PowerHemp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
Ganja <3
|
|
December 08, 2015, 05:36:07 PM |
|
"height" : 620740, "proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c",
but why this is correct now :O? getblockbynumber 620740 "proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c"
|
|
|
|
binmon
|
|
December 08, 2015, 05:36:27 PM |
|
"height" : 620740, "proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c",
YAY! I'm still on the right fork! "height" : 620740, "version" : 6, "merkleroot" : "c836934670a5083465c507f13dcd8e4159f488d830f705c744486ee21d706afc", "mint" : 0.50170000, "time" : 1449595536, "nonce" : 1965641779, "bits" : "1c36ba0a", "difficulty" : 4.67771715, "blocktrust" : "4ad838c88", "chaintrust" : "54766b40519c38", "previousblockhash" : "00000000245743f3aac7dcaea92569af542214f7599c20ab8b5784ba3932a514", "nextblockhash" : "000000001bbfe2efb0240517c1a1dc1b376a019fe8365d230d0232f3c45f22b1", "flags" : "proof-of-work", "proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c",
|
|
|
|
AmberCoinDev (OP)
|
|
December 08, 2015, 05:45:29 PM |
|
"height" : 620740, "proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c",
but why this is correct now :O? getblockbynumber 620740 "proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c" You could have been on wrong chain when you did a check. And then jumped to correct one. Just an assumption.
|
|
|
|
PowerHemp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
Ganja <3
|
|
December 08, 2015, 11:03:55 PM |
|
"height" : 620740, "proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c",
but why this is correct now :O? getblockbynumber 620740 "proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c" You could have been on wrong chain when you did a check. And then jumped to correct one. Just an assumption. hope mine work now but have just 1 active connection with this conf file: listen=0 addnode=ambercoin01.mooo.com addnode=ambercoin02.mooo.com addnode=ambercoin03.mooo.com still an the right chain? "proofhash" : "000019c548da74cb68e8e53b95a9524e0e26b47ee266756775279717c4468191" getblockbynumber 621328
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
December 08, 2015, 11:33:07 PM |
|
"height" : 620740, "proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c",
but why this is correct now :O? getblockbynumber 620740 "proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c" You could have been on wrong chain when you did a check. And then jumped to correct one. Just an assumption. hope mine work now but have just 1 active connection with this conf file: listen=0 addnode=ambercoin01.mooo.com addnode=ambercoin02.mooo.com addnode=ambercoin03.mooo.com still an the right chain? "proofhash" : "000019c548da74cb68e8e53b95a9524e0e26b47ee266756775279717c4468191" getblockbynumber 621328 Sorry, but that doesn't match what I have. getblockbynumber 621328 "proofhash" : "00001608bf50f9aeef38145138d12e9bf672dc57653b42fa852c012c95519594" Can others please post their hash? getblockbynumber 621328 "proofhash" : "00001608bf50f9aeef38145138d12e9bf672dc57653b42fa852c012c95519594" @PowerHemp try it without the conf, seriously. Thats like the last thing you havent tried
|
|
|
|
PowerHemp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
Ganja <3
|
|
December 09, 2015, 12:01:49 AM |
|
at 620740 u have the same like dev and me?
|
|
|
|
binmon
|
|
December 09, 2015, 01:31:29 AM |
|
at 620740 u have the same like dev and me?
