tuanvie
|
|
July 29, 2014, 05:12:49 PM |
|
hi, I have some questions about the fury of 1.3 mh / s that I have. every time you start a new start can run 1.2 mh / s after 30 minutes. and I've tried every pool, the result is the same, where the problem is?
|
|
|
|
oberon89
|
|
July 29, 2014, 09:06:51 PM |
|
I had the same error. Make sure to do the following:
- Copy cgminer directory to your root "C:\cgminer\cgminer.exe" and start from there - Make sure you have full administrator privileges on your account - Start cgminer with right click -> Run as administrator - Make sure your USB Hub has enough power (Ampere)
This is what fixed my problems!
I tried all four of your suggestions, but it still does not work: ( cgminer 3.1.1 works perfectly ... I just do not understand
|
|
|
|
Ruledo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
July 29, 2014, 09:22:58 PM Last edit: July 29, 2014, 09:34:44 PM by Ruledo |
|
I just mod my fury! Change power supply to 12V 20A Add copper heatsink 8X8X5mm change thermal paste with artic 5 silver. make lot of hole on the back and andd 12cm fan. Add 43kohm on paralel with R7 (1.43V)
@381mhz i have 1680Mh/s (dev HR) on minera and 1500 1800 Mh/s for Pool Hashrate with 5% error for now.
temp seems lower than original setup.
A 43Kohm resistor parallel with the stock 9.2Kohm should = 7.5Kohm. Going from the 2nd post, that would come out to 1.3v not 1.43v? Just checking because I want to keep the watts as low as possible and get that stable 381 clock before I mod the rests of my Blizzards. *Edit: the mod with 5.6K worked but wow, the watts...
|
|
|
|
bosondehiggs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
July 29, 2014, 09:30:36 PM |
|
I did not check the value of the resistor with a multimeter, and my multimeter is not the most accurate and it has low battery.
|
|
|
|
Ruledo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
July 29, 2014, 09:56:56 PM |
|
"Houston, we have had a problem", a crazy modder supplied the chips with 1.6v even if it's rated 1.32v max. He is even speaking of going up to 1.8v... 7.5k resistor should be the way to go for the actual clock cap. it gives 1.35v
I'm thinking this is the way to go? nst6563, do you know the lowest volts that get a stable 381 clock?
|
|
|
|
nst6563 (OP)
|
|
July 29, 2014, 10:11:02 PM |
|
"Houston, we have had a problem", a crazy modder supplied the chips with 1.6v even if it's rated 1.32v max. He is even speaking of going up to 1.8v... 7.5k resistor should be the way to go for the actual clock cap. it gives 1.35v
I'm thinking this is the way to go? nst6563, do you know the lowest volts that get a stable 381 clock? Obviously every miner is going to be a little different, but I would say 1.35v - 1.42v would do the trick. I believe mine are set to 1.41v. Less than that and they gave more errors, more than that gave quickly diminishing returns so I backed it down to 1.4v-1.41v.
|
|
|
|
Ruledo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
July 29, 2014, 10:15:21 PM |
|
"Houston, we have had a problem", a crazy modder supplied the chips with 1.6v even if it's rated 1.32v max. He is even speaking of going up to 1.8v... 7.5k resistor should be the way to go for the actual clock cap. it gives 1.35v
I'm thinking this is the way to go? nst6563, do you know the lowest volts that get a stable 381 clock? Obviously every miner is going to be a little different, but I would say 1.35v - 1.42v would do the trick. I believe mine are set to 1.41v. Less than that and they gave more errors, more than that gave quickly diminishing returns so I backed it down to 1.4v-1.41v. Thanks! I've got some 6.2K that are actually the right size. 6.8k sounds more like what you are talking about. The trimmer idea does sound epic though.
|
|
|
|
bosondehiggs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2014, 06:08:34 AM |
|
I check dmaxl code and see: #define ZEUS_CLK_MAX 382
It is dangerous to change to 400?
|
|
|
|
Darkwinde
|
|
July 30, 2014, 07:27:37 AM |
|
I check dmaxl code and see: #define ZEUS_CLK_MAX 382
It is dangerous to change to 400?
