Bitcoin Forum
August 20, 2025, 01:02:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 [516] 517 518 519 520 521 522 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Scientific proof that God exists?  (Read 846037 times)
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4746
Merit: 3646



View Profile
June 17, 2021, 11:19:24 PM
 #10301

I don't really know if I can give you scientific proof. But just take a look at natural things around you such like sky, ocean , animals then ask your self if all this things just happened like that and they do not have beginning. Just try imagine if things can just form by itself if not God

Ignorance is not proof. Your lack of imagination is not proof.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4242
Merit: 1405


View Profile
June 18, 2021, 02:50:07 AM
 #10302

I don't really know if I can give you scientific proof. But just take a look at natural things around you such like sky, ocean , animals then ask your self if all this things just happened like that and they do not have beginning. Just try imagine if things can just form by itself if not God

Ignorance is not proof. Your lack of imagination is not proof.


Thanks for telling us what your religion is.     Cool

Covid is snake venom. Dr. Bryan Ardis https://thedrardisshow.com/ - Search on 'Bryan Ardis' at these links https://www.bitchute.com/, https://www.brighteon.com/, https://rumble.com/, https://banned.video/.
Chato1977
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 58


View Profile
June 18, 2021, 04:22:40 AM
 #10303

I don't really know if I can give you scientific proof. But just take a look at natural things around you such like sky, ocean , animals then ask your self if all this things just happened like that and they do not have beginning. Just try imagine if things can just form by itself if not God

Ignorance is not proof. Your lack of imagination is not proof.


Thanks for telling us what your religion is.     Cool
What should it be?  Wink

i rather have huge imaginary than being Ignorance  Cheesy

BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4242
Merit: 1405


View Profile
June 19, 2021, 01:11:37 AM
 #10304

I don't really know if I can give you scientific proof. But just take a look at natural things around you such like sky, ocean , animals then ask your self if all this things just happened like that and they do not have beginning. Just try imagine if things can just form by itself if not God

Ignorance is not proof. Your lack of imagination is not proof.


Thanks for telling us what your religion is.     Cool
What should it be?  Wink

i rather have huge imaginary than being Ignorance  Cheesy

A person's religion should start with knowing that God exists. Much of the rest, which he believe rather than knows, is his religion.

You can't make a universe like ours exist without God. The scientific proof is found in combining cause-and-effect with entropy (reduction of complexity), and with the amount of complexity we have. Only God could make something like this happen scientifically.

The second is that the universe is a machine made up of machines. All machines that we know of have makers. God is the universe machine Maker. We have no evidence of any machine having been made without a maker.

Cool

Covid is snake venom. Dr. Bryan Ardis https://thedrardisshow.com/ - Search on 'Bryan Ardis' at these links https://www.bitchute.com/, https://www.brighteon.com/, https://rumble.com/, https://banned.video/.
hornetsnest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1477
Merit: 973


View Profile
June 20, 2021, 11:40:07 PM
 #10305

Quote
The earth hangs in the darkness and rotates without intervention while revolving around the sun at a precise distance from the moon. The tide comes in and goes out while the dawn turns to dusk and the rain falls on both the good and the wicked while even the expelled spirits roam the dry arid place for rest. Reasons and seasons tell even the beasts that God exists but debased men puffed with foolish pride cannot find wisdom in humility.

Amen to that brother ^ Cool

████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4746
Merit: 3646



View Profile
June 21, 2021, 12:04:03 AM
 #10306

You keep repeating these "proofs", but simply repeating them does not make them true.

You can't make a universe like ours exist without God. The scientific proof is found in combining cause-and-effect with entropy (reduction of complexity), and with the amount of complexity we have.

You assume that the original complexity of the universe could only come from a god, and therefore a god must exist. That is a logical fallacy called "begging the question".

The second is that the universe is a machine made up of machines. All machines that we know of have makers. God is the universe machine Maker. We have no evidence of any machine having been made without a maker.

I have already demonstrated that the water cycle is a machine with no known maker. Therefore, you cannot claim that "all machines that we know of have makers". Furthermore, the lack of evidence of the water cycle being created without a maker is not proof that it has a maker. Inability to prove a statement is not proof that the opposite of the statement is true.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
Love3angle
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 21, 2021, 10:37:01 AM
 #10307

The world is just too perfect to happen to be a byproduct of big bang theory.
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4242
Merit: 1405


View Profile
June 23, 2021, 04:59:48 AM
 #10308

You keep repeating these "proofs", but simply repeating them does not make them true.

You can't make a universe like ours exist without God. The scientific proof is found in combining cause-and-effect with entropy (reduction of complexity), and with the amount of complexity we have.
You neglect to consider that scientific proofs include our identities... like "I am" or "I exist." This is only an extension of complexity, that is so far beyond the complexities that we know, that it almost proves God by itself.



