CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

The DGB price is also dropping. down 35% today.

http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/digibyte/

[sp_]

@sp_, I don't see Digibyte on your coinspool. It shows up as Trinity.

Yes. Trinity is another coin wich use the my-gr algo.

[sp_]

@sp_, I don't see Digibyte on your coinspool. It shows up as Trinity.

MYR-GR ALGO--
I was able to set-up and solo-mine DigiByte (DGB) coin.  My 750ti cards got 15Mh/s, my 960 cards got 30Mh/s, and my 270 cards got 45Mh/s.  I spent a few hours on it, but DGB is a high difficulty coin, and the value dropped rapidly as I mined.  I didn't hit a bllock.  It is difficult to find the network hash rate for DGB on each algo, too.       --scryptr

You can get the diffs from the wallet though with getmininginfo:
"blocks" : 1299118,
"difficulty_sha256d" : 4866313.40426662,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 334.38890218,
"difficulty_groestl" : 723.73364105,
"difficulty_skein" : 4203.55432105,
"difficulty_qubit" : 139.71485676,
But yeah, with that diff you need ~34 Mh/s (myr-gr) to find one block a day and the diff jumps around a lot.

My gtx 970 does:

Skein: 300MHASH
MYR-GR: 47MHASH
Qubit: 10MHASH

With the current difficulty mining my-gr and one gtx 970 you will make around 3012 DGB = $0.8 per day.

Not worth it..

[tbearhere]

I have uploaded the official binary now. release 71

Thx sp...will test it on my new 980ti if I get precision x working with 2 750ti all on the same rig.  

My first 980ti ..... and that is with release 71 not 69. Nice increase sp.

[tbearhere]

@sp_, I don't see Digibyte on your coinspool. It shows up as Trinity.

MYR-GR ALGO--
I was able to set-up and solo-mine DigiByte (DGB) coin.  My 750ti cards got 15Mh/s, my 960 cards got 30Mh/s, and my 270 cards got 45Mh/s.  I spent a few hours on it, but DGB is a high difficulty coin, and the value dropped rapidly as I mined.  I didn't hit a bllock.  It is difficult to find the network hash rate for DGB on each algo, too.       --scryptr

You can get the diffs from the wallet though with getmininginfo:
"blocks" : 1299118,
"difficulty_sha256d" : 4866313.40426662,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 334.38890218,
"difficulty_groestl" : 723.73364105,
"difficulty_skein" : 4203.55432105,
"difficulty_qubit" : 139.71485676,
But yeah, with that diff you need ~34 Mh/s (myr-gr) to find one block a day and the diff jumps around a lot.

My gtx 970 does:

Skein: 300MHASH
MYR-GR: 47MHASH
Qubit: 10MHASH

With the current difficulty mining my-gr and one gtx 970 you will make around 3012 DGB = $0.8 per day.

Not worth it..

Yes I checked it out...not worth it...every algo down....we're almost mining air.

[sp_]

Difficult to ROI with the 980ti when you know that pascal is comming in q1 2016 with 16 times the speed of the Maxwell. (16nm)

[tbearhere]

Difficult to ROI with the 980ti when you know that pascal is comming in q1 2016 with 16 times the speed of the Maxwell. (16nm)

Yes I know ... that's one reason I have only one with the btc I made.
And when pascal comes out...it will be the end of the crypto coins.
And I have invested every btc I made back into mining equipment. 1.8 yrs and what I got, starting out with a 640 gtx, was 12 750ti's and one 980ti. 

[sp_]

Difficult to ROI with the 980ti when you know that pascal is comming in q1 2016 with 16 times the speed of the Maxwell. (16nm)

Yes I know ... that's one reason I have only one with the btc I made.
And when pascal comes out...it will be the end of the crypto coins.

No It will be another Pascal sp-mod.

[tbearhere]

Difficult to ROI with the 980ti when you know that pascal is comming in q1 2016 with 16 times the speed of the Maxwell. (16nm)

Yes I know ... that's one reason I have only one with the btc I made.
And when pascal comes out...it will be the end of the crypto coins.

No It will be another Pascal sp-mod.

Yes.   But the private mining farms with pascal at full implementation will make a killing.  
But then again they may have so much hashing power they may go after Bitcoin directly. Like I say...  It's all a question of balance.
EDIT: I got that 980ti 2 months ago...just got the card hashing 2 days ago.

[pallas]

Difficult to ROI with the 980ti when you know that pascal is comming in q1 2016 with 16 times the speed of the Maxwell. (16nm)

Yes I know ... that's one reason I have only one with the btc I made.
And when pascal comes out...it will be the end of the crypto coins.

No It will be another Pascal sp-mod.

