[ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"

[dooglus]

Great Idea ! Mind if i borrow for my own project ? Such a simple solution, because if indeed a valid transaction was created, a re-broadcast would resolve it.

It's not a new idea. There have been services offering to broadcast transactions for people since shortly after Bitcoin was launched.

See https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/pushtx/ for a good BTC one for instance. It lets you decode a transaction without broadcasting if you want to check that the fee is reasonable for example.

[Blockchain Mechanic]

Great Idea ! Mind if i borrow for my own project ? Such a simple solution, because if indeed a valid transaction was created, a re-broadcast would resolve it.

It's not a new idea. There have been services offering to broadcast transactions for people since shortly after Bitcoin was launched.

See https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/pushtx/ for a good BTC one for instance. It lets you decode a transaction without broadcasting if you want to check that the fee is reasonable for example.

Oh, i know that. But i mean having it as an option WITHIN the exchange. So if a problem arises, a user can check the transaction and/or re-broadcast on demand.

[almightyruler]

Has anyone managed to get a proxy working with CLAM?

I have both proxy=x.x.x.x:xxxx in clam.conf and -proxy=x.x.x.x:xxxx on the commandline, but the client refuses to use the proxy, and continues to attempt direct connects.

The only mention of "proxy" in debug.log is:

AppInit2 : parameter interaction: -proxy set -> setting -discover=0

I've set up several other coin clients and all have used the proxy as expected. CLAM is the first to do something different. Any ideas?

Clam version v1.4.18.0-unk (), fresh compile downloaded from the github link in the OP.


=================

Edit: Now I remember, I had this exact same problem a few years back. For some odd reason, the CLAM client doesn't properly discover peers (or use existing knowledge of peers) when you configure a proxy. It appears to ignore the contents of peers.dat, and the seed data returned from clam.just-dice.com - both of which contain plenty of information about peers.

The only solution seems to be to manually force peer connects by configuring them as addnodes, but this is not a viable long term solution.

[jerry0]

How much interest are you getting from this coin?

[jarsumarsu]

How much interest are you getting from this coin?

It's something like 0.1% /day...

[BayAreaCoins]

How much interest are you getting from this coin?

It's something like 0.1% /day...

Here is bot from JD chat stats:

 100 JD Clams, minus 10%, stake 0.09125747 CLAM per day .=. 0.00004388 BTC .. 0.40035968 USD .. 0.35644933 EUR .. 125.36169704 DOGE .. 0.00147113 ETH .. 0.00294324 LTC .. Your Share (1.0000) : 0.00006956

So, basically what jarsu said.

[almightyruler]

Bought some CLAM on Poloniex today...

Attempted withdraw to wallet...

Wondered why it showed Pending even after 20 minutes...

Then remembered Poloniex is broken.

[BayAreaCoins]

Bought some CLAM on Poloniex today...

Attempted withdraw to wallet...

Wondered why it showed Pending even after 20 minutes...

Then remembered Poloniex is broken.

Open a support ticket and wait! I'm waiting on a few deposits in.  It's been 6 hours.

You think that after they lost 1800 BTC... they would at least bother to fix the CLAM wallet or ask Doog/X for further free assistance.  

O well, shameless plug:  https://freebitcoins.com/swap/

[dooglus]

You think that after they lost 1800 BTC...

I heard that they passed that loss on to their customers - that all the people who were lending out BTC at some point about a week after the dump took the loss, whether they had loans active at the time of the big CLAM dump or not.

[almightyruler]

You think that after they lost 1800 BTC...

I heard that they passed that loss on to their customers - that all the people who were lending out BTC at some point about a week after the dump took the loss, whether they had loans active at the time of the big CLAM dump or not.

https://medium.com/circle-trader/overview-of-btc-margin-lending-pool-losses-a2f0905aaa56

"Today [June 7th], we recognized the generalized loss across lenders in the BTC margin lending pool. As a result, the principal of all active BTC loans as of 14:00 UTC today has been reduced by 16.202%. This action impacted 0.4% of Poloniex users."

My understanding is that any funds you loan are stored in a separate account at Poloniex, so I guess that means anyone who had BTC in their lending account took the loss, regardless of whether they had any active loans (or anything to do with CLAM).

[yefi]

Yeah, there's a forum thread on it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5151636.0

It was neglectful to allow such large positions to build up on margin.

[butt_coin]

Bought some CLAM on Poloniex today...

Attempted withdraw to wallet...

Wondered why it showed Pending even after 20 minutes...

