|
phzi
|
 |
September 20, 2014, 07:05:31 PM |
|
Where can I get a miner for linux that hashes x11 at > 4.8mh on a 7950 other than from wolf?
If you don't know how, hire a developer to help you? Anyone with a cl and profiling experience could likely offer significant improvements. This said, wolf0 ALWAYS seems to exaggerate his hashrate claims. His apparent optimized XMR miner was "over 2x as fast", but nobody ever saw such a drastic improvement over lucas's build, not in reported hashrate, and certainly not in actual hashes submitted to the pool. Where can I get a miner for linux that hashes x11 at > 4.8mh on a 7950 other than from wolf?
anywhere he did not publish What does this even mean? I think he meant that you can't get x11 > 4.8MH/s on a 7950 from wolf0, because he didn't publish his solutions. But, he has hinted that if you PM him he might sell them to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
kotarius
|
|
September 20, 2014, 07:07:31 PM |
|
I think he meant that you can't get x11 > 4.8MH/s on a 7950 from wolf0, because he didn't publish his solutions. But, he has hinted that if you PM him he might sell them to you.
I actually know of one other person in this community, who I trust, that has his binaries (but not the source code) and has verified in-deed that his code provides a 40% increase in hash power for x11/13/15 family, for all cards 7-series and above, and has screenshots and pool data to prove it. |
|
|
|
|
|
phzi
|
|
September 20, 2014, 07:08:47 PM |
|
I actually know of one other person in this community, who I trust, that has his binaries (but not the source code) and has verified in-deed that his code provides a 40% increase in hash power for all cards 7-series and above, and has screenshots and pool data to prove it.
So, it's for sure then that wolf0 is violating the GPLv3 by not providing source code even when he is distributing the binaries? Great... what a fucking asshole. I really hope one of the sgminer or cgminer devs sue him. Build your own miner and stop stealing, wolf0! Or try being honorable for once and stop violating software licenses. |
|
|
|
|
qwep
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 20, 2014, 07:54:02 PM |
|
Where can I get a miner for linux that hashes x11 at > 4.8mh on a 7950 other than from wolf?
If you don't know how, hire a developer to help you? Anyone with a cl and profiling experience could likely offer significant improvements. This said, wolf0 ALWAYS seems to exaggerate his hashrate claims. His apparent optimized XMR miner was "over 2x as fast", but nobody ever saw such a drastic improvement over lucas's build, not in reported hashrate, and certainly not in actual hashes submitted to the pool. Where can I get a miner for linux that hashes x11 at > 4.8mh on a 7950 other than from wolf?
anywhere he did not publish What does this even mean? I think he meant that you can't get x11 > 4.8MH/s on a 7950 from wolf0, because he didn't publish his solutions. But, he has hinted that if you PM him he might sell them to you. he refused to sell it to me |
|
|
|
|
|
bullus
|
|
September 20, 2014, 08:02:52 PM |
|
Loving the Asus DCII 290X   Just for the fun  |
btc 16LWhms487bzCxQWq5oeW8SMDPmU2rvQjf
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
September 20, 2014, 10:07:34 PM |
|
Guys, please give advice. How should i compile sgminer 5 for mining on multipools (trademybit, nicehash) now ? Is it below correct ? git clone -b v5_0 https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer.git
cd sgminer
git submodule init
git submodule update
autoreconf -i
CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native" ./configure
make
And second questions, which drivers are the best for mining on r9 270 on Linux ? Remove -b v5_0 as it has been rolled into master branch Everything else looks fine I use 14.6 drivers myself |
|
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
September 21, 2014, 02:13:03 AM |
|
Ok I have just got my 290x cards to hash over 5.6m on x11 but they will only do it one or two at a time ,, each time i restart the miner a different card peaks up to 5.68m
the temps only reach 83, the fan speed is 60, i have no shortage of power and i have seen all the cards hit 5.68m with the clock settings they are set to
so why could they all not run over 5.6m all the time ?
cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
September 21, 2014, 02:34:49 AM |
|
Ok I have just got my 290x cards to hash over 5.6m on x11 but they will only do it one or two at a time ,, each time i restart the miner a different card peaks up to 5.68m
the temps only reach 83, the fan speed is 60, i have no shortage of power and i have seen all the cards hit 5.68m with the clock settings they are set to
so why could they all not run over 5.6m all the time ?
