chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
December 19, 2015, 12:06:46 AM |
|
But your cards are showing lower numbers than others. I get 2.9-3.1 on most of my cards on the factory clocks. With Overclocking you can reach 3.4-3.5 in the x11 algo. on the 750ti.
what are your numbers on the stock 980ti g1 for x11 and quark? ... 27.5 MHASH in quark stock clocks (release 76) I have the G1 OC card. It did 13MHASH in x11 in an earlier release, but haven't tested the latest build. now those are nice figures ... could you test it in x11 when you have time please? ... im very curious ... #crysx Seems to do 12.8 Mhash at stock clocks(release 74) Cuda 7.5 is down to 12.3mhash tanx sp ... even at those hasrates - it seems its worth the effort with those cards ... they are powerhouses ... could more work be done on the x11 algo? ... i think that those results have made my mind up now ... tanx sp ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 19, 2015, 12:11:43 AM |
|
Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
December 19, 2015, 12:22:12 AM |
|
Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.
well - i think building a nice big gigabyte 980ti g1 system will be a force to be reckoned with - no matter what algo ... but you are right - though i dont have too much of an issue with any algo at the moment ... i will keep you informed as to what is happening on the 980ti front ... ive been in talks - and 'nice' system just may be built in the next week or two ... if it is decided that ccminer-spmod is to be used ( not my decision this time around - as i may be building the machine but not funding it ) - then it will be mining for a whole weekend on one of the algos on your donation links for a whole weekend - with that machine as the dedicated system for that 48hours of mining ... i am quite anxious to see it in action - especially if i can get it done to my specs ... we will see ... and you will be the first to know here if it does go ahead ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 19, 2015, 04:49:17 PM |
|
Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.
4 750ti's draw 260 watts.
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 19, 2015, 04:51:42 PM |
|
What is the algo for the bat file for cryptonight plx......... thx I'll try it on my 980ti. Is it just -a cryptonight ? Never mined that algo before.
I don't know....nobody will answer me
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 19, 2015, 04:56:39 PM |
|
What is the algo for the bat file for cryptonight plx......... thx I'll try it on my 980ti. Is it just -a cryptonight ? Never mined that algo before.
I don't know....nobody will answer me cryptonight is not included in my fork. You need to download the opensource version here: https://github.com/tsiv/ccminer-cryptonight
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 19, 2015, 05:18:47 PM |
|
What is the algo for the bat file for cryptonight plx......... thx I'll try it on my 980ti. Is it just -a cryptonight ? Never mined that algo before.
I don't know....nobody will answer me cryptonight is not included in my fork. You need to download the opensource version here: https://github.com/tsiv/ccminer-cryptonightOk thx sp But I can't compile it.
|
|
|
|
Eliovp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1294
Huh?
|
|
December 19, 2015, 05:52:51 PM Last edit: December 19, 2015, 06:20:35 PM by Eliovp |
|
Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.
4 750ti's draw 260 watts. 4 R9 Nano's draw 400 watt while doing 11Mhz per card!..
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 19, 2015, 06:03:12 PM Last edit: December 20, 2015, 10:33:38 AM by tbearhere |
|
Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.
4 750ti's draw 260 watts. 4 R9 Nano's draw 400 watt while doing 11Mhz.. And 4 750ti do 12.8 mh/s at about 260 watts. And a 980ti does 13.5 mh/s at 310 watts at the wall..so about 240 watts. EDIT Make that 360 watts not 260 watts.
|
|
|
|
Eliovp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1294
Huh?
|
|
December 19, 2015, 06:21:31 PM Last edit: December 19, 2015, 06:39:16 PM by Eliovp |
|
Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.
4 750ti's draw 260 watts. 4 R9 Nano's draw 400 watt while doing 11Mhz.. And 4 750ti do 12.8 mh/s at about 260 watts. And a 980ti does 13.5 mh/s at 310 watts at the wall..so about 240 watts. I edited my post.. it's 11mhz per card. Some extra info. 23,5Mhz @ 60Watt (core down to 850) per card on Ethereum, 25Mhz @ 100watt (stock clock) and 30Mhz @ 200watt (core @ 1100) Don't think Nvidia can beat that ;-) But pricy card none the less..
|
|
|
|
bobben2
|
|
December 19, 2015, 07:35:53 PM |
|
Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.
