[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[Artoodeetoo]

Based on the circa 100 BTC buy order @20k.. Looks like we may not be seeing the teens again.. Here is hoping.

I'm ready to short if it gets there. He might cancel that order right before it hits....just saying. I don't want to visit the 17s again

And how will you short.. Not aware that any exchanges allow it... Well some do, but you are talking about only with LTC and BTC...

[hellyeahent]

you would need 1000 coins in your wallet to become xnode. you can have any coin for minting/staking, just unlock your wallet for staking.
xnode = your coins collecting transaction fees
minting/staking = your coin collecting interest of 3.33%/yr

Probably nooby question but ty for answering.

Do I need to buy an Xnode to stake in my wallet?

No. Regular wallet with funds in it, thats it.

Does anyone have an idea about what return an xnode will get?

Best guess if not.

Close to nothing coz u dont get 3,33% inflation coins but only mining fee

[studio1one]

Anyway to check if my Xnode status is working?

[madmanbts]

Based on the circa 100 BTC buy order @20k.. Looks like we may not be seeing the teens again.. Here is hoping.

I'm ready to short if it gets there. He might cancel that order right before it hits....just saying. I don't want to visit the 17s again

And how will you short.. Not aware that any exchanges allow it... Well some do, but you are talking about only with LTC and BTC...

I mean if the order get eaten or canceled, I'll sell as I expect a drop, and I will buy later cheaper.

[saberu]

I noticed there was a guide on the official XC Reddit but it seemed to have some stuff missing so for any Linux newbs using Debian/ Ubuntu I present Saberu`s guide for building QT on Ubuntu/ Debian:

sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install g++ git make qt4-dev-tools qt4-qmake libdb++-dev libssl-dev libminiupnpc-dev libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev
git clone https://github.com/atcsecure/x11coin
cp ~/bitcoin/src/qt/locale/bitcoin_en.qm ~/x11coin/src/locale/
cp ~/bitcoin/src/qt/locale/bitcoin_ru_qm ~/x11coin/src/locale/
chmod +x x11coin/ -R
chmod +x x11coin/* -R
cd x11coin
qmake
sed -i 's/-mgw48-mt-sd-1_55//g' Makefile
make clean
make

The make command will then take a while to compile the x11coin wallet GUI binary file from source. Then when it is finished just type ./x11coin-qt though you may want to make an x11coin.conf file using the values in the OP.

If qmake is giving you errors on the qmake command then try-

sudo apt-get remove qt5-default qttools5-dev-tools && sudo apt-get autoremove && sudo apt-get clean && sudo apt-get autoclean

This will remove all the qt5 packages and route the qmake command to use qt4 only.

[syypro]

Anyway to check if my Xnode status is working?

+1000000

[Taner]

Anyway to check if my Xnode status is working?

+1000000

Just want to confirm that the xnodes seem to be working as expected. I have sent a transaction from one wallet to another through the xnodes and in reviewing the transaction on either end cannot see the sending or receiving address. The block explorer is still down and when it gets back I will check it out further with it.

One thing I noticed is the normal fee is added to the sending transaction. The anon fee which is 0.00001 is then subtracted from the amount sent. So the receiver gets the amount sent - 0.00001. Might we want to have this fee included in the amount so the receiving end gets the full amount sent?

I know the above is a very small concern. The key is the nodes are running and my trans action went through without a hitch. I know Atcsecure is going to give us more info tomorrow but thought this was great news and should be shared.

Great work by the dev!


edit: This was on the live network, with real funds, sent to and from non xnode wallets

[studio1one]

Anyway to check if my Xnode status is working?

+1000000

Just want to confirm that the xnodes seem to be working as expected. I have sent a transaction from one wallet to another through the xnodes and in reviewing the transaction on either end cannot see the sending or receiving address. The block explorer is still down and when it gets back I will check it out further with it.

One thing I noticed is the normal fee is added to the sending transaction. The anon fee which is 0.00001 is then subtracted from the amount sent. So the receiver gets the amount sent - 0.00001. Might we want to have this fee included in the amount so the receiving end gets the full amount sent?

I know the above is a very small concern. The key is the nodes are running and my trans action went through without a hitch. I know Atcsecure is going to give us more info tomorrow but thought this was great news and should be shared.

Great work by the dev!


edit: This was on the live network, with real funds, sent to and from non xnode wallets

I mean how to check if I am set up correctly as an Xnode myself.

[fairglu]

I'm trying to get the XC Blockchain Explorer at http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc is back on the main chain, but wallet is taking a long time to re-synchronize: the network is still heavily on the old version, and the wallet is always connecting to other wallets on the fork...

Which brings a question, how can a POS chain quickly recover from a fork?

For POW, once you get the majority of the mining pools to switch, you're through, but for POS, you need to get the majority of the wallets, or the fork could leave a long time.

Having some built-in notification mechanism seems crucial!

[avw1982]

LOL someone need some XC

2014-06-02 10:23:27   BUY   0.00204490   2000.08740173   4.08997872
2014-06-02 10:23:23   BUY   0.00204490   632.00000000   1.29237680
2014-06-02 10:23:00   BUY   0.00204490   3045.93166927   6.22862567

[Artoodeetoo]

LOL someone need some XC

2014-06-02 10:23:27   BUY   0.00204490   2000.08740173   4.08997872
2014-06-02 10:23:23   BUY   0.00204490   632.00000000   1.29237680
2014-06-02 10:23:00   BUY   0.00204490   3045.93166927   6.22862567

100 BTC order @ 20k

We will look back im sure and think, that was a bargain buy.