Yes.   But the private mining farms with pascal at full implementation will make a killing.  
But then again they may have so much hashing power they may go after Bitcoin directly. Like I say...  It's all a question of balance.

switching to a new architecture is easier for small miners than big farms.

[sp_]

Difficult to ROI with the 980ti when you know that pascal is comming in q1 2016 with 16 times the speed of the Maxwell. (16nm)

Yes I know ... that's one reason I have only one with the btc I made.
And when pascal comes out...it will be the end of the crypto coins.

No It will be another Pascal sp-mod.

Yes.   But the private mining farms with pascal at full implementation will make a killing.  
But then again they may have so much hashing power they may go after Bitcoin directly. Like I say...  It's all a question of balance.

switching to a new architecture is easier for small miners than big farms.

I was thinking scrypt (litecoin) with a bigger cache the nfactor buffer might fit in the shared mem, and then we could get ASIC speed's with gpu's again. Pascal seems to come with 16GB 3d Ram. Interesting..

With 3d adressmodes the electric signal will travel less distance and increase the clockspeeds.

[tbearhere]

Difficult to ROI with the 980ti when you know that pascal is comming in q1 2016 with 16 times the speed of the Maxwell. (16nm)

Yes I know ... that's one reason I have only one with the btc I made.
And when pascal comes out...it will be the end of the crypto coins.
And I have invested every btc I made back into mining equipment. 1.8 yrs and what I got, starting out with a 640 gtx, was 12 750ti's and one 980ti.   

No It will be another Pascal sp-mod.

Yes.   But the private mining farms with pascal at full implementation will make a killing.  
But then again they may have so much hashing power they may go after Bitcoin directly. Like I say...  It's all a question of balance.

switching to a new architecture is easier for small miners than big farms.

I was thinking scrypt (litecoin) with a bigger cache the nfactor buffer might fit in the shared mem, and then we could get ASIC speed's with gpu's again. Pascal seems to come with 16GB 3d Ram. Interesting..

With 3d adressmodes the electric signal will travel less distance and increase the clockspeeds.

There you go.... Its all a question of balance.  

[tbearhere]

Anybody what's the best miner control for nicehash only.  thx

[serg_25]

Hi, guys i have an issue with second card overclocking.
command works good for gpu:0

Code:

nvidia-settings -a "[gpu:0]/GPUGraphicsClockOffset[1]=125"

and in response i can see something like "new parameter accepted"  (don't remember exactly)
but if i run for my second gpu:1

Code:

nvidia-settings -a "[gpu:1]/GPUGraphicsClockOffset[1]=125"

it will be just empty result.

I use next configs: /etc/X11/xorg.conf

Code:

Section "Device"
    Identifier     "Device0"
    Driver         "nvidia"
    VendorName     "NVIDIA Corporation"
    Option         "Coolbits" "12"
    BusID          "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection

Section "Device"
    Identifier     "Device1"
    Driver         "nvidia"
    VendorName     "NVIDIA Corporation"
    Option         "Coolbits" "12"
    BusID          "PCI:5:0:0"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
    Identifier     "Screen0"
    Device         "Device0"
    Monitor        "Monitor0"
    DefaultDepth    24
    Option         "Coolbits" "12"
    Option         "AllowEmptyInitialConfiguration" "True"
    SubSection     "Display"
        Depth       24
    EndSubSection
EndSection

Section "Screen"
    Identifier     "Screen1"
    Device         "Device1"
    Monitor        "Monitor1"
    DefaultDepth    24
    Option         "Coolbits" "12"
    Option         "AllowEmptyInitialConfiguration" "True"
    SubSection     "Display"
        Depth       24
    EndSubSection
EndSection

Bus id was checked by command "nvidia-xconfig --query-gpu-info"

Code:

GPU #0:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
  Name      : GeForce GTX 750 Ti                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
  UUID      : GPU-9e8890e0-1157-f92e-067e-827bf1cdfef8                                                                                                                                                                                              
  PCI BusID : PCI:1:0:0    

GPU #1:
  Name      : GeForce GTX 750 Ti
  UUID      : GPU-c1ca6da6-5e0c-22d9-9ef9-3ab94f3048a1
  PCI BusID : PCI:5:0:0

can't find what's wrong.

[bensam1231]

Difficult to ROI with the 980ti when you know that pascal is comming in q1 2016 with 16 times the speed of the Maxwell. (16nm)

16nm is the process size, it doesn't equate to a 16x increase in performance. Just a increase in efficiency.

A die shrink also means it'll also probably show up late and be expensive due to die yield issues. That's the whole reason we're still on 28nm. I'd say Q2, maybe slipping to early Q3.

[tbearhere]

What speeds do you get on GTX 980 Ti and GTX 950 Lyra2REv2?

I get
GTX 980 Ti ... 17.450 khs
GTX 950 ... 5.480 khs

It should be 4x faster than a 750ti.. I get 6.8 mh on 750ti ....30mh on 980ti  that's 4x the hashrate on quark.

Now on Lyra2REv2..750ti I get 4.8mh..on 980ti it should be 21mh...but it's only 16mh... wtf

[sp_]

What speeds do you get on GTX 980 Ti and GTX 950 Lyra2REv2?
I get
GTX 980 Ti ... 17.450 khs
GTX 950 ... 5.480 khs

It should be 4x faster than a 750ti.. I get 6.8 mh on 750ti ....30mh on 980ti  that's 4x the hashrate on quark.
Now on Lyra2REv2..750ti I get 4.8mh..on 980ti it should be 21mh...but it's only 16mh... wtf

You need to make a new kernal that uses the extra power of the 980ti. My modded kernals run best on the 750ti.

What is the powerdraw at 17,5 MHASH?

[tbearhere]

What speeds do you get on GTX 980 Ti and GTX 950 Lyra2REv2?
I get
GTX 980 Ti ... 17.450 khs
GTX 950 ... 5.480 khs

It should be 4x faster than a 750ti.. I get 6.8 mh on 750ti ....30mh on 980ti  that's 4x the hashrate on quark.
Now on Lyra2REv2..750ti I get 4.8mh..on 980ti it should be 21mh...but it's only 16mh... wtf

You need to make a new kernal that uses the extra power of the 980ti. My modded kernals run best on the 750ti.

What is the powerdraw at 17,5 MHASH?

That's r71 and the power draw I don't know and the new precision x 16 won't let me push the memory clock.
I can't make kernels. That's what I paid .5 btc for you to do.

[scryptr]

@sp_, I don't see Digibyte on your coinspool. It shows up as Trinity.

MYR-GR ALGO--
I was able to set-up and solo-mine DigiByte (DGB) coin.  My 750ti cards got 15Mh/s, my 960 cards got 30Mh/s, and my 270 cards got 45Mh/s.  I spent a few hours on it, but DGB is a high difficulty coin, and the value dropped rapidly as I mined.  I didn't hit a bllock.  It is difficult to find the network hash rate for DGB on each algo, too.       --scryptr

You can get the diffs from the wallet though with getmininginfo:
"blocks" : 1299118,
"difficulty_sha256d" : 4866313.40426662,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 334.38890218,
"difficulty_groestl" : 723.73364105,
"difficulty_skein" : 4203.55432105,
"difficulty_qubit" : 139.71485676,
But yeah, with that diff you need ~34 Mh/s (myr-gr) to find one block a day and the diff jumps around a lot.

My gtx 970 does:

Skein: 300MHASH
MYR-GR: 47MHASH
Qubit: 10MHASH

With the current difficulty mining my-gr and one gtx 970 you will make around 3012 DGB = $0.8 per day.

Not worth it..

Yes I checked it out...not worth it...every algo down....we're almost mining air.

MYR-GR BROKEN--

I continued to work with the Myriad-Groestl (myr-gr) algo and can confirm that it is broken.  Mining with release dot 71 at DigiHash.co, the official DigiByte developer's pool, I got about 1.5Mh/s poolside with my GTX 960, while in my console the display read 30.5Mh/s.  I also tried DigiByte's "EasyMiner".  It uses an older version of CCminer, v1.5.24.  It got 26Mh/s poolside and in my console, with fluctuation poolside. I earned 71 DigiBytes (DGB) overnight with my GTX 960 using EasyMiner.

I am now trying to solo-mine Diamond coin (DMD), with Diamond-Groestl (dmd-gr).  There are good solo-mining  instructions on the web for both Diamond coin and DigiByte coin.  My GTX 960 SC gets 16.2Mh/s with +80/240, my 750ti FTW cards get 8Mh/s stock for dmd-gr algo.       --scryptr

[frazier34567]

My 6 EVGA 750 ti SC cards (no bios mod) are running great for 577 days with no problems. I no longer over-clock since I stopped mining VTC and LTC back in the day.  Say 90 days of OC.  The GPU fans run at 61-67% GPU temps are 47-53C  I have a Biostar H81S2 Bitcoin motherboard, and Corsair AX760i Platinum PSU. The 6 cards are running windows 8.1 use a total of 435.3W for the rig (According to the digital PSU).

I get

39400 kH/s on Quark.
28720 kH/s on Lyra2v2
19190 kH/s on X11

They have 3 year warranties.  Granted I will finally break even in about 20 days.  And this rig has 8 GB ram and an i3 processor.  I would recommend going for the Celeron processor, a Gold PSU and 4 GB of RAM to save money (takes about 2.9 GB right now to run the OS and rig).   The only good thing about all of the extras is I can compile new versions of ccminer without slowdowns on mining. 

Well had my first card fail.  Time to RMA it.