CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[rednoW]

Nice, best model for mining ever. Mine are at 50 C degrees right now...

yeah! Now it is running 300mhs@70%tdp - only 124wat in nvidia smi.
47 degrees @ 70%fan

[tbearhere]

And then network difficulty increased by 20% and it's earning less then Eth without SIA, let alone ETH+SIA.

Yes...just checked network difficulty .... 150,000...wow   

[Amph]

And then network difficulty increased by 20% and it's earning less then Eth without SIA, let alone ETH+SIA.

Yes...just checked network difficulty .... 150,000...wow   

i'm still doing better than etheruem alone, better than eth+ sia maybe not, but consumption in that case will rise by 50% so it's not that far away...

[bensam1231]

And then network difficulty increased by 20% and it's earning less then Eth without SIA, let alone ETH+SIA.

Yes...just checked network difficulty .... 150,000...wow  

i'm still doing better than etheruem alone, better than eth+ sia maybe not, but consumption in that case will rise by 50% so it's not that far away...

You definitely don't have a wattmeter. Even then, you could just look at TDP and it's virtually identical between Eth+Sia and Lbry (about +20%). Considering how little wattage Lbry uses anyway, that's like 10 more watts. It uses less then the original Epsylon miner.Your opinion is woefully uninformed as always.

And no, yesterday Eth earned more then Lbry, let alone Eth+Sia. That you could figure out just by plugging some numbers into Whattomine.

[Amph]

And then network difficulty increased by 20% and it's earning less then Eth without SIA, let alone ETH+SIA.

Yes...just checked network difficulty .... 150,000...wow  

i'm still doing better than etheruem alone, better than eth+ sia maybe not, but consumption in that case will rise by 50% so it's not that far away...

You definitely don't have a wattmeter. Even then, you could just look at TDP and it's virtually identical between Eth+Sia and Lbry. Your opinion is woefully uninformed as always.

And no, yesterday Eth earned more then Lbry, let alone Eth+Sia. That you could figure out just by plugging some numbers into Whattomine.

no i have one and while with lbry i'm consuming 120w per card with eth+sia it's around 150w at least



800w power out for the whole system that is the consumption of the system without counting the lost efficiency(8%) of the psu, and i have 3 noctua fan in it so remove at least 60w for the system if not more

[bensam1231]

That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.

Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.

Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.

[Nikolaj]

That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.

Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.

Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.

indeed. Use a real wattmeter, software measurements are worthless.

[go6ooo1212]

That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.

Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.

Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.

indeed. Use a real wattmeter, software measurements are worthless.

I confirm that statement , also...

[Velgelm]

now LBC mining on my MSI GTX 960 2GB with 1.8.2 open-source version
i reached 104 Mh on 70% TDP and (1450 Mhe core& -501 Mem)

Fan speed 18% (auto controlled) LOL only  59c 

[Amph]

That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.

Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.

Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.

that is 100% accurate i've already done the proof with the wattmeter and it show the same, you don't need a wattmeter anymore in 2016

i already done the test with eth-sia and it is 150w, the fact that you want to trust only what suit your need, speak for itself, yet you did't show any proof of anything, just useless talking

efficiency i know it's apply to everything, it was a way to say what is the actual cosumption of the system, which would be in any case greater with eth-sia, i've already tried it

That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.

Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.

Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.

indeed. Use a real wattmeter, software measurements are worthless.

no you don't know what you are talking about, corsair link is 100% accurate, far from being useless

That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.

Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.

Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.

indeed. Use a real wattmeter, software measurements are worthless.

I confirm that statement , also...

well you are also wrong

[bensam1231]

That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.

Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.

Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.

that is 100% accurate i've already done the proof with the wattmeter, you don't need a wattmeter anymroe in 2016

i already done the test with eth-sia and it is 150w, the fact that you don't trust me about this, it does not matter

efficiency i know it's apply to everything, it was a way to say what is the actual cosumption of the system, which would be in any case greater with eth-sia, i've already tried it

Saying 'proof' is not proof, nor is saying the date as if measuring with a device between a power source and what's consuming it is antiquated. I'm assuming that's power management software for a stupid expensive PSU. As I mentioned before, use a wattmeter. You could also use a multimeter with a clamp, but that's approximate +/-5% depending on how good your multimeter is.

