Bitcoin Forum
November 14, 2024, 11:43:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: na
na
na

Pages: « 1 ... 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 [353] 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 ... 593 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][1000 SYNC] Proof of Stake now run by BLOCKCHAIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY  (Read 816010 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
YAdaminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 829
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 10:26:26 AM
 #7041

I will always make the right decision, We all want Sync to succeed. Everyone is rushing after anonymous wallet but there's no place to spend the coins in the darknet. I am closely watching this coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630628.0 since they are launching DarknetMarket with their coin.

I don't think that anon is the right way for sync although right now all coins going that way are in some kind of uptrend, we got our uptrend with 100% interest.
Why we should folow when we are in the lead. On some coins announcement of anon implementation caused pump but we all know what is following after pump.
Our mpool with our small volume uptrend also making a change, othervise we would be allready at 0.0001.
So as I said great things happen when you least expect them.

Buy SYNC the new type of miner
 - ROI 1 year or less
 - energy efficiant
 - reward program
 - ...
HunterS
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 10:29:40 AM
 #7042

all these coin trying to be anonymise and associating themselves with tor and darknet is only going to draw unwanted attention and i think is just a bad image for crypto in general

raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 10:31:00 AM
 #7043

all these coin trying to be anonymise and associating themselves with tor and darknet is only going to draw unwanted attention and i think is just a bad image for crypto in general

MASSIVE MONEY LAUNDERING SCAMS. like i've said - get your profit while you can.

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
HunterS
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 10:36:31 AM
 #7044

OUujeeA! I am finally STAKING!  Grin
awesome bro.the new wallet running smooth as.i havent had one sycning problem since update Grin Wink Hats off to the dev and anyone whos been helping.cheers guys and girls

Mick2K
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 10:42:28 AM
 #7045

I personally don't care about anonymity. I don't want to buy drugs or illegal porn shit with any coin.
But if MsCollec want to implement some anon features then it's okay. It' his/her decision.

But i think a higher stake would be nice. If this coin should be an long time investment maybe it is possible to lower the interest over time. I don't know.

Do whatever you think is right. I will hold my little amount of sync and buy more if i can.
YAdaminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 829
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 10:42:34 AM
 #7046

PsychoMarket : 50% per year is better  Cool

It is not. If nothing else then because you dont fix what isnt broken cause you could breake it in fixing process.
srbty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 135
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 10:45:55 AM
 #7047

OUujeeA! I am finally STAKING!  Grin
awesome bro.the new wallet running smooth as.i havent had one sycning problem since update Grin Wink Hats off to the dev and anyone whos been helping.cheers guys and girls

What means "Generated but not accepted" ?
srbty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 135
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 10:50:57 AM
 #7048

okey, i found the answer.  Cheesy
HunterS
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 10:55:21 AM
 #7049

okey, i found the answer.  Cheesy
i not complete sure but i think its like and orphan block when mining

srbty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 135
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 11:02:40 AM
 #7050

vvhen i click on transaction, pop up this explanation:

"Generated coins must mature 60 blocks before they can be spent. When you generated this block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, its state will change to "not accepted" and it won't be spendable. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a block within a few seconds of yours."
srbty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 135
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 11:03:44 AM
 #7051

...mmm yea. Huh Tongue Undecided Grin
Kenta
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:04:45 PM
 #7052

to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems.
Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.

I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?

How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?

Trade your cryptocoins at: ◣ bleutrade.com ◢◣ C-Cex.com ◢
sovie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 265



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:07:39 PM
 #7053

I'm of the definite opinion that for any financial instrument to survive in any kind of market
if it is serious that is, it must compete with other financial instruments.

After all Sync is directly competing with $ £ E GOLD SILVER for a safe haven of value.

Economics 101

Fiat is controlled by goverment and banking cartels but they still offer anywhere
from 3 - 8% interest TRADITIONALLY - the fools have fucked that up big time

Gold and Silver is heavily manipuilated by the cartels but that will end August this year

as they have been caught red handed.

