|
fenomenhaa
|
 |
May 12, 2015, 09:55:03 AM |
|
İ have some problems with realese 50, cc miner crashes and many rejects. Realese 48 still best for my rigs..
|
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 12, 2015, 09:58:28 AM |
|
wich algos are you mining?
|
|
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
|
May 12, 2015, 10:49:55 AM |
|
wich algos are you mining?
@Sp, Quark... |
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97 |
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
May 12, 2015, 10:55:48 AM |
|
This is a deviation from the Stratum specification and should be fixed poolside - diff changes are to be enforced on the next work message sent where the cleanjobs parameter is true.
Pools don't always follow protocol. Then they can get fucked. hehehe ... that fixes that ...  ... #crysx Well, hardly a point in having standards and protocols if a big pool will just decide to blow them off and become incompatible with miners - this is what the protocol is designed to prevent. I honestly think we need a new protocol, but working with what we have now is a must for interoperability. totally agree wolf ... i come from a corporate background - and let me tell you - THOSE guys dont move unless its completely and absolutely IN LINE with their 'protocols' ... the unfortunate thing is - that there are absolutely no restrictions ( on pools or miners alike ) that bar any deviation from the 'standards' that are required for full interoperability between pools and miners ... #crysx |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
May 12, 2015, 10:56:38 AM |
|
wich algos are you mining?
@Sp, Quark... what are the parameters you are using? ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
|
May 12, 2015, 11:06:00 AM |
|
wich algos are you mining?
@Sp, Quark... what are the parameters you are using? ... #crysx Just add i 22.5, it 's also same with default(without) parameters. |
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97 |
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 12, 2015, 11:19:45 AM |
|
Just add i 22.5, it 's also same with default(without) parameters.
Could be to high intensity. The optimal intensity will vary from build to build. try to reduce to 22.4 and downward or use the default intensity. the default@quark is 22 for the 750ti. and 23 for 960/970/980 |
|
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
|
May 12, 2015, 11:30:50 AM |
|
Just add i 22.5, it 's also same with default(without) parameters.
Could be to high intensity. The optimal intensity will vary from build to build. try to reduce to 22.4 and downward or use the default intensity. the default@quark is 22 for the 750ti. and 23 for 960/970/980 i knew that, still have errors with default parameters,included i 22, Rigs rocksolid with relaise 48,150+hours stable(with i 22.5 gives highest hash)... |
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97 |
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 12, 2015, 12:19:29 PM |
|
Just add i 22.5, it 's also same with default(without) parameters.
Could be to high intensity. The optimal intensity will vary from build to build. try to reduce to 22.4 and downward or use the default intensity. the default@quark is 22 for the 750ti. and 23 for 960/970/980 i knew that, still have errors with default parameters,included i 22, Rigs rocksolid with relaise 48,150+hours stable(with i 22.5 gives highest hash)... Linux or windows? |
|
|
|
|
Slava_K
|
|
May 12, 2015, 01:06:37 PM |
|
Just add i 22.5, it 's also same with default(without) parameters.
Could be to high intensity. The optimal intensity will vary from build to build. try to reduce to 22.4 and downward or use the default intensity. the default@quark is 22 for the 750ti. and 23 for 960/970/980 i knew that, still have errors with default parameters,included i 22, Rigs rocksolid with relaise 48,150+hours stable(with i 22.5 gives highest hash)... Linux or windows? The bandwidth of the Internet? what time on pc? |
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 12, 2015, 01:18:50 PM |
|
This is a deviation from the Stratum specification and should be fixed poolside - diff changes are to be enforced on the next work message sent where the cleanjobs parameter is true.
The Pools doesn't always follow protocol. Then they can get fucked. Fuck the pools. Solomine to avoid fluctation. |
|
|
|
|
CapnBDL
|
|
May 12, 2015, 02:00:54 PM |
|
hehehe...Guys...too funny, but true.
Now that ccminer is supposed to report a little truer hashrate, what kind of speed is everyone getting for a single 750Ti mining quark? Not that important...just curious. I show around 6.3+Mgh miner side. Also, I'm using MinerControl (finally) and want to know if the version of ccminer that comes with it has been changed just for that program or is it 'stock'?
Thank you
GREAT job sp and friends!!
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
May 12, 2015, 02:29:14 PM |
|
hehehe...Guys...too funny, but true.
Now that ccminer is supposed to report a little truer hashrate, what kind of speed is everyone getting for a single 750Ti mining quark? Not that important...just curious. I show around 6.3+Mgh miner side. Also, I'm using MinerControl (finally) and want to know if the version of ccminer that comes with it has been changed just for that program or is it 'stock'?
Thank you
GREAT job sp and friends!!
Damn. With 280X doing 11.4MH/s on Quark, it's not quite good enough. Need to up that. ill be in on that wolf ... sgminer with your bins? ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
sambiohazard
|
|
May 12, 2015, 02:31:57 PM |
|
hehehe...Guys...too funny, but true.
