[ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot)

[gzubeck]

I'm getting 100% CPU utilization when using ccminer and mining Garlicoin...This is killing my hashrates on my 5 GTX 1070 Ti rig. (CPU: Intel G3920)


Is there a fix for this?

Found this link on their site...is this coin for real or is this some kind of joke coin?

https://pandawanfr.github.io/GarlicRecipes/mining-win-nvidia.html

[Yorktown2018]

I'm getting 100% CPU utilization when using ccminer and mining Garlicoin...This is killing my hashrates on my 5 GTX 1070 Ti rig. (CPU: Intel G3920)


Is there a fix for this?

Found this link on their site...is this coin for real or is this some kind of joke coin?

https://pandawanfr.github.io/GarlicRecipes/mining-win-nvidia.html

lol it's real and trading for about $2.50 a coin. I've been through that page already. It seems that ccminer itself (for some reason) is putting my CPU usage at 100%

No other miner (that I've used) does this

[gzubeck]

I'm getting 100% CPU utilization when using ccminer and mining Garlicoin...This is killing my hashrates on my 5 GTX 1070 Ti rig. (CPU: Intel G3920)


Is there a fix for this?

Found this link on their site...is this coin for real or is this some kind of joke coin?

https://pandawanfr.github.io/GarlicRecipes/mining-win-nvidia.html

lol it's real and trading for about $2.50 a coin. I've been through that page already. It seems that ccminer itself (for some reason) is putting my CPU usage at 100%

No other miner (that I've used) does this

be careful...if you mine too many coins you could get bad breath! :>)

[cycloblastic]

I'm getting 100% CPU utilization when using ccminer and mining Garlicoin...This is killing my hashrates on my 5 GTX 1070 Ti rig. (CPU: Intel G3920)


Is there a fix for this?

any update on this? seeing the same thing with 4x1070Ti's

[fr4nkthetank]

lol@garlicoin hahahaha.  A fine meme coin that one is.  I would say huge pump incoming before the airdrop opens for registration, maybe.  AFter expect massive tsunamis of dumping.  But if the meme power is in this coin, who are we to judge.

[hankt]

I've taken a day or two to search for a resolution to this myself, but I need help.

Can someone highlight what I have done wrong? I get this issue mining ZEC on this pool and Dwarfpool.

C:\Program Files\cc miner>ccminer-x64 -a equihash -o stratum+tcp://zec-asia1.nanopool.org:6666 -u t1bSSY5ZBhLJ9RYL7Pbkcz4AfWJUxGX7dGM/Hank01 -p c=ZEC
*** ccminer 2.2.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 9.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some kernels from alexis78, djm34, djEzo, tsiv and krnlx.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2018-01-25 12:02:35] Starting on stratum+tcp://zec-asia1.nanopool.org:6666
[2018-01-25 12:02:35] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-25 12:02:35] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-25 12:02:35] 8 miner threads started, using 'equihash' algorithm.
[2018-01-25 12:02:35] Unsupported extranonce size of 16 (12 maxi)
[2018-01-25 12:02:36] Stratum subscribe answer id is not correct!
[2018-01-25 12:02:36] JSON-RPC call failed: (unknown reason)
[2018-01-25 12:02:36] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2018-01-25 12:02:37] API bind to port 4068 failed - using port 4069
[2018-01-25 12:03:06] Unsupported extranonce size of 16 (12 maxi)
[2018-01-25 12:03:06] Stratum subscribe answer id is not correct!
[2018-01-25 12:03:06] JSON-RPC call failed: (unknown reason)
[2018-01-25 12:03:06] ...retry after 30 seconds

[gzubeck]

I've taken a day or two to search for a resolution to this myself, but I need help.

Can someone highlight what I have done wrong? I get this issue mining ZEC on this pool and Dwarfpool.

C:\Program Files\cc miner>ccminer-x64 -a equihash -o stratum+tcp://zec-asia1.nanopool.org:6666 -u t1bSSY5ZBhLJ9RYL7Pbkcz4AfWJUxGX7dGM/Hank01 -p c=ZEC
*** ccminer 2.2.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 9.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some kernels from alexis78, djm34, djEzo, tsiv and krnlx.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2018-01-25 12:02:35] Starting on stratum+tcp://zec-asia1.nanopool.org:6666
[2018-01-25 12:02:35] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-25 12:02:35] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-25 12:02:35] 8 miner threads started, using 'equihash' algorithm.
[2018-01-25 12:02:35] Unsupported extranonce size of 16 (12 maxi)
[2018-01-25 12:02:36] Stratum subscribe answer id is not correct!
[2018-01-25 12:02:36] JSON-RPC call failed: (unknown reason)
[2018-01-25 12:02:36] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2018-01-25 12:02:37] API bind to port 4068 failed - using port 4069
[2018-01-25 12:03:06] Unsupported extranonce size of 16 (12 maxi)
[2018-01-25 12:03:06] Stratum subscribe answer id is not correct!
[2018-01-25 12:03:06] JSON-RPC call failed: (unknown reason)
[2018-01-25 12:03:06] ...retry after 30 seconds

C:\Program Files\cc miner>ccminer-x64 -a equihash -o stratum+tcp://zec-asia1.nanopool.org:6666 -u t1bSSY5ZBhLJ9RYL7Pbkcz4AfWJUxGX7dGM/Hank01 _{-p c=ZEC}

I'm not sure why your password is c=zec?

password should just be x. No?

