scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 11, 2019, 07:19:03 PM Last edit: February 11, 2019, 07:42:48 PM by scryptr |
|
I'LL LOOK FOR A NEWS REPORT--
Sorry to hear about it. If it is that severe, it may be in the news. Glad to see the new release of CCminer, however.
Hope things return to normal! --scryptr
EDIT: Apparently, there is severe flooding in Northwest France, and snow in the Alps with the possibility of avalanches. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 11, 2019, 07:21:52 PM |
|
Wallets are still connected via the backup connection, so payouts were made normally.
But this connection is not very good today and i cant resume normal operations...
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2019, 05:32:20 PM |
|
YIIMP IS UP--
I connected to Yiimp today. My shares are where I left them, and the site looks as before. Hope things recover smoothly! --scryptr
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2019, 05:42:17 PM |
|
this issue affected 12500 users and 200 companies around... for 24h + mobile phones too (at a smaller scale)
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 13, 2019, 04:37:23 PM |
|
That's a big outage. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
igorsantos
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 179
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 01, 2019, 10:30:18 PM |
|
static int nightcap_is_prime(uint64_t number) { if (number <= 1) return 0; if((number % 2 == 0) && number > 2) return 0; for(uint64_t i = 3; i < sqrt(number); i += 2) { if(number % i == 0) return 0; } return 1; } static uint64_t nightcap_get_cache_size(uint64_t block_number) { uint64_t sz = NIGHTCAP_CACHE_BYTES_INIT + (NIGHTCAP_CACHE_BYTES_GROWTH * round(sqrt(6 * (block_number / NIGHTCAP_EPOCH_LENGTH)))); sz -= NIGHTCAP_HASH_BYTES; while (!nightcap_is_prime(sz / NIGHTCAP_HASH_BYTES)) { sz -= 2 * NIGHTCAP_HASH_BYTES; } return sz; } static uint64_t nightcap_get_full_size(uint64_t block_number) { uint64_t sz = NIGHTCAP_DATASET_BYTES_INIT + (NIGHTCAP_DATASET_BYTES_GROWTH * round(sqrt(6 * (block_number / NIGHTCAP_EPOCH_LENGTH)))); sz -= NIGHTCAP_MIX_BYTES; while (!nightcap_is_prime(sz / NIGHTCAP_MIX_BYTES)) { sz -= 2 * NIGHTCAP_MIX_BYTES; } return sz; I tried to create an executable for windows but this error appears "135 error c2668: 'sqrt': ambiguous call to overloaded function" Can you tell me why? https://github.com/mangofusi/ccminer/tree/nightcap
|
|
|
|
Schleicher
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 12, 2019, 04:43:01 PM Last edit: March 12, 2019, 04:56:30 PM by Schleicher Merited by scryptr (10), vapourminer (3) |
|
That's because sqrt() only uses floating point variables (float, double, or long double). Adding casts to double should fix the error: for(uint64_t i = 3; i < sqrt((double)number); i += 2) { uint64_t sz = NIGHTCAP_CACHE_BYTES_INIT + (NIGHTCAP_CACHE_BYTES_GROWTH * round(sqrt((double)(6 * (block_number / NIGHTCAP_EPOCH_LENGTH))))); uint64_t sz = NIGHTCAP_DATASET_BYTES_INIT + (NIGHTCAP_DATASET_BYTES_GROWTH * round(sqrt((double)(6 * (block_number / NIGHTCAP_EPOCH_LENGTH)))));
|
|
|
|
igorsantos
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 179
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 23, 2019, 06:46:06 PM |
|
That's because sqrt() only uses floating point variables (float, double, or long double). Adding casts to double should fix the error: for(uint64_t i = 3; i < sqrt((double)number); i += 2) { uint64_t sz = NIGHTCAP_CACHE_BYTES_INIT + (NIGHTCAP_CACHE_BYTES_GROWTH * round(sqrt((double)(6 * (block_number / NIGHTCAP_EPOCH_LENGTH))))); uint64_t sz = NIGHTCAP_DATASET_BYTES_INIT + (NIGHTCAP_DATASET_BYTES_GROWTH * round(sqrt((double)(6 * (block_number / NIGHTCAP_EPOCH_LENGTH))))); ok, thanks. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
idcraypool
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2019, 04:34:21 PM |
|
how to change those code for support equihash 96_5 i was tried changed the equihash.h : #define WK 9 to 5 #define WN 200 to 96
released ccminer.exe but test mining coin got this error: [2019-05-13 00:26:49] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=000fffff range=000fffff [2019-05-13 00:26:49] GPU #0: Allocated 122 MB of context memory [2019-05-13 00:26:49] GPU #0: solver: CUDA error 'an illegal memory access was encountered' in func 'eq_cuda_context<RB, SM, SSM, THREADS, PACKER>::solve' line 2058 [2019-05-13 00:26:52] GPU #0: start=00000001 end=00100000 range=000fffff [2019-05-13 00:26:52] GPU #0: an illegal memory access was encountered [2019-05-13 00:26:52] GPU #0: scanhash_equihash:191 all CUDA-capable devices are busy or unavailable [2019-05-13 00:26:52] GPU #0: init: CUDA: failed to alloc memory [2019-05-13 00:26:52] restart_threads
how to fix it? thx ps i was tried nothing changed code for equihash 200_9 is ok
|
|
|
|
IlyaVak
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2019, 06:00:49 PM |
|
AltCoinLog about Ccminer![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Faltcoinlog.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F05%2FCCminer.jpg&t=665&c=4KZDM1xjdHgQxw) Where to download the original version of Ccminer, a guide to tuning and optimization. User errors and solutions to problems. Ready Bat files for mining. Article written in Russian. https://altcoinlog.com/download-ccminer-nastroika/
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2019, 06:01:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
anorganix
Copper Member
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 970
Merit: 287
Per aspera ad astra
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2019, 09:02:30 PM |
|
Thanks for the input Ilya, official ccminer is available for download at http://ccminer.org/And don’t forget that it was, is and will be opensource, thanks to Epsylon3 and other contributors.
