Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 07:14:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Which video you like the most for LitecoinDark?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njZCeOibh_Y&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftKAUxwX7TQ&feature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb8ixDXwqQs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USuLSFUVY7E

Pages: « 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 [112] 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 ... 406 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [LTCD] LitecoinDark.com ★ Scrypt ★ Difficulty Shield ★ Multipool ★ Fast  (Read 368501 times)
TrollByFire
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 16, 2014, 11:55:50 PM
 #2221


Also note that the "master" branch is not intended to be stable.  Each release tree carries its own branch and tag.  I can't expect them to know which repo to use, but even the official repo had a branch ltcd-1.0.1 and tag litecoindark-1.0.1 that was newer than the rollback and did sync properly.  Maybe I should reconsider this policy due to the many who do not know how to checkout a branch...



Dude, with respect maybe you should reconsider this policy for those of us who do know how to check out a branch but expect master to be stable.

+1

hence master.

And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.

guess I've been in a hole the past few years along with all my project partners.

I didn't say everyone does this.  But it is extremely common practice.  I meant no offense in any case.

BTC: 12JYhysrpqnzqhkZ6qRY8At3G14btEwTtF
1715066091
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715066091

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715066091
Reply with quote  #2

1715066091
Report to moderator
1715066091
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715066091

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715066091
Reply with quote  #2

1715066091
Report to moderator
1715066091
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715066091

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715066091
Reply with quote  #2

1715066091
Report to moderator
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
s1gs3gv
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1014

ex uno plures


View Profile WWW
September 16, 2014, 11:56:49 PM
 #2222

And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.

Don't lecture me about software development. I was writing unix device drivers 35 years ago.
And here's a bit of advice, don't expect people to dig through your documentation to find out that you are using non-standard development methodology and that your master branch is a piece of crap.

You are a fucking idiot. First, for publishing a master commit that doesn't work. Second for trying to play in this game with 6 kids, several jobs, and no sleep for 36 hours.
IKnowBetter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 16, 2014, 11:57:01 PM
 #2223

I have no direct access to the primary github.  All I can do is send a pull request, which I may have neglected to do in my sleepless state.  I apologize for this, and am submitting the request now.  As for the OP, I do agree that the staging repo should be listed, but again, have not even had the chance to address this with Rob.

I know that you are working hard, but please coordinate the communication better for the sake of LTCD.

Also, did you coordinate with exchanges and confirmed that they updated their wallets to the new version? I assure you that they don't read this thread and won't know that there is a fork if the new version isn't even in the official repository.

I am just the coder.  I also have multiple real jobs and a life to live outside of crypto.  I don't get paid for what I do, nor do I have time to handle every request or issue personally or even in a timely fashion.  I am a 32 year old father of six who is badly in need of sleep.  This is why there are other team members.  We work great as a team, but our greatest weakness is in the fact that we live on different continents and timezones are way off.

Not trying to be defensive, just saying that if there are any shortcomings, please understand that I'm not the only person involved, even if I do tend to be the most vocal.  And I did speak with people from exchanges, but I was also busy with other major issues.  As it stands, I have yet to find time to assist best-pool with their issue.  I can assure you that I will, but there are only so many things one man can do at once.

And I'm not being offensive. I'm just trying to make sure that the two most important issues when preparing the fork have been addressed: 1) People knowing that they have to update and knowing how to do this; 2) Exchanges knowing that they have to update and knowing how to do this.

Thanks for all the great work. I just saw that the 1) wasn't addressed and wanted to point that out. You can't really execute a successful fork if people cannot upgrade their wallets.

Also, can someone remind what was the best pool issue? I might be able to help.
TrollByFire
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 17, 2014, 12:00:20 AM
 #2224

It has something to do with MPOS not connecting to their compiled daemon.  I have not had a chance to speak with the best-pool team as I was predisposed earlier when the PM arrived.  If you are wiling to help as well, great, and thank you.

BTC: 12JYhysrpqnzqhkZ6qRY8At3G14btEwTtF
TrollByFire
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 17, 2014, 12:01:05 AM
 #2225

And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.

Don't lecture me about software development. I was writing unix device drivers 35 years ago.
And here's a bit of advice, don't expect people to dig through your documentation to find out that you are using non-standard development methodology and that your master branch is a piece of crap.

