atcsecure
|
|
October 01, 2014, 09:05:16 PM |
|
There is a topic about Coinshuffle on the front page of Reddit r/bitcoin, please upvote this XC post: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2hy9n5/presenting_coinshuffle_trustless_peertopeer/ckxfq1pSynechist I posted your explanation of XCurrency ( http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2hy9n5/presenting_coinshuffle_trustless_peertopeer/ckxhc9q?context=3) and someone asked me: "I haven't quite grasped the scenario of 'what happens if a node that receives coins to mix just drops off the face of the Earth', what happens to those coins? How do you work around this? Side note: you should also consider building in a timeout setting, such that a node involved in mixing cannot hold coins for more than X seconds or Y coins or Z transactions (or some combination); else, they could sit there collecting as many coins as possible and then walking off with them - unless there's some other mitigation to this already? In short, how do you mitigate against rogue nodes? Yes you have mentioned something about kicking bad nodes out, but what's to prevent a rogue node from just re-spawning under a different ID?" Can you give me a response to give them or post there directly? Interesting question but really thats how REV1 worked, REV2's trustless system doesn't allow a node to hold coins and "disappear" - since its an atomic transaction, so if the node drops off in the middle of the TX, then the TX fails and is banned.. Rogue/Bad nodes can't steal coins If a node's connection crashes before it manages to sign, it's IP gets banned? One strike and you're out? Did the node have to have 500 XC or was it just the requirement for the xmixer? There is a ban score actually and this system is being updated for rev3 The node would have been an XMIXER
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
illodin
|
|
October 01, 2014, 09:13:46 PM |
|
The node would have been an XMIXER
XMIXER requires 1000 XC, XNODE requires 0?
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
October 01, 2014, 09:20:20 PM |
|
The node would have been an XMIXER
XMIXER requires 1000 XC, XNODE requires 0? Correct
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
tr8kr
|
|
October 01, 2014, 09:25:42 PM |
|
Want some XC Illodin to begin your path to the light side ?
|
|
|
|
novirudarzg
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
|
October 01, 2014, 09:57:32 PM |
|
hello can anyone help me? i get 3 times less xc through multipool than it says in stats (0.25 xc per mhash x11) ,, is that becoz' unconfirmed shares or else?
You should be getting about 50% of that, due to the litecoinx shares not included Dan yes that is correct. thanks
|
|
|
|
akula999
|
|
October 01, 2014, 10:08:25 PM |
|
1000 XC, will take me forever! Oh well. Slow and steady.
|
Bitcoin: 1FzZehkiwfeeUmfmBrym8VvXX7gUj3miHe XMR: 4AqrzGPfEKeZrVXyPDNXUrNeKZZGNYiXMDoY49PvdffKNTRg6xp2Qz74SZ72gT5F9HH8Vaic99ndRg6 UBGcVijaNStQjwwf
|
|
|
Driv3n
|
|
October 01, 2014, 10:27:59 PM |
|
Any chance we gonna do a custom Blockchain rather then using a general site?
Like this ? Credits to KimmyF This still blows my mind everytime I see it. Can you imagine when we have a lot more xmixers running as well...
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
October 01, 2014, 10:32:28 PM |
|
Any chance we gonna do a custom Blockchain rather then using a general site?
Like this ? Credits to KimmyF This still blows my mind everytime I see it. Can you imagine when we have a lot more xmixers running as well... I agree, not only is KimmyF's tool amazing, the visual representation of the transaction is quite impressive and show's how complex XC's mixing technology is.
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
illodin
|
|
October 01, 2014, 10:47:15 PM |
|
Any chance we gonna do a custom Blockchain rather then using a general site?
Like this ? Credits to KimmyF This still blows my mind everytime I see it. Can you imagine when we have a lot more xmixers running as well... Yes... if I squint my eyes and tilt my head slightly to the left I can discern the letters N O B L O A T.
|
|
|
|
wooder
|
|
October 01, 2014, 11:02:37 PM |
|
Rev2 was released weeks ago and we still don't have a linux client. when is the ETA for a Rev2 linux client?
It sucks that one has to buy a windows license to use the latest version of XCurrency.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 01, 2014, 11:04:50 PM |
|
N O B L O A T. Correct. Each mixing transaction (between many users) is a single atomic transaction, recorded on the blockchain as such. This means a whole lot less transactions, and less bloat overall.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
October 01, 2014, 11:07:11 PM |
|
Rev2 was released weeks ago and we still don't have a linux client. when is the ETA for a Rev2 linux client?
It sucks that one has to buy a windows license to use the latest version of XCurrency.
I agree, linux client is coming in the next few days Dan
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
wooder
|
|
October 01, 2014, 11:09:36 PM |
|
Rev2 was released weeks ago and we still don't have a linux client. when is the ETA for a Rev2 linux client?
It sucks that one has to buy a windows license to use the latest version of XCurrency.
I agree, linux client is coming in the next few days Dan thanks for the info. looking forward to the release
|
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
October 01, 2014, 11:25:41 PM |
|
This still blows my mind everytime I see it. Can you imagine when we have a lot more xmixers running as well... Yes... if I squint my eyes and tilt my head slightly to the left I can discern the letters N O B L O A T. I can understand where this idea comes from but complexity !== Bloat. For those interested, moved the site into the Azure cloud a couple of days ago & am finalizing stuff.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 01, 2014, 11:39:07 PM |
|
This still blows my mind everytime I see it. Can you imagine when we have a lot more xmixers running as well... Yes... if I squint my eyes and tilt my head slightly to the left I can discern the letters N O B L O A T. I can understand where this idea comes from but complexity !== Bloat. For those interested, moved the site into the Azure cloud a couple of days ago & am finalizing stuff. Great news Kimmy. Can't wait until it's out.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
October 02, 2014, 12:14:54 AM |
|
This still blows my mind everytime I see it. Can you imagine when we have a lot more xmixers running as well... Yes... if I squint my eyes and tilt my head slightly to the left I can discern the letters N O B L O A T. I can understand where this idea comes from but complexity !== Bloat. For those interested, moved the site into the Azure cloud a couple of days ago & am finalizing stuff. Exactly... an extra input/out vs a whole new transaction saves a lot of bytes from the blockchain. This isn't the Monero thread... ps. Can't wait to try your explorer. Did you use a graphing library out there or did you code your own? I just didn't have time to finish mine yet...
|
|
|
|
adhitthana
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 02, 2014, 05:12:14 AM |
|
okay to use XChat, make a new local wallet address, then right click to get your Pubkey - those 2 values are what you share
however in an upcoming release, you can just use your alias/username
Awesome; Thank you! Yes and it will be decentralised - (Proof of Identity) If I wanted to understand this concept better, is there anything I could read?
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
October 02, 2014, 06:45:04 AM |
|
So if my Internet drops out while I am mixing, I get banned and I can't send XC anymore?
Or am I wrong here? Please explain this a bit better.
|
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
October 02, 2014, 07:58:16 AM |
|
Look at that beard, it is magnificent.
|
|
|
|
|