4 750ti's draw 260 watts. 4 R9 Nano's draw 400 watt while doing 11Mhz.. And 4 750ti do 12.8 mh/s at about 260 watts. And a 980ti does 13.5 mh/s at 310 watts at the wall..so about 240 watts. I edited my post.. it's 11mhz per card. Some extra info. 23,5Mhz @ 60Watt (core down to 850) per card on Ethereum, 25Mhz @ 100watt (stock clock) and 30Mhz @ 200watt (core @ 1100) Don't think Nvidia can beat that ;-) But pricy card none the less.. I have one single 970 card doing 7.3MH/s (X11), system is drawing 200W at the wall, 100W when idle. ccminer 1.5.63 sp-mod. So both in terms of power usage and hashing power it beats 2 750 TIs, at least for X11.
|
Fellow miners, get your thens and thans in order and help other forum readers understand what you are writing. Remember the grammar basics: B larger THAN A (comparator operator). If something THEN ....
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
|
December 19, 2015, 09:13:19 PM Last edit: December 20, 2015, 12:34:23 AM by antantti |
|
I edited my post.. it's 11mhz per card.
Some extra info.
23,5Mhz @ 60Watt (core down to 850) per card on Ethereum, 25Mhz @ 100watt (stock clock) and 30Mhz @ 200watt (core @ 1100)
Don't think Nvidia can beat that ;-)
But pricy card none the less..
Some really nice numbers there... I thought my nvidia 100KH/s@600watts from the wall was good...
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 19, 2015, 11:45:56 PM Last edit: December 20, 2015, 12:45:28 AM by sp_ |
|
I have another cuda 7.5 speedup in the lyra2v2 algo. +5-10% on the gtx 960. Will finetune the code and submit later.
Edit: nice boost on the gtx 950 as well. 5350KHASH on standard clocks Edit: gtx 970,980, 980ti just a small speedup from release 74 (cuda 6.5) edit: gtx 750ti unchanged.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
December 20, 2015, 01:04:15 AM |
|
I have another cuda 7.5 speedup in the lyra2v2 algo. +5-10% on the gtx 960. Will finetune the code and submit later.
Edit: nice boost on the gtx 950 as well. 5350KHASH on standard clocks Edit: gtx 970,980, 980ti just a small speedup from release 74 (cuda 6.5) edit: gtx 750ti unchanged.
sp ... in two weeks ( after christmas ) there will be a 'new' miner placed on your dbm link ... choose an algo ( up to quark ( # 12 on nicehash ) - i have not implemented any further algos ) and i will place it on there ... if spmod75 is released by then - ill compile and place that to mine 48hours ( a weekend ) and see what the results will be while donating to you also ... if the optimizations are all they seem under cuda75 - then we should get a good run if it all comes through and the machine is built in that time frame ... tanx for the awesome work ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 20, 2015, 01:17:55 AM |
|
if the optimizations are all they seem under cuda75 - then we should get a good run if it all comes through and the machine is built in that time frame ... tanx for the awesome work ...
Cuda 7.5 works best on compute 5.2 cards. I just released a new binary. Please test guys. Release 77: my lyra2v2 numbers standard clocks various cards (windows 8.1, latest driver x86 build): gtx 950: 5,350 gtx 960: 6,050 gtx970: 10.000 gtx 980: 11,600 gtx 980ti 15,600
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
December 20, 2015, 01:27:46 AM |
|
if the optimizations are all they seem under cuda75 - then we should get a good run if it all comes through and the machine is built in that time frame ... tanx for the awesome work ...
Cuda 7.5 works best on compute 5.2 cards. I just released a new binary. Please test guys. Release 77: my lyra2v2 numbers standard clocks various cards (windows 8.1, latest driver x86 build): gtx 950: 5,350 gtx 960: 6,050 gtx970: 10.000 gtx 980: 11,600 gtx 980ti 15,600 nice - ill test when i get in to the office and compile ... i didnt realize we were up to ccminer-spmod77 already ... tanx sp ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
December 20, 2015, 03:13:54 AM |
|
Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.
4 750ti's draw 260 watts. 4 R9 Nano's draw 400 watt while doing 11Mhz per card!.. Is that at the wall? My fury draws more than 300 watt, the single card! And it's the same chipset.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
December 20, 2015, 03:33:46 AM |
|
Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.
4 750ti's draw 260 watts. 4 R9 Nano's draw 400 watt while doing 11Mhz per card!.. Is that at the wall? My fury draws more than 300 watt, the single card! And it's the same chipset. yup ... apparently the nano has mixed specs of the fury x and fury - but with a much lower power draw - and a much smaller size mate ... very impressive cards ... but very expensive cards ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
December 20, 2015, 07:02:38 AM |
|
Noboby tested yet? What speeds are you getting in release 77 (lyra2v2) ? Can you compare with release 74 and 76 please. This program is supported by donations. If you want more speead, please donate to my donation adress. A handful of people did it for release 76. Thanks for your support.
|
|
|
|
|