Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 12:32:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 [1465] 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 ... 1628 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos  (Read 1483641 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
cryptico
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 01:28:00 PM
 #29281

It wil depend on how much shares will be given to the XC holders for XC inc, since there will be a public ITO and shares will be bought in BTC as well.

So it would depends on how much share of the company XC inc will want to share with the XC holders as XC inc will not get any profit from th ITO from XC bags.

It might be tot coin supply minus the amount that was not possible to buy for XC holders, hence the pre-mine. so do the math and we can have a percentage.

.WildBeastBlock.       █
 ▄     █▄    ▄
 █     ██     █
 █      █▀   ███
 █▄▄   ▄█    ███
███   ▀██▄   ▀█
 █▀     █▀   ██
 █    ▄███   ██▀
 ██  ▀▀██   ▄▄█
 ██▄    ██▄  ██▄
 ▄█    ▄██    █
▀██     █    ███
 ██    ▄██   ▀██
 ██▀    ██▀   █
  █     █▀    █
  █     █     █
  ▀     █     ▀
       █
 ▄     █▄    ▄
 █     ██     █
 █      █▀   ███
 █▄▄   ▄█    ███
███   ▀██▄   ▀█
 █▀     █▀   ██
 █    ▄███   ██▀
 ██  ▀▀██   ▄▄█
 ██▄    ██▄  ██▄
 ▄█    ▄██    █
▀██     █    ███
 ██    ▄██   ▀██
 ██▀    ██▀   █
  █     █▀    █
  █     █     █
  ▀     █     ▀
  with New Wallet & Smart Message Insertion
  with Smart Doc Insertion
  Free WBB Chat App | Fully Secure and Private
1714825954
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714825954

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714825954
Reply with quote  #2

1714825954
Report to moderator
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714825954
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714825954

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714825954
Reply with quote  #2

1714825954
Report to moderator
1714825954
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714825954

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714825954
Reply with quote  #2

1714825954
Report to moderator
reebokasss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 01:30:53 PM
 #29282

and the same story like everytime : mini pump on news and then dump again.. i cant imagine, how we will go very high in price like everyone are saying, but i still believe   Angry hope to see some price movement till new years (AND OF COURSE REV3 , BECAUSE IT WAS PROMISED TO REALEASE IN AUTUMN 2014)

For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
Conurtrol
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 478
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 01:32:15 PM
 #29283

It wil depend on how much shares will be given to the XC holders for XC inc, since there will be a public ITO and shares will be bought in BTC as well.

So it would depends on how much share of the company XC inc will want to share with the XC holders as XC inc will not get any profit from th ITO from XC bags.

It might be tot coin supply minus the amount that was not possible to buy for XC holders, hence the pre-mine. so do the math and we can have a percentage.


I think we need to determine a percentage first and then do the math to make it work.
cryptico
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 01:38:00 PM
 #29284

It wil depend on how much shares will be given to the XC holders for XC inc, since there will be a public ITO and shares will be bought in BTC as well.

So it would depends on how much share of the company XC inc will want to share with the XC holders as XC inc will not get any profit from th ITO from XC bags.

It might be tot coin supply minus the amount that was not possible to buy for XC holders, hence the pre-mine. so do the math and we can have a percentage.


I think we need to determine a percentage first and then do the math to make it work.

yes but how you determine the percentage? complicated...maybe just 80/20% and we cut the head of the bull

.WildBeastBlock.       █
 ▄     █▄    ▄
 █     ██     █
 █      █▀   ███
 █▄▄   ▄█    ███
███   ▀██▄   ▀█
 █▀     █▀   ██
 █    ▄███   ██▀
 ██  ▀▀██   ▄▄█
 ██▄    ██▄  ██▄
 ▄█    ▄██    █
▀██     █    ███
 ██    ▄██   ▀██
 ██▀    ██▀   █
  █     █▀    █
  █     █     █
  ▀     █     ▀
       █
 ▄     █▄    ▄
 █     ██     █
 █      █▀   ███
 █▄▄   ▄█    ███
███   ▀██▄   ▀█
 █▀     █▀   ██
 █    ▄███   ██▀
 ██  ▀▀██   ▄▄█
 ██▄    ██▄  ██▄
 ▄█    ▄██    █
▀██     █    ███
 ██    ▄██   ▀██
 ██▀    ██▀   █
  █     █▀    █
  █     █     █
  ▀     █     ▀
  with New Wallet & Smart Message Insertion
  with Smart Doc Insertion
  Free WBB Chat App | Fully Secure and Private
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2014, 01:38:12 PM
 #29285


Coverage of the Blocknet on AltcoinSpeculation.com!

