|
hoertest
|
 |
October 08, 2014, 02:23:00 PM |
|
well if the bug is real i don't care for an XC Atlas review one bit anymore.  |
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:23:16 PM |
|
is it possible to get the ito process reviewed or verified by a third party?
not that i don't trust you but i have the feeling we'll see some people show up again come launchtime trying to associate XC with you know who again.
I think this is a very good idea. |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:23:39 PM |
|
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:25:29 PM |
|
It's a bit concerning... considering Kristov Atlas reviewed their code. |
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:28:47 PM |
|
So who's up for testing this? |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
Sabretooth
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:28:56 PM |
|
well if the bug is real i don't care for an XC Atlas review one bit anymore. Same, maybe we should get the guy who found the exploit to review our code, maybe not the official reviewer, but one of the reviewers. |
Uno: uVcEaDQ5MXcYRjSGY1E7FXfrtxGk6QKnBm
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:30:58 PM |
|
well if the bug is real i don't care for an XC Atlas review one bit anymore. Same, maybe we should get the guy who found the exploit to review our code, maybe not the official reviewer, but one of the reviewers. The more code reviews the better. |
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:32:01 PM |
|
well if the bug is real i don't care for an XC Atlas review one bit anymore. Same, maybe we should get the guy who found the exploit to review our code, maybe not the official reviewer, but one of the reviewers. The more code reviews the better. Yeah. How about we offer him a bounty when the time is right? |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
illodin
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:40:27 PM |
|
Hmm - how to short it?
Too late, the bug was fixed in 10 minutes yesterday. |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:42:47 PM |
|
Hmm - how to short it?
Too late, the bug was fixed in 10 minutes yesterday. What kind of Bug was it? |
|
|
|
|
illodin
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:43:49 PM |
|
Hmm - how to short it?
Too late, the bug was fixed in 10 minutes yesterday. What kind of Bug was it? It allowed someone to get masternode rewards (20% of the block reward) more often than normal. Usually with one masternode, and with current number of masternodes, you will get the ~1 RDK reward once in every ~1000 blocks. He managed to game that number up. |
|
|
|
|
|
holyprofit
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:44:15 PM |
|
is it possible to get the ito process reviewed or verified by a third party?
not that i don't trust you but i have the feeling we'll see some people show up again come launchtime trying to associate XC with you know who again.
Yep - this is an excellent comment - it is just bound to attract those people |
|
|
|
|
|
holyprofit
|
|
October 08, 2014, 03:05:15 PM |
|
Hmm - how to short it?
Too late, the bug was fixed in 10 minutes yesterday. What kind of Bug was it? It allowed someone to get masternode rewards (20% of the block reward) more often than normal. Usually with one masternode, and with current number of masternodes, you will get the ~1 RDK reward once in every ~1000 blocks. He managed to game that number up. Sounds like a strange sort of bug - |
|
|
|
|
robinwilliams
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
October 08, 2014, 03:07:20 PM |
|
is it possible to get the ito process reviewed or verified by a third party?
not that i don't trust you but i have the feeling we'll see some people show up again come launchtime trying to associate XC with you know who again.
Yep - this is an excellent comment - it is just bound to attract those people please tell me ur going to open source before you try to do a stock offering? you do realize you are promising something is under the hood that no one knows is even THERE for a coin. and now you are selling a company based on that promise? most people are going to laugh their asses off at you if you do a closed source "anon platform" company (for whatever reason) that can be bought into all built around software that nobody has seen? or just a few people have seen? |
|
|
|
|
|
Astroxjr
|
|
October 08, 2014, 03:07:56 PM |
|
is it possible to get the ito process reviewed or verified by a third party?
not that i don't trust you but i have the feeling we'll see some people show up again come launchtime trying to associate XC with you know who again.
Yep - this is an excellent comment - it is just bound to attract those people Since no funds will change hands, what exactly would need to reviewed anyway All that needs to be checked is the allocation of shares POST and that is easy to do. However, reputation of the Dev is impeccable anyway, regardless of the FUD that has been thrown about  |
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 08, 2014, 03:12:53 PM |
|
is it possible to get the ito process reviewed or verified by a third party?
not that i don't trust you but i have the feeling we'll see some people show up again come launchtime trying to associate XC with you know who again.
Yep - this is an excellent comment - it is just bound to attract those people please tell me ur going to open source before you try to do a stock offering? you do realize you are promising something is under the hood that no one knows is even THERE for a coin. and now you are selling a company based on that promise? most people are going to laugh their asses off at you if you do a closed source "anon platform" company (for whatever reason) that can be bought into all built around software that nobody has seen? or just a few people have seen? Something about your tone is unnecessary. That said, we've been clear (moreover in a press release, which you should've read) about how we're bringing XC into the public: internal testing and consultations, public reviews, bounties, then open source. This is the plan, and everyone knows it; nobody is wandering in blindly. Lastly, XC Inc is *not* based on the code, since it's a private company developing various *other* technologies, mostly based on and extending the usefulness of the currency. So even if we keep the code entirely unreviewed, it'll make little difference to XC Inc. |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 08, 2014, 03:14:08 PM |
|
is it possible to get the ito process reviewed or verified by a third party?
not that i don't trust you but i have the feeling we'll see some people show up again come launchtime trying to associate XC with you know who again.
Yep - this is an excellent comment - it is just bound to attract those people please tell me ur going to open source before you try to do a stock offering? you do realize you are promising something is under the hood that no one knows is even THERE for a coin. and now you are selling a company based on that promise? most people are going to laugh their asses off at you if you do a closed source "anon platform" company (for whatever reason) that can be bought into all built around software that nobody has seen? or just a few people have seen? what is the sense of this comment you can check the code work by making a transaction. why don't you break the anon and then come back to us. stop trolling dude you are a waste of your life. |
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 08, 2014, 03:14:45 PM |
|
is it possible to get the ito process reviewed or verified by a third party?
not that i don't trust you but i have the feeling we'll see some people show up again come launchtime trying to associate XC with you know who again.
Yep - this is an excellent comment - it is just bound to attract those people Since no funds will change hands, what exactly would need to reviewed anyway All that needs to be checked is the allocation of shares POST and that is easy to do. However, reputation of the Dev is impeccable anyway, regardless of the FUD that has been thrown about A third party's involvement will bolster the legitimacy of the ITO regardless of how little is at stake. Not everyone knows or trusts XC; the stronger our case, the easier it is for everyone. |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
