Scientific proof that God exists?

[BADecker]

^ I'm surprised the mods haven't given you a warning about that link you keep spamming all over the thread. Spamming links is generally frowned upon.

The link is supposed to be used. I could rewrite the whole thing every time. Or I could copy and paste. The link makes for brevity. This way people who have seen it can read through what is written more easily, and go to the link for a refresher. So, it is NOT spam. It is explanation, done in a wise way.

I see by your posts, that like it or not, you are finally coming around.

[Buffer Overflow]

^ I'm surprised the mods haven't given you a warning about that link you keep spamming all over the thread. Spamming links is generally frowned upon.

The link is supposed to be used. I could rewrite the whole thing every time. Or I could copy and paste. The link makes for brevity. This way people who have seen it can read through what is written more easily, and go to the link for a refresher. So, it is NOT spam. It is explanation, done in a wise way.

If you think it's important just stick it in your signature.
No need to spam the main board with it every five minutes.

I see by your posts, that like it or not, you are finally coming around.

I'm surprised you can see anything with your eyes so tightly sealed shut.

[BADecker]

^ I'm surprised the mods haven't given you a warning about that link you keep spamming all over the thread. Spamming links is generally frowned upon.

The link is supposed to be used. I could rewrite the whole thing every time. Or I could copy and paste. The link makes for brevity. This way people who have seen it can read through what is written more easily, and go to the link for a refresher. So, it is NOT spam. It is explanation, done in a wise way.

If you think it's important just stick it in your signature.
No need to spam the main board with it every five minutes.

I see by your posts, that like it or not, you are finally coming around.

I'm surprised you can see anything with your eyes so tightly sealed shut.

If you would open your eyes and read the things at the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, you would see that it is you with your eyes shut... not I. Maybe I should develop it into an audio, so that you can get it with your eyes shut.   

[Buffer Overflow]

^ I'm surprised the mods haven't given you a warning about that link you keep spamming all over the thread. Spamming links is generally frowned upon.

The link is supposed to be used. I could rewrite the whole thing every time. Or I could copy and paste. The link makes for brevity. This way people who have seen it can read through what is written more easily, and go to the link for a refresher. So, it is NOT spam. It is explanation, done in a wise way.

If you think it's important just stick it in your signature.
No need to spam the main board with it every five minutes.

I see by your posts, that like it or not, you are finally coming around.

I'm surprised you can see anything with your eyes so tightly sealed shut.

If you would open your eyes and read the things at the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, you would see that it is you with your eyes shut... not I. Maybe I should develop it into an audio, so that you can get it with your eyes shut.   

Your link points some disconnected random thoughts. You've been told this before.

[BADecker]

^ I'm surprised the mods haven't given you a warning about that link you keep spamming all over the thread. Spamming links is generally frowned upon.

The link is supposed to be used. I could rewrite the whole thing every time. Or I could copy and paste. The link makes for brevity. This way people who have seen it can read through what is written more easily, and go to the link for a refresher. So, it is NOT spam. It is explanation, done in a wise way.

If you think it's important just stick it in your signature.
No need to spam the main board with it every five minutes.

I see by your posts, that like it or not, you are finally coming around.

I'm surprised you can see anything with your eyes so tightly sealed shut.

If you would open your eyes and read the things at the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, you would see that it is you with your eyes shut... not I. Maybe I should develop it into an audio, so that you can get it with your eyes shut.    

Your link points some disconnected random thoughts. You've been told this before.

The thoughts at the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 only seem disconnected to you because...



EDIT: Have you tried Ginkgo Biloba?

EDIT2: Wow! 224 pages!

[Buffer Overflow]

^ I'm surprised the mods haven't given you a warning about that link you keep spamming all over the thread. Spamming links is generally frowned upon.

The link is supposed to be used. I could rewrite the whole thing every time. Or I could copy and paste. The link makes for brevity. This way people who have seen it can read through what is written more easily, and go to the link for a refresher. So, it is NOT spam. It is explanation, done in a wise way.

If you think it's important just stick it in your signature.
No need to spam the main board with it every five minutes.

I see by your posts, that like it or not, you are finally coming around.

I'm surprised you can see anything with your eyes so tightly sealed shut.

If you would open your eyes and read the things at the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, you would see that it is you with your eyes shut... not I. Maybe I should develop it into an audio, so that you can get it with your eyes shut.    

