[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[Longenecker]

Final Rev2 only 1 week away!!!   

[MiningMinion]

It doesn't bother me at all that Dan reviews code of other altcoins.
Honestly, I think it's a win for Xcurrency in the longrun because the more people who learn about Dan and his respected background, the more people will be introduced to XC.

I totally agree.  This only solidfies XC and it's community which also just solidifies his commitment in the crypto world and is pioneering for the future here.

[CryptoGretzky]

Anyone know if there is a github that has X11 hashing in C#?  Trying to make the C codes out there into interop DLL is killing me...

[qiwoman2]

This is wonderful news.

Maybe it's a good time to get more XC now rev2 is on the way. Congratulations for all the success and I am hoping it will bring XC to greater heights and unite the XC community. I am glad to be part of such a great coin and community.

[Artoodeetoo]

It doesn't bother me at all that Dan reviews code of other altcoins.
Honestly, I think it's a win for Xcurrency in the longrun because the more people who learn about Dan and his respected background, the more people will be introduced to XC.

Exactly and Dan has to eat.. Apple and google both started in a garage and I'm sure they did all they could to keep the cash flowing in fo fund and subsidiese the primary project. As long as its a sideline and does not impact release schedules I have no problem at all with Dan branching out...

[dida]

Hi guys I just got 5.2 Btc on btc-e after a wire transfer but there is a fuking MONTH of Hold on them. they say it can be requested to be removed but the link for assistance does not work is there anyone in here knows how this process work and direct me to the correct link pr person to contact for this?

thank you

Edit:

I created a ticket trough support hope they will look at it speedy enough

I had issues with btc-e when there was the huge dds attack in january/feb and had 10 btc withdrawn from my account
but the transfer never appeared on the blockchain. There we at least 10 of us in that position and the support is very slow -
but they do get round to it eventually.

Here is a link to that issue - you see that eventually they came good for us all so don't worry.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1y7con/btce_not_sending_bitcoins_after_one_week_be/

The other thing you can do is to post a reply on

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=433283

If you can google translate it into russian it seems to work faster - (I usually did an english and russian version
in the same message). Also you can keep submitting tickets - my first one was never looked at but the second one
suddenly worked.

You can pm me if you need more advice -


 

Thanks for this good to know next time gonna use local BTC for sure

Why dont you use BitKonan? They are ultra professional service.

[Dungor]

Could XCMixers also store XChat messages encrypted of cause and at a fee? Currently both sender and receiver has to be online and that's fine, but at a fee it could be saved for offline deliverance. XCMixers will be most likely to have a lot of uptime but the message should of cause be split up and spread across several mixers with redundancy for safety and security.

Just a suggestion

Bump, Teka Synechist?

[rhader]

This is wonderful news.

Maybe it's a good time to get more XC now rev2 is on the way. Congratulations for all the success and I am hoping it will bring XC to greater heights and unite the XC community. I am glad to be part of such a great coin and community.

Can we get a link to the content of the rev2 update???

[Artoodeetoo]

1 week to rev 2... This is the week I expect it to really start hitting up... Is there a link to the incorporated features... Should be exciting.. I'm expecting whales to start showing up... These trolls are probably a precursor to that ... Get me cheap coins lads!!!

Just goes to show though... The attack vector of the fud now is so narrow it just comes across as totally desperate and childish.

[CryptoGretzky]

This is wonderful news.

Maybe it's a good time to get more XC now rev2 is on the way. Congratulations for all the success and I am hoping it will bring XC to greater heights and unite the XC community. I am glad to be part of such a great coin and community.

Can we get a link to the content of the rev2 update???

Don't think there is a link yet cause well the announcement isn't out yet for what's in the final release, but... there is this new "undisclosed privacy" tech/feature that we will find out in a week.

[CryptoGretzky]

1 week to rev 2... This is the week I expect it to really start hitting up... Is there a link to the incorporated features... Should be exciting.. I'm expecting whales to start showing up... These trolls are probably a precursor to that ... Get me cheap coins lads!!!

Just goes to show though... The attack vector of the fud now is so narrow it just comes across as totally desperate and childish.

When Dan is the go to guy for code review... how can XC be looked at in a bad light really puzzles me.   People just don't realized yet that when XC gets to Rev 3 and beyond, there will be no competition.

[novirudarzg]

1 week to rev 2... This is the week I expect it to really start hitting up... Is there a link to the incorporated features... Should be exciting.. I'm expecting whales to start showing up... These trolls are probably a precursor to that ... Get me cheap coins lads!!!

