Michail1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1499
Merit: 1164
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2018, 04:46:27 PM Last edit: May 21, 2018, 04:56:45 PM by Michail1 |
|
I eventually synced. Since I don't use the wallet, I will try a couple of tests.
First, I am using: v1.4.17
Looking in logs, I see the client reaches 751 Orphan blocks. It gets a bunch more, but each one is numbered 751. Basically locks up.
I see others have taken the advice of connect=0 I will run that tonight just as another test / confirmation that it may resolve the issue. Of course, a client update would be needed to make no connections while it is importing blocks.
Well, again, it stopped automatically for me at block 1775693 bootstrap.dat 2.38 GB (2,565,076,446 bytes) sha256 713B93B7458E88500F1E32557F0BC58B9F05A6B13E1DE31576F25F5300184C96 blk0001.dat 1.95 GB (2,097,155,946 bytes) sha256 510D0CABB4208D9A545A0E05FAB2C0C29C225D699E0601A16B2891FACBD2CE98 blk0002.dat 40.1 MB ( 42,074,112 bytes) sha256 4E0425F4E1244A86167460031043C0247B09F5EAEBA6E1BCB4136A91EE0A2394 Here is the snippet from the debug log. SetBestChain: new best=33282ccb31e0242458ea8cf426cfb05714753604b37c413a8e95486ca81c7191 height=1775690 trust=567448766874838286320 blocktrust=509240947264508 date=11/16/17 09:02:08 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=81963d01eb963e0bc0f323c5252c67eee91c851e6bdc0552ef3ba5877b1bd9f7 height=1775691 trust=567449274043651486296 blocktrust=507168813199976 date=11/16/17 09:03:44 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=4787753ea648205e9f413cea6001eabf92614869318f469a2733bb016f9a1f5c height=1775692 trust=567449778894470438909 blocktrust=504850818952613 date=11/16/17 09:05:20 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=64aded1cfe3679857107151e22caa8043908fec2229a2e16b9a7046e0985ca23 height=1775693 trust=567450280914992243496 blocktrust=502020521804587 date=11/16/17 09:06:08 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED ERROR: CTransaction::ReadFromDisk() : OpenBlockFile failed ERROR: FetchInputs() : 6d855febfba9794f14995f90993a2c56444a4c7c5ec561030f983c657dc36492 ReadFromDisk prev tx 31cea8afbee32d452f52028ef310b51c749bbaaffd9ecd3df442b6898b4b641a failed InvalidChainFound: invalid block=fb790923aa509ff87a97287afd0639efa4763023fb6a7f42691837400f949b77 height=1775694 trust=567450780123264426586 blocktrust=499208272183090 date=11/16/17 09:06:56 InvalidChainFound: current best=64aded1cfe3679857107151e22caa8043908fec2229a2e16b9a7046e0985ca23 height=1775693 trust=567450280914992243496 blocktrust=502020521804587 date=11/16/17 09:06:08 ERROR: SetBestChain() : SetBestChainInner failed ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED ERROR: CTransaction::ReadFromDisk() : OpenBlockFile failed ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=5cc7e18e8e8d3a4d11beac2117869739f2185177262e8fb221baede214ebc0df ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=e24425383f3707c7f3b23e90d720e4883a98aeca0c1a3777e317efc9539c81ab ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=9109b5f5ed6bc67b4669e3d24823e42bf881b3772bf7a9b53ade463a9be95666 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=91afe77917861bf006e7ee797fecbb944dd18ae43ceb0c000674c996de88ffbc ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=f15bb5e8275a215b1921865dcc16e64aed9af05cdf6166c8dce7210b4f9ee70d ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=f5ef33223365fa4cdfc51d8c3c11340b23f7da3f4d5cdb3facd06f5fc008aaf3 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=2a576b57412f46383262a66a7ff966626830b9f6aab3d221e55106489d74cbd7 . . .
