martibg
Member
 Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
 |
September 18, 2014, 02:45:32 AM |
|
that's a raping Net Hashrate 214,542.88 MH/s and is still rising  the people with small rigs will get nuts again... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Angora
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:46:26 AM |
|
I am using a fork of minerd on a gridseed. How would I add the submit no stale command?
Been throwing 280K since the launch. Switched to Best-Pool on day 2 and getting 99% efficiency.
I did try cranking the gridseed up more but started getting way too many hw errors and rejects.
|
|
|
|
|
mothermole1
Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:46:46 AM |
|
Not sure if best-pool is on the correct blockchain. Hashlink seems like its on the correct one.
It's the opposite. Best-pool is on the correct blockchain an hashlink is forked out. Best-pool chain is longer. Also, Bittrex is on the same chain as best-pool (I just confirmed it by moving some coins from my wallet which is also in sync with best-pool). ^^^ +1 -- The longer chain will win. That's by design. Bestpool's expected difficulty is apparently 3,000 in 119 blocks.. That's higher than before? Will this work now the mulipools are onboard? |
|
|
|
|
voodoo1967
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Litecoindark Reddit Moderator
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:48:53 AM |
|
so dose it matter that no unconfirmed is not showing on best-pool and blocks are found by unknown While on hashlink it shows the name of the finder and actual shares. Best pool show no shares or names for finding blocks
|
|
|
|
|
IKnowBetter
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:49:19 AM |
|
Bestpool's expected difficulty is apparently 3,000 in 119 blocks.. That's higher than before? Will this work now the mulipools are onboard?
You should just ignore it as it's showing random numbers. Best-pool's frontend doesn't know DifficultyShield and it's showing numbers which would be correct if the DifficultyShield wasn't in place. In fact, difficulty is rising slightly every blocks so just as it should be. |
|
|
|
|
|
JCJr222
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:50:26 AM |
|
Not sure if best-pool is on the correct blockchain. Hashlink seems like its on the correct one.
It's the opposite. Best-pool is on the correct blockchain an hashlink is forked out. Best-pool chain is longer. Also, Bittrex is on the same chain as best-pool (I just confirmed it by moving some coins from my wallet which is also in sync with best-pool). ^^^ +1 -- The longer chain will win. That's by design. Bestpool's expected difficulty is apparently 3,000 in 119 blocks.. That's higher than before? Will this work now the mulipools are onboard? Seems they still have the difficulty estimation set for the previous diff algorithm. The difficulty now changes for every block. No worries  |
|
|
|
|
|
TrollByFire
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:51:07 AM |
|
Not sure if best-pool is on the correct blockchain. Hashlink seems like its on the correct one.
It's the opposite. Best-pool is on the correct blockchain an hashlink is forked out. Best-pool chain is longer. Also, Bittrex is on the same chain as best-pool (I just confirmed it by moving some coins from my wallet which is also in sync with best-pool). ^^^ +1 -- The longer chain will win. That's by design. Bestpool's expected difficulty is apparently 3,000 in 119 blocks.. That's higher than before? Will this work now the mulipools are onboard? That's what it's designed to do. The dashboard doesn't know about the algorithm, so it isn't correct. |
BTC: 12JYhysrpqnzqhkZ6qRY8At3G14btEwTtF
|
|
|
mothermole1
Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:51:44 AM |
|
Bestpool's expected difficulty is apparently 3,000 in 119 blocks.. That's higher than before? Will this work now the mulipools are onboard?
You should just ignore it as it's showing random numbers. Best-pool's frontend doesn't know DifficultyShield and it's showing numbers which would be correct if the DifficultyShield wasn't in place. In fact, difficulty is rising slightly every blocks so just as it should be. Sweet as man thanks  I see that there was a mini panic on Bittrex when there was uncertainty over the fork lol. Back up to 2.1k now. TrollByFire or Robbert: You should update the OP so that everyone knows that the fork was successful and people can have a little boost in faith for the coin. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gavrilo77
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:53:53 AM |
|
Good morning. What happen?
YEAH!!!! We did it!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litecoindark (OP)
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:55:15 AM |
|
Bestpool's expected difficulty is apparently 3,000 in 119 blocks.. That's higher than before? Will this work now the mulipools are onboard?