Your link points some disconnected random thoughts. You've been told this before.

The thoughts at the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 only seem disconnected to you because...

Your thoughts are random and disconnected because they are random and disconnected.

Obviously. 

[BADecker]

^ I'm surprised the mods haven't given you a warning about that link you keep spamming all over the thread. Spamming links is generally frowned upon.

The link is supposed to be used. I could rewrite the whole thing every time. Or I could copy and paste. The link makes for brevity. This way people who have seen it can read through what is written more easily, and go to the link for a refresher. So, it is NOT spam. It is explanation, done in a wise way.

If you think it's important just stick it in your signature.
No need to spam the main board with it every five minutes.

I see by your posts, that like it or not, you are finally coming around.

I'm surprised you can see anything with your eyes so tightly sealed shut.

If you would open your eyes and read the things at the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, you would see that it is you with your eyes shut... not I. Maybe I should develop it into an audio, so that you can get it with your eyes shut.    

Your link points some disconnected random thoughts. You've been told this before.

The thoughts at the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 only seem disconnected to you because...

Your thoughts are random and disconnected because they are random and disconnected.

Obviously. 

Well, I'm getting my thoughts together, and when I do, I will be able to prove the existence of God so that even you won't have a doubt. For now, just to stay on topic, check out the evidence that proves the existence of God at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

[no141]

It's impossible to prove a god exists, due to the fact there is no God. Get over yourself, and trust in existence, that didn't start from a god.

The burden of proof is on the one that claims something is real, as it is pretty impossible to prove something is not real.

Nothing seen in this world, in the past, in space, in biology, nothing at all proves a supreme being. The only proof you can ever give is HUMANs like the idea of god(s), and they keep inventing them to suit their needs. If you want a god, we each are god. If you don't believe me, find out what an ant is thinking before you squish one

[Vod]

BADecker has been brainwashed since he was born.  There is no hope for him.

You could put the proof in front of his face and he will deny it.  His entire existence would become worthless if he admitted the truth.  

He will die ignorant.  We have to accept this.

[BADecker]

It's impossible to prove a god exists, due to the fact there is no God. Get over yourself, and trust in existence, that didn't start from a god.

The burden of proof is on the one that claims something is real, as it is pretty impossible to prove something is not real.

Nothing seen in this world, in the past, in space, in biology, nothing at all proves a supreme being. The only proof you can ever give is HUMANs like the idea of god(s), and they keep inventing them to suit their needs. If you want a god, we each are god. If you don't believe me, find out what an ant is thinking before you squish one

Personally, I'll stick to the evidences at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 that prove God exists.

See the post at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=635960.msg10817578#msg10817578 which proves that the evidence at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 really prove that God exists.

[BADecker]

BADdecker has been brainwashed since he was born.  There is no hope for him.

You could put the proof in front of his face and he will deny it.  His entire existence would become worthless if he admitted the truth. 

He will die ignorant.  We have to accept this.

Except that the evidence at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 which proves that God exists is being proven by scientists using the scientific method, continuously, on a daily basis, even though they don't express it this way.

Why would anyone think that God doesn't exist since all the evidence of the whole universe proves that He does? The above link shows the proof.

[XinXan]

BADdecker has been brainwashed since he was born.  There is no hope for him.

You could put the proof in front of his face and he will deny it.  His entire existence would become worthless if he admitted the truth. 

He will die ignorant.  We have to accept this.

Except that the evidence at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 which proves that God exists is being proven by scientists using the scientific method, continuously, on a daily basis, even though they don't express it this way.

Why would anyone think that God doesn't exist since all the evidence of the whole universe proves that He does? The above link shows the proof.

Or except that 95% of scientists say that god does not exist with thousands of proofs of how old is the earth or the evolution theory and many many others.

Why would anyone accept your shitty "evidence" and not accept the other thousands of evidences provided by scientists?

[BADecker]

BADdecker has been brainwashed since he was born.  There is no hope for him.

You could put the proof in front of his face and he will deny it.  His entire existence would become worthless if he admitted the truth. 

He will die ignorant.  We have to accept this.

Except that the evidence at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 which proves that God exists is being proven by scientists using the scientific method, continuously, on a daily basis, even though they don't express it this way.

Why would anyone think that God doesn't exist since all the evidence of the whole universe proves that He does? The above link shows the proof.