Although orphan stays at block 0, no more bestchains appear to have loaded. In the end, I see.... ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=166705ff3f78aeda9251ad3bc79bca5c88f461539987dff0747a0062d885de56 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=79241ea0703cebdea6a4a766dfdacea7f23319327034a8db346d0ff95f68e758 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=4a398a03270b98afa5e0ba0f9d643533b78b708c7a8fd536144cc6fc72684b65 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=b18c076bb4e687d959932c85766f0099592f1e4f1995f98d55bc63aa90f23c68 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=bb831330ced8366b7095c5a71267b8cd3ef5ef5078ee00aea57fcbde79d21732 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=eb4205fb93f5e6c6aeacbff987564f3ec4e1488a6e0c57a000299ab3625741d9 bool LoadExternalBlockFile(FILE*)() : Deserialize or I/O error caught during load Loaded 1781474 blocks from external file in 42731538ms dumpaddr thread stop addcon thread interrupt net thread interrupt msghand thread interrupt opencon thread interrupt Shutdown : In progress... StopNode() Shutdown : done
So, I made a backup of the debug.log file at this point, renamed the bootstrap.dat.old back and restarted. Appears to be running like it should...... ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1775690 33282ccb31e0242458ea8cf426cfb05714753604b37c413a8e95486ca81c7191 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1775691 81963d01eb963e0bc0f323c5252c67eee91c851e6bdc0552ef3ba5877b1bd9f7 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1775692 4787753ea648205e9f413cea6001eabf92614869318f469a2733bb016f9a1f5c ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1775693 64aded1cfe3679857107151e22caa8043908fec2229a2e16b9a7046e0985ca23 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1775694 fb790923aa509ff87a97287afd0639efa4763023fb6a7f42691837400f949b77 Postponing 1 reconnects REORGANIZE REORGANIZE: Disconnect 0 blocks; 64aded1cfe3679857107151e22caa8043908fec2229a2e16b9a7046e0985ca23..64aded1cfe367 9857107151e22caa8043908fec2229a2e16b9a7046e0985ca23 REORGANIZE: Connect 1 blocks; 64aded1cfe3679857107151e22caa8043908fec2229a2e16b9a7046e0985ca23..fb790923aa509 ff87a97287afd0639efa4763023fb6a7f42691837400f949b77 REORGANIZE: done SetBestChain: new best=5cc7e18e8e8d3a4d11beac2117869739f2185177262e8fb221baede214ebc0df height=1775695 trust=567451276791207500535 blocktrust=496667943073949 date=11/16/17 09:07:28 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=e24425383f3707c7f3b23e90d720e4883a98aeca0c1a3777e317efc9539c81ab height=1775696 trust=567451770931307516863 blocktrust=494140100016328 date=11/16/17 09:07:44 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=9109b5f5ed6bc67b4669e3d24823e42bf881b3772bf7a9b53ade463a9be95666 height=1775697 trust=567452262805132909752 blocktrust=491873825392889 date=11/16/17 09:08:16 . . . . .
Annnnnddddd, it fails again. SetBestChain: new best=b18c076bb4e687d959932c85766f0099592f1e4f1995f98d55bc63aa90f23c68 height=1781473 trust=569912537987922081905 blocktrust=490474450244869 date=11/20/17 10:10:56 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=bb831330ced8366b7095c5a71267b8cd3ef5ef5078ee00aea57fcbde79d21732 height=1781474 trust=569913028971501803220 blocktrust=490983579721315 date=11/20/17 10:12:16 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=eb4205fb93f5e6c6aeacbff987564f3ec4e1488a6e0c57a000299ab3625741d9 height=1781475 trust=569913520714206297916 blocktrust=491742704494696 date=11/20/17 10:14:24 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=0def539c364181bb509653a291a50783b49d79aa1cf79fc1e4377c963413e1b2 height=1781476 trust=569914012968678030572 blocktrust=492254471732656 date=11/20/17 10:16:00 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED bool LoadExternalBlockFile(FILE*)() : Deserialize or I/O error caught during load Loaded 5782 blocks from external file in 976515ms
This was a key block number in my prior setup days ago during my posts. Something is definately wrong. I could understand the random getting disconnected as maybe internet went down; however, at key block numbers is too coincidental. This is definately AFTER the 2GB blk file is created. So, my file is now.... blk0002.dat 47.9 MB ( 50,328,045 bytes) sha256 ABFE04484E56047C449E7BB983BF4AFA056195DB623999FFA1955AC697ED6557 at 1781476 Clam version v1.4.17 (2015-09-23 21:07:15 -0300) Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1j 15 Oct 2014
|
|
|
|
criptocambio
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2018, 05:36:13 PM |
|
I eventually synced. Since I don't use the wallet, I will try a couple of tests.
