Jacques de Molay
|
|
October 24, 2014, 01:13:24 AM |
|
I cant wait for this retard wannabe to finish dumping and Ive already said who it was, its going to be glorious leaving all the shit coins in the dust soon.
How many did he have? I dont care to be honest, he will be fresh out soon enough and even then he wont have enough to stop the surge upwards. Besides he is heavily invested in his other shit coin which is nearing the ipo price (which is already drastically over priced for such little effort anyway that got used to fund things outside of crypto as its first main goal, everything else is semantics to believe they are doing "something worthwhile" in crypto ) And its pretty easy to tell who it is, go talk truth in another thread and XC drops...gee I wonder who that buttthurt faggit is
|
|
|
|
infinitechaos
|
|
October 24, 2014, 01:14:29 AM |
|
my 2 XCents about the current selling ....
I see only one answer in the chain, combined with info from private talks with some early adaptors, following BCT daily & came to the conclusion that the current development, eg: selling of big stacks, is a positive move for XC.
Nobody can deny that there are some big holders of XC that started really early, a time when XC was viewed as and only compared to just any other coin & we had several coins like that a day. They just gambled this this one would maybe hit the big time. This is way before the FUD started about identity (who is this dev) & the team was still anonymous & a lot smaller. Just people that had the hardware or rented it to mine this coin in an early stage. They got more coins than most of us can dream of (i consider 100K up a minimum for this group) Think those people viewed XC at the time as just any other coin, based on the market view at that moment and they holded a long time waiting for the 'change' they where used to. But at the same time they based there decision to hold on old principles, a new promising coin. Then a (seen from an alt-coin world perspective) a strange time started, XC was different, it was not run like any other coin but from the start it was run like a business, think a lot of the early adaptors never saw something like that before.
As more time went by the bigger the difference with the rest of the altcoin market grew. My analyses shows just one thing: Early adaptors (maybe not sure what to expect from current moves) are covering there initial costs, all coins that are sold atm are linked directly to the POW stage. Even with a price below 100K they have a nice profit & there stacks are big enough to sell part and still hold enough to be considered rich if all works out. Same time more and more new XC holders enter the arena and place there new bought coins for staking off the exchanges.
Distribution is improving a lot atm, think most, if not all exchanges are tapping into there cold storage to handle all the withdraws. Maybe the price will drop even more but the rate distribution is improving is 'out of this world'
I know, just my 2 cents and maybe/probably some of you will call me crazy. The funny part is that i do have a site ready to deploy backing the statements above but atm im just not willing to spend >200XC a month on hosting costs. I will be broke within a year if i do that.
Im holding the coins i bought to late while at the same time feeling i missed an opportunity to mine this coin early on (had my miner shut down when XC was in POW stage coz of overall bad ROI) and am waiting for the completion of at least rev 2.5 and the public bounties/reviews to crack XC anon solution, confidence that XC will win. Then i have enough to run this site years in a row, just on POS rewards.
BUMP
|
|
|
|
shockstar
|
|
October 24, 2014, 01:14:41 AM |
|
I cant wait for this retard wannabe to finish dumping and Ive already said who it was, its going to be glorious leaving all the shit coins in the dust soon.
How many did he have? I dont care to be honest, he will be fresh out soon enough and even then he wont have enough to stop the surge upwards. Besides he is heavily invested in his other shit coin which is nearing the ipo price (which is already drastically over priced for such little effort anyway that got used to fund things outside of crypto) who is this person are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
spookycoins
|
|
October 24, 2014, 01:15:09 AM |
|
Silverking dump? Pure speculation.
|
That's me on twitter --> @spookycoins
|
|
|
Jacques de Molay
|
|
October 24, 2014, 01:17:48 AM |
|
Silverking dump? Pure speculation.
Nope there is none on my part, he cant help himself when his other precious coin is questioned (or in his mind attacked) it correlates when the dumps occur = he isnt very smart at all. I tested and proved this today with two posts in the new heavily moderated qbk thread... some guy was boasting about setting up bitcoin machine in Queensland on the Gold Coast so I put in a new story frmo a few days ago that police arrested a bitcoin owner on the Gold Coast with heavy links to drugs and police took the machine...all removed and dumps occurred right on queue. predictable - very.
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
|
October 24, 2014, 01:19:53 AM |
|
I cant wait for this retard wannabe to finish dumping and Ive already said who it was, its going to be glorious leaving all the shit coins in the dust soon.