Dangerous not bit your miner will freaking out as the communication protocol of the controller cannot handle values above 382. So you can see the same discussion some pages earlier
|
|
|
|
bosondehiggs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2014, 04:46:14 PM |
|
thank you
|
|
|
|
jstefanop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2155
Merit: 1400
|
|
July 31, 2014, 08:45:35 PM |
|
Anyone get any of the under clocked X6 hardware yet? Want to see how easy it is to over clock these to X3 ranges...im assuming all they have done is cram in more chips and just undervolted.
|
|
|
|
LongAndShort
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 31, 2014, 09:10:04 PM Last edit: August 01, 2014, 03:40:59 AM by LongAndShort |
|
hello, I'm trying cgminer.exe dmaxl 4.3.5 with my two zeus blizzard, but my pc with window xp 32 bits com ports of the following error: do not have user privileges required to open //./COM4
this is my .bat
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://stratum.forkpool.com:3341 -u x -p x --zeus-nocheck-golden --scan-serial //./COM5 --scan-serial //./COM4 --zeus-options //./COM4,6,328;//./COM5,6,328
can you help? the other miners and earlier work properly. Thanks in advance
This should work because the ";" only works in the config and not the bat command line afaikBut as for the user privileges i'm not sure but check your device manager and make sure you're choosing to use the right port for the miner because ive noticed that i get that when im already running something on that COM port and possibly on your 32b system it is locking the port after you have already used it once and you might need a restart.cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://stratum.forkpool.com:3341 -u x -p x --zeus-nocheck-golden --scan-serial //./COM5 --scan-serial //./COM4 --zeus-options //./COM4,6,328 --zeus-options //./COM5,6,328 If you are still having issues then please show us a picture of your device manager showing the usb ports@Darkwinde You don't call!? You don't write!?!?!?
|
|
|
|
reputedchain
|
|
August 01, 2014, 01:02:13 AM |
|
hey i have a question i am new to this stuff. i am using latest bfgminer and i am running 3 furys and when i run all three one of them gets a com port failor and does not work any fixes?
|
|
|
|
LongAndShort
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1050
|
|
August 01, 2014, 02:26:44 AM |
|
hey i have a question i am new to this stuff. i am using latest bfgminer and i am running 3 furys and when i run all three one of them gets a com port failor and does not work any fixes?
This is the bfg thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=626361.0
|
|
|
|
Darkwinde
|
|
August 01, 2014, 07:41:15 AM |
|
@Darkwinde You don't call!? You don't write!?!?!?
What? Did not get it
|
|
|
|
|
jeezy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1237
Merit: 1010
|
|
August 01, 2014, 08:42:04 AM |
|
Yeah, I think the real advantage will come from overvolting it because it's the same hardware. What they did was just pack more chips on the board and undervolt them to achieve less wattage. So if you restore the original voltage or even overvolt it you should get really good MH.
|
|
|
|
ManeBjorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1004
|
|
August 01, 2014, 06:45:27 PM |
|
You can get some nice overclocking They did change up the controller a bit it seems so you have to be careful in tweaking. I am still seeing how far I can push it with existing software. So far I have it up to 25 mh/s stable with 2% errors. I am working on trying to get it up to 28 mh/s with less than the 12% errors I get. Yeah, I think the real advantage will come from overvolting it because it's the same hardware. What they did was just pack more chips on the board and undervolt them to achieve less wattage. So if you restore the original voltage or even overvolt it you should get really good MH.
|
|
|
|
djkyno
|
|
August 02, 2014, 05:32:20 PM |
|
Anymore physical modification like the mini blade or something ? i love to see more mods haha
|
|
|
|
YSH
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
August 02, 2014, 08:25:43 PM |
|
Hey Guys
Hope someone can help me!
Today I reapplied TIM, before i ran it on 336 now i can run it on 341 <10% HW errors.
I wanted to hook up a 3 pin molex 12 cm fan to the front of it instead of having 1 on the top. But the fan won't spin up, why is that?
|
|
|
|
|