First, I am using: v1.4.17
Looking in logs, I see the client reaches 751 Orphan blocks. It gets a bunch more, but each one is numbered 751. Basically locks up.
I see others have taken the advice of connect=0 I will run that tonight just as another test / confirmation that it may resolve the issue. Of course, a client update would be needed to make no connections while it is importing blocks.
Well, again, it stopped automatically for me at block 1775693 bootstrap.dat 2.38 GB (2,565,076,446 bytes) sha256 713B93B7458E88500F1E32557F0BC58B9F05A6B13E1DE31576F25F5300184C96 blk0001.dat 1.95 GB (2,097,155,946 bytes) sha256 510D0CABB4208D9A545A0E05FAB2C0C29C225D699E0601A16B2891FACBD2CE98 blk0002.dat 40.1 MB ( 42,074,112 bytes) sha256 4E0425F4E1244A86167460031043C0247B09F5EAEBA6E1BCB4136A91EE0A2394 Here is the snippet from the debug log. SetBestChain: new best=33282ccb31e0242458ea8cf426cfb05714753604b37c413a8e95486ca81c7191 height=1775690 trust=567448766874838286320 blocktrust=509240947264508 date=11/16/17 09:02:08 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=81963d01eb963e0bc0f323c5252c67eee91c851e6bdc0552ef3ba5877b1bd9f7 height=1775691 trust=567449274043651486296 blocktrust=507168813199976 date=11/16/17 09:03:44 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=4787753ea648205e9f413cea6001eabf92614869318f469a2733bb016f9a1f5c height=1775692 trust=567449778894470438909 blocktrust=504850818952613 date=11/16/17 09:05:20 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=64aded1cfe3679857107151e22caa8043908fec2229a2e16b9a7046e0985ca23 height=1775693 trust=567450280914992243496 blocktrust=502020521804587 date=11/16/17 09:06:08 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED ERROR: CTransaction::ReadFromDisk() : OpenBlockFile failed ERROR: FetchInputs() : 6d855febfba9794f14995f90993a2c56444a4c7c5ec561030f983c657dc36492 ReadFromDisk prev tx 31cea8afbee32d452f52028ef310b51c749bbaaffd9ecd3df442b6898b4b641a failed InvalidChainFound: invalid block=fb790923aa509ff87a97287afd0639efa4763023fb6a7f42691837400f949b77 height=1775694 trust=567450780123264426586 blocktrust=499208272183090 date=11/16/17 09:06:56 InvalidChainFound: current best=64aded1cfe3679857107151e22caa8043908fec2229a2e16b9a7046e0985ca23 height=1775693 trust=567450280914992243496 blocktrust=502020521804587 date=11/16/17 09:06:08 ERROR: SetBestChain() : SetBestChainInner failed ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED ERROR: CTransaction::ReadFromDisk() : OpenBlockFile failed ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=5cc7e18e8e8d3a4d11beac2117869739f2185177262e8fb221baede214ebc0df ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=e24425383f3707c7f3b23e90d720e4883a98aeca0c1a3777e317efc9539c81ab ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=9109b5f5ed6bc67b4669e3d24823e42bf881b3772bf7a9b53ade463a9be95666 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=91afe77917861bf006e7ee797fecbb944dd18ae43ceb0c000674c996de88ffbc ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=f15bb5e8275a215b1921865dcc16e64aed9af05cdf6166c8dce7210b4f9ee70d ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=f5ef33223365fa4cdfc51d8c3c11340b23f7da3f4d5cdb3facd06f5fc008aaf3 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=2a576b57412f46383262a66a7ff966626830b9f6aab3d221e55106489d74cbd7 . . .
