sir.miklosh
|
|
October 17, 2014, 04:05:15 PM Last edit: October 17, 2014, 05:06:28 PM by sir.miklosh |
|
I got:
280x - 4.49 mhash(x11), 1100/1500, powertune 0%, -w 128, -i 17, -g 2 and 3.1 mhash on x13
catalyst-14.7-rc3-windows-aug12 + sgminer-5.0-badman74-mod-win32
|
|
|
|
|
wunkbone
|
|
October 18, 2014, 12:38:35 PM |
|
Is upgrading to 14.9 a good idea?
|
|
|
|
BAUAR
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
October 18, 2014, 06:23:16 PM |
|
What is this error? This miner is it right? Please help me
|
|
|
|
Hippie Tech
aka Amenstop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1001
All cryptos are FIAT digital currency. Do not use.
|
|
October 18, 2014, 11:39:50 PM |
|
Hello, I have a problem. This is sph-sgminer Fork with Whirlpool Algorithm Support. I downloaded from here: http://cryptomining-blog.com/3120-updated-sph-sgminer-fork-with-whirlpool-algorithm-support/My card is Asus Radeon R9 290, Win7 64 bit. My bat file is: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 sgminer.exe -k x11mod -o stratum+tcp://x11.ltcrabbit.com:3332 -u user -p password --auto-fan --gpu-engine 990 --gpu-memclock 1350 -I 18 -w 512 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 24550 Please help me. Thanks. What is this error? This miner is it right? Please help me Try this version and the following command line. https://www.westhash.com/software/sgminer-5.0-badman74-mod-win32.zipsetx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 sgminer --algorithm darkcoin-mod -o http://xxxx -u me -p you -g 2 -w 128
gl
|
|
|
|
PlatinumExpress
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
October 19, 2014, 12:45:36 AM |
|
Is upgrading to 14.9 a good idea?
I hear no. 14.7 is best
|
|
|
|
MetaMorphius
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
October 19, 2014, 03:50:56 PM |
|
14.9 works well for video related things but not so much for this miner software.
|
|
|
|
BCMan
|
|
October 20, 2014, 12:45:52 PM |
|
Is upgrading to 14.9 a good idea?
I hear no. 14.7 is best Better, than 14.4?
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
October 20, 2014, 12:46:36 PM |
|
Is upgrading to 14.9 a good idea?
I hear no. 14.7 is best Better, than 14.4? on linux I had the best results with 14.6 beta
|
|
|
|
BCMan
|
|
October 20, 2014, 12:54:13 PM |
|
Is upgrading to 14.9 a good idea?
I hear no. 14.7 is best Better, than 14.4? on linux I had the best results with 14.6 beta What about Win7? I'm wondering if there's any difference in performance between 14.4 and 14.7.
|
|
|
|
platinum4
|
|
October 21, 2014, 07:25:40 AM |
|
14.4 and 14.7 yes, there was a big boost in performance on algorithms that used groestl that came out in 14.6
14.4 is just impeding your performance against other rigs at this point - upgrade to at least 14.6r1/2/3 or 14.7
I've seen nothing worse in 14.9 but the performance seems to "degrade" over time.
|
|
|
|
BanditryAndLoot
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Activity: 350
|
|
October 21, 2014, 10:26:05 PM Last edit: October 22, 2014, 12:26:32 AM by BanditryAndLoot |
|
OH GOD! What do I do? [18:09:18] Started sgminer 4.2.2 [18:09:18] * using Jansson 2.6 [18:09:18] ADL found more devices than opencl! [18:09:18] There is possibly at least one GPU that doesn't support OpenCL [18:09:18] Use the gpu map feature to reliably map OpenCL to ADL [18:09:18] WARNING: Number of OpenCL and ADL devices did not match! [18:09:18] Hardware monitoring may NOT match up with devices!
