Fuzzbawls
|
 |
June 30, 2015, 08:52:25 PM |
|
the interactive option also is made for that... i guess interactive should be checked instead of is_windows()
Would love to see this change made! I was getting quite frustrated with mining scrypt-jane and the card not allocating anywhere near the amount of memory it could have (not running a display off the card).
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
 |
June 30, 2015, 09:04:04 PM |
|
Concerning the cards with more than 2GB, I think there is also some limitation in the driver layer (WDDM), 2.3GB or thereabouts is the maximum that Windows can use with regular display drivers. FWIW, I know the maximum VRAM I've used in Linux is about 3.7GB per card. Windows 10 might be finally addressing this though (eventually): GPU virtual memory in WDDM 2.0
|
|
|
|
Grim
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 07:03:09 AM |
|
Concerning the cards with more than 2GB, I think there is also some limitation in the driver layer (WDDM), 2.3GB or thereabouts is the maximum that Windows can use with regular display drivers. FWIW, I know the maximum VRAM I've used in Linux is about 3.7GB per card. Windows 10 might be finally addressing this though (eventually): GPU virtual memory in WDDM 2.0What is your hashrate in linux with scrypt-n?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 07:21:53 AM Last edit: July 01, 2015, 07:33:04 AM by sp_ |
|
Upgrading the driver to the latest version is a good idea. NVIDIA fixed some memory allocation bugs. With the older drivers, ccminer sometimes got out of memory even if there where alot of free memory on the cards. Restarting the miner helped, but the crashes seamed to be random.
Windows 7 seems to be bether in allocating big blocks of memory on the gpu. In windows 8 there is some kind of restriction.. I have problems with the cryptonight miner to run with optimal settings.
On windows:
Since all my builds are 32 bit (faster hashing) you might want to increase the allowed memory in the application from 2gb to 3gb with this command:
editbin /LARGEADDRESSAWARE ccminer.exe
I will modify the project file tonight so that this flag is set automaticly in all future builds.
|
|
|
|
Slava_K
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 07:59:52 AM |
|
OK. Then i download and test on win 10...
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1024
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 08:30:03 AM |
|
Upgrading the driver to the latest version is a good idea. NVIDIA fixed some memory allocation bugs. With the older drivers, ccminer sometimes got out of memory even if there where alot of free memory on the cards. Restarting the miner helped, but the crashes seamed to be random.
Windows 7 seems to be bether in allocating big blocks of memory on the gpu. In windows 8 there is some kind of restriction.. I have problems with the cryptonight miner to run with optimal settings.
On windows:
Since all my builds are 32 bit (faster hashing) you might want to increase the allowed memory in the application from 2gb to 3gb with this command:
editbin /LARGEADDRESSAWARE ccminer.exe
I will modify the project file tonight so that this flag is set automaticly in all future builds.
I don't recall Claymore running into this, you may want to talk to him. He might have a idea of how to get around it or figure it out, unless this is a Nvidia only issue.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
SS2006
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 08:50:57 AM |
|
I used to be able to get over 10000 KH and intensity 21 on a GTX 980 the latest version crashed at intensity 21 and at 20 it can't go over 9000
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 08:54:43 AM |
|
I assume this is x11?
Try with -i 20.9 or -i 20.8 and -g 2
-g 2 (2 threads) will actually increase the intensity by 1 but split the memory allocation into 2 blocks instead of one big block of memory. In windows 8 it seems to be a problem to allocate big chunks of continious gpu memory.
What is the rate when you don't have a -i parameter?
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 09:22:05 AM |
|
Concerning the cards with more than 2GB, I think there is also some limitation in the driver layer (WDDM), 2.3GB or thereabouts is the maximum that Windows can use with regular display drivers. FWIW, I know the maximum VRAM I've used in Linux is about 3.7GB per card. Windows 10 might be finally addressing this though (eventually): GPU virtual memory in WDDM 2.0What is your hashrate in linux with scrypt-n? I've never tested Scrypt-N at all, ever, so I am not familiar with the right settings for this one. If I have a chance I'll run some autotune/benchmarking and let you know.
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 01:25:21 PM |
|
Upgrading the driver to the latest version is a good idea. NVIDIA fixed some memory allocation bugs. With the older drivers, ccminer sometimes got out of memory even if there where alot of free memory on the cards. Restarting the miner helped, but the crashes seamed to be random.