Although orphan stays at block 0, no more bestchains appear to have loaded. In the end, I see.... ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=166705ff3f78aeda9251ad3bc79bca5c88f461539987dff0747a0062d885de56 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=79241ea0703cebdea6a4a766dfdacea7f23319327034a8db346d0ff95f68e758 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=4a398a03270b98afa5e0ba0f9d643533b78b708c7a8fd536144cc6fc72684b65 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=b18c076bb4e687d959932c85766f0099592f1e4f1995f98d55bc63aa90f23c68 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=bb831330ced8366b7095c5a71267b8cd3ef5ef5078ee00aea57fcbde79d21732 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 0, prev=eb4205fb93f5e6c6aeacbff987564f3ec4e1488a6e0c57a000299ab3625741d9 bool LoadExternalBlockFile(FILE*)() : Deserialize or I/O error caught during load Loaded 1781474 blocks from external file in 42731538ms dumpaddr thread stop addcon thread interrupt net thread interrupt msghand thread interrupt opencon thread interrupt Shutdown : In progress... StopNode() Shutdown : done
So, I made a backup of the debug.log file at this point, renamed the bootstrap.dat.old back and restarted. Appears to be running like it should...... ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1775690 33282ccb31e0242458ea8cf426cfb05714753604b37c413a8e95486ca81c7191 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1775691 81963d01eb963e0bc0f323c5252c67eee91c851e6bdc0552ef3ba5877b1bd9f7 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1775692 4787753ea648205e9f413cea6001eabf92614869318f469a2733bb016f9a1f5c ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1775693 64aded1cfe3679857107151e22caa8043908fec2229a2e16b9a7046e0985ca23 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1775694 fb790923aa509ff87a97287afd0639efa4763023fb6a7f42691837400f949b77 Postponing 1 reconnects REORGANIZE REORGANIZE: Disconnect 0 blocks; 64aded1cfe3679857107151e22caa8043908fec2229a2e16b9a7046e0985ca23..64aded1cfe367 9857107151e22caa8043908fec2229a2e16b9a7046e0985ca23 REORGANIZE: Connect 1 blocks; 64aded1cfe3679857107151e22caa8043908fec2229a2e16b9a7046e0985ca23..fb790923aa509 ff87a97287afd0639efa4763023fb6a7f42691837400f949b77 REORGANIZE: done SetBestChain: new best=5cc7e18e8e8d3a4d11beac2117869739f2185177262e8fb221baede214ebc0df height=1775695 trust=567451276791207500535 blocktrust=496667943073949 date=11/16/17 09:07:28 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=e24425383f3707c7f3b23e90d720e4883a98aeca0c1a3777e317efc9539c81ab height=1775696 trust=567451770931307516863 blocktrust=494140100016328 date=11/16/17 09:07:44 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=9109b5f5ed6bc67b4669e3d24823e42bf881b3772bf7a9b53ade463a9be95666 height=1775697 trust=567452262805132909752 blocktrust=491873825392889 date=11/16/17 09:08:16 . . . . .
Annnnnddddd, it fails again. SetBestChain: new best=b18c076bb4e687d959932c85766f0099592f1e4f1995f98d55bc63aa90f23c68 height=1781473 trust=569912537987922081905 blocktrust=490474450244869 date=11/20/17 10:10:56 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=bb831330ced8366b7095c5a71267b8cd3ef5ef5078ee00aea57fcbde79d21732 height=1781474 trust=569913028971501803220 blocktrust=490983579721315 date=11/20/17 10:12:16 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=eb4205fb93f5e6c6aeacbff987564f3ec4e1488a6e0c57a000299ab3625741d9 height=1781475 trust=569913520714206297916 blocktrust=491742704494696 date=11/20/17 10:14:24 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=0def539c364181bb509653a291a50783b49d79aa1cf79fc1e4377c963413e1b2 height=1781476 trust=569914012968678030572 blocktrust=492254471732656 date=11/20/17 10:16:00 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED bool LoadExternalBlockFile(FILE*)() : Deserialize or I/O error caught during load Loaded 5782 blocks from external file in 976515ms
This was a key block number in my prior setup days ago during my posts. Something is definately wrong. I could understand the random getting disconnected as maybe internet went down; however, at key block numbers is too coincidental. This is definately AFTER the 2GB blk file is created. So, my file is now.... blk0002.dat 47.9 MB ( 50,328,045 bytes) sha256 ABFE04484E56047C449E7BB983BF4AFA056195DB623999FFA1955AC697ED6557 at 1781476 Clam version v1.4.17 (2015-09-23 21:07:15 -0300) Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1j 15 Oct 2014 Looks like an read/write error from your disk. The code is not printing the exact exception so it will be difficult to help you, as it looks a hardware failure and probably hard to replicate in another hardware. Are you using the pre-compiled version or are you compiling it yourself? If yes, please find the attached code in main.cpp catch (std::exception &e) { LogPrintf("%s() : Deserialize or I/O error caught during load\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); }
and change to catch (std::exception &e) { std::cerr << e.what(); }
so we can have the exact exception message
|
criptocambio.com.br
|
|
|
Michail1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1499