http://altcoinspeculation.com/blocknet-the-internet-of-blockchains-combining-altcoin-potential/


Co-Founder, the Blocknet
JakeThePanda
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 01:40:50 PM
 #29286

and the same story like everytime : mini pump on news and then dump again.. i cant imagine, how we will go very high in price like everyone are saying, but i still believe   Angry hope to see some price movement till new years (AND OF COURSE REV3 , BECAUSE IT WAS PROMISED TO REALEASE IN AUTUMN 2014)

All coins are currently battling for the same users in the crypto community.  I don't have the statistics, but based on the price of BTC I would say the crypto community has probably shrunk over the last year.  Every altcoin scam reduces the community by a certain amount so all the altcoins are fighting over a smaller and smaller user base.  XC, will not go into hyper pump stage until the community grows by a large amount. the real world is using them, or every altcoin user dumps their other shit coins and moves their money to XC.  I think we are way off from any of these things happening.
Conurtrol
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 478
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 01:41:25 PM
 #29287

XChat is a potential bombshell and since it has already been under development with XCurrency and was already theoretically 100% owned by Xcurrency owners it is a special case. I think XCurrency owners should get a very high percentage of ownership in XChat and then a smaller percentage in XC inc. Something like 80% and 10% would make sense to me.
BTCwriter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 01:53:10 PM
 #29288


That is not true. SDC is not officially "in" until publicly stated otherwise by their dev team and community which is not the case right now i'm afraid
#

Did you just create that rule? It's not your call.

SDC are in. In fact, we've been in communication with them the most. We were chatting on Skype with Rynomster and others during the announcement.

Now drop this, for heaven's sake!



Uh oh look like this guy is after you guys tail now. He can spend days/nights talking non-stop
He's something. Just warn you.
agent725
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 306
Merit: 250

currently working on the Internet of Coins


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2014, 02:05:21 PM
 #29289

"Internet of Blockchains"? Haha, that looks exactly like what we're already working on for months.

http://internetofcoins.org


                         ▄██▄               
                        ▐████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄     ▄████
             ▄▄          ▀██▀     ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█████▌
           ▄████▌       ▐█                ███▀
          ▄██████▀██▄▄▄▄█▌       ▄██▄       ██
  ▄▄▄  ▄██▀ ▀██▀       ██▀▀▀▀██▌█████▌      ▐██
 ██████▀▀             ▐▀      ▄▄██████       ██
▐██████           ▄█████▄▄▄███▀ ▀███▀        ▐██
 █████▀           ███████▐█▀                ██████
   ▀▀▄█▄          ███████                  ▐███████
      ██▀▄███▄     ▀███▀██▄      ▄▄▄▄      ▐██████▌
       ▀███████          ████▄ ▄██████▄ ▄███▀████▀
        ███████▌███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▐███████████▀
        ███████ ███████████████████████▌▀
         ▀███▀       ▀▀▀▀▀▀███▐████████
                                ▀████▀






wooder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 324
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 02:10:37 PM
 #29290

REV2 was released over a month ago and there is still no linux/mac client.
is this coin a windows only coin or will there ever be a release of the linux/mac client?

it sucks to get the answer nearly two weeks ago that the client for linux will be released in a few days
 but except this empty promise nothing happend.
atcsecure
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2014, 02:11:49 PM
 #29291

"Internet of Blockchains"? Haha, that looks exactly like what we're already working on for months.

http://internetofcoins.org



Although this appears to be just cross-chain transactions, while XBridge is cross-node enablement

Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
GStealthCoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 02:14:34 PM
 #29292

Is synechist part of the XC team? Any details would be welcome.

# I am not part of the official StealthCoin Team. Just a community member.
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2014, 02:17:00 PM
 #29293

Is synechist part of the XC team? Any details would be welcome.

Yup: http://xc-official.com/the-xc-team/

Co-Founder, the Blocknet
spookycoins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2014, 02:21:07 PM
 #29294

1. Congrats to Dan and the XC team for putting all the resources together to launch the concept of The Blocknet.
2. Congrats to the contributing devs from other altcoins for recognizing a sensible collaboration when they see one.
3. And a big thanks to the people on this thread asking the tough questions.

Hopefully The Blocknet won't suck.
I'm off to set up my Xmixer.
-spooky

That's me on twitter --> @spookycoins
laredo7mm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 537



View Profile
October 16, 2014, 02:23:04 PM
 #29295

REV2 was released over a month ago and there is still no linux/mac client.
is this coin a windows only coin or will there ever be a release of the linux/mac client?

it sucks to get the answer nearly two weeks ago that the client for linux will be released in a few days
 but except this empty promise nothing happend.


Haven't you asked about this many times in the past and been answered?  