The more he dumps the more I earn from the Multipool. Heu heu heu
I won't bring up his name because I think you are incorrect. I think that there are a few interests that have issues with XC based on vested interest. And if they are able to manipulate a low liquid market then there is at least the possibility that, if they are vested elsewhere (again, not naming names) that it is likely of little consequence for them to keep selling and rebuying in order to sell again on the upswings. It has been a very consistent pattern over the course of months with new interests becoming interested in XC not being perceived as a safe bet. I think that there is a concerted effort to suppress the price. But I don't think that will work once XC is public...because the technology is nothing like that is out there now and nor is expanding beyond the fickle and sometimes malicious whims of the crypto community going to be anything but a positive. I think what I have always thought. That XC is building a foundation for their code specifically so they can incorporate. The code, which people are screaming is invalid because it is currently close sourced (which I think is a good idea), is a foundation for all of the applications. For XChat, XMobile, VOIP and et cetera. All of this is beside the Blocknet, which will be something for the crypto community and beyond when we finally evolve beyond the few petulant lucky millionaires who happened to find themselves after a major and fortunate pump. I wish I had more BTC to buy more XC. No other crypto is planning an ITO. None. And that speaks volumes about long term interests with regards to the XC team and other competitors. Won't stop me from cringing though...I bought on this last down swing and might have to sell another one in order to take advantage... And for the record...name calling is no fun.
|
|
|
|
almond
|
|
October 24, 2014, 01:21:04 AM |
|
I cant wait for this retard wannabe to finish dumping and Ive already said who it was, its going to be glorious leaving all the shit coins in the dust soon.
The more he dumps the more I earn from the Multipool. Heu heu heu
speaking of the multipool.....what's up with the erratic shift payouts ? Tuesday's is still pending, and Saturday's and Sunday's were also late. It's been a very reliable pool, up until this week.
|
Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
|
October 24, 2014, 01:23:55 AM |
|
I think it should be noted again that there was a recent thread and recruitment of Trolls for BTC. If someone has the money to hire trolls for BTC then they have the money to manipulate a low liquid market...
|
|
|
|
coinzcoinzcoinz
|
|
October 24, 2014, 01:26:08 AM |
|
Guys, I keep monitoring XC since it is an interesting project. Some advise: Do not build an app without the help of a UI/UX designer. You guys can do better. I'm a user interface designer myself but unfortunately I don't have time to help out. If you want to be taken seriously, these things need to look far more professional. Hopefully the interface will be looked at in the future (ideally this would be the first step though since it affects application architecture).
|
|
|
|
Jacques de Molay
|
|
October 24, 2014, 01:30:41 AM |
|
I cant wait for this retard wannabe to finish dumping and Ive already said who it was, its going to be glorious leaving all the shit coins in the dust soon.
The more he dumps the more I earn from the Multipool. Heu heu heu
speaking of the multipool.....what's up with the erratic shift payouts ? Tuesday's is still pending, and Saturday's and Sunday's were also late. It's been a very reliable pool, up until this week. It was stuck on 120 for a while, they must have got word that it was. I see it change between cryptsy, polo, bitt now. They all come through eventually. I cant wait for this retard wannabe to finish dumping and Ive already said who it was, its going to be glorious leaving all the shit coins in the dust soon.
The more he dumps the more I earn from the Multipool. Heu heu heu
I won't bring up his name because I think you are incorrect. I think that there are a few interests that have issues with XC based on vested interest. And if they are able to manipulate a low liquid market then there is at least the possibility that, if they are vested elsewhere (again, not naming names) that it is likely of little consequence for them to keep selling and rebuying in order to sell again on the upswings. It has been a very consistent pattern over the course of months with new interests becoming interested in XC not being perceived as a safe bet. I think that there is a concerted effort to suppress the price. But I don't think that will work once XC is public...because the technology is nothing like that is out there now and nor is expanding beyond the fickle and sometimes malicious whims of the crypto community going to be anything but a positive. I think what I have always thought. That XC is building a foundation for their code specifically so they can incorporate. The code, which people are screaming is invalid because it is currently close sourced (which I think is a good idea), is a foundation for all of the applications. For XChat, XMobile, VOIP and et cetera. All of this is beside the Blocknet, which will be something for the crypto community and beyond when we finally evolve beyond the few petulant lucky millionaires who happened to find themselves after a major and fortunate pump. I wish I had more BTC to buy more XC. No other crypto is planning an ITO. None. And that speaks volumes about long term interests with regards to the XC team and other competitors. Won't stop me from cringing though...I bought on this last down swing and might have to sell another one in order to take advantage... And for the record...name calling is no fun. Fair call, but I feel I can say whatever I want about him as I have "dealt" with his abuse in PM so I am correct in my judgements on this person.