Or except that 95% of scientists say that god does not exist with thousands of proofs of how old is the earth or the evolution theory and many many others.

Even if 95% of the scientists say that it is fact, they don't really know that it is fact. Why not? Because they base virtually all their findings of everything on the idea that the operations of the universe were always, basically the same as they are today.

The truth is that they don't know that physics laws don't change and haven't been changing throughout time. In fact, if you Google for it, you can find that we see variations in physics constants year by year right now.

In addition, there are many, many variables that could have happened over time that could easily throw any reasons for any distant-past statements off.

The clincher is in the actual papers that the scientists write. Even if they want God to not exist with all their hearts, they still write most of their stuff as theories. Why? Because they can't prove much of anything that isn't sitting right in front of them, so to speak.

One other point. There are many scientists who believe in the existence of God, but only say it quietly, because they would lose their positions in the scientific labs or universities if they let it be known in a big way. This shows that ideas against the existence of God are based in politics and big money.

Why would anyone accept your shitty "evidence" and not accept the other thousands of evidences provided by scientists?

Why? Several reasons. One is the previous stuff I wrote directly above.

Another is that the scientific evidences don't show anything about the existence of God except that He does exist.

Another is that my evidences at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 can be proven out even by a novice scientist who has even a small ability to use logic.

This makes the thing that you are really saying to be that you don't really care about what the truth is. You are simply going to believe whatever you are going to believe, even if the proof to the opposite jumps right up and bites you in the left eye. Further evidence that you are doing this is that you don't have any explanation evidence that you can spell out like I have spelled mine out.

Sorry, bud. You just ain't got it.

[Astargath]

BADdecker has been brainwashed since he was born.  There is no hope for him.

You could put the proof in front of his face and he will deny it.  His entire existence would become worthless if he admitted the truth. 

He will die ignorant.  We have to accept this.

Except that the evidence at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 which proves that God exists is being proven by scientists using the scientific method, continuously, on a daily basis, even though they don't express it this way.

Why would anyone think that God doesn't exist since all the evidence of the whole universe proves that He does? The above link shows the proof.

Or except that 95% of scientists say that god does not exist with thousands of proofs of how old is the earth or the evolution theory and many many others.

Even if 95% of the scientists say that it is fact, they don't really know that it is fact. Why not? Because they base virtually all their findings of everything on the idea that the operations of the universe were always, basically the same as they are today.

The truth is that they don't know that physics laws don't change and haven't been changing throughout time. In fact, if you Google for it, you can find that we see variations in physics constants year by year right now.

In addition, there are many, many variables that could have happened over time that could easily throw any reasons for any distant-past statements off.

The clincher is in the actual papers that the scientists write. Even if they want God to not exist with all their hearts, they still write most of their stuff as theories. Why? Because they can't prove much of anything that isn't sitting right in front of them, so to speak.

One other point. There are many scientists who believe in the existence of God, but only say it quietly, because they would lose their positions in the scientific labs or universities if they let it be known in a big way. This shows that ideas against the existence of God are based in politics and big money.

Why would anyone accept your shitty "evidence" and not accept the other thousands of evidences provided by scientists?

Why? Several reasons. One is the previous stuff I wrote directly above.

Another is that the scientific evidences don't show anything about the existence of God except that He does exist.

Another is that my evidences at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 can be proven out even by a novice scientist who has even a small ability to use logic.

This makes the thing that you are really saying to be that you don't really care about what the truth is. You are simply going to believe whatever you are going to believe, even if the proof to the opposite jumps right up and bites you in the left eye. Further evidence that you are doing this is that you don't have any explanation evidence that you can spell out like I have spelled mine out.

Sorry, bud. You just ain't got it.

If I say something doesn’t have a cause, it doesn’t have a cause.
I say the universe doesn’t have a cause.
Therefore, the universe doesn’t have a cause.
Therefore, God doesn’t exist.

[BADecker]

BADdecker has been brainwashed since he was born.  There is no hope for him.

You could put the proof in front of his face and he will deny it.  His entire existence would become worthless if he admitted the truth. 

He will die ignorant.  We have to accept this.

Except that the evidence at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 which proves that God exists is being proven by scientists using the scientific method, continuously, on a daily basis, even though they don't express it this way.

Why would anyone think that God doesn't exist since all the evidence of the whole universe proves that He does? The above link shows the proof.

