[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[LD2164]

I really love this thread.  Whoretest, goatboy, even the official unnoffical xc troll, pookie.  The team of course, the extended team, the affiliates...  Everyone has such a personality.  

[1714949200]

1714949200

[holyprofit]

from the eyes of a bully believe me there is nothing more fun than bullying XC because of our community code. Assholes like that look for victims not opponents and we are way to fucking nice with this assholes and let them pull us into their unwinnable arguments while they sit  there laughing their asses of.

I hope this atlas review comes asap and is positiv. would shut this fuckers up for good.

I agree the community code is difficult to stick to when the same few assholes come round again and again, but it does seem to work - they kind of drift away (for therapy or
something) when no-one rises to the bait.
  

[CryptoGretzky]

from the eyes of a bully believe me there is nothing more fun than bullying XC because of our community code. Assholes like that look for victims not opponents and we are way to fucking nice with this assholes and let them pull us into their unwinnable arguments while they sit  there laughing their asses of.

I hope this atlas review comes asap and is positiv. would shut this fuckers up for good.

I agree the community code is difficult to stick to when the same few assholes come round again and again, but it does seem to work - they kind of drift away (for therapy or
something) when no-one rises to the bait.
  

The saying of "Don't feed the troll" comes to mind.

[cryptico]

we need to step up the game I have a feeling that rev 2.5 and rev 3 will not be too far from each other as Dan is already working on group chat that should have been a Rev3 release.

After the code reviews I believe xc will gain the crown of 1st crypto innovator as it should be.

I am not even concerned about any short term pricing of XC anymore.  Seriously, look at the roadmap for XC... that's just the surface of it.  Imagine how much more Dan has in store as a surprise for us.   Just accumulate now while it's low.   Don't worry about the long term.   Go look around and try to find another with such an awesome roadmap.  

We are not talking fly by night unknown coders with their "future plans" of other coins.   Dan has delivered before not just in crypto, but in real life professional situations.   Look at the blockchain map of our anon solution that KimmyF has charted for us.   Is there really anything to worry about?

Just don't sweat the short term.  

ps.  XC have not forked even once unlike that coin that fork every RC release...

I Have to agree Thak you;)

[CryptoGretzky]

we need to step up the game I have a feeling that rev 2.5 and rev 3 will not be too far from each other as Dan is already working on group chat that should have been a Rev3 release.

After the code reviews I believe xc will gain the crown of 1st crypto innovator as it should be.

I am not even concerned about any short term pricing of XC anymore.  Seriously, look at the roadmap for XC... that's just the surface of it.  Imagine how much more Dan has in store as a surprise for us.   Just accumulate now while it's low.   Don't worry about the long term.   Go look around and try to find another with such an awesome roadmap.  

We are not talking fly by night unknown coders with their "future plans" of other coins.   Dan has delivered before not just in crypto, but in real life professional situations.   Look at the blockchain map of our anon solution that KimmyF has charted for us.   Is there really anything to worry about?

Just don't sweat the short term.  

ps.  XC have not fork even once unlike that coin that fork every RC release...

I Have to agree Thak you;)

I left out some words

[CryptoGretzky]

Also, put it this way.  XC is not affected by the Bash shell bug.

I wonder how many of those coins that have centralized masternode sitting on those Amazon EC2 center have already been infected by NSA... hmmm makes you wonder doesn't it?   

[synechist]

from the eyes of a bully believe me there is nothing more fun than bullying XC because of our community code. Assholes like that look for victims not opponents and we are way to fucking nice with this assholes and let them pull us into their unwinnable arguments while they sit  there laughing their asses of.

I hope this atlas review comes asap and is positiv. would shut this fuckers up for good.

I agree the community code is difficult to stick to when the same few assholes come round again and again, but it does seem to work - they kind of drift away (for therapy or
something) when no-one rises to the bait.
  

The saying of "Don't feed the troll" comes to mind.

Hoertest, our community code does not make victims out of anyone. Constructive and respectful discussion is clearly apparent to onlookers, who will have no trouble identifying who's a troll and who is worthy of respect.

So I think you're mistaken about that.

And yes, not feeding trolls is an integral part of this. :-)

[synechist]

Also, put it this way.  XC is not affected by the Bash shell bug.

I wonder how many of those coins that have centralized masternode sitting on those Amazon EC2 center have already been infected by NSA... hmmm makes you wonder doesn't it?   

Nice!

[dannyspk]

So I've been away for a little while from the forums and crypto land. I am still staking XC and not worried about anything. A couple of people I know are quite interested in the ITO of XC Inc. any ideas when is it taking fruition? Perfect time to lay down infrastructure while we slowly gain recognition.

PS. Drk needs to do another major correction and find a real bottom. XC moment of glory if they complete their short term goals during this time and outwin the competition.

[cryptico]

https://twitter.com/moolah_io/status/517983600458104833

Moolah asking for suggestions of new features to implement in the site. Can someone with a twitter account suggest a XC to fiat pair?

thx

[synechist]

https://twitter.com/moolah_io/status/517983600458104833

Moolah asking for suggestions of new features to implement in the site. Can someone with a twitter account suggest a XC to fiat pair?

thx

Nice one. Replied.

