[ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"

[BayAreaCoins]

ClamChecker.com is now closing and I will open source the code for anyone to build a digging assistance service easily.

I still support not taking away peoples free 4.6 CLAMS regardless of not having this service any more.

[1715153983]

1715153983

[xploited]

ClamChecker.com is now closing and I will open source the code for anyone to build a digging assistance service easily.

I still support not taking away peoples free 4.6 CLAMS regardless of not having this service any more.

Respectfully it is not your code to open source. I do have our communications specifying such.

If you want to be pety, so be it. I open souce MY code to the community.

[BayAreaCoins]

ClamChecker.com is now closing and I will open source the code for anyone to build a digging assistance service easily.

I still support not taking away peoples free 4.6 CLAMS regardless of not having this service any more.

Respectfully it is not your code to open source. I do have our communications specifying such.

If you want to be pety, so be it. I open souce MY code to the community.

It's my code.... When you do work for someone who paid for it... it's no long YOUR code.

I paid for it and I have a copy.  

It will be open sourced for the community by me.  Everyone should want to assist people in growing the CLAM network and digging their coins.

My stance on digging is still the same even without the website and being essentially scammed by xploited.

[SuperClam]

No, but my creativecuriosity account IS.

Why am I not shocked to see that account still totes a DiceBitcoin.com signature.  
Dicebitcoin.com was a HUGE scam site that was endorsed by dooglus.  They got caught cheating and basically allowed Doog to withdraw their money before robbing everyone else.

Everyone "gets" it.
You aren't happy.

If you have something on-topic and relevant to say about CLAM.
Say it.

Otherwise, please move on.

[danonthehill]

We are announcing the topic of the first of these petitions: the process and continuation of "digging" distribution CLAM.
In the coming days, we will announce the timing, choices and assist users in properly submitting "votes" using the process.


The first petition will likely be simplified - but, we see this as an enduring way forward with governance.

This process will allow the entire community to ascertain what petitions have majority support among stakeholders (and is hence likely to succeed given completed code).
The community can then proceed informed and collaborate on getting the code ready to submit to the community.


We invite the community to help us hone the list of choices prior to the start of the voting on this first petition.

Long Live The Great CLAM!

OK. I misread this and thought you were looking for suggestions in general, so right now discussion should be focussed on choices for the vote on "the process and continuation of "digging" distribution CLAM"...a decision which might make a fork redundant. Good.

What are the ideas for the choices in the vote so far?

[Bitcoiner2015]

So now everyone involved in CLAMs has a negative trust next to their name because you kids have thrown the toys out of the pram?
The trust system here is stupid, disagreements shouldn't result in negative trust which will undermine the whole CLAM project.

[DrkLvr_]

ClamChecker is closing 

You mean no one used your shitty-looking site you threw together in an afternoon? Praising yourself about how you're "In it for the community" but as soon as the price goes down you close up shop? 

I think we should keep discussing coin name ideas just so this idiotic parasite wastes all his money registering the domains for them.

[icanscript]

Hi All,

I have about 5000 Addresses from < 2014 that I have backed up from 2010 onwards. I want to check these all to see if they are in the initial distribution list.

I am quite handy with programming but wondering what the best way to check a large amount of addresses are?

Is there a list of all Bitcoin addresses that were sent clams? the initial distribution list? that I can check against

Regards,

[gamblingbad]

I've been asked to make my current thoughts clear.

I don't plan on making any kind of a new coin at the moment. SuperCLAM has stepped up and proposed a polling system (that I don't yet fully understand), and so I am willing to see how that pans out. If we as a community can use the forthcoming polling system to make changes that we want then I don't see the need for a new coin.

I'm not committing to never making a new coin, but I don't think it's likely that I will make one. CLAM is niche enough as it is without further splitting the community into two pieces.

Thanks for make that announcement. And if you plan in future to make a coin i hope u make a new snapshot, so we all can buy clam safetly.

[ethought]

Hi All,

I have about 5000 Addresses from < 2014 that I have backed up from 2010 onwards. I want to check these all to see if they are in the initial distribution list.

I am quite handy with programming but wondering what the best way to check a large amount of addresses are?

Is there a list of all Bitcoin addresses that were sent clams? the initial distribution list? that I can check against

Regards,

Just dumping and importing the private keys from your addresses into the clam client is probably the simplest method I can think of - easy to script.

Correct me if I am wrong, someone, and there is an easier way.

[icanscript]

Hi All,

I have about 5000 Addresses from < 2014 that I have backed up from 2010 onwards. I want to check these all to see if they are in the initial distribution list.

I am quite handy with programming but wondering what the best way to check a large amount of addresses are?

Is there a list of all Bitcoin addresses that were sent clams? the initial distribution list? that I can check against

Regards,

Just dumping and importing the private keys from your addresses into the clam client is probably the simplest method I can think of - easy to script.

Correct me if I am wrong, someone, and there is an easier way.