cheers
not sure really but you can try my config for 290x, just change the clocks to suit you
{
"profiles" : [
{
"name" : "x11",
"xintensity" : "64",
"algorithm" : "x11"
},
{
"name" : "x13",
"algorithm" : "x13"
},
{
"name" : "x14",
"algorithm" : "x14"
},
{
"name" : "x15",
"algorithm" : "x15"
},
{
"name" : "NIST5",
"intensity" : "16",
"algorithm" : "nist5"
},
{
"name" : "whirlcoin",
"algorithm" : "whirlcoin"
},
{
"name" : "diamond",
"xintensity" : "64",
"worksize": "256",
"algorithm" : "diamond"
},
{
"name" : "scrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-engine": "1000,1000",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250,1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"gpu-threads": "1",
"algorithm" : "zuikkis"
},
{
"name" : "nscrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-engine": "1000,1000",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250,1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"intensity" : "16",
"algorithm" : "alexkarnew",
"nfactor" : "11"
},
{
"name" : "keccak",
"intensity" : "12",
"gpu-threads": "4",
"algorithm" : "keccak"
},
{
"name" : "qubit",
"intensity" : "14",
"algorithm" : "qubitcoin"
},
{
"name" : "quark",
"intensity" : "14",
"algorithm" : "quarkcoin"
}
],
"intensity" : "16",
"worksize": "64",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "7",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"blake-compact" : true,
"keccak-unroll" : "8",
"luffa-parallel" : true,
"gpu-fan" : "90-100",
"gpu-engine": "1040,1040",
"gpu-memclock" : "1375,1375",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"failover-only" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "96",
"temp-overheat" : "94",
"temp-target" : "85",
"auto-fan" : true,
"auto-gpu" : false,
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log-show-date" : true,
"log" : "5",
"net-delay" : true,
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "5",
"shares" : "0",
"no-submit-stale" : false,
"no-restart" : false,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"show-coindiff" : true,
"remove-disabled" : true
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
kotarius
|
|
September 21, 2014, 04:07:08 AM |
|
So, it's for sure then that wolf0 is violating the GPLv3 by not providing source code even when he is distributing the binaries? Great... what a fucking asshole. I really hope one of the sgminer or cgminer devs sue him.
Build your own miner and stop stealing, wolf0! Or try being honorable for once and stop violating software licenses.
The thing is, even if he violated GPL, it will be a moot point as soon as someone released an equivalent open source miner, which isn't really hard to do given all the information we have from this thread, and the fact that AMD even posted their own optimization guide. http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/opencl-zone/amd-accelerated-parallel-processing-app-sdk/opencl-optimization-guide/#50401334_pgfId-448804So instead of all the useless whining about wolf, which will definitely not change his mind, maybe people should get to work. |
|
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
September 21, 2014, 04:18:35 AM |
|
Ok I have just got my 290x cards to hash over 5.6m on x11 but they will only do it one or two at a time ,, each time i restart the miner a different card peaks up to 5.68m
the temps only reach 83, the fan speed is 60, i have no shortage of power and i have seen all the cards hit 5.68m with the clock settings they are set to
so why could they all not run over 5.6m all the time ?
cheers
not sure really but you can try my config for 290x, just change the clocks to suit you
{
"profiles" : [
{
"name" : "x11",
"xintensity" : "64",
"algorithm" : "x11"
},
{
"name" : "x13",
"algorithm" : "x13"
},
{
"name" : "x14",
"algorithm" : "x14"
},
{
"name" : "x15",
"algorithm" : "x15"
},
{
"name" : "NIST5",
"intensity" : "16",
"algorithm" : "nist5"
},
{
"name" : "whirlcoin",
"algorithm" : "whirlcoin"
},
{
"name" : "diamond",
"xintensity" : "64",
"worksize": "256",
"algorithm" : "diamond"
},
{
"name" : "scrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-engine": "1000,1000",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250,1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"gpu-threads": "1",
"algorithm" : "zuikkis"
},
{
"name" : "nscrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-engine": "1000,1000",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250,1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"intensity" : "16",
"algorithm" : "alexkarnew",
"nfactor" : "11"
},
{
"name" : "keccak",
"intensity" : "12",
"gpu-threads": "4",
"algorithm" : "keccak"
},
{
"name" : "qubit",
"intensity" : "14",
"algorithm" : "qubitcoin"
},
{
"name" : "quark",
"intensity" : "14",
"algorithm" : "quarkcoin"
}
],
"intensity" : "16",
"worksize": "64",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "7",
"hamsi-short" : true,
"blake-compact" : true,
"keccak-unroll" : "8",
"luffa-parallel" : true,
"gpu-fan" : "90-100",
"gpu-engine": "1040,1040",
"gpu-memclock" : "1375,1375",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"failover-only" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "96",
"temp-overheat" : "94",
"temp-target" : "85",
"auto-fan" : true,
"auto-gpu" : false,
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log-show-date" : true,
"log" : "5",
"net-delay" : true,
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "5",
"shares" : "0",
"no-submit-stale" : false,
"no-restart" : false,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"show-coindiff" : true,
"remove-disabled" : true
}
Thanks Badman i was using xi 64 which i still am your mem diff was 300 odd mine was 250 so i changed that BUT your power tune was 0 mine was +50 so i changed that to 0 first to see a great improvement so i then changed it to -10 and now i see a much more balanced rig all GPU hashing at 5.62+ :-) I never really got the powertune thing ,, i mean providing you got a good PSU then surly the GPU will take more power when it want's without + powertune,,,, infact right now it looks like adding a global +powertune = unnecessary power drain from the slower GPU's |
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
September 21, 2014, 10:03:02 AM |
|
So, it's for sure then that wolf0 is violating the GPLv3 by not providing source code even when he is distributing the binaries? Great... what a fucking asshole. I really hope one of the sgminer or cgminer devs sue him.