Or except that 95% of scientists say that god does not exist with thousands of proofs of how old is the earth or the evolution theory and many many others.

Even if 95% of the scientists say that it is fact, they don't really know that it is fact. Why not? Because they base virtually all their findings of everything on the idea that the operations of the universe were always, basically the same as they are today.

The truth is that they don't know that physics laws don't change and haven't been changing throughout time. In fact, if you Google for it, you can find that we see variations in physics constants year by year right now.

In addition, there are many, many variables that could have happened over time that could easily throw any reasons for any distant-past statements off.

The clincher is in the actual papers that the scientists write. Even if they want God to not exist with all their hearts, they still write most of their stuff as theories. Why? Because they can't prove much of anything that isn't sitting right in front of them, so to speak.

One other point. There are many scientists who believe in the existence of God, but only say it quietly, because they would lose their positions in the scientific labs or universities if they let it be known in a big way. This shows that ideas against the existence of God are based in politics and big money.

Why would anyone accept your shitty "evidence" and not accept the other thousands of evidences provided by scientists?

Why? Several reasons. One is the previous stuff I wrote directly above.

Another is that the scientific evidences don't show anything about the existence of God except that He does exist.

Another is that my evidences at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 can be proven out even by a novice scientist who has even a small ability to use logic.

This makes the thing that you are really saying to be that you don't really care about what the truth is. You are simply going to believe whatever you are going to believe, even if the proof to the opposite jumps right up and bites you in the left eye. Further evidence that you are doing this is that you don't have any explanation evidence that you can spell out like I have spelled mine out.

Sorry, bud. You just ain't got it.

If I say something doesn’t have a cause, it doesn’t have a cause.
I say the universe doesn’t have a cause.
Therefore, the universe doesn’t have a cause.
Therefore, God doesn’t exist.

You hang onto that thought. If you are going to believe that way, do it with your strength.

All of science looks to the idea of cause and effect. There is a cause for everything. Causes are simply effects of other causes. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 shows how cause and effect helps prove that God exists.

[Astargath]

you have to have some faith in God to know that God exists

That makes absolutly no sense, its called a delusion

[BADecker]

you have to have some faith in God to know that God exists

You have to have lots of faith that God doesn't exist if you believe that way, because the evidence at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 proves that He does exist.

[Astargath]

BADdecker has been brainwashed since he was born.  There is no hope for him.

You could put the proof in front of his face and he will deny it.  His entire existence would become worthless if he admitted the truth. 

He will die ignorant.  We have to accept this.

Except that the evidence at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 which proves that God exists is being proven by scientists using the scientific method, continuously, on a daily basis, even though they don't express it this way.

Why would anyone think that God doesn't exist since all the evidence of the whole universe proves that He does? The above link shows the proof.

Or except that 95% of scientists say that god does not exist with thousands of proofs of how old is the earth or the evolution theory and many many others.

Even if 95% of the scientists say that it is fact, they don't really know that it is fact. Why not? Because they base virtually all their findings of everything on the idea that the operations of the universe were always, basically the same as they are today.

The truth is that they don't know that physics laws don't change and haven't been changing throughout time. In fact, if you Google for it, you can find that we see variations in physics constants year by year right now.

In addition, there are many, many variables that could have happened over time that could easily throw any reasons for any distant-past statements off.

The clincher is in the actual papers that the scientists write. Even if they want God to not exist with all their hearts, they still write most of their stuff as theories. Why? Because they can't prove much of anything that isn't sitting right in front of them, so to speak.

One other point. There are many scientists who believe in the existence of God, but only say it quietly, because they would lose their positions in the scientific labs or universities if they let it be known in a big way. This shows that ideas against the existence of God are based in politics and big money.

Why would anyone accept your shitty "evidence" and not accept the other thousands of evidences provided by scientists?

Why? Several reasons. One is the previous stuff I wrote directly above.

Another is that the scientific evidences don't show anything about the existence of God except that He does exist.

Another is that my evidences at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 can be proven out even by a novice scientist who has even a small ability to use logic.

This makes the thing that you are really saying to be that you don't really care about what the truth is. You are simply going to believe whatever you are going to believe, even if the proof to the opposite jumps right up and bites you in the left eye. Further evidence that you are doing this is that you don't have any explanation evidence that you can spell out like I have spelled mine out.

