Unmoderated XC thread

[studio1one]

reserved

[SkyValeey]

reserved'

[slapper]

Retort.

[sartech]

waching

[chaeplin]

for the record.

it's working people wooohooo!  
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:

Code:

walletpassphrase <my password> 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0

now try to find my fucking sender address  

dev...
you are a saint 

What is correct block height ?

Does he list the "sent" address anywhere? i see a couple entries in different places, but without knowing what the originating addy is you obviously cant compare

I am waiting white paper.

Something changed for trust system.

How it works is key.

There is pattern.

[stealth923]

for the record.

it's working people wooohooo!  
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:

Code:

walletpassphrase <my password> 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0

now try to find my fucking sender address  

dev...
you are a saint  

What is correct block height ?

Does he list the "sent" address anywhere? i see a couple entries in different places, but without knowing what the originating addy is you obviously cant compare

I am waiting white paper.

Something changed for trust system.

How it works is key.

There is pattern.

The anonymity has been cracked already??? Has a pattern been found??

[chaeplin]

This x11 rich list 1 and 3.
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?178.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?862.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?79327.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?79069.htm

Constantly split coins.

Why ?

Anyone know about this ?
 

[chaeplin]

for the record.

it's working people wooohooo!  
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:

Code:

walletpassphrase <my password> 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0

now try to find my fucking sender address  

dev...
you are a saint  

What is correct block height ?

Does he list the "sent" address anywhere? i see a couple entries in different places, but without knowing what the originating addy is you obviously cant compare

I am waiting white paper.

Something changed for trust system.

How it works is key.

There is pattern.

The anonymity has been cracked already??? Has a pattern been found??

I am waiting white paper. That's all.

[nrvkush]

This x11 rich list 1 and 3.
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?178.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?862.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?79327.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?79069.htm

Constantly split coins.

Why ?

Anyone know about this ?
 

one day XC Developer splited PREMIE WALLET  to few lesser to improve staking, which had some issues.
Check premine addresses

im pretty shure its premine

[dragnar]

This x11 rich list 1 and 3.
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?178.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?862.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?79327.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?79069.htm

Constantly split coins.

Why ?

Anyone know about this ?
 

one day XC Developer splited PREMIE WALLET  to few lesser to improve staking, which had some issues.
Check premine addresses

im pretty shure its premine

look on most ritch lists top 3 wallets are mostly xchanges and very bizzy wallets ( after a coin is older ( couple of months ) most block explorers cant even show the transactions on those wallets ( to many transaction failed to load )

[chaeplin]

This x11 rich list 1 and 3.
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?178.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?862.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?79327.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?79069.htm

Constantly split coins.

Why ?

Anyone know about this ?
 

one day XC Developer splited PREMIE WALLET  to few lesser to improve staking, which had some issues.
Check premine addresses

im pretty shure its premine

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg7057964#msg7057964

To help improve staking, I've split up the balance in the premine wallet as thetime to age for coins maybe too large and the net weight goes up and down. I would guess it should even itself over time, as more coins split and stake.  It is much better for the coin to get a lot of small blocks instead of large ones.


XHciahhy7rgusYeSqi359TdJNUvT4S2QKc
XGgekbiLd5HAnv2iLrA7iZeNrWnDGJ8hbS
XS4QLi6VpQQo79HLkoFBj5YZkn6p6TuLKG


ATCSECURE

Understood, Thanks.

(But not like pre minined address)

[dragnar]

could some one tell me witch one of u owns 10% of all DRK coins ?

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?277224.htm <

[studio1one]

ok people listen...

I will pay 0.1 BTC to ONE person who FIRSTLY identify sender address called "1" until tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT)

tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT) or a bit later I post some screenshots of my wallet and transactions...

see what happens
time went... tic tic tic

and btw sorry for my bad English if my English is bad =)

it's working people wooohooo!  
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:

Code:

walletpassphrase <my password> 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0

now try to find my fucking sender address  

dev...
you are a saint 

Good challenge. Put money in escrow to encourage people to take on challenge

[chaeplin]

could some one tell me witch one of u owns 10% of all DRK coins ?