Build your own miner and stop stealing, wolf0! Or try being honorable for once and stop violating software licenses.
The thing is, even if he violated GPL, it will be a moot point as soon as someone released an equivalent open source miner, which isn't really hard to do given all the information we have from this thread, and the fact that AMD even posted their own optimization guide. http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/opencl-zone/amd-accelerated-parallel-processing-app-sdk/opencl-optimization-guide/#50401334_pgfId-448804So instead of all the useless whining about wolf, which will definitely not change his mind, maybe people should get to work. true, but don't expect that guide to help you much. optimizations are much more subtle and you need to know programming and the algorythms pretty well. |
|
|
|
patlaka2000
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
September 21, 2014, 10:16:49 AM |
|
Hello everyone,
I was a bit away from the forum and I want to catch up a bit.
Which is the latest version of sgminer 5, modified or not, the best ati drivers to go for.I have 1 sapphire 270x and 2 sapphire 280 dual-x. to mine x11,x13,x15 and nist5 algos. What config is best for them for these algos up to now.
Any support will be appreciated.
Thanks everyone!
|
|
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
September 21, 2014, 12:08:40 PM |
|
Hello everyone,
I was a bit away from the forum and I want to catch up a bit.
Which is the latest version of sgminer 5, modified or not, the best ati drivers to go for.I have 1 sapphire 270x and 2 sapphire 280 dual-x. to mine x11,x13,x15 and nist5 algos. What config is best for them for these algos up to now.
Any support will be appreciated.
Thanks everyone!
check out page one or look in this thread for badman74 for modded miner i using a mixture of latest amd and 14.6 |
|
|
|
|
patlaka2000
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
September 21, 2014, 03:22:38 PM |
|
Ok. I've got the moded miner from badman74. My R 270x show 2.95 mh and my R9 280x show 4.6 mh. Is this good or with this moded miner more is possible?
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
September 21, 2014, 04:11:51 PM |
|
Ok. I've got the moded miner from badman74. My R 270x show 2.95 mh and my R9 280x show 4.6 mh. Is this good or with this moded miner more is possible?
Thank you!
You can search back through this thread to find your cards hash rates ,,, |
|
|
|
|
qwep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 21, 2014, 08:45:08 PM |
|
branch of the miner turns to school farce, well, he did uludsheniya, well done to say, he will sell it or not sell his right, because not all the money is measured, will use the fact that there is also thanks to tech who does the work
|
|
|
|
|
yogabba
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:38:48 PM |
|
Hi,
where can i download v5? The link in the OP is down. Genuine question.
Thanks.
EDIT: Of course it´s in the binaries link. duh.........
|
|
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:41:01 AM |
|
can i change the order gpu's appear in afterburner ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oscilson
|
|
September 23, 2014, 11:46:36 AM |
|
can i change the order gpu's appear in afterburner ?
No. I just have to produce a corresponding list between the order shown in SG and Afterburner. |
|
|
|
|
|
boki15
|
|
September 24, 2014, 02:02:33 AM |
|
Please add support for switching on different gpu chips.
On one pc i had 5x280x and switching worked fine. One of them is dead and I took out an 290x from another pc. Switching back to an alg ends with an error. I can reproduce it on every configuration with different gpu chips, like 270x and 290.
Mining on one alg works fine.
I did not like an idea, but I had to try. Running two instances of sgminer with 2 same configs except a line "device": "0" / "device": "1,2,3,4". Why I did not like this idea? Because I do not really know which instance controls what (ie. temp). What I could see is that bin files are created even if the card is disabled. Switching back to an alg where bin file was created, produces an error. I remember I read somewhere that different gpu mem, shader, ... cause this error as it doesn't switch at the same time but I am too lazy to look through the forum.
From all other aspects it's working very stable for me, thanks for a nice software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