|
I will never send private messages with payment requests for my auctions. I only communicate transparently via the forum (not Telegram, Discord, Skype & others). Please be wary of scammers.
|
|
|
5yk0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 14, 2019, 10:37:31 PM |
|
This is what I get when running ccminer, it recognizes my gpu and even gives a hashrate, however it also says there is no kernel image available for execution on the device. Should I be concerned? I've read posts elsewhere about similar issues, but none of these were detecting the gpu. The other posts mentioned setting the cuda architecture to the proper one, but I cannot seem to grasp how that is done. I'm running Ubuntu 18.04 and cuda 9.1 with a GeForce GT520.
[2019-05-14 15:13:41] Starting on stratum+tcp://vtc.coinfoundry.org:3096 [2019-05-14 15:13:41] 1 miner thread started, using 'lyra2v3' algorithm. [2019-05-14 15:13:41] Stratum difficulty set to 15 (0.05859) [2019-05-14 15:13:41] GPU #0: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads [2019-05-14 15:13:43] GPU #0: no kernel image is available for execution on the device [2019-05-14 15:14:26] GPU #0: GeForce GT 520, 2777.44 kH/s [2019-05-14 15:14:27] GPU #0: no kernel image is available for execution on the device [2019-05-14 15:15:29] GPU #0: GeForce GT 520, 2704.37 kH/s [2019-05-14 15:15:29] Stratum difficulty set to 14 (0.05469) [2019-05-14 15:15:29] GPU #0: no kernel image is available for execution on the device [2019-05-14 15:16:29] GPU #0: GeForce GT 520, 2729.74 kH/s [2019-05-14 15:16:29] GPU #0: no kernel image is available for execution on the device [2019-05-14 15:17:25] Stratum difficulty set to 13 (0.05078) [2019-05-14 15:17:31] GPU #0: GeForce GT 520, 2637.25 kH/s [2019-05-14 15:17:31] GPU #0: no kernel image is available for execution on the device [2019-05-14 15:18:31] GPU #0: GeForce GT 520, 2633.14 kH/s [2019-05-14 15:18:32] Stratum difficulty set to 12 (0.04688) [2019-05-14 15:18:32] GPU #0: no kernel image is available for execution on the device [2019-05-14 15:19:31] GPU #0: GeForce GT 520, 2673.43 kH/s [2019-05-14 15:19:32] GPU #0: no kernel image is available for execution on the device [2019-05-14 15:20:31] GPU #0: GeForce GT 520, 2698.43 kH/s [2019-05-14 15:20:32] Stratum difficulty set to 11 (0.04297) [2019-05-14 15:20:32] GPU #0: no kernel image is available for execution on the device [2019-05-14 15:21:32] GPU #0: GeForce GT 520, 2684.36 kH/s [2019-05-14 15:21:33] Stratum difficulty set to 10 (0.03906) [2019-05-14 15:21:33] GPU #0: no kernel image is available for execution on the device [2019-05-14 15:22:33] GPU #0: GeForce GT 520, 2657.94 kH/s [2019-05-14 15:22:33] GPU #0: no kernel image is available for execution on the device [2019-05-14 15:23:08] Stratum difficulty set to 9 (0.03516) [2019-05-14 15:23:08] lyra2v3 block 1138796, diff 25016.611 [2019-05-14 15:23:08] GPU #0: no kernel image is available for execution on the device
|
|
|
|
shotgun1969
|
i just wondered if anyone seen this issue or possible bug. Ok so i set up 3 wallets to do a time limited rotate of the wallets and i set time up with a max dif. Maybe i am doing something wrong i have tried in both windows and in linux. here is my attempt with just max diff :loop ccminer-x64.exe -a skein -o http://192.168.1.215:9333 -u htc -p x -d 0 --cpu-priority=4 --max-dif=5.0 ccminer-x64.exe -a qubit -o http://192.168.1.215:14242 -u htc -p x -d 0 --cpu-priority=4 --max-dif=25.0 ccminer-x64.exe -a myr-gr -o http://192.1681.215:9335 -u htc -p x -d 0 --cpu-priority=4 --max-dif=5.0 GOTO loop pause it wont move off the first one at all and thinking i would mix in time limit to see if it would wait 180 seconds and go to the next one every 3 min :loop ccminer-x64.exe -a skein -o http://192.168.1.215:9333 -u htc -p x -d 0 --cpu-priority=4 --max-dif=5.0 --time-limit=180 ccminer-x64.exe -a qubit -o http://192.168.1.215:14242 -u htc -p x -d 0 --cpu-priority=4 --max-dif=25.0 --time-limit=180 ccminer-x64.exe -a myr-gr -o http://192.1681.215:9335 -u htc -p x -d 0 --cpu-priority=4 --max-dif=5.0 --time-limit=180 GOTO loop pause it wont move cause the miner didnt mine 3 minutes is what i am seeing. If i runn with the --time-limit=180 command behind each one only it rotates thru them then goes back to the top one no issue.