Then remembered Poloniex is broken.

Open a support ticket and wait! I'm waiting on a few deposits in.  It's been 6 hours.

You think that after they lost 1800 BTC... they would at least bother to fix the CLAM wallet or ask Doog/X for further free assistance.   

O well, shameless plug:  https://freebitcoins.com/swap/

Liquidity problem on your end too? Showing max amount of clams to swap to be 0 right now.

[dooglus]

I guess that means anyone who had BTC in their lending account took the loss, regardless of whether they had any active loans (or anything to do with CLAM).

I think you're misinterpreting what they wrote:

the principal of all active BTC loans as of 14:00 UTC today has been reduced by 16.202%

That's pretty clear: BTC loans which were active quite some time after the dump are the ones which took the haircut.

[gembitz]

I guess that means anyone who had BTC in their lending account took the loss, regardless of whether they had any active loans (or anything to do with CLAM).

I think you're misinterpreting what they wrote:

the principal of all active BTC loans as of 14:00 UTC today has been reduced by 16.202%

That's pretty clear: BTC loans which were active quite some time after the dump are the ones which took the haircut.

i got an idea lets bring back the polo trollbox!    muuuhahaha ~ more manipulation will fix everything!!!\_@@_/weeeee

https://medium.com/circle-trader/trollbox-is-back-a458e3ec58df

[bradleyb21]

You think that after they lost 1800 BTC...

I heard that they passed that loss on to their customers - that all the people who were lending out BTC at some point about a week after the dump took the loss, whether they had loans active at the time of the big CLAM dump or not.

Any idea why my wallet will not work? See my error message.
"Private keys read correctly, but other info is missing"

[dooglus]

Any idea why my wallet will not work? See my error message.
"Private keys read correctly, but other info is missing"

I have no idea. Google doesn't find a single result for that string:

No results found for "Private keys read correctly, but other info is missing".

Did you mistype it perhaps?

The closest I'm finding in the CLAM wallet source is the following:

./src/qt/bitcoinstrings.cpp:"Warning: error reading wallet.dat! All keys read correctly, but transaction "
./src/init.cpp:                string msg(_("Warning: error reading wallet.dat! All keys read correctly, but transaction data"

[gembitz]

Any idea why my wallet will not work? See my error message.
"Private keys read correctly, but other info is missing"

I have no idea. Google doesn't find a single result for that string:

No results found for "Private keys read correctly, but other info is missing".

Did you mistype it perhaps?

The closest I'm finding in the CLAM wallet source is the following:

./src/qt/bitcoinstrings.cpp:"Warning: error reading wallet.dat! All keys read correctly, but transaction "
./src/init.cpp:                string msg(_("Warning: error reading wallet.dat! All keys read correctly, but transaction data"

do you communicate with the new admin of poloniex?    tia!

[basool]

the price going to zero soon i think and my cryptopia not yet return back my Clam coin

[dooglus]

Any idea why my wallet will not work? See my error message.
"Private keys read correctly, but other info is missing"

I have no idea. Google doesn't find a single result for that string:

No results found for "Private keys read correctly, but other info is missing".

Did you mistype it perhaps?

The closest I'm finding in the CLAM wallet source is the following:

./src/qt/bitcoinstrings.cpp:"Warning: error reading wallet.dat! All keys read correctly, but transaction "
./src/init.cpp:                string msg(_("Warning: error reading wallet.dat! All keys read correctly, but transaction data"

do you communicate with the new admin of poloniex?    tia!

I think he's asking about the CLAM wallet software, not Poloniex.

I don't know who the "new admin of Poloniex" is, but I doubt I've spoken with whoever it is.

[gembitz]

Any idea why my wallet will not work? See my error message.
"Private keys read correctly, but other info is missing"

I have no idea. Google doesn't find a single result for that string:

No results found for "Private keys read correctly, but other info is missing".

Did you mistype it perhaps?

The closest I'm finding in the CLAM wallet source is the following:

./src/qt/bitcoinstrings.cpp:"Warning: error reading wallet.dat! All keys read correctly, but transaction "
./src/init.cpp:                string msg(_("Warning: error reading wallet.dat! All keys read correctly, but transaction data"

do you communicate with the new admin of poloniex?    tia!

I think he's asking about the CLAM wallet software, not Poloniex.

I don't know who the "new admin of Poloniex" is, but I doubt I've spoken with whoever it is.

just as i thought .. ok someone needs to call ceo of circle.     ~go for it bro we got chu~