Thank you,

Seems everytime I try and run the clam client it gets stuck on 35 weeks (syncing) even when I delete the database and start again. been trying to sync for two weeks now.

[ethought]

Hi All,

I have about 5000 Addresses from < 2014 that I have backed up from 2010 onwards. I want to check these all to see if they are in the initial distribution list.

I am quite handy with programming but wondering what the best way to check a large amount of addresses are?

Is there a list of all Bitcoin addresses that were sent clams? the initial distribution list? that I can check against

Regards,

Just dumping and importing the private keys from your addresses into the clam client is probably the simplest method I can think of - easy to script.

Correct me if I am wrong, someone, and there is an easier way.

Thank you,

Seems everytime I try and run the clam client it gets stuck on 35 weeks (syncing) even when I delete the database and start again. been trying to sync for two weeks now.

Here is a current list of nodes which may help (http://www.blocktree.io/peers/CLAM/):

addnode=144.76.185.69
addnode=91.232.105.11
addnode=2a01:4f8:151:6347::2
addnode=176.9.113.75
addnode=45.79.151.194
addnode=88.198.207.8
addnode=168.235.150.242
addnode=109.236.85.42
addnode=192.241.224.61
addnode=162.243.198.51
addnode=192.99.32.187
addnode=74.207.230.61
addnode=104.236.69.34
addnode=2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe6e:e806
addnode=159.203.117.103
addnode=203.45.89.214
addnode=199.233.246.224
addnode=5.189.139.227
addnode=23.117.142.67
addnode=86.188.104.174
addnode=75.136.69.71
addnode=93.33.144.9
addnode=109.182.159.47
addnode=151.80.33.164
addnode=86.191.255.223
addnode=52.5.155.203
addnode=99.237.87.158
addnode=213.107.69.133
addnode=91.73.255.52
addnode=2602:306:c5b4:a190:1d42:b1e5:8ad3:adcd
addnode=78.62.83.197
addnode=2605:f700:80:800::4958:58fc
addnode=2605:e000:a901:be00:ac5a:6691:f0a6:d3d7
addnode=89.164.59.191
addnode=2606:a000:8880:e900:9066:ff21:6cb8:b507
addnode=65.182.72.222
addnode=107.170.174.86
addnode=72.10.216.141
addnode=98.238.201.128
addnode=2003:89:ee36:587:6d14:c7da:ef2e:5695
addnode=188.218.135.19
addnode=91.230.202.187
addnode=31.223.129.19
addnode=125.212.124.117
addnode=188.68.49.137
addnode=185.37.86.95
addnode=141.135.135.208

[icanscript]

running much faster now, forgot about conf files and nodes (been a few years)

Thank you.

[chilly2k]

Hi All,

I have about 5000 Addresses from < 2014 that I have backed up from 2010 onwards. I want to check these all to see if they are in the initial distribution list.

I am quite handy with programming but wondering what the best way to check a large amount of addresses are?

Is there a list of all Bitcoin addresses that were sent clams? the initial distribution list? that I can check against

Regards,

Just dumping and importing the private keys from your addresses into the clam client is probably the simplest method I can think of - easy to script.

Correct me if I am wrong, someone, and there is an easier way.

Thank you,

Seems everytime I try and run the clam client it gets stuck on 35 weeks (syncing) even when I delete the database and start again. been trying to sync for two weeks now.

   You don't need the whole block chain to check addresses.  Up to block 10,000 should be fine.  Not sure if there is a newer bootstrap available.  Once you get to that point.   

[icanscript]

When I try to import my wallet. One wallet I have is from 2011, the other 3 are 2012.

I get the below. It seems to freeze the client for a time, I assume this is when its importing and then nothing... Does this small red fail image come up when anyone else imports a wallet? is it just normal?

[doothewop]

Does this small red fail image come up when anyone else imports a wallet? is it just normal?

Were your addresses funded in May of '13?  This red icon is what I get when I import
wallets that weren't funded then.

[icanscript]

Does this small red fail image come up when anyone else imports a wallet? is it just normal?

Were your addresses funded in May of '13?  This red icon is what I get when I import
wallets that weren't funded then.

yeah, there's transactions on them from 2011, was the CLAM initial distribution just between that year of may 13 to may 14? That would explain I guess.

[Thirdspace]

running much faster now, forgot about conf files and nodes (been a few years)

Thank you.

or... you could just download the bootstrap file(s) up to the latest block
then synch & redeem & stake from that point
downloading the bootstrap probably will save your bandwith

[doothewop]

yeah, there's transactions on them from 2011, was the CLAM initial distribution just between that year of may 13 to may 14? That would explain I guess.

No, if there was a balance on the address on the day then it would have been funded.

[icanscript]

yeah, there's transactions on them from 2011, was the CLAM initial distribution just between that year of may 13 to may 14? That would explain I guess.

No, if there was a balance on the address on the day then it would have been funded.

Ah, Well that would make even more sense, I think the balance is 0 for most of these wallets.

Thank you for your help.