|
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
i just wondered if anyone seen this issue or possible bug. Ok so i set up 3 wallets to do a time limited rotate of the wallets and i set time up with a max dif. Maybe i am doing something wrong i have tried in both windows and in linux.
Time-limit is the only one that exits, the others like max-diff, max-temp just wait at idle.
|
|
|
|
shotgun1969
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 25, 2019, 03:47:55 AM |
|
i just wondered if anyone seen this issue or possible bug. Ok so i set up 3 wallets to do a time limited rotate of the wallets and i set time up with a max dif. Maybe i am doing something wrong i have tried in both windows and in linux.
Time-limit is the only one that exits, the others like max-diff, max-temp just wait at idle. this is perfect and thats what i am looking for. A few months ago i was using the time-limit command and found my gpus stuck on one wallet or pool for hours because the pool went down and i didnt figure out why it didnt move on after 300 seconds until now because the time-limit has to mine that pool for 300 seconds or it wont switch. you can easily recreate the issue by putting in a bad address or password in the first one and try yourself. it wont go to the next wallet or pool til it mines that pool x seconds.
|
|
|
|
cryptotamer01
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 653
Merit: 11
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 02, 2019, 12:10:24 AM |
|
Hi. Will you add the SINOVATE in your pool and algo X25X. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
cuatrero
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 10, 2019, 07:49:28 PM |
|
Hi, i have the following error mining on AWS EC2 instances, perhaps you have any advice for me?
[2019-06-10 19:28:04] Starting on stratum+tcp://x11.usa.nicehash.com:3336 [2019-06-10 19:28:04] 1 miner thread started, using 'x11' algorithm. [2019-06-10 19:28:04] Stratum difficulty set to 64 [2019-06-10 19:28:04] x11 block 677682, diff 2549446.865 [2019-06-10 19:28:04] GPU #0: Intensity set to 19, 524288 cuda threads [2019-06-10 19:28:05] GPU #0: aes_cpu_init invalid device symbol [2019-06-10 19:28:06] GPU #0: aes_cpu_init invalid device symbol [2019-06-10 19:28:07] GPU #0: quark_blake512_cpu_setBlock_80:318 invalid device symbol Cuda error in func 'cuda_check_cpu_setTarget' at line 41 : invalid device symbol.
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2019, 05:31:44 PM Last edit: September 22, 2019, 10:33:26 PM by tbearhere |
|
Sorry for off topic but I think many here have mined Boolberry BBR. I thought you may like to know BBR to Zano swap. And yes BBR will still be supported after the swap ends July 30th 2019. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
http://coinswap.zano.org/
|
|
|
|
cryptofarmer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 26, 2019, 06:10:27 AM |
|
When Mining Phi2 there's a "bug" in the software.
the use_roots flag for LUX and GEX is now being triggered and activated whenever a job contains a root parameter. However the flag will never go back to false after this.
When using profit switching this causes a serious problem.
Please move the initial ' int use_roots = 0; ' To inside the ' work_decode ' function, so it gets checked on new jobs, to provide compatibility with profit switching.
|
|
|
|
|