Merit: 1164
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2018, 06:05:04 PM Last edit: May 21, 2018, 10:53:18 PM by Michail1 |
|
Looks like an read/write error from your disk. The code is not printing the exact exception so it will be difficult to help you, as it looks a hardware failure and probably hard to replicate in another hardware. Are you using the pre-compiled version or are you compiling it yourself? If yes, please find the attached code in main.cpp catch (std::exception &e) { LogPrintf("%s() : Deserialize or I/O error caught during load\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); }
and change to catch (std::exception &e) { std::cerr << e.what(); }
so we can have the exact exception message I doubt it's a problem specific to me. Appears many people are having the problem. The only way to get past this problem is to take out the 'connect=0' in order to sync past this block via internet syncing. Once you get past it, you can then close the client, rename bootstrap, and start up again. People having to close and reopen are getting past the problems by simply closing and restarting the client many times. As long as I keep connect=0, I am able to get stuck on the same block every time. I have saved the block state at this point to be able to easily repeat the problem should another test be requested. I am using the original pre-compiled version on windows. All in all, I can duplicate the problem several others are complaining about and appears to be at 1781476. Also, not a read/write issue. This is on a laptop with an SSD drive when I started the tests. It is now on a Windows Server (Raid 60) with 32GB ram. sha256 checks correctly for both machines. As long as I don't have the connect=0 in clam.conf and I import, and I keep restarting the client (everytime it stops), I can eventually sync up; however, it appears the fail points are the same each time. Leaving 'connect=0', I no longer load blocks from the bootstrap. Now I only see (after restarting the app each time).... . . . ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1781474 bb831330ced8366b7095c5a71267b8cd3ef5ef5078ee00aea57fcbde79d21732 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1781475 eb4205fb93f5e6c6aeacbff987564f3ec4e1488a6e0c57a000299ab3625741d9 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1781476 0def539c364181bb509653a291a50783b49d79aa1cf79fc1e4377c963413e1b2 ERROR: CheckBlock() : size limits failed ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED bool LoadExternalBlockFile(FILE*)() : Deserialize or I/O error caught during load Loaded 0 blocks from external file in 266760ms
0 blocks load. Again, if I take out connect=0, then it will error; however, it will start syncing from the internet to get past that point, in which case, I can then stop, rename bootstrap, and continue on again until the next point.
|
|
|
|
criptocambio
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2018, 07:54:51 PM |
|
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1781476 0def539c364181bb509653a291a50783b49d79aa1cf79fc1e4377c963413e1b2 ERROR: CheckBlock() : size limits failed
if (vtx.empty() || vtx.size() > MAX_SIZE || ::GetSerializeSize(*this, SER_DISK) > MAX_SIZE) return error("CheckBlock() : size limits failed");
Strange, a block with size larger than 1Mb in the bootstrap file? Is there any way to extract a single block from the bootstrap file to verify this?
|
criptocambio.com.br
|
|
|
.nuke
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 23, 2018, 10:36:26 AM |
|
Where I can find block explorer with nodes/peers addresses? Or could someone write here some fresh nodes to get wallet syncing faster?
|
|
|
|
zazarb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3458
Merit: 1548
Get loan in just five minutes goo.gl/8WMW6n
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 23, 2018, 11:35:09 AM |
|
Where I can find block explorer with nodes/peers addresses? Or could someone write here some fresh nodes to get wallet syncing faster?
I don't know or you looking for this, but my wallet have 26 connection: "addr" : "99.228.221.187:31174", "addr" : "46.101.33.61:31174", "addr" : "88.98.87.243:31174", "addr" : "97.83.177.95:31174", "addr" : "82.15.85.224:31174", "addr" : "78.46.108.202:31174", "addr" : "67.205.153.62:31174", "addr" : "187.181.165.79:31174", "addr" : "99.125.191.21:60985", "addr" : "109.233.58.44:31174", "addr" : "211.24.127.133:65493", "addr" : "31.6.27.234:56510", "addr" : "170.130.28.170:31174", "addr" : "159.203.5.220:31174", "addr" : "109.128.220.51:31174", "addr" : "54.37.239.40:31174", "addr" : "178.62.8.78:31174", "addr" : "75.66.14.7:56201", "addr" : "176.15.131.210:31174", "addr" : "188.110.118.117:63354", "addr" : "145.239.71.6:44308", "addr" : "216.254.241.42:31174", "addr" : "212.180.164.109:59118", "addr" : "46.105.98.179:49920", "addr" : "118.24.130.250:53113", "addr" : "78.46.92.72:56917",
|
|
|
|
criptocambio
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 23, 2018, 12:24:55 PM |
|
Where I can find block explorer with nodes/peers addresses? Or could someone write here some fresh nodes to get wallet syncing faster?