I have... getblockbynumber 620740 "proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c" "height" : 620740, "proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c",
I also have proofhash" : "000000000ff9673ff4de2c06fa45cb6524faa5a298c5b2d5fe96aee0d399cb7c" for block 620740 And for a more recent block, 621577, i have: proofhash" : "00001ed6ed7a2f486e65cfd23c6f66606ac8c16d174dc5ae2d6cfbc7036b794b",
|
|
|
|
binmon
|
|
December 09, 2015, 01:32:23 AM |
|
and POW difficulty is 9.65 so i'm not getting anything mining
|
|
|
|
crackfoo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1126
|
|
December 09, 2015, 03:33:37 AM |
|
Looks like Yobit is working now again.
|
ZPOOL - the miners multipool! Support We pay 10 FLUX Parallel Assets (PA) directly to block rewards! Get paid more and faster. No PA fee's or waiting around for them, paid instantly on every block found!
|
|
|
|
antho281
|
|
December 09, 2015, 04:22:58 AM |
|
We are solving about 35% of daily blocks
|
|
|
|
binmon
|
|
December 09, 2015, 04:41:36 AM |
|
Thank you; I just tried, but could not connect, although i see there are other users hashing away.... There is a warning about having issues, so maybe new connections are having trouble.... This was just a few minutes ago.
|
|
|
|
antho281
|
|
December 09, 2015, 05:02:33 AM |
|
Thank you; I just tried, but could not connect, although i see there are other users hashing away.... There is a warning about having issues, so maybe new connections are having trouble.... This was just a few minutes ago. This warning is "normal" in MPOS. When the cronjobs run, it automatically "solve" the problem and the warning disappear 😊 But what was the problem with your connection?
|
|
|
|
binmon
|
|
December 09, 2015, 05:22:05 AM |
|
Thank you; I just tried, but could not connect, although i see there are other users hashing away.... There is a warning about having issues, so maybe new connections are having trouble.... This was just a few minutes ago. This warning is "normal" in MPOS. When the cronjobs run, it automatically "solve" the problem and the warning disappear 😊 But what was the problem with your connection? just wouldn't connect. using ccminer, as follows: ccminer-x64.exe -a x13 -o stratum+tcp://pool.thecryptoworld.org:4034 -u me -p secret --cpu-priority 2 --show-diff (same string, modified for suprnova, and miner works fine) Error message I get: Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to pool.thecryptoworld port 4034: timed out .....retry after 30 seconds That's it.
|
|
|
|
antho281
|
|
December 09, 2015, 05:23:32 AM |
|
Thank you; I just tried, but could not connect, although i see there are other users hashing away.... There is a warning about having issues, so maybe new connections are having trouble.... This was just a few minutes ago. This warning is "normal" in MPOS. When the cronjobs run, it automatically "solve" the problem and the warning disappear 😊 But what was the problem with your connection? just wouldn't connect. using ccminer, as follows: ccminer-x64.exe -a x13 -o stratum+tcp://pool.thecryptoworld.org:4034 -u me -p secret --cpu-priority 2 --show-diff (same string, modified for suprnova, and miner works fine) Error message I get: Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to pool.thecryptoworld port 4034: timed out .....retry after 30 seconds That's it. the stratum is amber.thecryptoworld.org:4034, not pool I just realized the mistakes!
|
|
|
|
binmon
|
|
December 09, 2015, 05:26:54 AM |
|
Ok, i will try that; please change your "getting started" info! Thank you for your help!
|
|
|
|
antho281
|
|
December 09, 2015, 05:29:42 AM |
|
Ok, i will try that; please change your "getting started" info! Thank you for your help! It has been done 5 seconds before I send my last message
|
|
|
|
binmon
|
|
December 09, 2015, 05:39:22 AM |
|
Ok, i will try that; please change your "getting started" info! Thank you for your help! It has been done 5 seconds before I send my last message And it made a world of difference, lol Now i connected
|
|
|
|
antho281
|
|
December 09, 2015, 05:40:36 AM |
|
Ok, i will try that; please change your "getting started" info! Thank you for your help! It has been done 5 seconds before I send my last message And it made a world of difference, lol Now i connected Awesome!! Next time I'll double check that kind of thing! Welcome in
|
|
|
|
devega
|
|
December 09, 2015, 11:39:24 AM |
|
The price is slowly falling... i would have said it's a good info, because I can can get dividends at lower cost. But there is still no info about a time perspective to get it...
|
|
|
|
|