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?277224.htm <

Well what happen ?
Looks like cryptsy cold wallet. Check tx. all from cryptsy.


Previous 1st is http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?188207.htm

Code:

f56d0fb9f3...	70721	2014-5-19 02:44:00	+ 786.11505898 DRK	314,159.26535898 DRK

He set pi..

[solid12345]

Just playing devil's advocate...let's say the basic structure of the POS/POW coin WAS made by loljosh, in the end if the product works does it really matter? I could care less if the keebler elves cobbled it together as long as atcsecure built a working anonymous system. I personally see nothing wrong with paying someone to do the grunt work if you can focus on the more advanced functionsof the coin, Even Evan is admitting he needs help and is now looking for qualified devs to join the Dark team but nobody spreads FUD about that.

[coine_smithe]

Just playing devil's advocate...let's say the basic structure of the POS/POW coin WAS made by loljosh, in the end if the product works does it really matter? I could care less if the keebler elves cobbled it together as long as atcsecure built a working anonymous system. I personally see nothing wrong with paying someone to do the grunt work if you can focus on the more advanced functionsof the coin, Even Evan is admitting he needs help and is now looking for qualified devs to join the Dark team but nobody spreads FUD about that.

Then why doesn't atcsecure address the issue directly like you just did. If he said exactly what you just said people would trust him more.

[chaeplin]

ok people listen...

I will pay 0.1 BTC to ONE person who FIRSTLY identify sender address called "1" until tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT)

tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT) or a bit later I post some screenshots of my wallet and transactions...

see what happens
time went... tic tic tic

and btw sorry for my bad English if my English is bad =)

it's working people wooohooo!  
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:

Code:

walletpassphrase <my password> 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0

now try to find my fucking sender address  

dev...
you are a saint  

called "1" is account, not address.
You don't know how to check given address is yours.

Learn

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Accounts_explained

Code:

Sending
The sendfrom method sends coins and debits the specified account. 
It does **not** change Bitcoin's algorithm for selecting which coins in the wallet are sent
-- you should think of the coins in the wallet as being mixed together 
when they are received. There is no way to ask Bitcoin to "create a payment transaction 
using the coins received from these previously received transactions" 
without using the raw transactions API(which is not part of the account system.)

The sendtoaddress method works like sendfrom, but always debits the default account.

validateaddress is command to check.

[adhitthana]

Then why doesn't atcsecure address the issue directly like you just did. If he said exactly what you just said people would trust him more.

Possibly because this issue is important for people today who want to gamble on the coin and get rich quick.
The Dev probably has much more pressing things to do.
He might be putting all his energy into making the project work in the long run. The coin has probably enough attention now, so the trick is to develop it

[Profetu]

ok people listen...

I will pay 0.1 BTC to ONE person who FIRSTLY identify sender address called "1" until tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT)

tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT) or a bit later I post some screenshots of my wallet and transactions...

see what happens
time went... tic tic tic

and btw sorry for my bad English if my English is bad =)

it's working people wooohooo!  
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:

Code:

walletpassphrase <my password> 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0

now try to find my fucking sender address  

dev...
you are a saint  

called "1" is account, not address.
You don't know how to check given address is yours.

Learn

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Accounts_explained

Code:

Sending
The sendfrom method sends coins and debits the specified account. 
It does **not** change Bitcoin's algorithm for selecting which coins in the wallet are sent
-- you should think of the coins in the wallet as being mixed together 
when they are received. There is no way to ask Bitcoin to "create a payment transaction 
using the coins received from these previously received transactions" 
without using the raw transactions API(which is not part of the account system.)

The sendtoaddress method works like sendfrom, but always debits the default account.

validateaddress is command to check.

What a delusional smuck...how is cognitive dissonance working?

The bounty was not for "who finds an error in the code that successfully initiated a transaction that was later successfully received"

"1" is address label btw.

"You don't know how to check given address is yours."  What..? I....wow

Care to fight for the bounty ?

[sartech]

XC got out in a smart way  from POW game ... when X11 FPGA's start to rape everything and destroy the idea of ANTI ASICS .
lets see how fast the marketing  will go  on.