[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[robinwilliams]

Something about your tone is unnecessary.

That said, we've been clear (moreover in a press release, which you should've read) about how we're bringing XC into the public: internal testing and consultations, public reviews, bounties, then open source.

Lastly, XC Inc is not based on the code, since it's a private company developing various *other* technologies, mostly based on and extending the usefulness of the currency.

so it will be open sourced before the private company is launched? 

[1714961165]

1714961165

[1714961165]

1714961165

[1714961165]

1714961165

[atcsecure]

Something about your tone is unnecessary.

That said, we've been clear (moreover in a press release, which you should've read) about how we're bringing XC into the public: internal testing and consultations, public reviews, bounties, then open source.

Lastly, XC Inc is not based on the code, since it's a private company developing various *other* technologies, mostly based on and extending the usefulness of the currency.

so it will be open sourced before the private company is launched? 

No it will not be open sourced before then

[sugarboy321]

is it possible to get the ito process reviewed or verified by a third party?
not that i don't trust you but i have the feeling we'll see some people show up again come launchtime trying to associate XC with you know who again.

Yep - this is an excellent comment - it is just bound to attract those people  

please tell me ur going to open source before you try to do a stock offering?

you do realize you are promising something is under the hood that no one knows is even THERE for a coin.  and now you are selling a company based on that promise?

most people are going to laugh their asses off at you if you do a closed source "anon platform" company (for whatever reason) that can be bought into all built around software that nobody has seen?

or just a few people have seen?  

This guy must have been a broken record in a past life.....

[battbot]

Hmm - how to short it?

Too late, the bug was fixed in 10 minutes yesterday.

What kind of Bug was it?

It allowed someone to get masternode rewards (20% of the block reward) more often than normal. Usually with one masternode, and with current number of masternodes, you will get the ~1 RDK reward once in every ~1000 blocks. He managed to game that number up.

Sounds like a strange sort of bug -  

To summarize:

An advanced cryptographer finds an exploit (and possibly several) in DRK's code --> DRK confirms his exploit --> said advanced cryptographer now gains credibility.

Advanced & now credible cryptographer said DRK's code looks terrible --> priceless.

[robinwilliams]

This same cryptographer said DRK's code looks terrible --> priceless.

your a closed source project throwing stones at an open sourced project -> priceless  

No it will not be open sourced before then

thank you for the direct answer.

[battbot]

This same cryptographer said DRK's code looks terrible --> priceless.

your a closed source project throwing stones at an open sourced project -> priceless 

It took DRK many months to go open source.  XC will be fully open source sooner rather than later.

[cryptico]

is not open source wine wine wine wine when you open source??? wine wine wine wine...ho so you will not open source before the ito cry cry cry cry. I want it open source ...wine wine wine wine.

that is the only argument you have left to FUD pretty pathethic.

[sugarboy321]

Hmm - how to short it?

Too late, the bug was fixed in 10 minutes yesterday.

What kind of Bug was it?

It allowed someone to get masternode rewards (20% of the block reward) more often than normal. Usually with one masternode, and with current number of masternodes, you will get the ~1 RDK reward once in every ~1000 blocks. He managed to game that number up.

Sounds like a strange sort of bug -  

To summarize:

An advanced cryptographer finds a exploit (and possibly several) in DRK's code --> DRK confirms his exploit --> said advanced cryptographer now gains credibility.

Advanced & now credible cryptographer said DRK's code looks terrible --> priceless.

Priceless? Or did the price just tank?

[Teka]

This same cryptographer said DRK's code looks terrible --> priceless.

your a closed source project throwing stones at an open sourced project -> priceless 

No offence but you literally have nothing better to do then troll other project. I'm not sure if your the best person to throw insults around

[robinwilliams]

This same cryptographer said DRK's code looks terrible --> priceless.

your a closed source project throwing stones at an open sourced project -> priceless 

It took DRK many months to go open source.  XC will be fully open source sooner rather than later.

i think it was dumb for darkcoin to be a coin before it was open sourced.  I also think that a closed source project throwing stones at a open source project is ironic in the extreme.

[cryptico]

This same cryptographer said DRK's code looks terrible --> priceless.

your a closed source project throwing stones at an open sourced project -> priceless  

No it will not be open sourced before then

thank you for the direct answer.

None is throwing stones in this thread to anyone fuking troll!!

[synechist]

Let's treat even trolls with politeness.

[robinwilliams]

is not open source wine wine wine wine when you open source??? wine wine wine wine...ho so you will not open source before the ito cry cry cry cry. I want it open source ...wine wine wine wine.

that is the only argument you have left to FUD pretty pathethic.

