[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[synechist]

any news about rev2.5? this thread is really quiet last days

You ask this all the time and no one ever answers you, so why keep asking? We have a topnotch PR team. When there is news ready to release regarding Rev 2.5 you'll hear about it here. Repeatedly asking about news will not cause news to manifest.

You may also just refer to the timeline on the OP instead of asking questions, because the information there would lead you to assume that before Rev 2.5 comes, we'll be implementing our Web 3.0 distributed content server. ;-)

Is this the finalizing news about the qibuck collaboration?

Well, it'll be that we begin development of the Web 3.0 tech.

The ad server is funded by Qibuck, yes.

[1714964696]

1714964696

[cryptico]

any news about rev2.5? this thread is really quiet last days

You ask this all the time and no one ever answers you, so why keep asking? We have a topnotch PR team. When there is news ready to release regarding Rev 2.5 you'll hear about it here. Repeatedly asking about news will not cause news to manifest.

You may also just refer to the timeline on the OP instead of asking questions, because the information there would lead you to assume that before Rev 2.5 comes, we'll be implementing our Web 3.0 distributed content server. ;-)

Is this the finalizing news about the qibuck collaboration?

Well, it'll be that we begin development of the Web 3.0 tech.

The ad server is funded by Qibuck, yes.

will this mean new revenue for the mixers? is this sounding pretty huge to me?

 

[robinwilliams]

Well, it'll be that we begin development of the Web 3.0 tech.

meanwhile ethereum is getting forked by ibm and building their own coding language on the blockchain.  luv how u guys are basically imitating them    (except you plan on charging for decentralized services and making a company out of it lol ... whereas theres is opensource for all to develop)

whens the website getting a rework?  thing makes me dizzy ...

[Teka]

Well, it'll be that we begin development of the Web 3.0 tech.

meanwhile ethereum is getting forked by ibm and building their own coding language on the blockchain.  luv how u guys are basically imitating them  

whens the website getting a rework?  thing makes me dizzy ...

Oh hey its my favorite 'troll' .

[robinwilliams]

Well, it'll be that we begin development of the Web 3.0 tech.

meanwhile ethereum is getting forked by ibm and building their own coding language on the blockchain.  luv how u guys are basically imitating them  

whens the website getting a rework?  thing makes me dizzy ...

Oh hey its my favorite 'troll' .

that's right ... most luvable troll on the forums 

[synechist]

any news about rev2.5? this thread is really quiet last days

You ask this all the time and no one ever answers you, so why keep asking? We have a topnotch PR team. When there is news ready to release regarding Rev 2.5 you'll hear about it here. Repeatedly asking about news will not cause news to manifest.

You may also just refer to the timeline on the OP instead of asking questions, because the information there would lead you to assume that before Rev 2.5 comes, we'll be implementing our Web 3.0 distributed content server. ;-)

Is this the finalizing news about the qibuck collaboration?

Well, it'll be that we begin development of the Web 3.0 tech.

The ad server is funded by Qibuck, yes.

will this mean new revenue for the mixers? is this sounding pretty huge to me?

 

Yes it will.

You can revisit the press release here.

It is as huge as it sounds.

For clarity (contra-trolls), if a project has a component with the same aim that another project has (web 3.0), but achieves it in a different way (we're not Turing complete), and develops it sooner, then this does not constitute "imitating" the other project. Enough said.

[cryptico]

sorry for my ignorance what do you mean with touring? could you clarify for everyone less technical like me how XC approach with web 3.0 differs from ethereum one?

[robinwilliams]

sorry for my ignorance what do you mean with touring? could you clarify for everyone less technical like me how XC approach with web 3.0 differs from ethereum one?

touring complete is just a way of describing programmable.  (There is some criteria as far as loops are concerned)

touring complete blockchain means I can make programs on the blockchain

[Dungor]

sorry for my ignorance what do you mean with touring? could you clarify for everyone less technical like me how XC approach with web 3.0 differs from ethereum one?

Turing Completeness = programming language, like JAVA & C++
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness

[synechist]

sorry for my ignorance what do you mean with touring? could you clarify for everyone less technical like me how XC approach with web 3.0 differs from ethereum one?

Turing-completeness: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness

It basically means having the ability to express anything at all - in this case on a blockchain.

XC's approach is, to my mind, a lot more sensible: use the blockchain, but don't put all that code on it. Rather write APIs so that people can build any app at all upon XC. After all, why bloat it and why compromise its security? Blockchain-based malware is not fun.

[synechist]

sorry for my ignorance what do you mean with touring? could you clarify for everyone less technical like me how XC approach with web 3.0 differs from ethereum one?

Turing Completeness = programming language, like JAVA & C++
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness

Hah. Nice one Dungor. Beat me to it.

[cryptico]

sorry for my ignorance what do you mean with touring? could you clarify for everyone less technical like me how XC approach with web 3.0 differs from ethereum one?

Turing-completeness: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness

It basically means having the ability to express anything at all - in this case on a blockchain.

XC's approach is, to my mind, a lot more sensible: use the blockchain, but don't put all that code on it. Rather write APIs so that people can build any app at all upon XC. After all, why bloat it and why compromise its security? Blockchain-based malware is not fun.

Sounds like ethereum/IBM killer to me

[robinwilliams]

Sounds like ethereum/IBM killer to me

poes law?

[cryptico]

question.. can we still stake in ver 0.9.2.47 tor stick?

EDIT: Yep just received few

[synechist]

Hi all

Feel free to proliferate this tweet:

Free yourself completely from illicit data-collection: $XC + #XChat.
Download now: http://xc-official.com/xc-downloads/
#privacy


https://twitter.com/XCurrency/status/516629095934095360

[MemCiD]

Hi all

Feel free to proliferate this tweet:

Free yourself completely from illicit data-collection: $XC + #XChat.
Download now: http://xc-official.com/xc-downloads/
#privacy


https://twitter.com/XCurrency/status/516629095934095360

I'm so lost when it comes to this lol

[Joshuar]

any news about rev2.5? this thread is really quiet last days

You ask this all the time and no one ever answers you, so why keep asking? We have a topnotch PR team. When there is news ready to release regarding Rev 2.5 you'll hear about it here. Repeatedly asking about news will not cause news to manifest.

You may also just refer to the timeline on the OP instead of asking questions, because the information there would lead you to assume that before Rev 2.5 comes, we'll be implementing our Web 3.0 distributed content server. ;-)

Wow, that is very impressive.

I'm really  looking forward to XC's upcoming features.

[swannsonite]

Just ran into an interesting resistance to crypto currency in general. "Virtual money will not be able to be traded in the event of a EMP. Hard silver however will have value to owners." My thought is in the event of an EMP that massive nothing but food guns and water would be of value? Is there a way to EMP proof XC?

[robinwilliams]

Just ran into an interesting resistance to crypto currency in general. "Virtual money will not be able to be traded in the event of a EMP. Hard silver however will have value to owners." My thought is in the event of an EMP that massive nothing but food guns and water would be of value? Is there a way to EMP proof XC?

rofl haaaaaaaahaaaaaa - going to quote this.

[URSAY]

Just ran into an interesting resistance to crypto currency in general. "Virtual money will not be able to be traded in the event of a EMP. Hard silver however will have value to owners." My thought is in the event of an EMP that massive nothing but food guns and water would be of value? Is there a way to EMP proof XC?

You mean XC isn't backed by goats?