
I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?
How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?
Nope, all good here. stake and block chain moving along nicely
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:13:49 PM |
|
to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems. Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.
I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?
How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?
this is what test-net is for. all these so called 'developers' launching shitcoins without fully putting them through the wringer, then changing their minds as to how the coin should work... why would anyone invest in anything that hadn't been fully tested? we have, indeed, all been duped, and there is probably more; 'oh, lets do it this way - no, this way' attitude from our gracious leader in the pipeline.
|
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
ando0022
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:20:53 PM |
|
to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems. Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.
I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?
How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?
Nope, all good here. stake and block chain moving along nicely For me too, everything is fine ! Good work !
|
|
|
|
Nite69
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:22:34 PM |
|
to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems. Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.
I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?
How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?
send version message: version 60017, blocks=10307, us=xxxx:24241, them=xxxx:49270, peer=xxx:49270 Added time data, samples 200, offset -1 (+0 minutes) Added xxx:24241 from xxxxx: 2151 tried, 3672 new Moving xxxx:24241 to tried receive version message: version 60018, blocks=10066, us=xxxx, them=xxxx:24241, peer=xxxx:49270 getblocks 10067 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
We don't have protocol version 60018. Who has compiled this? But my wallet works just ok, and so seems to be the explorer.
|
Sync: ShiSKnx4W6zrp69YEFQyWk5TkpnfKLA8wx Bitcoin: 17gNvfoD2FDqTfESUxNEmTukGbGVAiJhXp Litecoin: LhbDew4s9wbV8xeNkrdFcLK5u78APSGLrR AuroraCoin: AXVoGgYtSVkPv96JLL7CiwcyVvPxXHXRK9
|
|
|
Kenta
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:24:08 PM |
|
to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems. Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.
I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?
How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?
this is what test-net is for. all these so called 'developers' launching shitcoins without fully putting them through the wringer, then changing their minds as to how the coin should work... why would anyone invest in anything that hadn't been fully tested? we have, indeed, all been duped, and there is probably more; 'oh, lets do it this way - no, this way' attitude from our gracious leader in the pipeline. As a not-so-conservative investor, I'm willing to take a lot of shit in the hope that I will be the earlybird that catches the worm. My patience isn't limitless however, and I see other coins having the same features as this one and more. And then someone desperately trying to control the coin without the necessary support to make it a success. Mining BlackCatCoin now, OPEC will hopefully be released in a few hours today.
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:25:52 PM |
|
to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems. Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.
I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?
How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?
this is what test-net is for. all these so called 'developers' launching shitcoins without fully putting them through the wringer, then changing their minds as to how the coin should work... why would anyone invest in anything that hadn't been fully tested? we have, indeed, all been duped, and there is probably more; 'oh, lets do it this way - no, this way' attitude from our gracious leader in the pipeline. As a not-so-conservative investor, I'm willing to take a lot of shit in the hope that I will be the earlybird that catches the worm. My patience isn't limitless however, and I see other coins having the same features as this one and more. And then someone desperately trying to control the coin without the necessary support to make it a success. Mining BlackCatCoin now, OPEC will hopefully be released in a few hours today. after my experiences with this, and previous altcoins; I am no longer mining anything other than Bitcoin - that one is already successful.
|
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
|