clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
August 08, 2016, 11:25:53 PM |
|
Block by Jays86! That's his 30th Kano block and our 8th of the day! Woohooo!
|
|
|
|
javierfjavier
|
|
August 08, 2016, 11:39:39 PM |
|
Mining again. My house flooded last week due to a intense rain.. Everything ok, the sp20 is hashing again. A s7 coming soon, is already here, tomorrow will pick up at the courier. I want to find a block before retire the Sp.. Soft mining, warm mining, little ball of fees 🎤
|
|
|
|
firetreeactual
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
|
|
August 09, 2016, 12:31:28 AM |
|
LOL- Ok got it. How do we know luck is a woman?
Well Frank always sang that luck be a lady, so I figured he knew what he was talking about. https://youtu.be/ZJpGHR6ofusI thought the lady was a tramp.... LOL. Maybe I'm confusing things in my small brain... Actually, "Luck Be A Lady Tonight" and "The Lady Is A Tramp" are both Sinatra charts. You ain't wrong.
|
To infinity and beyond...on two 741s and one of only 3...nope, make that 4...full nodes in Hawaii...on <30A. (I have other gear on the Hoth ice planet)
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
August 09, 2016, 12:42:58 AM |
|
block 424284 was snatched from antpoo !
Heh yeah that was the last block I saw just before I went to sleep ... I didn't notice it was an orphan race ... was rather late It was confirmed by BTCC so we got our block to BTCC faster than antpoo did Checking the actual relay log (in china) at that time ... [2016-08-08 16:39:13.027+00] 0000000000000000032a3f19a178d00fe04ac8ff559ecf642f5de96063243ad8 recv'd, size 999843 with 4322 bytes on the wire [2016-08-08 16:39:41.189+00] 00000000000000000379cd0f071b4ca78714fd111abe92dbfe9262c3e946bb56 recv'd, size 988055 with 84822 bytes on the wire [2016-08-08 16:41:36.158+00] 00000000000000000443d185e8fc346b917bd77b205ee34745f162a717b32cfb recv'd, size 998199 with 506605 bytes on the wire
Orange 32 is the block before the orphan race (fupool) Green 37 is us (the orphan race here between us and antpoo) Blue 44 is BTCC confirming us So, no sign of antpoo on the china block relay, thus it must have been a late block, or something else ... Clearly they've screwed up with that one. Checking the btcd on one of our china nodes ... 2016-08-08 16:39:13.290890 UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000032a3f19a178d00fe04ac8ff559ecf642f5de96063243ad8 height=424283 ... 2016-08-08 16:39:41.279290 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000000000379cd0f071b4ca78714fd111abe92dbfe9262c3e946bb56 height=424284 ... 2016-08-08 16:41:37.099681 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000000000443d185e8fc346b917bd77b205ee34745f162a717b32cfb height=424285 ...
Again no sign of it - the antpoo hash was 0000000000000000038a7019dfaaac6abf2a54d7d53e510958c310b8732571f7 The weird thing about it was that the timestamp in it "2016-08-08 16:37:40" was 1.5 minutes before the fupool block that we both confirmed, so they are certainly setting the timestamps in the blocks back in time for some reason. Timestamps aren't accurate, but 'usually' represent when the work was sent to the miner, or a small amount of rolling forward after that. https://blockchain.info/tx/a74b23d1268b182983fdbd6d809eeeebbca069582616bce627204ac5c48b561aAlso of interest blocktail.com doesn't show it at all. I wonder if antpoo is hiding their orphans there now that they own it ... like they hide hardware errors and stales in their cgminer clone
|
|
|
|
wolfen
|
|
August 09, 2016, 12:58:27 AM |
|
Bravo on the analysis Kano
|
For those about to block we salute you! AC->BTC
|
|
|
wmabern
|
|
August 09, 2016, 01:16:44 AM Last edit: August 09, 2016, 01:31:09 AM by wmabern |
|
block 424284 was snatched from antpoo !
Heh yeah that was the last block I saw just before I went to sleep ... I didn't notice it was an orphan race ... was rather late It was confirmed by BTCC so we got our block to BTCC faster than antpoo did Checking the actual relay log (in china) at that time ... [2016-08-08 16:39:13.027+00] 0000000000000000032a3f19a178d00fe04ac8ff559ecf642f5de96063243ad8 recv'd, size 999843 with 4322 bytes on the wire [2016-08-08 16:39:41.189+00] 00000000000000000379cd0f071b4ca78714fd111abe92dbfe9262c3e946bb56 recv'd, size 988055 with 84822 bytes on the wire [2016-08-08 16:41:36.158+00] 00000000000000000443d185e8fc346b917bd77b205ee34745f162a717b32cfb recv'd, size 998199 with 506605 bytes on the wire
Orange 32 is the block before the orphan race (fupool) Green 37 is us (the orphan race here between us and antpoo) Blue 44 is BTCC confirming us So, no sign of antpoo on the china block relay, thus it must have been a late block, or something else ... Clearly they've screwed up with that one. Checking the btcd on one of our china nodes ... 2016-08-08 16:39:13.290890 UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000032a3f19a178d00fe04ac8ff559ecf642f5de96063243ad8 height=424283 ... 2016-08-08 16:39:41.279290 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000000000379cd0f071b4ca78714fd111abe92dbfe9262c3e946bb56 height=424284 ... 2016-08-08 16:41:37.099681 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000000000443d185e8fc346b917bd77b205ee34745f162a717b32cfb height=424285 ...