You assume that the original complexity of the universe could only come from a god, and therefore a god must exist. That is a logical fallacy called "begging the question".

The second is that the universe is a machine made up of machines. All machines that we know of have makers. God is the universe machine Maker. We have no evidence of any machine having been made without a maker.

I have already demonstrated that the water cycle is a machine with no known maker. Therefore, you cannot claim that "all machines that we know of have makers". Furthermore, the lack of evidence of the water cycle being created without a maker is not proof that it has a maker. Inability to prove a statement is not proof that the opposite of the statement is true.

The water cycle is a tiny machine in the loads of machines that make up the universe. Machines have makers. A maker great enough to make the universe is consistent with the definition of our word "God."

Cool

Covid is snake venom. Dr. Bryan Ardis https://thedrardisshow.com/ - Search on 'Bryan Ardis' at these links https://www.bitchute.com/, https://www.brighteon.com/, https://rumble.com/, https://banned.video/.
MainJade
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 23, 2021, 01:38:48 PM
 #10309

In past scientists created a god element that could mimic any element but it was unstable and couldn't last for a long time.
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4746
Merit: 3646



View Profile
June 23, 2021, 04:01:51 PM
 #10310

The second is that the universe is a machine made up of machines. All machines that we know of have makers. ...
I have already demonstrated that the water cycle is a machine with no known maker. Therefore, you cannot claim that "all machines that we know of have makers". Furthermore, the lack of evidence of the water cycle being created without a maker is not proof that it has a maker. Inability to prove a statement is not proof that the opposite of the statement is true.
The water cycle is a tiny machine in the loads of machines that make up the universe. Machines have makers. A maker great enough to make the universe is consistent with the definition of our word "God."

Tiny or not, it means that you cannot claim that all machines have makers. Of course, there exist machines that have makers, but you can't use that statement to prove that the universe was made by a god (how ever you define "god"), because the universe can be one of those machines with no maker.

And while we are rehashing your broken proof, remember that we can't use probability as an argument here, since we have no way to measure it.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4242
Merit: 1405


View Profile
June 24, 2021, 03:35:40 AM
 #10311

The water cycle is a tiny machine in the loads of machines that make up the universe. Machines have makers. A maker great enough to make the universe is consistent with the definition of our word "God."

Tiny or not, it means that you cannot claim that all machines have makers. Of course, there exist machines that have makers, but you can't use that statement to prove that the universe was made by a god (how ever you define "god"), because the universe can be one of those machines with no maker.

And while we are rehashing your broken proof, remember that we can't use probability as an argument here, since we have no way to measure it.

Absolutely can! Consider. There are about 5,000 years of people history that we can confirm really happened on earth. Confirmation comes through examining speech patterns and applying them to what is written on ancient clay tablets. We also have a little DNA from the past.

In this 5,000 years we have found all kinds of machines and made-things. What do we know about these machines and made-things?
1. For some of them, we know who made them.
2. For some of them, we have a pretty good idea who made them... evidence.
3. For some we don't know who made them.
4. For many, if we want to stand off a little way and be objective, we don't know that they were made... and we don't know that they weren't made.

But here's the real clincher.
1. We have proof that multitudes of machines and made-things were made, often knowing who the makers were.
2. But we don't have proof that even one thing or machine was not made... just popped spontaneously into existence for no reason.

If there were only 5 things in the universe, and we only knew for a fact that one of them was made, where's the evidence that at least one of the 5 was not made?... since the other 4 might or might not have been made?

But the universe is full of things. And we have proof of billions of things having been made, because many of the makers are still alive. And we have strong evidence that the books that talk about the makers of other things are not lying. And even many of the things that we don't know were made, look like other things that we know WERE made.

So, find us the proof for something that was not made... so that we know absolutely that it exists without having been made. Prove it. Don't prove it for countless thousands of things. Don't turn to theories. Show us the proof for just one. Proof that it could absolutely not have been made and yet exists.

In other words, all we have is two things:
1. Billions of machines have makers;
2. We don't know.

We don't know of even one thing for a fact that doesn't have a maker. Some of us consider that all machines have makers. Some others just keep on playing the lottery.

Cool

Covid is snake venom. Dr. Bryan Ardis https://thedrardisshow.com/ - Search on 'Bryan Ardis' at these links https://www.bitchute.com/, https://www.brighteon.com/, https://rumble.com/, https://banned.video/.
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4746
Merit: 3646



View Profile
June 24, 2021, 06:57:22 AM
 #10312

And we have proof of billions of things having been made, ...