Kind of funny that nanopool deosn't even mention ccminer in their setups...I think most people use ewbf miner because even with the 2% fee your getting more production than the 2% cost of using the miner. You might also try using their other port. I once had a problem with the pool being offline. Try using the next closest pool to you.

[hankt]

I've taken a day or two to search for a resolution to this myself, but I need help.

Can someone highlight what I have done wrong? I get this issue mining ZEC on this pool and Dwarfpool.

C:\Program Files\cc miner>ccminer-x64 -a equihash -o stratum+tcp://zec-asia1.nanopool.org:6666 -u t1bSSY5ZBhLJ9RYL7Pbkcz4AfWJUxGX7dGM/Hank01 -p c=ZEC
*** ccminer 2.2.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 9.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some kernels from alexis78, djm34, djEzo, tsiv and krnlx.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2018-01-25 12:02:35] Starting on stratum+tcp://zec-asia1.nanopool.org:6666
[2018-01-25 12:02:35] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-25 12:02:35] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-25 12:02:35] 8 miner threads started, using 'equihash' algorithm.
[2018-01-25 12:02:35] Unsupported extranonce size of 16 (12 maxi)
[2018-01-25 12:02:36] Stratum subscribe answer id is not correct!
[2018-01-25 12:02:36] JSON-RPC call failed: (unknown reason)
[2018-01-25 12:02:36] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2018-01-25 12:02:37] API bind to port 4068 failed - using port 4069
[2018-01-25 12:03:06] Unsupported extranonce size of 16 (12 maxi)
[2018-01-25 12:03:06] Stratum subscribe answer id is not correct!
[2018-01-25 12:03:06] JSON-RPC call failed: (unknown reason)
[2018-01-25 12:03:06] ...retry after 30 seconds

C:\Program Files\cc miner>ccminer-x64 -a equihash -o stratum+tcp://zec-asia1.nanopool.org:6666 -u t1bSSY5ZBhLJ9RYL7Pbkcz4AfWJUxGX7dGM/Hank01 _{-p c=ZEC}

I'm not sure why your password is c=zec?

password should just be x. No?

Kind of funny that nanopool deosn't even mention ccminer in their setups...I think most people use ewbf miner because even with the 2% fee your getting more production than the 2% cost of using the miner. You might also try using their other port. I once had a problem with the pool being offline. Try using the next closest pool to you.

Password is blank. The c=ZEC is an additional parameter passed through the password field for coin name. It is common.

The launch script works fine at zec.suprnova.cc on port 4142 - port setup specifically in support for ccminer.

It appears dwarfpool and nanopool do not support ccminer.

[Yorktown2018]

I'm getting 100% CPU utilization when using ccminer and mining Garlicoin...This is killing my hashrates on my 5 GTX 1070 Ti rig. (CPU: Intel G3920)


Is there a fix for this?

any update on this? seeing the same thing with 4x1070Ti's

Nothing major, but adding this helped a little: --lookup-gap=2 --cpu-affinity=o


Still doesn't explain why ccminer is pinning the CPU at 100%

Even my 7700K struggles with it...ccminer was pinning the i7 at over 80%

Again and I'm sorry, but this is probably the worst performing miner I've come across and this has been pretty much the response from this forum "lol meme coin  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ "

[pinball_wizard]

I'm getting 100% CPU utilization when using ccminer and mining Garlicoin...This is killing my hashrates on my 5 GTX 1070 Ti rig. (CPU: Intel G3920)


Is there a fix for this?

any update on this? seeing the same thing with 4x1070Ti's

Nothing major, but adding this helped a little: --lookup-gap=2 --cpu-affinity=o


Still doesn't explain why ccminer is pinning the CPU at 100%

Even my 7700K struggles with it...ccminer was pinning the i7 at over 80%

Again and I'm sorry, but this is probably the worst performing miner I've come across and this has been pretty much the response from this forum "lol meme coin  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ "

Same problem here guys...garlic is goood, but so consumption of CPU is killing me. Something better in .conf of ccminer setting 0 cpu intensity

[Eneen]

Seems like skein algo (LIZ coin) is faster about 20% on Cuda9 KlausT fork on my 1050Tis.
Maybe is possible to implement them here too?

