[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[synechist]

On the one hand I get excited hearing about the teams lofty ambitions, on the other hand all I want is a functional XCurrency wallet for my Mac. It seems to me the team is putting the cart before the horse. Why not get XCurrency functioning and adopted before focusing on ITO's, the Blocknet, ad hoc mesh networks, etc...?

It feels like the focus on XCurrency is dwindling and the team is centered on creating a private corporation so they can sell of their tech. As I understand it, XChat is part of XCurrency, that's why I bought more XC. Now I hear the possibilty of selling that technology in the future!?!?

It has also been said that XC Inc's purpose is to create tech that will work on the XCurrency platform, but now we have Blocknet and XBridge and so many other buzzwords and concepts that it's difficult to keep track of them all.

Dan says XCurrency is his baby, Steve Jobs said Lisa was his- we all know how that turned out. And Arlyn, you say we just increased our user base 10 fold, if we had the price would be reflecting that right now...it doesn't.

Just need to vent a little...maybe you all know exactly what you're doing. Unfortunately several of your investors don't and are confused about the future of XC. I hope to see several XCurrency releases in the near future including mobile, Mac, and linux wallets.

Did you read my response to your post earlier?

The Blocknet does not dilute XC's resources. It grows them massively. So we can launch the Blocknet and carry on developing XC too.

In fact, it's best to do things in this order, because the Blocknet is completely awesome for securing a userbase for XC's tech.

Also read Hoertest's posts. He really gets it.

[1714808118]

1714808118

[1714808118]

1714808118

[1714808118]

1714808118

[SouthernBTC]

On the one hand I get excited hearing about the teams lofty ambitions, on the other hand all I want is a functional XCurrency wallet for my Mac. It seems to me the team is putting the cart before the horse. Why not get XCurrency functioning and adopted before focusing on ITO's, the Blocknet, ad hoc mesh networks, etc...?

It feels like the focus on XCurrency is dwindling and the team is centered on creating a private corporation so they can sell of their tech. As I understand it, XChat is part of XCurrency, that's why I bought more XC. Now I hear the possibilty of selling that technology in the future!?!?

It has also been said that XC Inc's purpose is to create tech that will work on the XCurrency platform, but now we have Blocknet and XBridge and so many other buzzwords and concepts that it's difficult to keep track of them all.

Dan says XCurrency is his baby, Steve Jobs said Lisa was his- we all know how that turned out. And Arlyn, you say we just increased our user base 10 fold, if we had the price would be reflecting that right now...it doesn't.

Just need to vent a little...maybe you all know exactly what you're doing. Unfortunately several of your investors don't and are confused about the future of XC. I hope to see several XCurrency releases in the near future including mobile, Mac, and linux wallets.

Did you read my response to your post earlier?

The Blocknet does not dilute XC's resources. It grows them massively. So we can launch the Blocknet and carry on developing XC too.

In fact, it's best to do things in this order, because the Blocknet is completely awesome for securing a userbase for XC's tech.

Also read Hoertest's posts. He really gets it.

I didn't post anything earlier, must've been someone else with questions. I will read Hoertest's posts though.

[Mountaingoat]

How about for every 100 XC you hold you get 1 share of the Blocknet?

That is of course a relative number.

[xxxgoodgirls]

Is there any difference from SuperNET?

[agent725]

"Internet of Blockchains"? Haha, that looks exactly like what we're already working on for months.

http://internetofcoins.org

Although this appears to be just cross-chain transactions, while XBridge is cross-node enablement

Oh snap!

The Internet of Coins / Hybrid Assets methods enable the transaction of value across ledger-based (blockchain) systems, as well as ledgerless systems. So in essence it goes much further than an Internet of Blockchains. However, XBridge also looks interesting. Perhaps they can be used in sync.

[ib88]

On the one hand I get excited hearing about the teams lofty ambitions, on the other hand all I want is a functional XCurrency wallet for my Mac. It seems to me the team is putting the cart before the horse. Why not get XCurrency functioning and adopted before focusing on ITO's, the Blocknet, ad hoc mesh networks, etc...?