Let's all pile in!

[cryptico]

https://twitter.com/moolah_io/status/517983600458104833

Moolah asking for suggestions of new features to implement in the site. Can someone with a twitter account suggest a XC to fiat pair?

thx

Nice one. Replied.

Let's all pile in!

cool thx:)

[illodin]

I laugh in their general direction.

As soon as XC integrates VOIP with Video, "Game over man, game over."

And if "VOIP with Video" is deemed a useful and desired feature that absolutely for some reason has to be implemented within a crypto coin, is there a reason Darkcoin couldn't implement it (or to follow the suit of XC, add it to their roadmap)?

If you really need that feature now, these are just the couple of the first google hits I got - why would someone go through the trouble of buying coins so they can make VOIP calls when they can use already existing free software?
http://zfoneproject.com/
http://www.ibtimes.com/what-tox-hackers-develop-secure-private-skype-alternative-1675704

[synechist]

I laugh in their general direction.

As soon as XC integrates VOIP with Video, "Game over man, game over."

And if "VOIP with Video" is deemed a useful and desired feature that absolutely for some reason has to be implemented within a crypto coin, is there a reason Darkcoin couldn't implement it (or to follow the suit of XC, add it to their roadmap)?

If you really need that feature now, these are just the couple of the first google hits I got - why would someone go through the trouble of buying coins so they can make VOIP calls when they can use already existing free software?
http://zfoneproject.com/
http://www.ibtimes.com/what-tox-hackers-develop-secure-private-skype-alternative-1675704

Who says you'll need to buy coins?

But thanks for the links. That Zfone thing might be legit, though Tox isn't truly distributed (it uses DHT).

It's a desirable feature for a distributed privacy-centric web 3.0 platform. It's not a particularly desirable feature for a currency.

(Yes, XC isn't a "coin".)

[CryptoGretzky]

I laugh in their general direction.

As soon as XC integrates VOIP with Video, "Game over man, game over."

And if "VOIP with Video" is deemed a useful and desired feature that absolutely for some reason has to be implemented within a crypto coin, is there a reason Darkcoin couldn't implement it (or to follow the suit of XC, add it to their roadmap)?

If you really need that feature now, these are just the couple of the first google hits I got - why would someone go through the trouble of buying coins so they can make VOIP calls when they can use already existing free software?
http://zfoneproject.com/
http://www.ibtimes.com/what-tox-hackers-develop-secure-private-skype-alternative-1675704

You know in this world... it's not always about who's first right?   Apple don't necessarily come out with the innovation, but they innovate so that it's "easy and acccessible".  You don't even have to be best, just sufficient.

Case in point.  NFC has been on Android phone forever, so what?   Apple comes out and bring the big gun, hooks users up to 220k merchants.   (Accessible).  

No private VOIP has been really accessible so far.   The trophy is still waiting to be claimed.

[sugarboy321]

I laugh in their general direction.

As soon as XC integrates VOIP with Video, "Game over man, game over."

And if "VOIP with Video" is deemed a useful and desired feature that absolutely for some reason has to be implemented within a crypto coin, is there a reason Darkcoin couldn't implement it (or to follow the suit of XC, add it to their roadmap)?

If you really need that feature now, these are just the couple of the first google hits I got - why would someone go through the trouble of buying coins so they can make VOIP calls when they can use already existing free software?
http://zfoneproject.com/
http://www.ibtimes.com/what-tox-hackers-develop-secure-private-skype-alternative-1675704

Yes, very good last point.

Maybe only useful to merchants dealing with XC and users like us.

[cryptico]

Synechist do you have anyone working on a Q&A antifud newbie quicklink reference guide? that will be needed to direct new users that will pop in here in the near future.

[policymaker]

I laugh in their general direction.

As soon as XC integrates VOIP with Video, "Game over man, game over."

And if "VOIP with Video" is deemed a useful and desired feature that absolutely for some reason has to be implemented within a crypto coin, is there a reason Darkcoin couldn't implement it (or to follow the suit of XC, add it to their roadmap)?

If you really need that feature now, these are just the couple of the first google hits I got - why would someone go through the trouble of buying coins so they can make VOIP calls when they can use already existing free software?
http://zfoneproject.com/
http://www.ibtimes.com/what-tox-hackers-develop-secure-private-skype-alternative-1675704

Decentralized private VOIP calls is a world first for XC, and like previously mentioned, coins and crypto land is just part of the whole XC package. If you had been truly interested in XC as a true potential investor with no other agenda, you would have known that the team has repeatedly said that several XC features using the platform will be independent of the crypto deal, it's to every1's advantage to have people use the XC app even if they are not actually interested in any coins.

[Sabretooth]

Nice to read that a review by Kristov Atlas is in the cards for XC.

Links please?

[battbot]

Nice to read that a review by Kristov Atlas is in the cards for XC.

Links please?

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2i3ksa/xcurrencys_revolutionary_privacy_advancement/ckywn60