|
|
|
|
URSAY
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1010
|
|
October 24, 2014, 01:36:34 AM |
|
Guys, I keep monitoring XC since it is an interesting project. Some advise: Do not build an app without the help of a UI/UX designer. You guys can do better. I'm a user interface designer myself but unfortunately I don't have time to help out. If you want to be taken seriously, these things need to look far more professional. Hopefully the interface will be looked at in the future (ideally this would be the first step though since it affects application architecture).
Respectfully, I disagree. You put things out and show delivery. Features, including design and UI can always be improved upon in future deliveries. The point is xc users have more utility in the currency with new platforms, NOW. This provides value to the whole eco-system. Design is important, yes. I'm a designer. But this space moves fast and improvements are only a release away if needed.
|
|
|
|
Sabretooth
|
|
October 24, 2014, 01:57:06 AM |
|
Guys, I keep monitoring XC since it is an interesting project. Some advise: Do not build an app without the help of a UI/UX designer. You guys can do better. I'm a user interface designer myself but unfortunately I don't have time to help out. If you want to be taken seriously, these things need to look far more professional. Hopefully the interface will be looked at in the future (ideally this would be the first step though since it affects application architecture).
It looks a lot better on the actual phone.
|
Uno: uVcEaDQ5MXcYRjSGY1E7FXfrtxGk6QKnBm
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
|
October 24, 2014, 02:10:15 AM |
|
Guys, I keep monitoring XC since it is an interesting project. Some advise: Do not build an app without the help of a UI/UX designer. You guys can do better. I'm a user interface designer myself but unfortunately I don't have time to help out. If you want to be taken seriously, these things need to look far more professional. Hopefully the interface will be looked at in the future (ideally this would be the first step though since it affects application architecture).
Respectfully, I disagree. You put things out and show delivery. Features, including design and UI can always be improved upon in future deliveries. The point is xc users have more utility in the currency with new platforms, NOW. This provides value to the whole eco-system. Design is important, yes. I'm a designer. But this space moves fast and improvements are only a release away if needed. I was thinking the same thing. The UI should be secondary after the 'background code'. Not that it isn't important but it is an easy thing to update. That said...I am not adverse to the UI. I like the color scheme...
|
|
|
|
adhitthana
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 24, 2014, 03:13:30 AM |
|
Guys, I keep monitoring XC since it is an interesting project. Some advise: Do not build an app without the help of a UI/UX designer. You guys can do better. I'm a user interface designer myself but unfortunately I don't have time to help out. If you want to be taken seriously, these things need to look far more professional. Hopefully the interface will be looked at in the future (ideally this would be the first step though since it affects application architecture).
It looks a lot better on the actual phone. How can we download it?
|
|
|
|
Sabretooth
|
|
October 24, 2014, 03:19:26 AM |
|
|
Uno: uVcEaDQ5MXcYRjSGY1E7FXfrtxGk6QKnBm
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 24, 2014, 05:38:51 AM |
|
It looks really nice on the phone!! Maybe a transparent green on top and then it is perfect! ...but is it working?? just the messages?
|
|
|
|
Aderks
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
October 24, 2014, 06:01:40 AM |
|
It looks really nice on the phone!! Maybe a transparent green on top and then it is perfect! ...but is it working?? just the messages? I was chatting with someone on my phone. I think they are making some UI changes and then conducting the closed testing soon.
|
|
|
|
reebokasss
|
|
October 24, 2014, 06:36:22 AM |
|
any news about when mobile wallet testing will finish, and we will see final mobile wallet? and one stupid question, how to open the same wallet in mobile like in computer? should we copy wallet.dat file or what?
|
|
|
|
onealfa
|
|
October 24, 2014, 06:39:32 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
October 24, 2014, 07:49:56 AM |
|
lower amount of wallets is pretty reasonable, dont forget all the moolah/mintpal commotion top100 wallets nice %, actually more than 1 month ago, but dont be surprised if current holdings fluctuate a lot, I believe holders and traders might maximize profit from the imminent blocknet ITO, so I expect holder wallets to drop for at least some days before and after 29/10, I will try for sure.
|
|
|
|
|