Then it only picks up one out of my two cards Add: ~/Desktop/assbags/sgminer-5.0-pre-release-2014-07-20-linux-amd64 $ ./sgminer -n
[20:15:35] CL Platform vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [20:15:35] CL Platform name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing [20:15:35] CL Platform version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1411.4) [20:15:35] Platform devices: 1 [20:15:35] 0 Hawaii [20:15:35] Number of ADL devices: 1 [20:15:35] ATI ADL Overdrive5 API found. [20:15:35] ATI ADL Overdrive6 API found. [20:15:35] Found 8 logical ADL adapters [20:15:35] ADL index 0, id 942519664 - BIOS partno.: 113-C6711100-002, version: 015.039.000.006.003516, date: 10/17/13 04:52 [20:15:35] GPU 0 assigned: iAdapterIndex:0 iPresent:1 strUDID:256:26545:4098:1128:4163 iBusNumber:1 iDeviceNumber:0 iDrvIndex:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:4098 name:AMD Radeon R9 200 Series [20:15:35] ADL index 1, id 942519664 - BIOS partno.: 113-C6711100-002, version: 015.039.000.006.003516, date: 10/17/13 04:52 [20:15:35] ADL index 2, id 942519664 - BIOS partno.: 113-C6711100-002, version: 015.039.000.006.003516, date: 10/17/13 04:52 [20:15:35] ADL index 3, id 942519664 - BIOS partno.: 113-C6711100-002, version: 015.039.000.006.003516, date: 10/17/13 04:52 [20:15:35] ADL index 4, id 942519664 - BIOS partno.: 113-C6711100-002, version: 015.039.000.006.003516, date: 10/17/13 04:52 [20:15:35] ADL index 5, id 942519664 - BIOS partno.: 113-C6711100-002, version: 015.039.000.006.003516, date: 10/17/13 04:52 [20:15:35] ADL index 6, id 943949264 - FAILED to get BIOS info [20:15:35] GPU 1 assigned: iAdapterIndex:6 iPresent:1 strUDID:512:26545:4098:1128:4163 iBusNumber:2 iDeviceNumber:0 iDrvIndex:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:4098 name:AMD Radeon R9 200 Series [20:15:35] ADL found more devices than opencl! [20:15:35] There is possibly at least one GPU that doesn't support OpenCL [20:15:35] Use the gpu map feature to reliably map OpenCL to ADL [20:15:35] ADL index 7, id 943949264 - FAILED to get BIOS info [20:15:35] WARNING: Number of OpenCL and ADL devices did not match! [20:15:35] Hardware monitoring may NOT match up with devices! [20:15:35] GPU 0 AMD Radeon R9 200 Series hardware monitoring enabled [20:15:35] ADL GPU 0 is Adapter index 0 and maps to adapter id 942519664 [20:15:35] GPU 0 BIOS partno.: 113-C6711100-002, version: 015.039.000.006.003516, date: 10/17/13 04:52 [20:15:35] Failed to ADL_Overdrive5_FanSpeed_Get for default value [20:15:35] 1 GPU devices max detected
wut? using mint, 2x 290 cards.
|
And it's only at the end of fall, that we discover it was naught but the wind that knew when one particular leaf was to fall from one particular tree, only to land in one distinct spot .. to be left for an eternity, and waste its time in a wait sublime. C0A2A1C4
|
|
|
ihascryptos
|
|
October 21, 2014, 11:15:08 PM |
|
Has anyone been able to get x14 working on a HD6850 (or any of the HD6xxx series) in windows? If so can you help me out?
|
I like tacos!
|
|
|
thew3apon
|
|
October 21, 2014, 11:38:20 PM |
|
I am still using 14.6 RC2. Too lazy to upgrade..
|
|
|
|
ihascryptos
|
|
October 22, 2014, 12:32:02 AM |
|
Has anyone been able to get x14 working on a HD6850 (or any of the HD6xxx series) in windows? If so can you help me out?
Bump? I can only mine right now with my archaic 5670 cards. have not found a fix to get 6xxx series running. HALP! X14 mining the 5670 works great @ 280kh using the version from nicehash and running this string. sgminer.exe --algorithm x14old -o stratum+tcp://pool.ipominer.com:3337 -u username.workername -p password --intensity 14 Nicehash link to the miner: https://www.nicehash.com/software/sgminer-5.0-badman74-mod-win32.zipthe 6850 does not hash. if i use either x14 kernel setup and various versions of sgminer. on one it defaults to scrypt and gets my worker banned on the other it does nothing but hardware errors (1 every 90ish seconds) I am running win7 64 bit with most current Ati drivers downloaded this morning.
|
I like tacos!
|
|
|
lbr
|
|
October 22, 2014, 12:33:19 PM |
|
OH GOD! What do I do? ... Then it only picks up one out of my two cards Add: ... wut? using mint, 2x 290 cards. On Win it usually points to driver issues, fixed by cleanup and re-install. On *nix.. maybe the same.
|
|
|
|
whitemage
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:12:20 PM |
|
I'm using 14.9 - I think it has the OpenCL 2.0 beta, I should try that shit.
How does it work out for you?
|
|
|
|
BanditryAndLoot
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Activity: 350
|
|
October 22, 2014, 02:41:57 PM |
|
On Win it usually points to driver issues, fixed by cleanup and re-install. On *nix.. maybe the same.
Hm, that's weird because it's the exact same issue on two machines. One machine i just used driver manager, and the other I just grabbed the latest beta, and latest stable right off the site. Even when I get the one card to work, the mining speed is crap - 3333 for x11, when it should be well over 4. Changing settings does nothing for the speed either. I'll keep trying though, thanks.
|
And it's only at the end of fall, that we discover it was naught but the wind that knew when one particular leaf was to fall from one particular tree, only to land in one distinct spot .. to be left for an eternity, and waste its time in a wait sublime. C0A2A1C4
|
|
|
MaxDZ8
|
|
October 22, 2014, 03:12:59 PM |
|
I'm using 14.9 - I think it has the OpenCL 2.0 beta, I should try that shit.
How does it work out for you? Fine; looking through the OpenCL 2.0 specs for some good shit to use. Be careful. Relevant.
|
|
|
|
|
|