There is a reason we go on card by card basis, because you can try and 'inflate' numbers by skewing stats. No one cares how much your system consumes besides you. One card applies to me, it applies to you, and it applies to the megafarm that has 400 some 1070s.

It doesn't matter if I trust you or not, it does matter if you're wrong and misinforming others.


This is based off of 24hr average difficulty and profitability for a 1070, the energy use isn't accurate.

[giagge]

That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.

Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.

Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.

that is 100% accurate i've already done the proof with the wattmeter, you don't need a wattmeter anymroe in 2016

i already done the test with eth-sia and it is 150w, the fact that you don't trust me about this, it does not matter

efficiency i know it's apply to everything, it was a way to say what is the actual cosumption of the system, which would be in any case greater with eth-sia, i've already tried it

Saying 'proof' is not proof, nor is saying the date as if measuring with a device between a power source and what's consuming it is antiquated. I'm assuming that's power management software for a stupid expensive PSU. As I mentioned before, use a wattmeter. You could also use a multimeter with a clamp, but that's approximate +/-5% depending on how good your multimeter is.

There is a reason we go on card by card basis, because you can try and 'inflate' numbers by skewing stats. No one cares how much your system consumes besides you. One card applies to me, it applies to you, and it applies to the megafarm that has 400 some 1070s.

It doesn't matter if I trust you or not, it does matter if you're wrong and misinforming others.


This is based off of 24hr average difficulty and profitability for a 1070, the energy use isn't accurate.

Man...

Ethereum is not good to mine .

[Amph]

That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.

Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.

Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.

that is 100% accurate i've already done the proof with the wattmeter, you don't need a wattmeter anymroe in 2016

i already done the test with eth-sia and it is 150w, the fact that you don't trust me about this, it does not matter

efficiency i know it's apply to everything, it was a way to say what is the actual cosumption of the system, which would be in any case greater with eth-sia, i've already tried it

Saying 'proof' is not proof, nor is saying the date as if measuring with a device between a power source and what's consuming it is antiquated. I'm assuming that's power management software for a stupid expensive PSU. As I mentioned before, use a wattmeter. You could also use a multimeter with a clamp, but that's approximate +/-5% depending on how good your multimeter is.

There is a reason we go on card by card basis, because you can try and 'inflate' numbers by skewing stats. No one cares how much your system consumes besides you. One card applies to me, it applies to you, and it applies to the megafarm that has 400 some 1070s.

It doesn't matter if I trust you or not, it does matter if you're wrong and misinforming others.


This is based off of 24hr average difficulty and profitability for a 1070, the energy use isn't accurate.

wrong and misinformed about what? i posted a screen that is saying clearly that lbry is consuming less this is a proof, other thing are bullshit

you can not consume less than 150w for eth-sia no matter what you do, stop saying crap like that

i'm now making basically the same amount between eth and lbry, 0.03 per day, and in fact your screen do not prove anything, this is mine



once again you only prove how ridiculous are your claims, and i was right when i said that i was making the same before even putting value on whattomine

[sp_]

Donations have increased after the release of 1.8.2 (around 5% of the lbry net hash is sp-moded)

LBRY Sp-mod #3 vs 1.8.2

Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 950 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 960 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 980 sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 980ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 3gb sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 6gb sp-mod #3 is the fastest
Gtx 1070 same speed
Gtx 1080 sp-mod is the fastest

Sp-mod #4 vs 1.8.2

Gtx 750ti sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 950 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 960 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 980 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 980ti sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 3gb sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1060 6gb sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1070 sp-mod #4 is the fastest
Gtx 1080 sp-mod #4 is the fastest

Salut from paris.

[myagui]

Donations hasve increased after the release of 1.8.2

LBRY Sp-mod #3 vs 1.8.2

Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
[... keyboard stuck ...]

Sp-mod #4 vs 1.8.2

Gtx 750ti sp-mod #3 is the fastest
[... keyboard stuck , and don't you mean #4?...]

Salut from paris.

Is that taking into account the hashrate "lost" to fees? 
Side note: Interesting that so many people seem to be observing something different.

<random> Fromage! </random>

[sp_]

Is that taking into account the hashrate "lost" to fees?  
Side note: Interesting that so many people seem to be observing something different.

