See if I can post it tomorrow...but Scrypt-Jane:15 I get 1.24 mh per 750ti if that's any help for now.
Unfortunately that doesn't help, as I really don't recall Scrypt-Jane:15 performance on the 750ti at all (and neither can I test it). All of my performance & test references are on Scrypt-Jane:16 specifically. Thanks for posting though!
0.38 khash (750ti 2GB, win 7)
but only 1.05 GB vram is in use ...
I'm particularly curious about Vista, as memory management differences might explain better performance on that one.
[...] So a 750ti with 2 GB is hashing as fast as a 750ti 4 GB at scrypt-n (chacha) algos.
(970 4 GB allocates a max of 2.1 GB, above that = performance drop) [...]
I find that statement to be true for Windows (7 & 8, still dunno about Vista), but not for Linux. On Linux, you can use different launch settings for the 4GB cards and much better performance can be achieved. My 980's run fastest with about 3.4 GB of VRAM allocated, but only on Linux. Might relate to the memory backoff settings discussed up-thread.
device_backoff = is_windows() ? 12 : 2;Windows backoff 12%, non-Windows backoff 2%
device_backoff = is_windows() ? 1 : 2;Windows backoff 1%, non-Windows backoff 2%
I suppose this is the change. Have not done this modification myself before though.