KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2436 blocks

[Jeremiah1610]

Cryptostarusa took the 2nd place miner

[1715384296]

1715384296

[1715384296]

1715384296

[1715384296]

1715384296

[nazzer]

Looks like a little more hash rate is powering in
Lets hope that continues to grow over the next few days

Don't jinx it!

[admidiral]

looks like i gonna gain some weight from friend chicken, Singapore chicken rice, roasted chicken with somtum

[fjtropepe]

Looks like a little more hash rate is powering in
Lets hope that continues to grow over the next few days

Seems like you know something.....  but didn't share it all?  :-)


My two extra S9's might help!  I will have to do some explain to the electrical company, went from 600 kWh per month to about 8400 kWh... hmmm
I'll just say, I'm putting it through the meter.. its all legit!

Someone is renting hashing power.

[kano]

Looks like a little more hash rate is powering in
Lets hope that continues to grow over the next few days

Seems like you know something.....  but didn't share it all?  :-)


My two extra S9's might help!  I will have to do some explain to the electrical company, went from 600 kWh per month to about 8400 kWh... hmmm
I'll just say, I'm putting it through the meter.. its all legit!

Someone is renting hashing power.

Nope - I block rentals on all servers when I find them.

[1manshow]

Cryptostarusa took the 2nd place miner

Too late it already overtook the 1st position. Keep it up cryptostarusa, hope you can find us the block now!

[Megaquake]

cryptostarusa=   7,713.58THs  awesome!

[Tnaa97]

cryptostarusa=   7,713.58THs  awesome!

WOW!!

I wanna be cryptostarusa when I grow up!!!

[rifleman74]

Time to crack the block, it's been withholding favors for awhile now.

MINE ON WITH KANO-SAN!

[Apprentice]

a new T9+ is now available

[akadamson]

haha...

there goes that theory/advantage/whatever you want to call it.

i guess the math is either wrong or right, but if the later, doesn't present a very pretty picture... I guess we'll hope it's wrong.

Check out this mornings version of minergain.com - changing that N/A for the week to 0.0000 inflicted all sorts of punishment on the numbers it appears.

[heartlandmining]

a new T9+ is now available

Limit 2 for all, BCH only, ships 10 working days out from payment, 10.5T @ 2008 USD. 

[Leonid2806]

пoбыcтpeй yжe блoк нaшли и пocлe нeгo cpaзy 4-5 блoкa

[clgrissom3]

haha...

there goes that theory/advantage/whatever you want to call it.

i guess the math is either wrong or right, but if the later, doesn't present a very pretty picture... I guess we'll hope it's wrong.

Check out this mornings version of minergain.com - changing that N/A for the week to 0.0000 inflicted all sorts of punishment on the numbers it appears.

I'm not sure why everyone seems to think this month is so bad...with the average pool hash rate we've had this month the expected number of blocks is somewhere between 8.2 and 8.4 for 31 days...we already have 8.  Even if we don't get another that's pretty damn good!

[akadamson]

haha...

there goes that theory/advantage/whatever you want to call it.

i guess the math is either wrong or right, but if the later, doesn't present a very pretty picture... I guess we'll hope it's wrong.

Check out this mornings version of minergain.com - changing that N/A for the week to 0.0000 inflicted all sorts of punishment on the numbers it appears.

I'm not sure why everyone seems to think this month is so bad...with the average pool hash rate we've had this month the expected number of blocks is somewhere between 8.2 and 8.4...we already have 8.  Even if we don't get another that's pretty damn good!

Im not saying things are bad.  For a while, lots of people pointed to the numbers that were shared on Minergain.com as a reference for the benefit of this pool.  That all *appears* to have fizzled away yesterday when the owners of minergain agreed to change the weekly number to 0 instead of what was prior a N/A because there had been no blocks found.  I suspect, but who knows what the math is, that those N/A's weren't being counted in the percentages and now that they are and at zero, it's strongly impacted what was presented as an advantage.

Granted that's just a data point and it may not be an accurate one now as there may be other math issues that it uncovered.  For me personally, I know that at slush in 6 days I was paid .01 BTC, the next .01 BTC took 10 days and this was all at the beginning of this month (I've only been here since the 18/19th).  The above was with 14TH same as here.  I got a small amount on the last block .001<something> from here and so I'm really curious what the first *real* block for me will look like.  That will tell me some of what I want to understand in a bit more imperical way than percentages and numbers that may not be correct.... We'll see, not going anywhere just curious

[Tnaa97]

haha...

there goes that theory/advantage/whatever you want to call it.

i guess the math is either wrong or right, but if the later, doesn't present a very pretty picture... I guess we'll hope it's wrong.

Check out this mornings version of minergain.com - changing that N/A for the week to 0.0000 inflicted all sorts of punishment on the numbers it appears.