You are a fucking idiot. First, for publishing a master commit that doesn't work. Second for trying to play in this game with 6 kids, several jobs, and no sleep for 36 hours.


Thank you for your opinion. 

BTC: 12JYhysrpqnzqhkZ6qRY8At3G14btEwTtF
s1gs3gv
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1014

ex uno plures


View Profile WWW
September 17, 2014, 12:03:32 AM
 #2226

Thank you for your opinion.  

Get some sleep. Cuddle your kids, hug your wife. Come back in 12 hours.

There isn't a shitcoin made that is worth more than your family. Even this one.

Thats my opinion.
Xircom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 17, 2014, 12:06:22 AM
 #2227

And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.

Don't lecture me about software development. I was writing unix device drivers 35 years ago.
And here's a bit of advice, don't expect people to dig through your documentation to find out that you are using non-standard development methodology and that your master branch is a piece of crap.

You are a fucking idiot. First, for publishing a master commit that doesn't work. Second for trying to play in this game with 6 kids, several jobs, and no sleep for 36 hours.


With that way of speaking is very diffecult to take you serious. And guessing from your age, you should have learned to speak polite...

BTC: 1MyJmxS9ER5ZBNvpG3LhoUXGotpzbPowed
s1gs3gv
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1014

ex uno plures


View Profile WWW
September 17, 2014, 12:09:47 AM
 #2228

And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.

Don't lecture me about software development. I was writing unix device drivers 35 years ago.
And here's a bit of advice, don't expect people to dig through your documentation to find out that you are using non-standard development methodology and that your master branch is a piece of crap.

You are a fucking idiot. First, for publishing a master commit that doesn't work. Second for trying to play in this game with 6 kids, several jobs, and no sleep for 36 hours.


With that way of speaking is very diffecult to take you serious. And guessing from your age, you should have learned to speak polite...

Dear Xircom, at my age nothing pisses me off more than wasting my time building some shitcoin's master branch just to find out that nobody tested it and that it is a piece of crap.

And I don't really care if you take me seriously or not.
Normandoyle
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100

meow


View Profile WWW
September 17, 2014, 12:14:29 AM
 #2229

Anyone want to spare a bounty? I have some G+ followers. Let me know in my inbox Smiley
Xircom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 17, 2014, 12:14:35 AM
 #2230

And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.

Don't lecture me about software development. I was writing unix device drivers 35 years ago.
And here's a bit of advice, don't expect people to dig through your documentation to find out that you are using non-standard development methodology and that your master branch is a piece of crap.

You are a fucking idiot. First, for publishing a master commit that doesn't work. Second for trying to play in this game with 6 kids, several jobs, and no sleep for 36 hours.


With that way of speaking is very diffecult to take you serious. And guessing from your age, you should have learned to speak polite...



Dear Xircom, at my age nothing pisses me off more than wasting my time building some shitcoin's master branch just to find out that nobody tested it and that it is a piece of crap.

And I don't really care if you take me seriously or not.

I do not care if you like the coin or not, but if you have a problem, please adress it polite. Its a forum kids are reading too...nor you dodnt care about that either !

BTC: 1MyJmxS9ER5ZBNvpG3LhoUXGotpzbPowed
voodoo1967
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10

Litecoindark Reddit Moderator


View Profile
September 17, 2014, 12:19:49 AM
 #2231

And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.

Don't lecture me about software development. I was writing unix device drivers 35 years ago.
And here's a bit of advice, don't expect people to dig through your documentation to find out that you are using non-standard development methodology and that your master branch is a piece of crap.

You are a fucking idiot. First, for publishing a master commit that doesn't work. Second for trying to play in this game with 6 kids, several jobs, and no sleep for 36 hours.


With that way of speaking is very diffecult to take you serious. And guessing from your age, you should have learned to speak polite...

Dear Xircom, at my age nothing pisses me off more than wasting my time building some shitcoin's master branch just to find out that nobody tested it and that it is a piece of crap.

And I don't really care if you take me seriously or not.

well why not help out then and stop coming down on people so hard just saying  Grin
motorhead89
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 464
Merit: 250


Wasssssup!