Windows 7 seems to be bether in allocating big blocks of memory on the gpu. In windows 8 there is some kind of restriction.. I have problems with the cryptonight miner to run with optimal settings.
On windows:
Since all my builds are 32 bit (faster hashing) you might want to increase the allowed memory in the application from 2gb to 3gb with this command:
editbin /LARGEADDRESSAWARE ccminer.exe
I will modify the project file tonight so that this flag is set automaticly in all future builds.
This errors out. Says that "editbin" is not recognized as an internal or external command
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks 
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3276
Merit: 1003
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 03:22:01 PM |
|
@tbearhere Can you post your hashrate/card for Scrypt-Jane:16 on Vista? Would be funny to find that Vista matches the performance on Linux (or betters it?), while recent Windows versions all suck!  What does Linux do with the 750ti ?
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 03:53:10 PM |
|
No clue tbearhere, I've only got the 980. Will send you a PM for more off-topic followup.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1093
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 04:03:25 PM |
|
@tbearhere Can you post your hashrate/card for Scrypt-Jane:16 on Vista? Would be funny to find that Vista matches the performance on Linux (or betters it?), while recent Windows versions all suck!  What does Linux do with the 750ti ? let me know what settings need to be run in order to test this - and i shall do a 15minutes test tomorrow for you if you like ... it will be with the latest git clone ... on nicehash using sp's donation link ... fedora 20 x64 ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 06:21:36 PM |
|
Submitted another speedup in quark. More is comming. I will improve the bandwidth of the hashes since half of the buffers are not used. Then the intensity can be increased..
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1798
Merit: 1028
|
 |
July 01, 2015, 10:41:14 PM |
|
Submitted another speedup in quark. More is comming. I will improve the bandwidth of the hashes since half of the buffers are not used. Then the intensity can be increased..
UNUSED BUFFERS-- Do unused buffers have anything to do with the poor performance of GTX 960/970 relative to GTX 750ti on Lyra2? Or is it the memory controller? Or both? My 4GB GTX 960 is slower than a 2GB 750ti mining Lyra2, and it just indicates improper coding to match the card's capacity. Both cards are on a Win 7 x64 system. DJM34, don't be afraid to chime in, you are the code master of Lyra2. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
July 02, 2015, 09:16:11 AM Last edit: July 02, 2015, 09:33:59 AM by sp_ |
|
Yes, the code needs to be changed in order to get a boost. The problem of the lyra algorithm is that it is memory hard, buffers are bigger than the level1 cache of the gpu, so the program constantly fetch memory to the cache. DJM has made a private version wich does 3.2MHASH on the 780ti. He has recoded everything. The sp-mod is at least doing bether than the new Furyx (here is a 100$ 1 gb NVIDIA 750 card with overclocking and a modded bios). Powerusage 40 watt  AMD furyx lyra hashrates. (source cryptomining blog) – Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS – Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
July 02, 2015, 11:05:26 AM |
|
Submitted another speedup in quark. More is comming. I will improve the bandwidth of the hashes since half of the buffers are not used. Then the intensity can be increased..
UNUSED BUFFERS-- Do unused buffers have anything to do with the poor performance of GTX 960/970 relative to GTX 750ti on Lyra2? Or is it the memory controller? Or both? My 4GB GTX 960 is slower than a 2GB 750ti mining Lyra2, and it just indicates improper coding to match the card's capacity. Both cards are on a Win 7 x64 system. DJM34, don't be afraid to chime in, you are the code master of Lyra2. --scryptr being in discussion with vtc team, can't really say anything  some progress on neoscrypt: ~850kH/s on gtx980 ~500kh/s on gtx780ti 201kh/s on gtx750
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
July 02, 2015, 11:38:11 AM |
|
being in discussion with vtc team, can't really say anything  Even with a kernal that does 3MHASH@lyra2re on the gtx 980, mining quark@19MHASH is 230% more profitable with the current rates.
|
|
|
|
AliMan
|
 |
July 02, 2015, 12:06:07 PM |
|
Speaking of quark, thought I'd mention that the fastest is still just release 51 for 970/980's. With 3 970's and 2 980's, I'm getting 92.6-93 mh/s compared to a max of 92.5 mh/s on the newer releases.
|
|
|
|
|