Again no sign of it - the antpoo hash was 0000000000000000038a7019dfaaac6abf2a54d7d53e510958c310b8732571f7 The weird thing about it was that the timestamp in it "2016-08-08 16:37:40" was 1.5 minutes before the fupool block that we both confirmed, so they are certainly setting the timestamps in the blocks back in time for some reason. Timestamps aren't accurate, but 'usually' represent when the work was sent to the miner, or a small amount of rolling forward after that. https://blockchain.info/tx/a74b23d1268b182983fdbd6d809eeeebbca069582616bce627204ac5c48b561aAlso of interest blocktail.com doesn't show it at all. I wonder if antpoo is hiding their orphans there now that they own it ... like they hide hardware errors and stales in their cgminer clone Great technical analysis. I'm certainly glad someone knows, in depth, the inner-working of how BTC, the BTC Chain, and pools are supposed to operate. I'm also glad we have two of the best minds in the business running our pool!! That's why WE ROCK the BLOCKS! Mine on!!!!!
|
BITMIXER.IO Gone Baby, Gone.. ;-) Not any good sig campaigns out there that I want!
|
|
|
wolfen
|
|
August 09, 2016, 01:24:22 AM |
|
Looks like antpoo took a hit at 20utc
|
For those about to block we salute you! AC->BTC
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
August 09, 2016, 02:12:26 AM |
|
Block by aluz! Good start to the new day!
|
|
|
|
wmabern
|
|
August 09, 2016, 02:16:37 AM |
|
Block!
Good Job! Nice start to another 8-11 block day! Let's turn that stat board ALL LIME GREEN!
|
BITMIXER.IO Gone Baby, Gone.. ;-) Not any good sig campaigns out there that I want!
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
August 09, 2016, 03:39:13 AM |
|
antpoo...fupool...blocktail.com... Methinks ya'll need some anger management classes!
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
firetreeactual
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
|
|
August 09, 2016, 03:50:11 AM |
|
antpoo...fupool...blocktail.com... Methinks ya'll need some anger management classes! ...and then there's BiteMe.
|
To infinity and beyond...on two 741s and one of only 3...nope, make that 4...full nodes in Hawaii...on <30A. (I have other gear on the Hoth ice planet)
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
August 09, 2016, 06:36:52 AM |
|
antpoo...fupool...blocktail.com... Methinks ya'll need some anger management classes! Why aren't you mining there? That's why I call them (appropriate) names
|
|
|
|
Xircom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 09, 2016, 06:59:28 AM |
|
Kano - Could you please see if block 424322 was done by an S9 ?
|
BTC: 1MyJmxS9ER5ZBNvpG3LhoUXGotpzbPowed
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
August 09, 2016, 08:41:16 AM |
|
Kano - Could you please see if block 424322 was done by an S9 ?
It says it was an S9 - which means it probably was Meanwhile: block ... recently.
|
|
|
|
wmabern
|
|
August 09, 2016, 09:21:49 AM |
|
I just wake to find another block! 3rd for the day!
|
BITMIXER.IO Gone Baby, Gone.. ;-) Not any good sig campaigns out there that I want!
|
|
|
CryptoBuddha
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 233
Merit: 100
reality is what you think it is
|
|
August 09, 2016, 09:22:08 AM |
|
It's a block and all the stats are green again, love it... UPD: Guys, according to last 24 hrs statistics Kano ck pool is ahead of BitFury pool (5.7% vs 5.1% of blocks found)
|
aka Shammann elsewhere, spreche etwas Deutsch, pyccкий тoжe знaю ॐ मणि पद्मे हूँ
|
|
|
Xircom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 09, 2016, 09:31:37 AM |
|
It was a 1 Gen. S9 with downclock to get it stable. Look at the BestShare
|
BTC: 1MyJmxS9ER5ZBNvpG3LhoUXGotpzbPowed
|
|
|
Xircom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 09, 2016, 09:37:29 AM |
|
It's a block and all the stats are green again, love it... UPD: Guys, according to last 24 hrs statistics Kano ck pool is ahead of BitFury pool (5.7% vs 5.1% of blocks found) Yeah and Slush only got 2 Blocks more, but with 39PH more on the back.
|
BTC: 1MyJmxS9ER5ZBNvpG3LhoUXGotpzbPowed
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
August 09, 2016, 09:44:23 AM |
|
It was a 1 Gen. S9 with downclock to get it stable. Look at the BestShare <snip> WOW.... how many zillion shares is that.... if only this badass s9 is mining at solo.ckpool.org I wonder whats up with Juvia and her minions, haven't seen blocks coming from them - I think they are sleeping on the job
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
Newko
|
|
August 09, 2016, 10:17:54 AM |
|
Waking up to 3 blocks & a fresh cup o' Joe is a nice way to start the day
|
|
|
|
|