Bitcoin Forum
August 20, 2024, 11:03:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 [298] 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 ... 1627 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos  (Read 1484180 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
dida
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


SoNiC BooM


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 10:32:26 PM
 #5941

Even Darkcoin DRK got it right

util.h
{
static const int64 COIN = 100000000;
static const int64 CENT = 1000000;

}


XC didn't even fork Darkcoin properly.  Their code is totally broken, and it doesn't even have any Xnode code or implemenation available.

 


totally broken fork Darkcoin, XC didn't. Xnode doesn't even have code is totally broken like darkcoin

wow. what a fail.  Grin
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
June 08, 2014, 10:33:38 PM
 #5942

"...doesn't even have any Xnode code or implemenation available"

Perhaps you, dear fudder, only hold this opinion because you haven't visited this thread since the last FUDwar. (That's a guess, but the most plausible one that springs to mind.) The past three releases have had xnode functionality. The dev is now refining the xnode code before implementing the multi-path aspect.

So if you could kindly substantiate any further opinions you voice on this thread, that would be appreciated.

Co-Founder, the Blocknet
dadon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002


Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.


View Profile WWW
June 08, 2014, 10:33:49 PM
 #5943

so...encrypted messaging released possibly this week, can't wait to see it, exciting stuff! Wink
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
June 08, 2014, 10:34:43 PM
 #5944

so...encrypted messaging released possibly this week, can't wait to see it, exciting stuff! Wink

+1. The pace of development here leaves nothing to be desired.

Co-Founder, the Blocknet
Propulsion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


The Buck Stops Here.


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 10:35:11 PM
 #5945

Even Darkcoin DRK got it right

util.h
{
static const int64 COIN = 100000000;
static const int64 CENT = 1000000;

}


XC didn't even fork Darkcoin properly.  Their code is totally broken, and it doesn't even have any Xnode code or implemenation available.

wow. what a fail.

This thread is only for XC true believers. No FUD allowed at all.

Try this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.0

totally broken fork Darkcoin, XC didn't. Xnode doesn't even have code is totally broken like darkcoin
wow. what a fail.  Grin

For a thread not related to Darkcoin at all, a lot of you like to talk about it.
dida
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


SoNiC BooM


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 10:38:36 PM
 #5946

Even Darkcoin DRK got it right

util.h
{
static const int64 COIN = 100000000;
static const int64 CENT = 1000000;

}


XC didn't even fork Darkcoin properly.  Their code is totally broken, and it doesn't even have any Xnode code or implemenation available.

wow. what a fail.

This thread is only for XC true believers. No FUD allowed at all.

Try this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.0

totally broken fork Darkcoin, XC didn't. Xnode doesn't even have code is totally broken like darkcoin
wow. what a fail.  Grin

For a thread not related to Darkcoin at all, a lot of you like to talk about it.

desintegrity42 like to lick my XC balls so let him  Grin
dida
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


SoNiC BooM


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 10:44:20 PM
 #5947

much fun today at XC...must sleep now....bye all see ya after encrypted messaging release
pinkman12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1070
Merit: 1021


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 10:46:58 PM
 #5948

All i see is 'This user is currently ignored.' lol....many trolls lurk here

dadon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002


Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.


View Profile WWW
June 08, 2014, 10:48:32 PM
 #5949

so...encrypted messaging released possibly this week, can't wait to see it, exciting stuff! Wink

+1. The pace of development here leaves nothing to be desired.
the encrypted instant messaging is going to be a big one, if there was a way you could simply attach a payment to that message, as easily as attaching an emotion etc, that is were i think the next big thing in crypto is, i hope our Dev is thinking along these lines as well, people want privacy when exchanging email's, messages etc, add this with private payments in a quick easy format and you have all the ingredients for something bound to go mainstream.
child_harold
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 08, 2014, 10:52:00 PM
 #5950

Messages will be completely deletable? Are they only stored locally? Does the blockchain keep a record in any way?

As you can tell I have no idea how this is going to work!

dadon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002


Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.


View Profile WWW
June 08, 2014, 10:54:13 PM
 #5951

Messages will be completely deletable? Are they only stored locally? Does the blockchain keep a record in any way?

As you can tell I have no idea how this is going to work!
we can only guess, i'm sure the Dev will work this out, he is a smart bloke.
pinkman12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1070
Merit: 1021


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 10:55:15 PM
 #5952

Do we know when updated wallet is being released?

integrity42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
June 08, 2014, 10:56:55 PM
 #5953

Do we know when updated wallet is being released?