It feels like the focus on XCurrency is dwindling and the team is centered on creating a private corporation so they can sell of their tech. As I understand it, XChat is part of XCurrency, that's why I bought more XC. Now I hear the possibilty of selling that technology in the future!?!?

It has also been said that XC Inc's purpose is to create tech that will work on the XCurrency platform, but now we have Blocknet and XBridge and so many other buzzwords and concepts that it's difficult to keep track of them all.

Dan says XCurrency is his baby, Steve Jobs said Lisa was his- we all know how that turned out. And Arlyn, you say we just increased our user base 10 fold, if we had the price would be reflecting that right now...it doesn't.

Just need to vent a little...maybe you all know exactly what you're doing. Unfortunately several of your investors don't and are confused about the future of XC. I hope to see several XCurrency releases in the near future including mobile, Mac, and linux wallets.

Did you read my response to your post earlier?

The Blocknet does not dilute XC's resources. It grows them massively. So we can launch the Blocknet and carry on developing XC too.

In fact, it's best to do things in this order, because the Blocknet is completely awesome for securing a userbase for XC's tech.

Also read Hoertest's posts. He really gets it.

Can you elaborate further on how XC's resources will grow with the Blocknet? What are the resources in this instance? I would have thought that XC's resources (Dan and co's time) will be partly spent developing the Blocknet when they would otherwise be developing XC, hence slowing down its rate of development.

[laredo7mm]

Is there any difference from SuperNET?

Is Xbridge based upon the same principle as SuperNET is?

...this is not similar in code to the Supernet. It's true P2P and vastly more versatile.

[pookielax31]

Jesus you guys will do anything to hype this coin over here wont you......Rushing devs just so you can tweet and hype your own coin.... I see that really worked well for your guys price  ...Not everyone likes this idea



Seems like someone you guys should answer and not ignore....

[sugarboy321]

What kind of timetable for the completion for the Blockchain? Two or three years from the announcement date?

Err...Blocknet.

[laredo7mm]

Jesus you guys will do anything to hype this coin...

Really?  You have the balls to comment on hyping a coin after what you do and have done in this thread and others?

You are such a class act.  (Yes, that is sarcasm)

[pookielax31]

Doesnt take alot of balls to point out a fact... you guys will do anything to hype this coin, yet bitcoin magazine, web 2.0 and blocknet doesn't change a thing for it.... Dead coin, hasn't passed 190 in about 3 months probably wont again, and doesnt even have a mac or linux build of most recent wallet... Windows only, dont make me laugh

[atcsecure]

Doesnt take alot of balls to point out a fact... you guys will do anything to hype this coin, yet bitcoin magazine, web 2.0 and blocknet doesn't change a thing for it.... Dead coin, hasn't passed 190 in about 3 months probably wont again, and doesnt even have a mac or linux build of most recent wallet... Windows only, dont make me laugh

Linux wallet is available at - http://downloads.xc-official.com/testing/linux/

[Bl4ckw00d]

Doesnt take alot of balls to point out a fact... you guys will do anything to hype this coin, yet bitcoin magazine, web 2.0 and blocknet doesn't change a thing for it.... Dead coin, hasn't passed 190 in about 3 months probably wont again, and doesnt even have a mac or linux build of most recent wallet... Windows only, dont make me laugh

Linux wallet is available at - http://downloads.xc-official.com/testing/linux/

One less thing for trolls to troll about.  Thanks Dan  top drawer

[atcsecure]

Doesnt take alot of balls to point out a fact... you guys will do anything to hype this coin, yet bitcoin magazine, web 2.0 and blocknet doesn't change a thing for it.... Dead coin, hasn't passed 190 in about 3 months probably wont again, and doesnt even have a mac or linux build of most recent wallet... Windows only, dont make me laugh

Linux wallet is available at - http://downloads.xc-official.com/testing/linux/

Mac wallet build is underway, could be available by tomorrow

Dan

[CryptoChronic]

Is there any difference from SuperNET?