Rease #4 is faster on all cards more than 3.3%

Release #5 will hash at 5mhash per watt. On the gtx 1060 (pascal)

[Oakey22]

I am getting average 317 on a 1070. Not using sp version either.

[sp_]

I am getting average 317 on a 1070. Not using sp version either.

But 5% of the LBRY hashers are not using the gtx 1070. I get 322Mhash with sp-mod #3

[antantti]

ROUND 2

1.8.1 vs sp#3 70% 120% tdp, strix 970 vs strix 970, intensity 25, windows 7x64 368.81

Cards are sitting next to each other in that very same rig hashing together. Left with opensource right with sp #3. Same card, same memory, same bios, same asic quality, same default voltage. 1x8-pin power connector.

For this test tdp is set to 120% which means 196 watts which is max what these cards can do without bios mod.

Let's get ready to rumble!



-edit- well it looks like left wasn't steady at 1486 but you get the idea.

Looks like opensource got some steroids so it is time for...

ROUND 3

1.8.2 vs sp#3 120% tdp, 2xstrix 970 vs 2xstrix 970, intensity 25, windows 7x64 368.81

Cards are sitting next to each other in that very same rig hashing together. Left with opensource right with sp #3. Same card, same memory, same bios, same asic quality, same default voltage. 1x8-pin power connector.

For this test tdp is set to 120% which means 196 watts which is max what these cards can do without bios mod.

To the final round!



So who won? I don't know, maybe nethash?

[bensam1231]

That's not a watt meter. Also whats the point of taking a screen shot of only one miner? In order to use that as 'evidence' you'd need to take a screen shot of the same settings mining with Eth+Sia and then one with Lbry and do a side by side.

Most people don't suffer from trying to throw a miner in a case, that's your fault and only applies to you.

Also 'efficiency' applies to everything. If you're trying to throw PSU efficiency in there you probably took a look what I said and are trying to reallllly make what you said work... But you know... 10w more for eth+sia... 8% efficiency... so another .8w for a grand total of 10.8w. Good for you.

that is 100% accurate i've already done the proof with the wattmeter, you don't need a wattmeter anymroe in 2016

i already done the test with eth-sia and it is 150w, the fact that you don't trust me about this, it does not matter

efficiency i know it's apply to everything, it was a way to say what is the actual cosumption of the system, which would be in any case greater with eth-sia, i've already tried it

Saying 'proof' is not proof, nor is saying the date as if measuring with a device between a power source and what's consuming it is antiquated. I'm assuming that's power management software for a stupid expensive PSU. As I mentioned before, use a wattmeter. You could also use a multimeter with a clamp, but that's approximate +/-5% depending on how good your multimeter is.

There is a reason we go on card by card basis, because you can try and 'inflate' numbers by skewing stats. No one cares how much your system consumes besides you. One card applies to me, it applies to you, and it applies to the megafarm that has 400 some 1070s.

It doesn't matter if I trust you or not, it does matter if you're wrong and misinforming others.


This is based off of 24hr average difficulty and profitability for a 1070, the energy use isn't accurate.

wrong and misinformed about what? i posted a screen that is saying clearly that lbry is consuming less this is a proof, other thing are bullshit

you can not consume less than 150w for eth-sia no matter what you do, stop saying crap like that

i'm now making basically the same amount between eth and lbry, 0.03 per day, and in fact your screen do not prove anything, this is mine

once again you only prove how ridiculous are your claims, and i was right when i said that i was making the same before even putting value on whattomine

What proof did you post? What 'is proof'? You post ONE screenshot, showing Lbry usage... You don't post a comparative screenshot showing Eth+SIA mining. How is that proof? You can't compare both unless you have a data point on each side.

And then you posted Whattomine, what is that supposed to mean to me? I have no idea what those numbers are for or supposed to represent. I already said my screenshot is of a 1070. Doing 32Mhs on Ethereum and 270Mh on Lbry. If that's for six 1070s, you typed something in wrong. My 1070s run at 1975Mhz, which is quite obtainable, for Ethereum memory is running +800mhz, also obtainable.

I also didn't say you can consume 150w less on Eth+Sia, I said there is virtually no difference between the two. Read up a bit.