Just goes to show though... The attack vector of the fud now is so narrow it just comes across as totally desperate and childish.

When Dan is the go to guy for code review... how can XC be looked at in a bad light really puzzles me.   People just don't realized yet that when XC gets to Rev 3 and beyond, there will be no competition.

well said man

[Yygo]

What is the developers opinion on scripting on the blockchain (Turing complete a la Ethereum)?

I would appreciate some feedback on this...

Good question. Maybe someone should answer this?

[adhitthana]

1 week to rev 2... This is the week I expect it to really start hitting up... Is there a link to the incorporated features... Should be exciting.. I'm expecting whales to start showing up... These trolls are probably a precursor to that ... Get me cheap coins lads!!!
Just goes to show though... The attack vector of the fud now is so narrow it just comes across as totally desperate and childish.

When Dan is the go to guy for code review... how can XC be looked at in a bad light really puzzles me.   

XC  has cemented itself as a top 20 coin. It is seen in a good light, isn't it?
XC is currently number 15 here... http://coinmarketcap.com/  and if it's not the newest coin in the top 15 it is pretty close to it. That is no mean feat.

[CryptoGretzky]

1 week to rev 2... This is the week I expect it to really start hitting up... Is there a link to the incorporated features... Should be exciting.. I'm expecting whales to start showing up... These trolls are probably a precursor to that ... Get me cheap coins lads!!!
Just goes to show though... The attack vector of the fud now is so narrow it just comes across as totally desperate and childish.

Really ?  How do you think whales view the unnecessary defence of Jasin? Defending Jasin is a trade XC  can lose on but not win on. If Jasin gets found guilty of fraud in a future legal case XC loses. If that does not happen XC gains nothing they would not have had anyway.
Do you think that added risk makes whales want to buy?

Everything after and including..."We consider..." was unnecessary and just puts the project at risk.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg8720311#msg8720311

IF the fraud was centered around XC, sure... but his ASIC deal was something COMPLETELY not related to XC at all.

It's like saying a company should go down because one of their part time employee killed someone while drunk.   (remember Jasin never coded for XC so he's not even really a part time employee in any sense.   more like an invited consultant that haven't consulted anything yet)

Everyone should deserve to be innocent until proven guilty.   Are people saying that Jasin is completely innocent?   I don't think the XC community is saying he is or isn't guilty.   We are just saying that his innocence/guilt really have NOTHING to do with XC.   If they feel that Jasin is guilty, then take legal action against him and let the law deal with him...   We as a community can't do anything....    IF he's a real scammer, you think a whole bunch of annoymous people on a forum is going to really get him to pay back the money?  

The people that feel ripped off really need to take the action that will get their money back, not just whine in our thread....

[Mountaingoat]

Statement on XC's relation to Jasinlee


Hello all

We would like to state the nature of XC's relation to Jasinlee.


Jasinlee is not an official member of the XC Team, as has been reflected on our website for some time.

Jasinlee chose to remove himself from the XC Team out of concern for the effect that ongoing misperceptions about his troubled ASIC project might have on XC.

As such, XC is entirely independent of Jasinlee’s various projects, and clients of the Fibonacci ASIC project have no basis for associating its outcome with XC in any way.


We consider this matter resolved. Now concerning a separate matter, that of public perceptions of Jasinlee’s character and actions, at no point has the XC Team had reason to lose faith in Jasinlee’s integrity of character or doubt his intentions, whether toward XC or toward Fibonacci. Furthermore Jasinlee is entirely confident that a resolution will be reached. As such we have confidence that Jasin will resolve the outstanding issues with the Fibonacci ASIC project. Furthermore we believe that current arguments to the contrary are poorly substantiated and largely speculative, and therefore lack sufficient warrant. Given their severity, these allegations are thus of a highly unethical nature.

Finally, regarding Jasinlee’s past role at XC, he is a thought-leader, and we are grateful for his insightful and energising contribution and presence. However Jasinlee did not make any contributions to XC’s code and has not had access to it. Thus he has not been a developer for XC.

Why do you always use so many enters on the beginning of your message? Why not just do it like this:

Statement on XC's relation to Jasinlee
Hello all

We would like to state the nature of XC's relation to Jasinlee.

Jasinlee is not an official member of the XC Team, as has been reflected on our website for some time.