Gold and silver has a potential upswing of anywhere from 100% to 10000%
(i have some do you??)

Both fiat and metals can be used to directly exchange for any kind of material goods

However Crypto is in complete infancy at this stage so dark markets or reward programs

or whatever is not what is going to bring potential investors to this coin.

Crypto is being used and will continue to be used primarily by everyone as a way to store and increase

the value they hold, its a s simple as that.

Idea are always good but we must not lose sight on how and why the financial markets work the way they do

and how are we going to capitalise on that for the good of the coin. Quite frankly dreaming of markets that don't exist

and won't exist properly for many years is not what will make this coin vaulable.

But holding and maintaining VALUE is what will make this coin even more profitable than bitcoin its a s simple as that.

So to that end dropping the interest rate is the correct thing to do, but in light of the points outlined above

interst should be pegged at a competative rate to other assets to a reasonable 3 - 10% variable per anum

Variable meaning adjustable as any financial instrument is and this nonsensical approach will attract the big boys!

Don't get me wrong starting markets and implementing new technology is a must in this field but for the next year

lets face it no market or reward program will make one jot of difference to a potential investor from wanting to transfer

his bitcoins or fiat or gold and silver or shares or whatever to Sync save for the ability to safly hold and potential increase

their portfolios. SO I APPEAL TO MSCOLLEC DON'T SET THE INTEREST TO 1% AND TOO LOOK AT THE WIDER IMPLICATIONS

OF DOING THIS .Sync does still retain a modicum of potential and it will soar but

only if the next few steps are implemented properly and with serious thought on how it will impact on financial markets how it will work and exist

in relation to and challenge as a store of VALUE to the other financial class instruments currently available.

My vote goes 3% to 8% per anum variable

███████████████████████████
██████████▀▀▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▀▀██████
█████████▄██████ ████ ▀████
██████▀▀ ▄▄▄▄ ▀▀███▀▄██ ███
████▀   ██████   ▀██████ ██
███ ▄▄▄████████▄▄▄ ██▄▄▄ ██
██ █████▀    ▀█████ ████ ██
██  ▀██        ███▀ ███ ███
██   ▄██▄    ▄██▄   █▀▄████
███ ▄████████████▄ ████████
████▄▀███▀▀▀▀███▀▄█████████
██████▄▄      ▄▄███████████
███████████████████████████
█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
.
7 BTC  WELCOME BONUS!
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████


████████████████████████▄▄▄█████▄▄▄██████████████████████████████████████████████
████▄█████▄█▄███▄█▄██████████▄██▀▀▀██████████████████████████████████████████████
████████▀████▄████▀██████████████████████████▄█████▄██▄█████▄████▄████▄████▄██
███████████▐█████▌███████████▄█████▀███▀▀████████▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀██████▀▀███▀▀█████
████████▄████▀████▄██████████████████▄▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄██████████████████
██████████▀█▀███▀█▀██████████▀███████▀█████████▀█████▀██▀█████▀█████████████████
████████████████████████▀▀▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████████



█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████
█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
.
30+  ALTCOINS AVAILABLE
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
███████████████████████████
████████▀▀  ▐█▌  ▀▀████████
██████▄     ▐█▌     ▄██████
████ ▀██▄▄███████▄▄██▀ ████
███    ██▀▀  ▄  ▀▀██    ███
██    ██   ▄███▄   ██    ██
████████  ███████  ████████
██    ██  ▀▀ █ ▀▀  ██    ██
███    ██▄▄ ▀▀▀ ▄▄██    ███
████ ▄██▀▀██████▀▀▀██▄ ████
██████▀     ▐█▌     ▀██████
████████▄▄  ▐█▌  ▄▄████████
███████████████████████████
Mick2K
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:08:34 PM
 #7054

to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems.
Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.

I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?

How about you guys, do you have any problems today or is it only me?

No problems for me after the fork but i have not had any problems before the fork. I never understood the problems that many had.
powersup
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:10:41 PM
 #7055

to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems.
Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.

I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?

How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?