Lol!  look dudes i'm trying to point out the irony.

darkcoin open sources and the list of found exploits have only begun to be found (i'm sure).  

XC has still not open sourced and they are about to raise money for a company (in addition to the coin) and you're shitting on darkcoin.

I'm just TRYING to point out the irony of anonymity trusted to a non open sourced platform.  and the irony of throwing stones at an open sourced project (I'm sure vulnerabilities will be found when you guys open source).

I get it, I get it. . .I'll leave you in peace with your mountaingoat mascot

Let's treat even trolls with politeness.

ehhh don't worry about my feelings.  i think if you'll all pay attention to my logic you'll see the ironies from someone looking from the outside (i'm the only "outsider" in this thread).

[hoertest]

people are different. from an investors pov i wouldn't want it to go open source before the ito. yes i would have to trust them on the basis of their last actions and my own investigation but this will result in a higher reward. I would prefer the added risk here since its no risk to me in regards to the anonymity to work. If one doesn't prefer that risk, no one is forced to buy shares later, or now XC to get shares for free.
in a free market where noone is forced to buy anything all those complaints are laughable actually. just buy your favorite by your own standards and shut up.

[cryptico]

Every outsider can see that you are just trolling if the average IQ of an outsider is 15

[robinwilliams]

Every outsider can see that you are just trolling if the average IQ of an outsider is 15

lol i'm not trying to convince outsiders.  if i was i would be going about it differently.

i'm just kinda letting my thought process all hang out.  if you guys don't see the irony of a closed source privacy platform starting their own company in addition to their coin while throwing stones at the open source privacy platform then ... ok.

I do kinda let it all hang out and be honest - but i'm not sure i've accused anyone in here of an iq of 15  

you don't really engage in my logic - just personal assessments of my intelligence rather than the issues at hand.  

do you guys have any idea how rough it's gonna be on you when you get out of your little circle?  and you just accuse naysayers of having a low iq?

 

[battbot]

Every outsider can see that you are just trolling if the average IQ of an outsider is 15

lol i'm not trying to convince outsiders.  if i was i would be going about it differently.

i'm just kinda letting my thought process all hang out.  if you guys don't see the irony of a closed source privacy platform starting their own company in addition to their coin while throwing stones at the open source privacy platform then ... ok.

I do kinda let it all hang out and be honest - but i'm not sure i've accused anyone in here of an iq of 15  

you don't really engage in my logic - just personal assessments of my intelligence rather than the issues at hand.  

XC proper did not "throw stones," a community member did.  Quit using the jokes / jabs of random community members and saying XC proper is attacking an open source platform.  I do not represent XC in any official capacity.

Engage that logic.

[cryptico]

I have already reported you twice your account will be shut down. please every one report him as well to the moderator. thanks.

[atcsecure]

is not open source wine wine wine wine when you open source??? wine wine wine wine...ho so you will not open source before the ito cry cry cry cry. I want it open source ...wine wine wine wine.

that is the only argument you have left to FUD pretty pathethic.

Lol!  look dudes i'm trying to point out the irony.

darkcoin open sources and the list of found exploits have only begun to be found (i'm sure).  

XC has still not open sourced and they are about to raise money for a company (in addition to the coin) and you're shitting on darkcoin.

I'm just TRYING to point out the irony of anonymity trusted to a non open sourced platform.  and the irony of throwing stones at an open sourced project (I'm sure vulnerabilities will be found when you guys open source).

I get it, I get it. . .I'll leave you in peace with your mountaingoat mascot

Let's treat even trolls with politeness.

ehhh don't worry about my feelings.  i think if you'll all pay attention to my logic you'll see the ironies from someone looking from the outside (i'm the only "outsider" in this thread).

The only logic I see, is the fact that XC's tech is cutting in edge in both anonymous transactions and secured communications (XCHAT)... 

That is like asking microsoft to release its source code.....

[synechist]

ehhh don't worry about my feelings.  i think if you'll all pay attention to my logic you'll see the ironies from someone looking from the outside (i'm the only "outsider" in this thread).

Robinwilliams, your logic is plain to see and I do get it.

However I also get your tone, and I get the types of topics you bring up.

You:
- almost always - if not always - post negatively about XC
- harp on about issues that have been resolved and that you've already discussed here previously
- try to find reasons to put a negative spin on news
- patently ignore facts central to the topics you discuss that invalidate your cases against XC.


This is trolling. You are *not* "just kinda letting [your] thought process all hang out;" you are wilfully ignoring facts contrary to your negative view of XC.

As you well know, trolling is not allowed on Bitcointalk.


As such, this is to notify you that you are banned. Do not post here anymore.