Made a tool to list connected nodes in my client, hope it helps https://criptocambio.com.br/clamNodes
|
criptocambio.com.br
|
|
|
jordixal
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 221
Merit: 100
Bitcoin lover
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 23, 2018, 02:49:10 PM |
|
Hi dooglus, I have a doubt, whats is a block "Generated but not accepted" What does this mean to the clam system/network?. I'm having too much of this blocks in my wallet (W 10). Is this related on the the staking machine hardware, internetconnection or just bad luck?. thank you
|
|
|
|
dooglus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 25, 2018, 03:34:18 AM |
|
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1781476 0def539c364181bb509653a291a50783b49d79aa1cf79fc1e4377c963413e1b2 ERROR: CheckBlock() : size limits failed
if (vtx.empty() || vtx.size() > MAX_SIZE || ::GetSerializeSize(*this, SER_DISK) > MAX_SIZE) return error("CheckBlock() : size limits failed");
Strange, a block with size larger than 1Mb in the bootstrap file? Is there any way to extract a single block from the bootstrap file to verify this? The bootstrap file is fine. I recently imported the whole thing. I suspect it's the "vtx.empty()" condition which is true. It would be interesting to have a copy of the clam folder which reliably causes this error. I don't need the 2GB blk* file - I already have that. And I have the bootstrap.dat too. So just the other files.
|
Just-Dice | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | Play or Invest | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | 1% House Edge |
|
|
|
BayAreaCoins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1250
Owner at AltQuick.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 25, 2018, 05:54:08 AM |
|
Dooglus,
I believe Xploited has a email pending with you in regards to the CLAM update.
|
|
|
|
Michail1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1499
Merit: 1164
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 25, 2018, 06:19:19 AM |
|
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1781476 0def539c364181bb509653a291a50783b49d79aa1cf79fc1e4377c963413e1b2 ERROR: CheckBlock() : size limits failed
if (vtx.empty() || vtx.size() > MAX_SIZE || ::GetSerializeSize(*this, SER_DISK) > MAX_SIZE) return error("CheckBlock() : size limits failed");
Strange, a block with size larger than 1Mb in the bootstrap file? Is there any way to extract a single block from the bootstrap file to verify this? The bootstrap file is fine. I recently imported the whole thing. I suspect it's the "vtx.empty()" condition which is true. It would be interesting to have a copy of the clam folder which reliably causes this error. I don't need the 2GB blk* file - I already have that. And I have the bootstrap.dat too. So just the other files. Here.... https://www.dropbox.com/s/03aqrhnla5sca50/ClamNoDebug.rarThat is the entire directory except for debug.log and the blk0001.dat (2gb file). clam.conf still with connect=0 The log is basically... SetBestChain: new best=eb4205fb93f5e6c6aeacbff987564f3ec4e1488a6e0c57a000299ab3625741d9 height=1781475 trust=569913520714206297916 blocktrust=491742704494696 date=11/20/17 10:14:24 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED SetBestChain: new best=0def539c364181bb509653a291a50783b49d79aa1cf79fc1e4377c963413e1b2 height=1781476 trust=569914012968678030572 blocktrust=492254471732656 date=11/20/17 10:16:00 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED bool LoadExternalBlockFile(FILE*)() : Deserialize or I/O error caught during load Loaded 5782 blocks from external file in 976515ms addcon thread interrupt net thread interrupt opencon thread interrupt dumpaddr thread stop msghand thread interrupt Shutdown : In progress... StopNode() Shutdown : done