Sorry, bud. You just ain't got it.

If I say something doesn’t have a cause, it doesn’t have a cause.
I say the universe doesn’t have a cause.
Therefore, the universe doesn’t have a cause.
Therefore, God doesn’t exist.

You hang onto that thought. If you are going to believe that way, do it with your strength.

All of science looks to the idea of cause and effect. There is a cause for everything. Causes are simply effects of other causes. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 shows how cause and effect helps prove that God exists.

Proofs against god:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/index2.html

http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~yukimoon/BigBang/BigBang.htm

http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-origin-of-the-universe.html

You can keep believing in your thing but there are the solid proofs against god

[BADecker]

Proofs against god:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

Doesn't talk about God at all. Even if the times are correct here (we don't know that they are because laws of physics of the distant past may have been different), this only suggests that God did it differently than the religions say.

http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/index2.html

This author, himself, agrees that God exists when he says at the bottom of http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/outro.html:

One day, perhaps, we’ll all be free of conditioned thinking and learn to rely on observable and testable evidence when examining religious claims. One day, perhaps, we can all peacefully coexist. Whatever force might be watching us now probably realizes that the majority of us are currently incapable of achieving these goals. If this being is observing our planet during a search for an enlightened race that’s ready for the deepest secrets of the universe, it should probably try us again later.

http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~yukimoon/BigBang/BigBang.htm

While the Big Bang has not been proven to absolutely have not happened, the current descriptions and times that modern science applies to Big Bang happenings, have been shown to be wrong by electric cosmos information. See http://electric-cosmos.org/indexOLD.htm.

http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-origin-of-the-universe.html

Science and astronomy have made tremendous strides in knowledge about the universe over the last hundred years. Most of the knowledge is a hodge podge of pasting new findings into old. This process has turned the whole understanding of astronomy and cosmology into a complete mess, even though astronomers are ashamed to admit it... ashamed that they could have been so bold as to believe all those silly cosmology assertions of former astronomers and cosmologists. The evidence for this is found at http://electric-cosmos.org/indexOLD.htm and the pages following. Follow the thinking in Internet searches for "electric cosmos," and you will see how it is gradually replacing current popular understandings about the universe, simply because it makes way more sense.

You can keep believing in your thing but there are the solid proofs against god

You can keep on setting yourself against God for awhile, by believing that He doesn't exist. Yet, some of the most important and basic evidences that prove God exists are found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

[Astargath]

Proofs against god:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

Doesn't talk about God at all. Even if the times are correct here (we don't know that they are because laws of physics of the distant past may have been different), this only suggests that God did it differently than the religions say.

http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/index2.html

This author, himself, agrees that God exists when he says at the bottom of http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/outro.html:

One day, perhaps, we’ll all be free of conditioned thinking and learn to rely on observable and testable evidence when examining religious claims. One day, perhaps, we can all peacefully coexist. Whatever force might be watching us now probably realizes that the majority of us are currently incapable of achieving these goals. If this being is observing our planet during a search for an enlightened race that’s ready for the deepest secrets of the universe, it should probably try us again later.

http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~yukimoon/BigBang/BigBang.htm

While the Big Bang has not been proven to absolutely have not happened, the current descriptions and times that modern science applies to Big Bang happenings, have been shown to be wrong by electric cosmos information. See http://electric-cosmos.org/indexOLD.htm.

http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-origin-of-the-universe.html

Science and astronomy have made tremendous strides in knowledge about the universe over the last hundred years. Most of the knowledge is a hodge podge of pasting new findings into old. This process has turned the whole understanding of astronomy and cosmology into a complete mess, even though astronomers are ashamed to admit it... ashamed that they could have been so bold as to believe all those silly cosmology assertions of former astronomers and cosmologists. The evidence for this is found at http://electric-cosmos.org/indexOLD.htm and the pages following. Follow the thinking in Internet searches for "electric cosmos," and you will see how it is gradually replacing current popular understandings about the universe, simply because it makes way more sense.

You can keep believing in your thing but there are the solid proofs against god

You can keep on setting yourself against God for awhile, by believing that He doesn't exist. Yet, some of the most important and basic evidences that prove God exists are found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.

Proofs against god:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/index2.html

http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~yukimoon/BigBang/BigBang.htm

http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-origin-of-the-universe.html

You can keep believing in your thing but there are the solid proofs against god