Noo

[the_game1224]

On the one hand I get excited hearing about the teams lofty ambitions, on the other hand all I want is a functional XCurrency wallet for my Mac. It seems to me the team is putting the cart before the horse. Why not get XCurrency functioning and adopted before focusing on ITO's, the Blocknet, ad hoc mesh networks, etc...?

It feels like the focus on XCurrency is dwindling and the team is centered on creating a private corporation so they can sell of their tech. As I understand it, XChat is part of XCurrency, that's why I bought more XC. Now I hear the possibilty of selling that technology in the future!?!?

It has also been said that XC Inc's purpose is to create tech that will work on the XCurrency platform, but now we have Blocknet and XBridge and so many other buzzwords and concepts that it's difficult to keep track of them all.

Dan says XCurrency is his baby, Steve Jobs said Lisa was his- we all know how that turned out. And Arlyn, you say we just increased our user base 10 fold, if we had the price would be reflecting that right now...it doesn't.

Just need to vent a little...maybe you all know exactly what you're doing. Unfortunately several of your investors don't and are confused about the future of XC. I hope to see several XCurrency releases in the near future including mobile, Mac, and linux wallets.

Well put.  I've been with XC for a long time (look at the first page of this thread) and recently it has been pre-announcement after pre-announcement with a few testing releases in between.  Yes in the long term Blocknet sounds great for the future but it feels like the development of XCurrency itself may be shifting towards a side project and looking at the price I feel others agree.  
Having said that I hope my feelings regarding this are wrong...

[battbot]

That is not true. SDC is not officially "in" until publicly stated otherwise by their dev team and community which is not the case right now i'm afraid

#

Did you just create that rule? It's not your call.

SDC are in. In fact, we've been in communication with them the most. We were chatting on Skype with Rynomster and others during the announcement.

Now drop this, for heaven's sake!

I will not "drop it" As long as you want to keep bringing it up making out that i'm lying. It is not truth, it is not a done deal and sdc is not in fact "in" officially, as you continue to say. You may have perceived it as such but it is not truth or fact!

And has not even been passed through the entire dev team or community. I encourage you to re-read the logs and you will find its not a done deal at all at the very least it was said maybe that he thinks it will pass but will go and talk/consider it. But it most certainly was not agreed to right there and then. As they say pics or its not true. Show me some please.

Because i would hardly argue the fact if what i was stating was not truth! Why would i, I have no motivation to have such baseless claims unless you were confused about what has actually transpired! Sdc is not currently officially "in" as you state it.

Let's get one thing straight -- Rynomster gave XC permission to add SDC as a participant in the BlockNET announcement:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.msg9224147#msg9224147

[The-C-Word]

Doesnt take alot of balls to point out a fact... you guys will do anything to hype this coin, yet bitcoin magazine, web 2.0 and blocknet doesn't change a thing for it.... Dead coin, hasn't passed 190 in about 3 months probably wont again, and doesnt even have a mac or linux build of most recent wallet... Windows only, dont make me laugh

^^

Hunker down fellas, this is the kind of stuff that we're going to have to deal with. The blocknet challenges the old competitive P&D way of making money. We're going to see a lot of resistance in the guise of FUD and trolling.

[ib88]

Doesnt take alot of balls to point out a fact... you guys will do anything to hype this coin, yet bitcoin magazine, web 2.0 and blocknet doesn't change a thing for it.... Dead coin, hasn't passed 190 in about 3 months probably wont again, and doesnt even have a mac or linux build of most recent wallet... Windows only, dont make me laugh

No one cares what you think. You have absolutely no interest in this coins long term future, just looking to chase a pump before dumping. The fact that your main concern is how this news was released rather than the news itself shows this.

[spookycoins]

Let's get one thing straight -- Rynomster gave XC permission to add SDC as a participant in the BlockNET announcement:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.msg9224147#msg9224147

This.
Geez. This should shut some people up.