bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 03:38:59 PM |
|
I'm running a script that cycles through different algos on YAAMP so that in theory the pool gets me to mine the most profitable using "-p x11,x13,x14,x15,quark,lyra2"
Does that actually grant you higher payouts at the end of the day? I'd imagine constant switching is just lagging behind what was profitable. And the more people use a script like it the worse it gets. Edit: CPU validation errors are still there with v4. <--- look at my stats, I'm a newbie. This is the 1st day. I will try single algos and see what difference I get, my wallet is not synced yet. I'd assume that the pool calculates what profitable and switches you to it. At the moment its X14 (alipaycoin) and quark (a mixture) no idea they really are the best, though I see many more people are on X11, going to try a few different things over the next few days and see what happens. Sorry, welcome and good luck! Feel free to pm me if you need help.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
hefty
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 03:41:17 PM |
|
hi, can anyone help me with crashing driver only with 970 gtx gpus while mining with ccminer all realases, tried all 3 different drivers on win 8.1 gpus are not overclocked and temps are great, they are working fine while stress testing or gaming. 5xx and 6xx and 7xx series working fine with tsiv/tpruvot older miners and 770gtx works fine with sp releases only 970 gtx are crashing randomly sometimes 4 times in one hour and sometimes once in a 4 hour etc, is that normal, i tried reinstalling everything milion times but have no luck pls help i am mining mjollnir and i tried all releases from 1.5.1 upwards to sp 32 ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
|
jadefalke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1014
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 04:13:56 PM |
|
what are the typical hashing speeds for the Spreadcoin Algo for 750, 960, 970 and 980?
|
|
|
|
jpouza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1119
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 04:22:49 PM |
|
what are the typical hashing speeds for the Spreadcoin Algo for 750, 960, 970 and 980?
Considering all cards slightly overclocked with tsiv´s 0.1r2 miner: 750Ti: 1,7MH/s 960GTX: never tested, I believe it´s about 2x750Ti = 3,0-3,4MH/s 970GTX: 4,0MH/s 980GTX: 5,3 MH/s Cheers
|
|
|
|
frazier34567
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 04:44:51 PM |
|
Are any of you guys running the new miner on Windows 8.1?
Yes. I get this error when I try to run it: 0xc000007b Did you ever encounter anything as such? Need Cudart32_65.dll file in that folder or installing cuda 6.5 sdk on your system. Thanks for the response. Yea I have that in the same folder, when I run tsiv's miner, it runs fine, but with sp's, I get this error. This is all the dll I have in that folder cudart32_65.dll msvcr120.dll pthreadVC2.dll Maybe it is another one of them??? Just guessing
|
|
|
|
jadefalke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1014
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 07:23:24 PM |
|
what are the typical hashing speeds for the Spreadcoin Algo for 750, 960, 970 and 980?
Considering all cards slightly overclocked with tsiv´s 0.1r2 miner: 750Ti: 1,7MH/s 960GTX: never tested, I believe it´s about 2x750Ti = 3,0-3,4MH/s 970GTX: 4,0MH/s 980GTX: 5,3 MH/s Cheers Thanks for that!
|
|
|
|
jpouza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1119
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 09:45:16 PM |
|
sp_, release 4 still broken, hash problems.
|
|
|
|
frazier34567
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 09:48:24 PM |
|
-X factor on 750 ti test from 1 to 25 (26 is out of memory)
My Rig
6 EVGA 750 Ti SC cards -No overclock -no memory overclock -no bios mod -no extra power plug Windows 8.1 Pro Nvidia 347.25 Driver Spreadminer4
I did a comparison of -x 1 to 25 for about 2 minutes and looked at the high and low and eyeball average (No measurement taken) Got me down to testing 6 settings Base (No -x) 1738 -x 5 1739 -x 10 1732 -x 15 1737 -x 20 1742 -x 21 1739
Did a timed test of 2 minutes (Throwing out the start up hash rates, first 6 readings at sub 1600 Kh/s speeds). Used Excel to get average numbers below. Base (No -x) 1730 -x 5 1731 -x 10 1737 -x 15 1739 -x 20 1738 -x 21 1730
So I removed -x21 because why push the card that hard if it does not give good results.
I did a 5 minute test then, again throwing out the startup hashes below 1600 Kh/s. (See if heat slowdown would be an issue.) Used Excel to get average numbers below. Base (No -x) 1726.54 -x 5 1728.48 -x 10 1732.68 -x 15 1737.46 -x 20 1736.99
So the winner for my Rig is -x 15
Here is all of the results from first test. It surprised me how well -x 5 did
Min Max Eyeball Avg Base 1697 1750 1738 -x 1 1380 1470 1450 -x 2 1504 1576 1553 -x 3 1549 1595 1572 -x 4 1549 1593 1578 -x 5 1699 1755 1739 -x 6 1671 1718 1692 -x 7 1545 1602 1586 -x 8 1702 1750 1724 -x 9 1629 1691 1668 -x 10 1689 1755 1732 -x 11 1680 1737 1710 -x 12 1678 1735 1707 -x 13 1673 1722 1700 -x 14 1577 1709 1684 -x 15 1705 1755 1737 -x 16 1690 1745 1720 -x 17 1687 1733 1720 -x 18 1681 1731 1702 -x 19 1676 1722 1716 -x 20 1707 1761 1742 -x 21 1699 1750 1739 -x 22 1694 1749 1726 -x 23 1692 1743 1721 -x 24 1241 1727 1589 -x 25 650 1758 1400 -x 26 Out of Memory Crash
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 10:24:24 PM |
|
sp_, release 4 still broken, hash problems.