Jasinlee chose to remove himself from the XC Team out of concern for the effect that ongoing misperceptions about his troubled ASIC project might have on XC.

As such, XC is entirely independent of Jasinlee’s various projects, and clients of the Fibonacci ASIC project have no basis for associating its outcome with XC in any way.

We consider this matter resolved. Now concerning a separate matter, that of public perceptions of Jasinlee’s character and actions, at no point has the XC Team had reason to lose faith in Jasinlee’s integrity of character or doubt his intentions, whether toward XC or toward Fibonacci. Furthermore Jasinlee is entirely confident that a resolution will be reached. As such we have confidence that Jasin will resolve the outstanding issues with the Fibonacci ASIC project. Furthermore we believe that current arguments to the contrary are poorly substantiated and largely speculative, and therefore lack sufficient warrant. Given their severity, these allegations are thus of a highly unethical nature.

Finally, regarding Jasinlee’s past role at XC, he is a thought-leader, and we are grateful for his insightful and energising contribution and presence. However Jasinlee did not make any contributions to XC’s code and has not had access to it. Thus he has not been a developer for XC.

That looks more professional.

[Artoodeetoo]

1 week to rev 2... This is the week I expect it to really start hitting up... Is there a link to the incorporated features... Should be exciting.. I'm expecting whales to start showing up... These trolls are probably a precursor to that ... Get me cheap coins lads!!!
Just goes to show though... The attack vector of the fud now is so narrow it just comes across as totally desperate and childish.

Really ?  How do you think whales view the unnecessary defence of Jasin? Defending Jasin is a trade XC  can lose on but not win on. If Jasin gets found guilty of fraud in a future legal case XC loses. If that does not happen XC gains nothing they would not have had anyway.
Do you think that added risk makes whales want to buy?

Everything after and including..."We consider..." was unnecessary and just puts the project at risk.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg8720311#msg8720311

I don't think they would care.. Xc is fledgling, actors come and go.. I really am struggling for why we are being linked to any of this tbh... The phrase storm in a tea cup and posters with too much time on their hands cones to my mind.

[CryptoGretzky]

1 week to rev 2... This is the week I expect it to really start hitting up... Is there a link to the incorporated features... Should be exciting.. I'm expecting whales to start showing up... These trolls are probably a precursor to that ... Get me cheap coins lads!!!
Just goes to show though... The attack vector of the fud now is so narrow it just comes across as totally desperate and childish.

Really ?  How do you think whales view the unnecessary defence of Jasin? Defending Jasin is a trade XC  can lose on but not win on. If Jasin gets found guilty of fraud in a future legal case XC loses. If that does not happen XC gains nothing they would not have had anyway.
Do you think that added risk makes whales want to buy?

Everything after and including..."We consider..." was unnecessary and just puts the project at risk.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg8720311#msg8720311

I don't think they would care.. Xc is fledgling, actors come and go.. I really am struggling for why we are being linked to any of this tbh... The phrase storm in a tea cup and posters with too much time on their hands cones to my mind.

Ya... they won't care as long as the tech works.  I mean... look at this awesomeness...

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?8bd4b429c9f0651ebedab6b37ea2b1f7b64f4087e4a7dbd10e06c9af2122d8e6.htm

Sent 10 XC here...   Who sent to who??!?!  How can this be possibly decoded?

[Dungor]

The salty tears caused by un-diversified bad investments.
People didn't do their due diligence and investigation into what they invested in.
What they hopefully get from this is to not overexpose in their portfolio, and if it seems to good to be true, it probably is.

The saddest part about this is that it seems that the guy genuinely is trying to pay people back but the whiners wan't to bear no cost of risk. I bet if it had been at a profit they would wan't the full reward.

Crypto is still a free market, with winners and losers. Where chance of reward comes at a chance of loss.

Think about it this way, what happened was that the market moved resources from people that didn't deserve them. Beautiful really.

[dannyspk]

The salty tears caused by un-diversified bad investments.
People didn't do their due diligence and investigation into what they invested in.
What they hopefully get from this is to not overexpose in their portfolio, and if it seems to good to be true, it probably is.

The saddest part about this is that it seems that the guy genuinely is trying to pay people back but the whiners wan't to bear no cost of risk. I bet if it had been at a profit they would wan't the full reward.

Crypto is still a free market, with winners and losers. Where chance of reward comes at a chance of loss.

Think about it this way, what happened was that the market moved resources from people that didn't deserve them. Beautiful really.

Yep. And some people learn the hard way.