I'm not sure why everyone seems to think this month is so bad...with the average pool hash rate we've had this month the expected number of blocks is somewhere between 8.2 and 8.4...we already have 8.  Even if we don't get another that's pretty damn good!

Im not saying things are bad.  For a while, lots of people pointed to the numbers that were shared on Minergain.com as a reference for the benefit of this pool.  That all *appears* to have fizzled away yesterday when the owners of minergain agreed to change the weekly number to 0 instead of what was prior a N/A because there had been no blocks found.  I suspect, but who knows what the math is, that those N/A's weren't being counted in the percentages and now that they are and at zero, it's strongly impacted what was presented as an advantage.

Granted that's just a data point and it may not be an accurate one now as there may be other math issues that it uncovered.  For me personally, I know that at slush in 6 days I was paid .01 BTC, the next .01 BTC took 10 days and this was all at the beginning of this month (I've only been here since the 18/19th).  The above was with 14TH same as here.  I got a small amount on the last block .001<something> from here and so I'm really curious what the first *real* block for me will look like.  That will tell me some of what I want to understand in a bit more imperical way than percentages and numbers that may not be correct.... We'll see, not going anywhere just curious

These are the numbers from Minergain.com

Name,   Payout,   Hash Rate,   Network %,   Users,   Current Block,   Week CDT,   Month CDT,   Quarter CDT,   Year CDT,   Web KanoPool,   PPLNS,   45.84PH/s,   0.24% of 19.15EH/s,   1,315,   505456 (8.48Dys),   0.00000000,   0.00014808,   0.00018878,   0.00040412,   kano.is SlushPool,   Hybrid PPS,   2.11EH/s,   11.03% of 19.15EH/s,   17,752,   506810 (53.67Mins),   0.0106307,   0.00259635,   0.00100207,   0.00057396,   slushpool.com

Sorry, I'm to ignorant to insert a table properly...

[akadamson]

Actually, I'm not sure any of the numbers over that at minergain make sense at the moment.

This can't be right for example.

Slush pool, 0.0106307 CDT (week).

Wouldn't that mean using the weekly numbers that every day, every TH/s would make .01BTC?

So 5TH would make .05 a DAY?  If so, I want some of those numbers...

BTW, not trying to PAN minergain, I just think the numbers are broken either in general or due to the change they made yesterday

[2tights]

haha...

there goes that theory/advantage/whatever you want to call it.

i guess the math is either wrong or right, but if the later, doesn't present a very pretty picture... I guess we'll hope it's wrong.

Check out this mornings version of minergain.com - changing that N/A for the week to 0.0000 inflicted all sorts of punishment on the numbers it appears.

I'm not sure why everyone seems to think this month is so bad...with the average pool hash rate we've had this month the expected number of blocks is somewhere between 8.2 and 8.4 for 31 days...we already have 8.  Even if we don't get another that's pretty damn good!

100% agree. I haven't heard anyone say this month is bad, did I miss something?

[mtaboneweb]

haha...

there goes that theory/advantage/whatever you want to call it.

i guess the math is either wrong or right, but if the later, doesn't present a very pretty picture... I guess we'll hope it's wrong.

Check out this mornings version of minergain.com - changing that N/A for the week to 0.0000 inflicted all sorts of punishment on the numbers it appears.

I'm not sure why everyone seems to think this month is so bad...with the average pool hash rate we've had this month the expected number of blocks is somewhere between 8.2 and 8.4 for 31 days...we already have 8.  Even if we don't get another that's pretty damn good!

100% agree. I haven't heard anyone say this month is bad, did I miss something?

8 blocks is all it takes for me to do better than slush. This one would be a bonus.

[DPoS2]

Looks like a little more hash rate is powering in
Lets hope that continues to grow over the next few days

Stop hoping and market your pool for the advantages you have before it's too late to get big miners to save this peanut gallery
Everyone missed my points and barked about old talking points I wasn't even mentioning.

** Do large pools like Slush give more % rewards to really big miners and screw the little guys or does Slush screw everyone over?  If some miners get kickbacks, then which ones don't?  Go get those to join you

** A temporary promotional shortened ramp up time would be this pool's 'kickback' to get those miners to join and stick around since they wouldn't want to then give up their ramp up by leaving and then have to go through the full ramp up to come back

Sitting around pointing at 'math even outs' or 'it ain't as bad as such and such' is the same kind of talk I got when I pointed out some issues with BTCGuild back in their hayday that they sat on their hands for months until I was proved right (totally different issue that you can go look up on these boards if anyone cares)

Anyone can do the math and see how much less you are getting paid when the blocks per month go to single digits.  It helps everyone, and especially you, to get that number back up to 20 or so expected per month