Try to run it for a while in benchmark mode( -benchmark). Do you get any "does not validate on the cpu?"
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 10:25:55 PM |
|
what are the typical hashing speeds for the Spreadcoin Algo for 750, 960, 970 and 980?
Considering all cards slightly overclocked with tsiv´s 0.1r2 miner: 750Ti: 1,7MH/s 960GTX: never tested, I believe it´s about 2x750Ti = 3,0-3,4MH/s 970GTX: 4,0MH/s 980GTX: 5,3 MH/s Cheers Release 4 is around 2640 khash on a reference 960. Standard clocked.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 10:31:35 PM Last edit: January 28, 2015, 11:09:25 PM by sp_ |
|
I did a comparison of -x 1 to 25 for about 2 minutes and looked at the high and low and eyeball average (No measurement taken) Got me down to testing 6 settings Base (No -x) 1738 -x 5 1739 -x 10 1732 -x 15 1737 -x 20 1742 -x 21 1739
Tnx for testing. 750ti cards do good with multiple of 5. 980 and 960 with multiple of 8 And 970 with multiple of 13. Default in release 4 is : 750ti: 5 970: 13 980/960: 16
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 10:44:18 PM |
|
#3: editedThanks for testing. Seems to be an error in the test for this nounce value 0xffffffff. I think i need to change the test. This will not reduce the speed of the miner. The miner should find blocks now, but if you get invalid nounces except 0xffffffff then the hashspeed is broken.
|
|
|
|
frazier34567
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 11:05:56 PM |
|
Yes I get the FFFFFFF one when I was doing my tests. I assumed because of all the FFFFFF each time it was not a valid solution.
(Sorry if my FFFFFFF are not the right number of F.)
|
|
|
|
AliMan
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2015, 11:57:14 PM Last edit: January 29, 2015, 05:51:51 AM by AliMan |
|
Are any of you guys running the new miner on Windows 8.1?
Yes. I get this error when I try to run it: 0xc000007b Did you ever encounter anything as such? Need Cudart32_65.dll file in that folder or installing cuda 6.5 sdk on your system. Thanks for the response. Yea I have that in the same folder, when I run tsiv's miner, it runs fine, but with sp's, I get this error. This is all the dll I have in that folder cudart32_65.dll msvcr120.dll pthreadVC2.dll Maybe it is another one of them??? Just guessing That was it buddy, I was missing the msvcr120.dll Thanks man! Edit: Dam, it ran at first, but now it's saying not recognized as an external internal command.
|
|
|
|
jpouza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1119
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 29, 2015, 12:49:05 AM |
|
sp_, release 4 still broken, hash problems.
Try to run it for a while in benchmark mode( -benchmark). Do you get any "does not validate on the cpu?" When running/mining normal it gets a lot of this message...zero blocks..
|
|
|
|
jjjordan
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 29, 2015, 06:06:56 PM |
|
Yes I get the FFFFFFF one when I was doing my tests. I assumed because of all the FFFFFF each time it was not a valid solution.
(Sorry if my FFFFFFF are not the right number of F.)
With v.4 I don't get the strings with the zeros but only the FFFFF... message every now and then... found a solution, nonce #FFFFFFFF result for nonce #FFFFFFFF does not validate on CPU! (that is not copy/paste - I typed it )
|
|
|
|
frazier34567
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 29, 2015, 06:49:28 PM |
|
Yes I get the FFFFFFF one when I was doing my tests. I assumed because of all the FFFFFF each time it was not a valid solution.
(Sorry if my FFFFFFF are not the right number of F.)
With v.4 I don't get the strings with the zeros but only the FFFFF... message every now and then... found a solution, nonce #FFFFFFFF result for nonce #FFFFFFFF does not validate on CPU! (that is not copy/paste - I typed it ) Since I finished my testing yesterday on my 7x750 ti cards I have mined 4 blocks, with SpreadminerV4 at -x 15. Averaging 1736.42 Kh/s over the past 2:20:48.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 29, 2015, 09:57:26 PM |
|
I will test some more this weekend on 960,970,980 cards. Then I will add some parallization and reach 2 MHASH on the 750ti.
My private x11 miner is now peaking at 13 MHASH on the 980.
|
|
|
|
Dotcommie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 29, 2015, 11:58:17 PM |
|
Yes I get the FFFFFFF one when I was doing my tests. I assumed because of all the FFFFFF each time it was not a valid solution.
(Sorry if my FFFFFFF are not the right number of F.)
With v.4 I don't get the strings with the zeros but only the FFFFF... message every now and then... found a solution, nonce #FFFFFFFF result for nonce #FFFFFFFF does not validate on CPU! (that is not copy/paste - I typed it ) Yeah I got a lot of those as well but it appears to at least be working now since I saw a few yays in between all that. Previous builds I don't think I got more than 1 or 2 valid.
|
|
|
|
jpouza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1119
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 30, 2015, 12:18:08 PM |
|
I will test some more this weekend on 960,970,980 cards. Then I will add some parallization and reach 2 MHASH on the 750ti.
My private x11 miner is now peaking at 13 MHASH on the 980.
sp_, what about spreadx11 miner release 5, when it will be released? Release 4 isn´t working with my 980s and 970 cards (broken hash - does not validate on CPU). Cheers
|
|
|
|
|