and when rerun, the log does the same, but is: LoadBlockIndex(): hashBestChain=0def539c364181bb509653a291a50783b49d79aa1cf79fc1e4377c963413e1b2 height=1781476 trust=569914012968678030572 date=11/20/17 10:16:00 LoadBlockIndex(): synchronized checkpoint f89eedd61837c581b4b8fcb85782066b04f7266b4bd946b583805d330a0ae0cc Verifying last 500 blocks at level 1 block index 16855ms init message: Loading wallet... nFileVersion = 1041700 Keys: 101 plaintext, 0 encrypted, 101 w/ metadata, 101 total wallet 135ms init message: Loading addresses... Loaded 0 addresses from peers.dat 0ms mapBlockIndex.size() = 1781477 nBestHeight = 1781476 setKeyPool.size() = 100 mapWallet.size() = 0 mapAddressBook.size() = 1 DNS seeding disabled net thread start addcon thread start opencon thread start msghand thread start dumpaddr thread start init message: Done loading addcon thread interrupt opencon thread interrupt net thread interrupt dumpaddr thread stop msghand thread interrupt Shutdown : In progress... StopNode() Shutdown : done
And every time run after that is..... ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1781473 b18c076bb4e687d959932c85766f0099592f1e4f1995f98d55bc63aa90f23c68 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1781474 bb831330ced8366b7095c5a71267b8cd3ef5ef5078ee00aea57fcbde79d21732 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1781475 eb4205fb93f5e6c6aeacbff987564f3ec4e1488a6e0c57a000299ab3625741d9 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : already have block 1781476 0def539c364181bb509653a291a50783b49d79aa1cf79fc1e4377c963413e1b2 ERROR: CheckBlock() : size limits failed ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED bool LoadExternalBlockFile(FILE*)() : Deserialize or I/O error caught during load Loaded 0 blocks from external file in 266760ms opencon thread interrupt addcon thread interrupt net thread interrupt dumpaddr thread stop msghand thread interrupt Shutdown : In progress... StopNode() Shutdown : done
|
|
|
|
dooglus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 25, 2018, 12:51:05 PM |
|
Thanks, but it doesn't work for me. As soon as I try to run the CLAM client I get an error and it quits: 2018-05-25 12:43:59 Clam version v1.4.17-139-gf0707d3 (2017-04-10 17:28:15 +0000) 2018-05-25 12:43:59 Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 2018-05-25 12:43:59 Default data directory /home/user/.clam 2018-05-25 12:43:59 Used data directory /home/user/.clam 2018-05-25 12:43:59 init message: Verifying database integrity... 2018-05-25 12:43:59 dbenv.open LogDir=/home/user/.clam/database ErrorFile=/home/user/.clam/db.log 2018-05-25 12:44:00 init message: Loading block index... 2018-05-25 12:44:00 Opening LevelDB in /home/user/.clam/txleveldb 2018-05-25 12:44:00 Transaction index version is 70509 2018-05-25 12:44:00 Opened LevelDB successfully 2018-05-25 12:44:00 ERROR: LoadBlockIndex() : unable to unserialize record : try running with -reindex 2018-05-25 12:44:00 : Error loading block index database : try running with -reindex 2018-05-25 12:44:00 Shutdown : In progress... 2018-05-25 12:44:00 StopNode() 2018-05-25 12:44:00 Shutdown : done
I used my own blk0001.dat, with this sha256sum: 510d0cabb4208d9a545a0e05fab2c0c29c225d699e0601a16b2891facbd2ce98 blk0001.dat I guess it's the same as yours. Other than that I'm guessing we are using incompatible versions of leveldb. Edit: how does the start of your debug.log look when it's failing? Do you see a different "transaction index version" number?