You claim that there are billions of machines with provable makers. Fine. I claim that there are trillions of machines without provable makers. Therefore, the probability of a machine having a maker is 1/1000.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4242
Merit: 1405


View Profile
June 25, 2021, 08:27:07 PM
 #10313

And we have proof of billions of things having been made, ...

You claim that there are billions of machines with provable makers. Fine. I claim that there are trillions of machines without provable makers. Therefore, the probability of a machine having a maker is 1/1000.

That's where you make your mistake.

The trillions of machines without provable makers are really not only as you said, but also they are trillions of machines that easily might have makers. Those trillions cancel themselves out as being part of the equation.

Find five or ten machines that provably DON'T have a maker... or even one such machine... so we can pit them/it against the billions of machines that we KNOW have makers. That way we'll have a start in your direction.

Cool

Covid is snake venom. Dr. Bryan Ardis https://thedrardisshow.com/ - Search on 'Bryan Ardis' at these links https://www.bitchute.com/, https://www.brighteon.com/, https://rumble.com/, https://banned.video/.
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4746
Merit: 3646



View Profile
June 25, 2021, 10:27:19 PM
Last edit: June 26, 2021, 02:50:09 AM by odolvlobo
 #10314

And we have proof of billions of things having been made, ...
You claim that there are billions of machines with provable makers. Fine. I claim that there are trillions of machines without provable makers. Therefore, the probability of a machine having a maker is 1/1000.
That's where you make your mistake.
The trillions of machines without provable makers are really not only as you said, but also they are trillions of machines that easily might have makers. Those trillions cancel themselves out as being part of the equation.
Find five or ten machines that provably DON'T have a maker... or even one such machine... so we can pit them/it against the billions of machines that we KNOW have makers. That way we'll have a start in your direction.

My real point here is that you can make up any numbers that you want (as you and I both demonstrated) and there is no way to validate them, so any claims of proof by probability cannot be valid.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4242
Merit: 1405


View Profile
June 26, 2021, 07:19:54 PM
 #10315

The dude who made the first post is just another storyteller, lol

Trouble is, he doesn't tell nearly enough of the story.     Cool

Covid is snake venom. Dr. Bryan Ardis https://thedrardisshow.com/ - Search on 'Bryan Ardis' at these links https://www.bitchute.com/, https://www.brighteon.com/, https://rumble.com/, https://banned.video/.
Mauser
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 562


View Profile
June 27, 2021, 07:56:59 AM
 #10316

In past scientists created a god element that could mimic any element but it was unstable and couldn't last for a long time.

A god element? I haven't heard of that one yet. How does it work? It can mimic all other elements? This sounds interesting and very complex. How can the god element just change from a solid state, to liquid or gas? This probably requires a lot of energy. Also if this could be produced in large quantities than the military will likely start include it their arsenal.
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4242
Merit: 1405


View Profile
June 28, 2021, 05:01:41 AM
 #10317

And we have proof of billions of things having been made, ...
You claim that there are billions of machines with provable makers. Fine. I claim that there are trillions of machines without provable makers. Therefore, the probability of a machine having a maker is 1/1000.
That's where you make your mistake.
The trillions of machines without provable makers are really not only as you said, but also they are trillions of machines that easily might have makers. Those trillions cancel themselves out as being part of the equation.
Find five or ten machines that provably DON'T have a maker... or even one such machine... so we can pit them/it against the billions of machines that we KNOW have makers. That way we'll have a start in your direction.

My real point here is that you can make up any numbers that you want (as you and I both demonstrated) and there is no way to validate them, so any claims of proof by probability cannot be valid.

Zero isn't a number. Zero is lack of existence.    Cool

Covid is snake venom. Dr. Bryan Ardis https://thedrardisshow.com/ - Search on 'Bryan Ardis' at these links https://www.bitchute.com/, https://www.brighteon.com/, https://rumble.com/, https://banned.video/.
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4746
Merit: 3646



View Profile
June 28, 2021, 05:18:33 PM
 #10318

My real point here is that you can make up any numbers that you want (as you and I both demonstrated) and there is no way to validate them, so any claims of proof by probability cannot be valid.
Zero isn't a number. Zero is lack of existence.

I guess you are waxing philosophical here (zero is a number) in order to avoid acknowledging the fact that you have failed to prove scientifically that God exists.

Maybe you could try to prove mathematically that God ≠ 0.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
KingofVayne
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 1


View Profile
June 29, 2021, 09:06:14 AM
 #10319

Scientists cannot even prove, how the world is formed other than big bang theory, let alone god.
KillBalls2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 30, 2021, 12:13:41 PM
 #10320

I don't think science will be able to enlighten up on the matter, science is based on facts and god is metaphysical.
Pages: « 1 ... 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 [516] 517 518 519 520 521 522 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!