[kerhso]

LOL someone need some XC

2014-06-02 10:23:27   BUY   0.00204490   2000.08740173   4.08997872
2014-06-02 10:23:23   BUY   0.00204490   632.00000000   1.29237680
2014-06-02 10:23:00   BUY   0.00204490   3045.93166927   6.22862567

100 BTC order @ 20k

We will look back im sure and think, that was a bargain buy.

Do not care about the price, only interested in the future development and technical XC

[CatKiwi]

Good to see some big buys - I think we will probably test 0.003 within the next 24 hours - a period of stability like this without anyone dumping amounts the market can't soak up is a sure sign of an impending 'leg up'. While I think we will heavily rely on the failure of Darkcoin to get anywhere near their value I do think this coin is probably 2 or 3 times lower than it probably should be judging by the relatively stable price Darkcoin is holding.

If I had to put money on Darkcoin or XC having regard to which one is more likely to double in price I would put that money on XC at this point in time.

It's a market that has shown EXTREME reliance on good or bad news from the dev. It's more likely that the next news you hear from the dev will be positive and Id expect the push to 0.03 to occur almost right away.

Buy in now before the walls get moved up - its a good buy right now and I doubt that wall is going to be removed - if it does disappear for a moment it is far more likely to be because the market is pushing upwards and it therefore needs to be moved up a level.

[child_harold]

LOL someone need some XC

2014-06-02 10:23:27   BUY   0.00204490   2000.08740173   4.08997872
2014-06-02 10:23:23   BUY   0.00204490   632.00000000   1.29237680
2014-06-02 10:23:00   BUY   0.00204490   3045.93166927   6.22862567

100 BTC order @ 20k

We will look back im sure and think, that was a bargain buy.

Do not care about the price, only interested in the future development and technical XC

On this subject are there IP obfuscation technologies planned (or in place?)

[NewWorldCoiner]

Ok so basically each user will have to validated by an Admin and the newbies will have their own section where they can post until they reach 5 posts. Sounds good?

Sounds terrible. Like a private members club. And you want us to donate for this privilege? Take money off us, and edit any post you disagree with?

Yeah, right.

[mikemikemike]

LOL someone need some XC

2014-06-02 10:23:27   BUY   0.00204490   2000.08740173   4.08997872
2014-06-02 10:23:23   BUY   0.00204490   632.00000000   1.29237680
2014-06-02 10:23:00   BUY   0.00204490   3045.93166927   6.22862567

And I needed to sell. Without that 50k order the market is going below 0.002

[CatKiwi]

Ok so basically each user will have to validated by an Admin and the newbies will have their own section where they can post until they reach 5 posts. Sounds good?

Sounds terrible. Like a private members club.

If they want to moderate their own website's forum that seems fine to me - As long as freedom of speech is maintained here. This is will continue to be the main port of call for both positive and negative statements about the coin, as it should be.

You cannot simply prevent others from speaking their mind on a coin just because it harms your vested interest (e.g. you are holding coins you are trying to hype up and sell for a higher price and someone is making that harder for you to do by speaking negatively).

As long as this thread is a free speech zone the separate forum is no big deal. Anyone will be able to clearly see that its members will obviously be firmly attached to the coin and will take what they say with a grain of salt.

[Teka]

Ok so basically each user will have to validated by an Admin and the newbies will have their own section where they can post until they reach 5 posts. Sounds good?

Sounds terrible. Like a private members club.

If they want to moderate their own website's forum that seems fine to me - As long as freedom of speech is maintained here. This is will continue to be the main port of call for both positive and negative statements about the coin, as it should be.

You cannot simply prevent others from speaking their mind on a coin just because it harms your vested interest (e.g. you are holding coins you are trying to hype up and sell for a higher price and someone is making that harder for you to do by speaking negatively).

As long as this thread is a free speech zone the separate forum is no big deal. Anyone will be able to clearly see that its members will obviously be firmly attached to the coin and will take what they say with a grain of salt.

The new forum will be designed to listen to legitmate concerns and answer them. I will only moderate spam/fud. The users that get banned will be chosen by the community through the karma system unless it turns out that their questions where legitimate.

From here I only have deleted fud/spam.

[madmanbts]

Good to see some big buys - I think we will probably test 0.003 within the next 24 hours - a period of stability like this without anyone dumping amounts the market can't soak up is a sure sign of an impending 'leg up'. While I think we will heavily rely on the failure of Darkcoin to get anywhere near their value I do think this coin is probably 2 or 3 times lower than it probably should be judging by the relatively stable price Darkcoin is holding.

If I had to put money on Darkcoin or XC having regard to which one is more likely to double in price I would put that money on XC at this point in time.

It's a market that has shown EXTREME reliance on good or bad news from the dev. It's more likely that the next news you hear from the dev will be positive and Id expect the push to 0.03 to occur almost right away.

Buy in now before the walls get moved up - its a good buy right now and I doubt that wall is going to be removed - if it does disappear for a moment it is far more likely to be because the market is pushing upwards and it therefore needs to be moved up a level.

I also agree

[Teka]

Here is what I do everytime a post is deleted: