Paul Revere
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 260
The Scamcoats are coming!
|
 |
May 27, 2015, 01:20:52 PM |
|
Bitcoinist LTD. made an unfortunate business decision when we agreed on the domain licensing with GAW Miners LLC, by not following the obvious signs that GAW Miners LLC is in financial trouble. I wonder what was their first clue that GAW is in financial trouble? Maybe that they no longer exist, except as a P.O. box company? Quite the crack team of investigative journalists.  |
All of my posts are simply statements of my own personal opinions based on available information and pondering what might be possible considering human nature, with the goal of finding truth and preventing fraud. Please look at all of the facts and theories and put your thinking cap on to draw your own conclusions. If you feel that I have made a false statement or have been unnecessarily derogatory, I encourage you to please point it out, and if proven correct and/or reasonable I will remedy it. ~ Paul Revere
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
cryptojumper
|
|
May 27, 2015, 01:21:57 PM |
|
Not exactly, buy CON, not XPY. XPY is dead and CON is the future.
Yes because a coin with the word CON in it is going to sweep the world. What do you have against CONs in general? It's a very useful thing - prevents diseases, unwanted pregnancy, good for hygiene etc. It can save Africa if provided in enough quantities. When PayCon sweeps the world it will make an Africa CON relief fund, I'm sure of that Will distribute virtual CON for poor people so they could buy CON and have sex without risking lethal diseases  |
|
|
|
HashieNewb
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 616
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
May 27, 2015, 01:25:54 PM
Last edit: May 27, 2015, 02:52:38 PM by HashieNewb |
|
Hardly false. He says it right in the video. I didn't hear Al say "he created the internet" He said "I took the initiative in creating the internet" in regards to his involvement with previous policy that created what we now call the internet... but you disregard the context. anyway, great news! This dog is hunting! time to buy in... /jk https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/XPY_BTCSay the Paycoin fucktard. You are a lost cause. /jk means joking. You really do have a reading comprehension issue. I got out of paycoin at 90 days when GAW fucked up and released the XPY for 6 months cashtakers. I own none , never bought any to pump or dump .... pretty sure my post history shows that I am not a paycoin fucktard. |
|
|
|
|
rawbot
|
|
May 27, 2015, 03:06:03 PM |
|
What do you have against CONs in general? It's a very useful thing - prevents diseases, unwanted pregnancy, good for hygiene etc. It can save Africa if provided in enough quantities. When PayCon sweeps the world it will make an Africa CON relief fund, I'm sure of that Will distribute virtual CON for poor people so they could buy CON and have sex without risking lethal diseases PayCON is a financial product. Somebody who is conned is deprived of their money by deceit. It isn't rocket science. Like I have said before, Crestington made the same mistake as the dogecoin creators. They created a joke parody, were taken by surprise by the reception and suddenly they want to be taken seriously. Crestington, you have done a pretty good job in my opinion. But nobody is going to take Paycon seriously unless you change the name. If you change the name and continue to behave in a transparent and ethical manner, people will notice that and your coin will gain traction. Otherwise you will never be seen as anything but a joke. You could also get your supporters involved by voting on a new name. You would probably need a different logo as well. I can't see a picture of somebody taking a piss catching on. This isn't rocket science. I can't believe I am having to explain it. |
|
|
|
|
miaviator
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 519
It's for the children!
|
|
May 27, 2015, 03:28:52 PM |
|
No one could have predicted this Also a verb: Look, this is the bottom line. In business you should never change a deal you already made. Period.
I have run many companies (50m plus), and I have made many deals I did not like. But I always homered a deal once I made it.
These guys caused the exact opposite of what they wanted. They wanted to attract new miners and create trust and loyalty. Heck, I was even thinking about even staying longer term (have over 100mh). But I will never do business with them again. They have no integrity
The btc.com deal has been officially homered. |
|
|
|
Paul Revere
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 260
The Scamcoats are coming!
|
|
May 27, 2015, 03:36:34 PM |
|
No one could have predicted this Also a verb: Look, this is the bottom line. In business you should never change a deal you already made. Period.
I have run many companies (50m plus), and I have made many deals I did not like. But I always homered a deal once I made it.
These guys caused the exact opposite of what they wanted. They wanted to attract new miners and create trust and loyalty. Heck, I was even thinking about even staying longer term (have over 100mh). But I will never do business with them again. They have no integrity
The btc.com deal has been officially homered. The Homero Program is now being rolled out! Finally! Hit it, JB! |
All of my posts are simply statements of my own personal opinions based on available information and pondering what might be possible considering human nature, with the goal of finding truth and preventing fraud. Please look at all of the facts and theories and put your thinking cap on to draw your own conclusions. If you feel that I have made a false statement or have been unnecessarily derogatory, I encourage you to please point it out, and if proven correct and/or reasonable I will remedy it. ~ Paul Revere
|
|
|
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
May 27, 2015, 04:47:06 PM |
|
I think we should all quote the post where we predicted exactly what just happened with btc.com. Mine: 2018 is way out of Garza's time horizon. He's the guy who scrapped the original Paycoin idea for a crappy clone because he wanted it out in two weeks.
BOLD PREDICTION
The lease involved some sort of deposit. Garza will immediately cease paying for the domain and attempt to string along the seller for as long as possible. During this time, Garza still collects rent. At some point, the domain reverts back to its previous owner, and bitcoinist is out that month's rent and the original deposit.
This leads to a conclusion that Homero Joshua Garza is in control of BTC.COM, which can mean anything from editorial oversight over site's contents to pressuring Bitcoinist via the lease contract to defaulting on installment payments resulting in a return of the domain to the original owner. Is this my "I told you so" moment? BTW the former talk.btc.com is now available at talk-btc.com. Kudos to Bitcoinist for setting up a new domain for it although the forum is pretty much dead. Even with Garza out of the picture I don't see why anyone would need another crypto forum. |
|
|
|
|
kken01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1009
|
|
May 27, 2015, 04:54:10 PM |
|
i guess they will try to re-brand btc.com stuff they already produced. in hopes of regaining something from this total failure of business thinking. for some reason you cannot fuel your ambitions with fairy dust   who knew |
|
|
|
|
|
altheshort
|
|
May 27, 2015, 05:32:14 PM |
|
Looks like the penny may have finally dropped for good ol' super sleuths badbitcoin.org, who appear to have silently removed their hilariously overblown and pompous statement about GAW and Garza from their homepage. So near yet so far, though, as they still haven't added it to their 'badlist'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kken01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1009
|
|
May 27, 2015, 05:41:35 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Revere
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 260
The Scamcoats are coming!
|
|
May 27, 2015, 05:47:23 PM |
|
This makes perfect sense, because only idiots would listen to this shill at this point. |
All of my posts are simply statements of my own personal opinions based on available information and pondering what might be possible considering human nature, with the goal of finding truth and preventing fraud. Please look at all of the facts and theories and put your thinking cap on to draw your own conclusions. If you feel that I have made a false statement or have been unnecessarily derogatory, I encourage you to please point it out, and if proven correct and/or reasonable I will remedy it. ~ Paul Revere
|
|
|
favdesu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 27, 2015, 05:48:20 PM |
|
quoting of course. badbitcoin.org, a Josh Garza Scam and Fraud GAW Shill |
|
|
|
JONNYWACKS
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
May 27, 2015, 06:00:19 PM |
|
quoting of course. badbitcoin.org, a Josh Garza Scam and Fraud GAW Shill I personally hold badbitcoin.org responsible for continuence of Homero Garza's fraud due to its full throated endorsement of GAW and its cash and crypto stealing promises that had nothing to back them up. Garbage site and the same goes for its owner. I'll be spreading the word. |
|
|
|
|
Paul Revere
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 260
The Scamcoats are coming!
|
|
May 27, 2015, 06:03:29 PM |
|
Is it a coincidence that Badbitcoin (Vik) and Bitcoinist distance themselves from GAW/Garza on the same day? Thoughts on the identity of Vik perhaps being Vivien on the Bitcoinist staff?
|
All of my posts are simply statements of my own personal opinions based on available information and pondering what might be possible considering human nature, with the goal of finding truth and preventing fraud. Please look at all of the facts and theories and put your thinking cap on to draw your own conclusions. If you feel that I have made a false statement or have been unnecessarily derogatory, I encourage you to please point it out, and if proven correct and/or reasonable I will remedy it. ~ Paul Revere
|
|
|
Franz_Huber
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1004
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
May 27, 2015, 06:03:39 PM |
|
quoting of course. badbitcoin.org, a Josh Garza Scam and Fraud GAW Shill I think we should help babitcoin.org to be found on search engines in the right context. badbitcoin.org corrupt shill for paycoin accomplice to josh garza gaw vik fraud criminal scam lies deception deceit colonel32 bribery payola graft badbitcoin helped a ponzi operator |
|
|
|
kken01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1009
|
|
May 27, 2015, 06:16:13 PM |
|
 to quote Mr. Vik 'part of the fraud' Badbitcoin him self: this guy has some issues   edit: Paul yes that seems like a strong link. needs more looking into
|
|
|
|
|
|
CoinFire
|
|
May 27, 2015, 06:24:06 PM |
|
This makes perfect sense, because only idiots would listen to this shill at this point. Don't worry.... Coin Fire is still on the bad list. |
|
|
|
|
altheshort
|
|
May 27, 2015, 07:03:42 PM |
|
Is it a coincidence that Badbitcoin (Vik) and Bitcoinist distance themselves from GAW/Garza on the same day? Thoughts on the identity of Vik perhaps being Vivien on the Bitcoinist staff?
This seems likely, but to be honest I don't think it really matters who exactly ViK is, the point is that he/she/it/they have been forced to backpedal now. He/she/it/they were one of the final remaining perpetuators of the legitimacy myth of GAW and Garza, and hopefully with them out of the picture less people will potentially be tempted to invest in any scams Garza attempts. Obviously from a personal standpoint I'd love to see the slimy, pompous git publicly apologise for continuing to allow Garza to legitimise his assortment of crap through badbitcoin.org for so long, but I doubt that'll ever happen... |
|
|
|
|
|
vObh0n]6W
|
|
May 27, 2015, 07:11:25 PM |
|
Honestly, I'm inclined to think that anyone who voluntarily gets involved with Garza at this stage with all the evidence that's openly and easily available to research needs their head examined. Astonishingly stupid.
Wondering if they perhaps had already signed the contract a while ago and didn't want to be the ones who broke it. @miaviator any comments? Also:  Well, if gaw was the best, and gaw was a scam, that does logically imply this statement. |
Send tips here 1d5F2nmmRSDbCDfgBq1yrLQUooSprdAn4
|
|
|
|
