kano (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 4480
Merit: 1800
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
 |
February 07, 2016, 09:39:29 AM |
|
So how close do they have to be to be considered orphan. Less than 10ms?
Any other pool will probably only report an orphan if they successfully submitted the block to the network and it loses an orphan race. i.e. if the block goes out and people find out about it  So in our case a true orphan would get a normal block reply like the previous 397163 one: [2016-02-07 16:25:11.651] Possible block solve diff 821005982664.717041 !
[2016-02-07 16:25:11.927] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
But then it would have to fail an orphan race on the network. In this case we already knew the network had another block (23ms earlier) so it didn't even start an orphan race. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matias
|
|
February 07, 2016, 09:41:33 AM |
|
citronick, it is because of floating point operations rounding inaccuracies, kano.is checkes also blocks that are within 99.9% of required difficulty. So to my understanding it is deliberate process.
|
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4480
Merit: 1800
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
February 07, 2016, 09:45:44 AM |
|
...
there was another case Blk 344-345, that was "unworthy" - would that mean it was not even a true block to be claimed, compared to situation above?
what would trigger an "unworthy" block ? miner malfunction?
If you click on the blue ? it tells you  "Share diff was VERY close so we tested it, but it wasn't worthy" i.e. we test any share within 99.9% of being a block. We used to test 99% but adjusted that up to 99.9% recently. It was an "Unworthy" share - not worthy of being a block, not good enough difficulty, but we submit it in case of any rounding/math errors. |
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
February 07, 2016, 10:27:21 AM |
|
It looks like block 397163 was hit by another small miner, Romari1987 with 9THs...he gets on the Kano Acclaim board for the first time!
|
|
|
|
|
|
zOU
|
|
February 07, 2016, 10:43:28 AM |
|
It looks like block 397163 was hit by another small miner, Romari1987 with 9THs...he gets on the Kano Acclaim board for the first time!
\o/ ! it'd be cool if the acclaim table would show the Hash Rate too (Current or average at the time the block is found or... ? ) |
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4480
Merit: 1800
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
February 07, 2016, 11:17:29 AM |
|
It looks like block 397163 was hit by another small miner, Romari1987 with 9THs...he gets on the Kano Acclaim board for the first time!
\o/ ! it'd be cool if the acclaim table would show the Hash Rate too (Current or average at the time the block is found or... ? ) Nope. Where we gonna fit 109 numbers for bitminerpro ... |
|
|
|
|
zOU
|
|
February 07, 2016, 12:22:06 PM |
|
Nope. Where we gonna fit 109 numbers for bitminerpro ... Just one number, last known hasrate/shift so it works if someone has left the pool for exemple ? of course it may not be accurate if someone has found 1 block with 1Ghs and then got more. His last hashrate may not be representatative of the hasrate he/she had when he/she discovered the block. but globally, I think there's a certain consistency in hasrate for a given user. One doesn't go from Mhs to Phs very fast (unless renting, but that doesn't last long) Anyway, I'm not arguing, you're the boss  |
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4480
Merit: 1800
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
February 07, 2016, 12:39:49 PM |
|
5 payouts sent and confirmed in the last 10hrs: Payout 397045 sent 9.5hrs ago 2b8d10dce862a791d7a07f51a158eacbff1d65d9b24a2c63b3dde399c42b6372 Payout 397061 sent 7hrs ago 09454b962373f41a0782aea02f0663a0d9160d043581530947e0be89ec48234f Payout 397073 sent 5hrs ago f6e856ac2b8c257611b3d361425f2583f2dc46cd5238cb8efdcc8a8a0335154d Payout 397102 sent 1.25hrs ago c0517a7b81d33cfe2645820e749d934f7c60c0f6851154efb82e12c1fcd1f8c2 Payout 397104 sent 1hr ago 20963e73228a4807b16ea023eb49ff9cb26404cb63537950e5156b20efc2f75a All confirmed. 2 more in the queue. Next one I'll send in the morning since it will be around 4am my time So if there's anything I can say about that stale block - if we have to have one, it's way better to see one when luck is this good, than when luck is low |
|
|
|
AriesIV10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006
Mine for a Bit
|
|
February 07, 2016, 01:35:14 PM |
|
Block Difficulty 144116447847
|
|
|
|
baazju
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2016, 01:53:55 PM |
|
Did anyone else get another email from saying that we found that stale block again?? Got my hopes up twice now :/
|
Beware of scammers.
|
|
|
|
ZACHM
|
|
February 07, 2016, 02:05:23 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wikkidtt
|
|
February 07, 2016, 02:22:39 PM |
|
Did anyone else get another email from saying that we found that stale block again?? Got my hopes up twice now :/
Yes sir. |
|
|
|
|
|
nhando
|
|
February 07, 2016, 02:58:29 PM |
|
Not the way I wanted to add up to 10 Blocks for our Super Sunday.. ...... NOW LET'S GO REAL BLOCKIES!!!!!
|
Just "Mining" my own business.
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
February 07, 2016, 03:53:01 PM |
|
Block! BTCWoman hits 8th here on Kano with 43THs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
VRobb
|
|
February 07, 2016, 03:53:27 PM |
|
Block! Let's keep it!!  |
I don't believe in superstition because it's bad luck: 13thF1oor6CAwyzyxXPNnRvu3nhhYeqZdc
These aren't the Droids you're looking for: S5 & S7 (Sold), R4B2, R4B4 (RIP), 2x S9 obsolete, 2xS15-28, S17-56, S17-70
Pushing a whopping 1/5 PH! Oh The SPEED!!!
|
|
|
thedreamer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002
Go Big or Go Home.....
|
|
February 07, 2016, 05:13:20 PM |
|
Good recovery after the stale.  |
Go Big or Go Home.
|
|
|
|
nhando
|
|
February 07, 2016, 08:02:13 PM |
|
23PH, BRING OUT THE BIG GUNS!!! PEW! PEW! PEW!!! Come on BLOCKIES......
|
Just "Mining" my own business.
|
|
|
Gnicolas333
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2016, 08:09:24 PM |
|
Hi. I started mining on CKpool on January 19, 21:10. I have accumulated a certain amount on rewards. The payouts however do NOT reflect the accumulated rewards. I need to contact CKpool to remedie the problem.
GNicolas
|
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7824
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
February 07, 2016, 08:15:53 PM
Last edit: February 07, 2016, 08:30:50 PM by philipma1957 |
|
Hi. I started mining on CKpool on January 19, 21:10. I have accumulated a certain amount on rewards. The payouts however do NOT reflect the accumulated rewards. I need to contact CKpool to remedie the problem.
GNicolas
what is the issue? this is what we are paid up to block 397140 notice that I do match 0.01842464 BTC there is one reason you would not match that is if you are dust btc. ie very tiny btc like 0.00000055  |
|
|
|
|
PPOC
|
|
February 07, 2016, 08:44:27 PM |
|
23PH, BRING OUT THE BIG GUNS!!! PEW! PEW! PEW!!! Come on BLOCKIES......
We need 24+ph to match the 20 we had in last diff just to stay current on blocks per day. |
BTC: 1Bo6YsPeHCrVRygHLJg9BwHeaLSQpppcJi
"Lost coins only make everyone else’s coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone."
|
|
|
|