Nope, all good here.

stake and block chain moving along nicely

raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:13:49 PM
 #7056

to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems.
Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.

I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?

How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?

this is what test-net is for.
all these so called 'developers' launching shitcoins without fully putting them through the wringer, then changing their minds as to how the coin should work...

 Roll Eyes

why would anyone invest in anything that hadn't been fully tested? we have, indeed, all been duped, and there is probably more;
'oh, lets do it this way - no, this way' attitude from our gracious leader in the pipeline.

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
ando0022
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:20:53 PM
 #7057

to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems.
Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.

I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?

How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?

Nope, all good here.

stake and block chain moving along nicely



For me too, everything is fine !
Good work !
Nite69
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 477
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:22:34 PM
 #7058

to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems.
Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.

I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?

How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?

Code:
send version message: version 60017, blocks=10307, us=xxxx:24241, them=xxxx:49270, peer=xxx:49270
Added time data, samples 200, offset -1 (+0 minutes)
Added xxx:24241 from xxxxx: 2151 tried, 3672 new
Moving xxxx:24241 to tried
receive version message: version 60018, blocks=10066, us=xxxx, them=xxxx:24241, peer=xxxx:49270
getblocks 10067 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500

We don't have protocol version 60018. Who has compiled this?
But my wallet works just ok, and so seems to be the explorer.

Sync: ShiSKnx4W6zrp69YEFQyWk5TkpnfKLA8wx
Bitcoin: 17gNvfoD2FDqTfESUxNEmTukGbGVAiJhXp
Litecoin: LhbDew4s9wbV8xeNkrdFcLK5u78APSGLrR
AuroraCoin: AXVoGgYtSVkPv96JLL7CiwcyVvPxXHXRK9
Kenta
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:24:08 PM
 #7059

to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems.
Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.

I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?

How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?

this is what test-net is for.
all these so called 'developers' launching shitcoins without fully putting them through the wringer, then changing their minds as to how the coin should work...

 Roll Eyes

why would anyone invest in anything that hadn't been fully tested? we have, indeed, all been duped, and there is probably more;
'oh, lets do it this way - no, this way' attitude from our gracious leader in the pipeline.

As a not-so-conservative investor, I'm willing to take a lot of shit in the hope that I will be the earlybird that catches the worm. My patience isn't limitless however, and I see other coins having the same features as this one and more. And then someone desperately trying to control the coin without the necessary support to make it a success. Mining BlackCatCoin now, OPEC will hopefully be released in a few hours today.

Trade your cryptocoins at: ◣ bleutrade.com ◢◣ C-Cex.com ◢
raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 12:25:52 PM
 #7060

to be honest, I don't think that last fork went very well. It was supposed to make everything more stable, but I see the exact opposite happening; wallets on all my computers/nodes are constantly falling off and it doesn't help with a reboot, but a full chaindownload including 15-20 Syncd restarts every time. Conf or no Conf, really doesn't matter or so it seems.
Every wallet recompiled up to 1.0.2.0, seemed to help in the beginning, but then I was back to being forktrapped again.

I see that the block explorer follows, this makes me a bit suspicious.. am I being poisoned by some notoriously bad nodes?

How about you guys, do you have any/different problems today or is it only me?

this is what test-net is for.
all these so called 'developers' launching shitcoins without fully putting them through the wringer, then changing their minds as to how the coin should work...

 Roll Eyes

why would anyone invest in anything that hadn't been fully tested? we have, indeed, all been duped, and there is probably more;
'oh, lets do it this way - no, this way' attitude from our gracious leader in the pipeline.

As a not-so-conservative investor, I'm willing to take a lot of shit in the hope that I will be the earlybird that catches the worm. My patience isn't limitless however, and I see other coins having the same features as this one and more. And then someone desperately trying to control the coin without the necessary support to make it a success. Mining BlackCatCoin now, OPEC will hopefully be released in a few hours today.

after my experiences with this, and previous altcoins; I am no longer mining anything other than Bitcoin - that one is already successful.  Wink

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
Pages: « 1 ... 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 [353] 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 ... 593 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!