My opinion is, that the price is correlated to a few things like:

Rev2 was released weeks ago and we still don't have a linux and mac client, this is contra productive to the availability and useability of the coin.
I agree that a mobile wallet for android/iphone is also important but no client except a windows client for a closed source coin is a no go.
Even the tor-Stick is useless as it doesn't provide the latest version of the client (as it's also linux).

I think all operating systems should receive a client at the same time, as this is very important for the mass adoption of the coin.
It even shows that we care about every user. A new release should also provide an updated tor stick.

I think at least Rev 2.5 and Rev3 should be released after a working client exists for all major operating systems.

I, for one, can't use my coins and parked them in an exchange as i only use linux.
The current situation forces me to buy a windows license and even worse install this crappy OS just to receive and send coins.

That would only be a big deal if people are unaware that XC is still in development and hasn't launched publicly.

We're sorry for the delay, but it's just not feasible to release versions on every platform without testing the code first - which is what's been happening of late with the windows build.

In contrast, Rev 3's code will be fully ready for the public and available on all platforms on launch day.

atcsecure
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2014, 02:24:27 PM
 #29296

REV2 was released over a month ago and there is still no linux/mac client.
is this coin a windows only coin or will there ever be a release of the linux/mac client?

it sucks to get the answer nearly two weeks ago that the client for linux will be released in a few days
 but except this empty promise nothing happend.

It was not an empty promise, there were reasons why it was delayed, however I'll provide a link shortly for the linux test client...

Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
Crypto-in-tha-blood
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 02:34:55 PM
 #29297

"Internet of Blockchains"? Haha, that looks exactly like what we're already working on for months.

http://internetofcoins.org



Although this appears to be just cross-chain transactions, while XBridge is cross-node enablement

Oh snap!
Gumpty
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 02:43:31 PM
 #29298

How are the collective services of the blocknet going to be made accessible to the average user?

Theoretically...
If I have a XC in my wallet but I would like to use the VPN service of utilitycoin how might I go about doing that?
Will this require an automatic conversion of my XC to UTIL in order for the UTIL wallets to collect their fee?
Will the available blocknet services be visible from within any of the XBridge enabled wallets via some kind of dynamic UI?
If a new coin joins the blocknet while my wallet is running, will those services be made immediately available?

Is this still in a concept stage? Has technical design begun? Or actual code development?

Keep up the good work.  Smiley
hoertest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 03:08:54 PM
 #29299

and the same story like everytime : mini pump on news and then dump again.. i cant imagine, how we will go very high in price like everyone are saying, but i still believe   Angry hope to see some price movement till new years (AND OF COURSE REV3 , BECAUSE IT WAS PROMISED TO REALEASE IN AUTUMN 2014)

what will sell xc is its unrivaled privacy function and the posibility for xc holders to capitalise on it given they own enough to host a mixer. the blocknet will make it possible to collect those fees from every user that holds a coin that supports the XBridge. so way more than before blocknet. the 1k XC club will make alot of money.
incorporating the XBridge into the wallet should be a service everybody should request from their coin of choice. its voluntary to use but makes ones life much easier.

this is the biggest revolution since the blockchain itself. the logical next step.

edit: but i'm still with you , rev3 should come soon now. would be smart of the team to shoot out some more XC related stuff in short just to make that statement. Synechist hope you read this. this is phsychology 101. in case you missed we got an Xchat update yesterday too.
SouthernBTC
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 192
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 03:16:54 PM
 #29300

On the one hand I get excited hearing about the teams lofty ambitions, on the other hand all I want is a functional XCurrency wallet for my Mac. It seems to me the team is putting the cart before the horse. Why not get XCurrency functioning and adopted before focusing on ITO's, the Blocknet, ad hoc mesh networks, etc...?

It feels like the focus on XCurrency is dwindling and the team is centered on creating a private corporation so they can sell of their tech. As I understand it, XChat is part of XCurrency, that's why I bought more XC. Now I hear the possibilty of selling that technology in the future!?!?

It has also been said that XC Inc's purpose is to create tech that will work on the XCurrency platform, but now we have Blocknet and XBridge and so many other buzzwords and concepts that it's difficult to keep track of them all.

Dan says XCurrency is his baby, Steve Jobs said Lisa was his- we all know how that turned out. And Arlyn, you say we just increased our user base 10 fold, if we had the price would be reflecting that right now...it doesn't.

Just need to vent a little...maybe you all know exactly what you're doing. Unfortunately several of your investors don't and are confused about the future of XC. I hope to see several XCurrency releases in the near future including mobile, Mac, and linux wallets. Huh
Pages: « 1 ... 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 [1465] 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 ... 1628 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!