Now that ccminer is supposed to report a little truer hashrate, what kind of speed is everyone getting for a single 750Ti mining quark? Not that important...just curious. I show around 6.3+Mgh miner side. Also, I'm using MinerControl (finally) and want to know if the version of ccminer that comes with it has been changed just for that program or is it 'stock'?
Thank you
GREAT job sp and friends!!
I am only getting 5.5 MH/s on quark 750ti, although it is w/o 6-pin. Also hash rate is low while CPU is in use. I get 5.7 Mh/s while CPU is idle 5.5 Mh/s while mining with 1 core on CPU(25% load) 5.3 Mh/s while mining with 2 cores of CPU(50% load) Although i am not using any switches to enhance rates. Just vanilla config of algo, user:pass, pool url. |
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
May 12, 2015, 02:39:25 PM |
|
hehehe...Guys...too funny, but true.
Now that ccminer is supposed to report a little truer hashrate, what kind of speed is everyone getting for a single 750Ti mining quark? Not that important...just curious. I show around 6.3+Mgh miner side. Also, I'm using MinerControl (finally) and want to know if the version of ccminer that comes with it has been changed just for that program or is it 'stock'?
Thank you
GREAT job sp and friends!!
Damn. With 280X doing 11.4MH/s on Quark, it's not quite good enough. Need to up that. ill be in on that wolf ... sgminer with your bins? ... #crysx Yeah, but sadly, it's a modified SGMiner, so I can't distribute the binary like normal - I'd have to open source my modifications to the SGMiner base, although not the OpenCL. damn ... is there anything that can be done privately? ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
CapnBDL
|
|
May 12, 2015, 02:40:14 PM |
|
Thanks sambiohazard. I wanted to know how I was doing. Not sure what a 6pin is? I have this one OCed and am using the switches. Guess I'm running good. I do get 6.4 but, once in a while, it crashes the driver. Pretty cool tho, MinerControl keeps going. Of course, you only mine at ~1/5th of the hash.
Thanks again
edit; musta missed something. Don't think those last 2 posts were meant for me. I don't think...
|
|
|
|
|
sambiohazard
|
|
May 12, 2015, 02:48:42 PM |
|
Thanks sambiohazard. I wanted to know how I was doing. Not sure what a 6pin is? I have this one OCed and am using the switches. Guess I'm running good. I do get 6.4 but, once in a while, it crashes the driver. Pretty cool tho, MinerControl keeps going. Of course, you only mine at ~1/5th of the hash.
Thanks again
edit; musta missed something. Don't think those last 2 posts were meant for me. I don't think...
by 6 pin i meant the PCIe power connector that feeds additional power to the card, w/o it & with stock BIOS my card only uses 45W and is throttled after that. So i get low hashrate. Although i am fine with it. I guess with high temps i wouldn't want to push cards too much. hash/watt remain good. |
|
|
|
|
|
CapnBDL
|
|
May 12, 2015, 02:52:57 PM |
|
Thanks sambiohazard. I wanted to know how I was doing. Not sure what a 6pin is? I have this one OCed and am using the switches. Guess I'm running good. I do get 6.4 but, once in a while, it crashes the driver. Pretty cool tho, MinerControl keeps going. Of course, you only mine at ~1/5th of the hash.
Thanks again
edit; musta missed something. Don't think those last 2 posts were meant for me. I don't think...
by 6 pin i meant the PCIe power connector that feeds additional power to the card, w/o it & with stock BIOS my card only uses 45W and is throttled after that. So i get low hashrate. Although i am fine with it. I guess with high temps i wouldn't want to push cards too much. hash/watt remain good. OK...gottcha. I do use that, otherwise everything is stock. edit; heck...my bios is hard-coded so I can't change any voltages anyway. Highest bios allows is 1143mV. |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
May 12, 2015, 02:55:53 PM |
|
hehehe...Guys...too funny, but true.
Now that ccminer is supposed to report a little truer hashrate, what kind of speed is everyone getting for a single 750Ti mining quark? Not that important...just curious. I show around 6.3+Mgh miner side. Also, I'm using MinerControl (finally) and want to know if the version of ccminer that comes with it has been changed just for that program or is it 'stock'?
Thank you
GREAT job sp and friends!!
Damn. With 280X doing 11.4MH/s on Quark, it's not quite good enough. Need to up that. ill be in on that wolf ... sgminer with your bins? ... #crysx Yeah, but sadly, it's a modified SGMiner, so I can't distribute the binary like normal - I'd have to open source my modifications to the SGMiner base, although not the OpenCL. damn ... is there anything that can be done privately? ... #crysx Sure, as long as it's not distributed without source. I'm considering using my totally rewritten OpenCL with my own full-custom miner - algorithms can be imported VERY easily now. i think there is enough evidence that if we do a deal - its adhered to emphatically wolf ... no leaks from this end ... ever ... i have 16 gigabyte 280x oc cards left in the farm at the moment - and they cannot mine quark with any decent hash ... so if your miner can be used for them - they can be used for you ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