Maybe, but they don't publish the source code, so you're running useless wallets with malware

tr8kr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 10:58:49 PM
 #5954

Mr Integrity42 you have not posted on this forum since the 1 march and suddenly you come here and troll this thread, What is your goal ?
BrewCrewFan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 501



View Profile
June 08, 2014, 11:15:11 PM
 #5955

Mr Integrity42 you have not posted on this forum since the 1 march and suddenly you come here and troll this thread, What is your goal ?

If its not obvious enough. He needs to go back and wishing Gox is going to reopen.

Free SIGNs giving everyday. Be part, do not miss!.
SqMe5ceYfdcGsRyVpgvpYb6bRLS9j8omvB

XChat : Addy : XYuZESQpeMtZ2wit8nVVnXKGytfiaTBCo6 PubKey : eteshLzeq8Bh54BRjGSunMTc6Ytxtk7HYaSmDYMQn61z
shakesbear
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 684
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 11:16:59 PM
 #5956

Why does XC on divide to 6 decimals?

in util.h on github.
{
static const int64 COIN = 1000000;
static const int64 CENT = 10000;
}

COIN should be 100 million not 1 million.  This means that XC are only divisible to 6 decimals and not to 8 decimals.

You can't do much colored coin related things with only 6 decimals, not enough units.

pretty stupid. that means there are 400 times less XC units then bitcoin units. If this coin is ever going to take off, it should be
built from success from the ground up.

Turns out that the devs just forked mintcoin code (obvious from /contrib in the github source) and they didn't even bother to notice.


Another example of dev incompetence.

You guys just say this guy is trolling
But is his point true?
Any people can confirm?

░░▒▒▓▓▓▓▓************** DFINANCE is New Age of DEFI **************▓▓▓▓▓▒▒░░
░░▒▒▓▓▓▓* Bitcointalk ▐  TwitterReddit ▐  Telegram ▐  Github ▐  Discord *▓▓▓▓▒▒░░
░░▒▒▓▓▓** A Non-Code Platform for Decentralized Trading Instruments **▓▓▓▒▒░░
temrus63
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 11:23:55 PM
 #5957

what is problem?
all works fine
bitcad4u
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 255


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 11:26:50 PM
 #5958

So if the ports are the same it simply means that it wouldn't be able to work with Bitcoin daemon simultaneously which doesn't appear to be catastrophic.

No, you don't understand. The P2P port and RPC ports are both set the same. This makes the binary built from source impossible to use.


This is concerning because the windows/mac/linux binaries that everyone is using are NOT the same as the ones built from source.  Who knows if the official binaries contain malware unless we can build from source?

And I've already proved theres a bug in the source.  Amateur hour here. I can't believe nobody spotted this yet. I suppose real auditors and devs stay away from the altcoin section of this forum.

Tried to build it myself but it requires libboost 1.55 while I have 1.54 in repos. Too lazy to get 1.55 so not going to test it. However I haven't seen people reporting problems with that. Also config must be enough to correct that.

Thats convenient. You don't have to build it. Check the port numbers on the init file and bitcoinrpc file on github.

Hell, even look at the --help output. they have the ports wrong there too.

Thanks man, we really appreciate that you are giving us warnings.
As you can see on Mintpal currently, where the price is rocketing from 0.00095000 to currently 0.0118799, everyone is dumping in panic mode because of your warnings. Oh no wait, nobody seems to give a fuck.

They don't understand that the devs of this coin are clueless and it will be worthless. You should sell your coins to the idiots.

Can you provide proof of this- link to the source or paste it here... rather than just rambling like a drk troll
ctya
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 297
Merit: 30


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 11:27:31 PM
 #5959

Why does XC on divide to 6 decimals?

in util.h on github.
{
static const int64 COIN = 1000000;
static const int64 CENT = 10000;
}

COIN should be 100 million not 1 million.  This means that XC are only divisible to 6 decimals and not to 8 decimals.

You can't do much colored coin related things with only 6 decimals, not enough units.

pretty stupid. that means there are 400 times less XC units then bitcoin units. If this coin is ever going to take off, it should be
built from success from the ground up.

Turns out that the devs just forked mintcoin code (obvious from /contrib in the github source) and they didn't even bother to notice.


Another example of dev incompetence.

We are closed source right now, so github source is irrelevant for several versions now.
Github source is version 1.33
Version 1.36 is current
Version 1.37 is released tonight



bitcad4u
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 255


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 11:29:48 PM
 #5960

Even Darkcoin DRK got it right

util.h
{
static const int64 COIN = 100000000;
static const int64 CENT = 1000000;

}


XC didn't even fork Darkcoin properly.  Their code is totally broken, and it doesn't even have any Xnode code or implemenation available.

wow. what a fail.

XC does not need code to run xnodes (which are working) - XC is magical... thats why u dont see the code u fool, u cant see magic! 
Pages: « 1 ... 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 [298] 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 ... 1627 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!