[Yorktown2018]

I'm getting 100% CPU utilization when using ccminer and mining Garlicoin...This is killing my hashrates on my 5 GTX 1070 Ti rig. (CPU: Intel G3920)


Is there a fix for this?

any update on this? seeing the same thing with 4x1070Ti's

Nothing major, but adding this helped a little: --lookup-gap=2 --cpu-affinity=o


Still doesn't explain why ccminer is pinning the CPU at 100%

Even my 7700K struggles with it...ccminer was pinning the i7 at over 80%

Again and I'm sorry, but this is probably the worst performing miner I've come across and this has been pretty much the response from this forum "lol meme coin  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ "

Same problem here guys...garlic is goood, but so consumption of CPU is killing me. Something better in .conf of ccminer setting 0 cpu intensity

Yeah, this forum appears to be dead. Neither --cpu-affinity nor --cpu-priority fix this issue. I'm willing to give some Garlicoin to anybody who has a workaround and/or finds another miner that will work with mining Garlicoin.

[xgodprotopskill]

I tried mining bitcore on my rigs and I'm getting "Cuda error in func 'cuda_check_cpu_setTarget' at line 41" on GTX 1080Ti Palit rigs. It happens on 1080Ti Palit Super JetStream and 1080Ti Palit GameRock. It mines for like 5 minutes then this error appear and crash miner. How to fix this problem?

Here is screenshot of miner https://i.imgur.com/gaxpFuK.png

[sgrinavi]

I'm getting 100% CPU utilization when using ccminer and mining Garlicoin...This is killing my hashrates on my 5 GTX 1070 Ti rig. (CPU: Intel G3920)


Is there a fix for this?

any update on this? seeing the same thing with 4x1070Ti's

Nothing major, but adding this helped a little: --lookup-gap=2 --cpu-affinity=o


Still doesn't explain why ccminer is pinning the CPU at 100%

Even my 7700K struggles with it...ccminer was pinning the i7 at over 80%

Again and I'm sorry, but this is probably the worst performing miner I've come across and this has been pretty much the response from this forum "lol meme coin  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ "

Same problem here guys...garlic is goood, but so consumption of CPU is killing me. Something better in .conf of ccminer setting 0 cpu intensity

Yeah, this forum appears to be dead. Neither --cpu-affinity nor --cpu-priority fix this issue. I'm willing to give some Garlicoin to anybody who has a workaround and/or finds another miner that will work with mining Garlicoin.

The process was using 60% of my I7700k,  I set the CPU-Priority to 0 and backed down on my OC & CPU voltage down and now it's using, a still unreasonable, 34%, but at-least it's not running hot.

[krnlx]

http://yiimp.eu Is offline

[scryptr]

http://yiimp.eu Is offline

STILL DOWN--

What is up?       --scryptr

[onderdoor]

http://yiimp.eu Is offline

its up again. I think they are hacked again. 

hope I didnt lose my coins

[onderdoor]

Did anybody get ccminer working with Nvidia Tesla GPUs?

I tried it with a Tesla K80/M60? Whenever I try, it usually says what the latest block is but no mining activity.

I am not a expert but think your Tesla is to strong for the settings in or not compatible with mining. Try with high options bat file. dont ask me what to do. you card is just to high performance need to make high setting for your card. or it would not work properly. good luck

forget what i said before. Use ccminer cuda 9.0 hope that wil help

[quentindel]

Did anybody get ccminer working with Nvidia Tesla GPUs?

I tried it with a Tesla K80/M60? Whenever I try, it usually says what the latest block is but no mining activity.

Hey,

I do,
PM me your email if you need help.

[sahimsabaubaba]

I am on macOS and I tried following the instructions on https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/blob/linux/INSTALL. However, I got the following error when I run  ./build.sh. Does anyone know how to fix this?

Code:

make: *** No rule to make target `distclean'.  Stop.
clean
checking build system type... x86_64-apple-darwin17.3.0
checking host system type... x86_64-apple-darwin17.3.0
checking target system type... x86_64-apple-darwin17.3.0
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... ./install-sh -c -d
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... no
checking for nawk... no
checking for awk... awk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether make supports nested variables... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables... 
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking whether gcc understands -c and -o together... yes
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C99... none needed
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep
checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E
checking whether gcc needs -traditional... no
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for g++... g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of g++... gcc3
checking for gcc option to support OpenMP... unsupported
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking sys/endian.h usability... no
checking sys/endian.h presence... no
checking for sys/endian.h... no
checking sys/param.h usability... yes
checking sys/param.h presence... yes
checking for sys/param.h... yes
checking syslog.h usability... yes
checking syslog.h presence... yes
checking for syslog.h... yes
checking for sys/sysctl.h... yes
checking whether be32dec is declared... no
checking whether le32dec is declared... no
checking whether be32enc is declared... no
checking whether le32enc is declared... no
checking for size_t... yes
checking for working alloca.h... yes
checking for alloca... yes
checking for getopt_long... yes
checking for json_loads in -ljansson... no
checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... yes
checking for gzopen in -lz... yes
checking for SSL_free in -lssl... yes
checking for EVP_DigestFinal_ex in -lcrypto... yes
[b]./configure: line 6165: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 6165: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'[/b]
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.