|
Just-Dice | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | Play or Invest | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | 1% House Edge |
|
|
|
Michail1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1499
Merit: 1164
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 25, 2018, 07:04:12 PM Last edit: May 25, 2018, 07:41:42 PM by Michail1 |
|
Thanks, but it doesn't work for me. As soon as I try to run the CLAM client I get an error and it quits: 2018-05-25 12:43:59 Clam version v1.4.17-139-gf0707d3 (2017-04-10 17:28:15 +0000) 2018-05-25 12:43:59 Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 2018-05-25 12:43:59 Default data directory /home/user/.clam 2018-05-25 12:43:59 Used data directory /home/user/.clam 2018-05-25 12:43:59 init message: Verifying database integrity... 2018-05-25 12:43:59 dbenv.open LogDir=/home/user/.clam/database ErrorFile=/home/user/.clam/db.log 2018-05-25 12:44:00 init message: Loading block index... 2018-05-25 12:44:00 Opening LevelDB in /home/user/.clam/txleveldb 2018-05-25 12:44:00 Transaction index version is 70509 2018-05-25 12:44:00 Opened LevelDB successfully 2018-05-25 12:44:00 ERROR: LoadBlockIndex() : unable to unserialize record : try running with -reindex 2018-05-25 12:44:00 : Error loading block index database : try running with -reindex 2018-05-25 12:44:00 Shutdown : In progress... 2018-05-25 12:44:00 StopNode() 2018-05-25 12:44:00 Shutdown : done
I used my own blk0001.dat, with this sha256sum: 510d0cabb4208d9a545a0e05fab2c0c29c225d699e0601a16b2891facbd2ce98 blk0001.dat I guess it's the same as yours. Other than that I'm guessing we are using incompatible versions of leveldb. Edit: how does the start of your debug.log look when it's failing? Do you see a different "transaction index version" number? Strange.... My file is the same..... BLK0001.DAT CRC32: EDF37145 MD5: D9F206FF08650A0CF5F8DC71735A388D SHA-1: 9897F16A8E6AC09DD0AF41C66A2E2897482399A1 SHA-256: 510D0CABB4208D9A545A0E05FAB2C0C29C225D699E0601A16B2891FACBD2CE98 Clam version v1.4.17 (2015-09-23 21:07:15 -0300) Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1j 15 Oct 2014 Startup time: 05/21/18 16:59:10 Default data directory C:\Users\Michail\AppData\Roaming\Clam Used data directory C:\Users\Michail\AppData\Roaming\Clam init message: Verifying database integrity... dbenv.open LogDir=C:\Users\Michail\AppData\Roaming\Clam\database ErrorFile=C:\Users\Michail\AppData\Roaming\Clam\db.log init message: Loading block index... Opening LevelDB in C:\Users\Michail\AppData\Roaming\Clam\txleveldb Transaction index version is 70509 Opened LevelDB successfully
Deleted the log file. Did a rescan. Same results. Here is the log file ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/xyc2w3jlklcpuy0/debug.log ) I will try to rerun with a -reindex and bootstrap and connect=0 to see if anything changes tonight.
|
|
|
|
.nuke
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2018, 08:08:45 PM Last edit: May 26, 2018, 09:03:48 PM by .nuke |
|
hm, i've got positive BTC balance on block 300377, but didn't claim any CLAM, is it OK or I should have more than 1 btc on this date? BTW, uploaded current chain here.
|
|
|
|
BayAreaCoins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1250
Owner at AltQuick.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2018, 01:06:44 AM Last edit: June 07, 2018, 10:51:39 PM by BayAreaCoins |
|
hm, i've got positive BTC balance on block 300377, but didn't claim any CLAM, is it OK or I should have more than 1 btc on this date? BTW, uploaded current chain here. You only need over "dust" to qualify for CLAMS. You can also check your address risk-free for CLAMS at: https://freebitcoins.com/clamchecker/dig/ (or on Just-dice)
|
|
|
|
eva3059
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 01, 2018, 03:49:55 PM |
|
Honestly speaking I cannot see what is reason for that coin (it is not only one coin without reason, coin just to make one more coin
|
|
|
|
Olivia2546
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 01, 2018, 04:03:39 PM |
|
my synchronized wallet does not show the steaks either in what can be the reason
|
|
|
|
Vlada69
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 5
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 01, 2018, 06:57:13 PM |
|
Honestly speaking I cannot see what is reason for that coin (it is not only one coin without reason, coin just to make one more coin
as in human nature to have more ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
cointopper
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2018, 03:53:13 AM |
|
Hello Clams believers, Our aim is to add value to the whole crypto community by giving the best user experience to analyse cryptocurrencies. It would be really great help from your side if you can spend 60 seconds of your time and give us your valuable feedback for our two recent updates 1) Snapshot and 2) Colourful interface of Clams at: https://cointopper.com/coin/clamConstructive criticisms are always welcome at CoinTopper. Thank you!!
|
|
|
|
mike84.hn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2018, 04:59:36 AM |
|
my synchronized wallet does not show the steaks either in what can be the reason
I have the same problem. Anyone can help us?
|
|
|
|
|