View Profile
September 17, 2014, 12:22:14 AM
 #2232

Hi all! What's crackin!

I had my account hacked due to a weak password I was told. It has be re-secured and a stronger password implemented. Hacker was posting malware links using my account. Always use a very strong password.
motorhead89
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 464
Merit: 250


Wasssssup!


View Profile
September 17, 2014, 12:28:16 AM
 #2233

Everything works good here.... am I missing something? I just downloaded the wallet from page 1.... and installs and syncs fine. 
As far as I can tell this coin rocks!  Cool

I am using Windows 8.1 x64 bit.

I see someone questioning the way stuff was coded?

I don't see a problem here.

Keep Calm and Drink On!

I had my account hacked due to a weak password I was told. It has be re-secured and a stronger password implemented. Hacker was posting malware links using my account. Always use a very strong password.
voodoo1967
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10

Litecoindark Reddit Moderator


View Profile
September 17, 2014, 12:29:10 AM
 #2234

Everything works good here.... am I missing something? I just downloaded the wallet from page 1.... and installs and syncs fine. 
As far as I can tell this coin rocks!  Cool

I am using Windows 8.1 x64 bit.

I see someone questioning the way stuff was coded?

I don't see a problem here.

Keep Calm and Drink On!

what block dose your wallet say lol
s1gs3gv
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1014

ex uno plures


View Profile WWW
September 17, 2014, 12:30:33 AM
 #2235

well why not help out then and stop coming down on people so hard just saying  Grin

I did. I tested your master branch twice and told you it was broken. Rule 1 of software release management: make sure your master branch is stable and works. Develop in develop or feature branches, merge into a release candidate, test and merge into master.

Coming down on people so hard ? Hey, there are so many times I wish I had somebody older and more experienced when I was younger to tell me I was a fucking idiot for some of the things I did I can't count 'em on both hands and feet. That's tough love, not disrespect.

The guy needs to prioritize his family over litecoindark and I told 'em so.

Moving on now … good luck fellas.
motorhead89
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 464
Merit: 250


Wasssssup!


View Profile
September 17, 2014, 12:32:25 AM
 #2236

my wallet says block 16274..... is that correct? the block explorer says the same too?

I had my account hacked due to a weak password I was told. It has be re-secured and a stronger password implemented. Hacker was posting malware links using my account. Always use a very strong password.
voodoo1967
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10

Litecoindark Reddit Moderator


View Profile
September 17, 2014, 12:34:22 AM
 #2237

well why not help out then and stop coming down on people so hard just saying  Grin

I did. I tested your master branch twice and told you it was broken.

Coming down on people so hard ? Hey, there are so many times I wish I had somebody older and more experienced when I was younger to tell me I was a fucking idiot for some of the things I did I can't count 'em on both hands and feet. That's tough love, not disrespect.

The guy needs to prioritize his family over litecoindark and I told 'em so.

Moving on now … good luck fellas.


 do bad you cant stay ill miss you lol  Wink
Xircom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 17, 2014, 12:34:46 AM
 #2238

Thats just the bottom.... im sorry for this Guys way of Words.

BTC: 1MyJmxS9ER5ZBNvpG3LhoUXGotpzbPowed
Xircom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 17, 2014, 12:35:21 AM
 #2239

my wallet says block 16274..... is that correct? the block explorer says the same too?

Yes it is correct :-)

BTC: 1MyJmxS9ER5ZBNvpG3LhoUXGotpzbPowed
motorhead89
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 464
Merit: 250


Wasssssup!


View Profile
September 17, 2014, 12:40:08 AM
 #2240

someone is spreading fud... my wallet and the block explorer match perfectly for block count.
 
16274 is what I have right now... I don't see any issues.

I just sent a 2 ltcd transaction to my wallet from bittrex...works fine.

here is the transaction id
c19e4955fa4d93668db74af577111ef42cacbe0bcf995f761d9d5da93d0cbd0e

don't see any issue if everything works for me...

Keep Calm, Drink On!

I had my account hacked due to a weak password I was told. It has be re-secured and a stronger password implemented. Hacker was posting malware links using my account. Always use a very strong password.
Pages: « 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 [112] 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 ... 406 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!