You should just ignore it as it's showing random numbers. Best-pool's frontend doesn't know DifficultyShield and it's showing numbers which would be correct if the DifficultyShield wasn't in place. In fact, difficulty is rising slightly every blocks so just as it should be. Sweet as man thanks I see that there was a mini panic on Bittrex when there was uncertainty over the fork lol. Back up to 2.1k now. TrollByFire or Robbert: You should update the OP so that everyone knows that the fork was successful and people can have a little boost in faith for the coin. I will do that |
BTC: 1JwLwhZNy8CtKL92NcwNHJNFB8gwF1kRN2
|
|
|
IKnowBetter
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:55:39 AM |
|
TrollByFire or Robbert: You should update the OP so that everyone knows that the fork was successful and people can have a little boost in faith for the coin.
It's not 100% successful. Hashlink is wasting its hashes on an incorrect chain  . Someone should notify them. |
|
|
|
|
mothermole1
Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:57:26 AM |
|
TrollByFire or Robbert: You should update the OP so that everyone knows that the fork was successful and people can have a little boost in faith for the coin.
It's not 100% successful. Hashlink is wasting its hashes on an incorrect chain . Someone should notify them. The point is that the coin is safe. The blockchain is not screwing up.. It's Hashlink's fault for not being up to date. |
|
|
|
|
TimC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1022
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:57:42 AM |
|
TrollByFire or Robbert: You should update the OP so that everyone knows that the fork was successful and people can have a little boost in faith for the coin.
It's not 100% successful. Hashlink is wasting its hashes on an incorrect chain . Someone should notify them. Then my wallet if forked since I'm on the same chain as HashLink. I'll delete my block chain and try to re sync. |
|
|
|
|
|
yeahright
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:58:33 AM |
|
TrollByFire or Robbert: You should update the OP so that everyone knows that the fork was successful and people can have a little boost in faith for the coin.
It's not 100% successful. Hashlink is wasting its hashes on an incorrect chain . Someone should notify them. The point is that the coin is safe. The blockchain is not screwing up.. It's Hashlink's fault for not being up to date. Hashlink says they updated. |
|
|
|
|
|
TrollByFire
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:59:48 AM |
|
TrollByFire or Robbert: You should update the OP so that everyone knows that the fork was successful and people can have a little boost in faith for the coin.
It's not 100% successful. Hashlink is wasting its hashes on an incorrect chain . Someone should notify them. Already working on it. Thanks. Net Hashrate 240,642.90 MH/s  Pool Hashrate 3,375.80 MH/s  Multipools hit as soon as it was profitable to mine again. As predicted. |
BTC: 12JYhysrpqnzqhkZ6qRY8At3G14btEwTtF
|
|
|
|
TrollByFire
|
|
September 18, 2014, 03:01:06 AM |
|
TrollByFire or Robbert: You should update the OP so that everyone knows that the fork was successful and people can have a little boost in faith for the coin.
It's not 100% successful. Hashlink is wasting its hashes on an incorrect chain . Someone should notify them. The point is that the coin is safe. The blockchain is not screwing up.. It's Hashlink's fault for not being up to date. Hashlink says they updated. They did. And they are up to date, but the chain forked, and they aren't on the correct fork. This isn't their fault, it's part of the way bitcoin is designed. Eventually their node will sync with the rest of the network, but they can speed up the process by fixing it by hand. |
BTC: 12JYhysrpqnzqhkZ6qRY8At3G14btEwTtF
|
|
|
IKnowBetter
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
September 18, 2014, 03:02:29 AM |
|
TrollByFire or Robbert: You should update the OP so that everyone knows that the fork was successful and people can have a little boost in faith for the coin.
It's not 100% successful. Hashlink is wasting its hashes on an incorrect chain . Someone should notify them. The point is that the coin is safe. The blockchain is not screwing up.. It's Hashlink's fault for not being up to date. Hashlink says they updated. Probably each of both pools found hundred of blocks at once when difficulty dropped to ~0.00001 and each of them created their own blockchain fork then. It's how forks are started. |
|
|
|
|
TimC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1022
|
|
September 18, 2014, 03:05:24 AM |
|
TrollByFire or Robbert: You should update the OP so that everyone knows that the fork was successful and people can have a little boost in faith for the coin.
It's not 100% successful. Hashlink is wasting its hashes on an incorrect chain . Someone should notify them. Then my wallet if forked since I'm on the same chain as HashLink. I'll delete my block chain and try to re sync. So I deleted my block chain and now I'm synced up with ltcd.best-pool.com so I'm on the correct chain again. |
|
|
|
|
TimC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1022
|
|
September 18, 2014, 03:08:28 AM |
|
ltcd.best-pool.com still has not found a block in over 1 hour and 20 minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
